Discard-ban policies can help improve our understanding of the ecological role of food availability to seabirds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.04746.10AKeywords:
food availability, fishery discards, seabirds, ecological interactions, discard policiesAbstract
Discards from fisheries are the most important predictable anthropogenic food subsidies (PAFS) that are being incorporated into marine ecosystems. Changes on their availability and predictability can help us to understand the role that food availability (i.e. an important indicator of the carrying capacity) plays at different ecological levels, from individual fitness to community dynamic and ecosystem functioning. For several reasons, seabirds are an excellent model for evaluating the ecological effects arising from a lack of discards: 1) they are one of the most important discard scavengers, 2) they are easy to monitor and 3) they are apical predators are globally distributed, which makes them suitable health indicators of ecosystems. Here we review the existing information on seabird-discard interactions to identify the main knowledge gaps and propose new challenges for improving our understanding of the general role of food availability. We conclude that the new policies on the ban of fishery discards that are being progressively implemented in the European Union, Norway, Chile and New Zealand offer a suitable experimental scenario for improving our understanding of how a large decrease in the carrying capacity may alter demographic parameters such as survival, dispersal and reproduction, the resilience of populations against perturbations and the role of individual specialization in the foraging process.
Downloads
References
Annett C.A., Pierotti R. 1999. Long-Term Reproductive Output in Western Gulls: Consequences of Alternate Tactics in Diet Choice. Ecology 80: 288-297. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0288:LTROIW]2.0.CO;2
Arcos J., Louzao M., Oro D. 2008. Fisheries ecosystem impacts and management in the Mediterranean: seabirds point of view. In: Nielsen J., Dodson J.J., Friedland K., et al. (eds) Reconciling Fisheries with Conservation. Washington DC. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 49: 1471-1479. PMCid:PMC2386781
Bicknell A.W.J., Oro D., Camphuysen K. et al. 2013. Potential consequences of discard reform for seabird communities. J. Appl. Ecol. 50: 649-658. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12072
Bolnick D.I., Svanbäck R., Fordyce J.A., et al. 2003. The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am. Nat. 161: 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1086/343878 PMid:12650459
Borges L., Cocas L., Nielsen K.N. 2016. Discard ban and balanced harvest: a contradiction? ICES J. Mar. Sci. 73: 1632-1639. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw065
Calvino-Cancela M. 2011. Gulls (Laridae) as frugivores and seed dispersers. Plant. Ecol. 212: 1149-1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-9894-2
Cury P.M., Boyd I.L., Bonhommeau S., et al. 2011. Global Seabird Response to Forage Fish Depletion—One-Third for the Birds. Science 334: 1703-1706. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1212928 PMid:22194577
Ellis J.C. 2005. Marine birds on land: a review of plant biomass, species richness, and community composition in seabird colonies. Plant Ecol. 181: 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-005-7147-y
Fondo E.N., Chaloupka M., Heymans J.J., et al. 2015. Banning Fisheries Discards Abruptly Has a Negative Impact on the Population Dynamics of Charismatic Marine Megafauna. PLoS ONE 10: e0144543. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144543 PMid:26657412 PMCid:PMC4676608
Furness R.W., Crane J.E., Bearhop S., et al. 2006. Techniques to link individual migration patterns of seabirds with diet specialization, condition and breeding performance. Ardea 94: 631-638.
Garthe S., Camphuysen K., Furness R. 1996. Amounts of discards by commercial fisheries and their significance as food for seabirds in the North Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 136: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps136001
Genovart M., Arcos J.M., Álvarez D., et al. 2016. Demography of the critically endangered Balearic shearwater: the impact of fisheries and time to extinction. J. Appl. Ecol. 53: 1158-1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12622
Gilbert N.I., Correia R.A., Silva J.P., et al. 2016. Are white storks addicted to junk food? Impacts of landfill use on the movement and behaviour of resident white storks (Ciconia ciconia) from a partially migratory population. Mov. Ecol. 4: 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-016-0070-0 PMid:26981250 PMCid:PMC4791752
González-Solís J. 2003. Impact of fisheries on activity, diet and predatory interactions between yellow-legged and Audouin's gulls breeding at the Chafarinas Islands. Sci. Mar. 67: 83-88. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2003.67s283
Grémillet D., Pichegru L., Kuntz G., et al. 2008. A junk-food hypothesis for gannets feeding on fishery waste. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 275: 1149-1156. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1763 PMid:18270155 PMCid:PMC2602693
Hansen J., Sato M., Ruedy R. 2012. Perception of climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109: E2415–E2423. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205276109 PMid:22869707 PMCid:PMC3443154
Hawke D.J. 2006. Soil P in a forested seabird colony: inventories, parent material contributions, and N:P stoichiometry. Soil. Res. 43: 957-962. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR05075
Laneri K., Louzao M., Martínez-Abraín A., et al. 2010. Trawling regime influences longline seabird bycatch in the Mediterranean: new insights from a small-scale fishery. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 420: 241-252. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08847
Louzao M., Igual J.M., McMinn M., et al. 2006. Small pelagic fish, trawling discards and breeding performance of the critically endangered Balearic shearwater: improving conservation diagnosis. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 318: 247-254. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps318247
Matich P., Heithaus M.R., Layman C.A. 2011. Contrasting patterns of individual specialization and trophic coupling in two marine apex predators. J. Anim. Ecol. 80: 294-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01753.x PMid:20831730
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Attribution of Extreme Weather Events in the Context of Climate Change. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. 186 pp. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21852/attribution-of-extreme-weather-events-in-the-context-of-climate-change
Navarro J., Oro D., Bertolero A., et al. 2010. Age and sexual differences in the exploitation of two anthropogenic food resources for an opportunistic seabird. Mar. Biol. 157: 2453-2459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-010-1509-2
Oro D. 1996a. Effects of trawler discard availability on egg laying and breeding success in the lesser black-backed gull Larus fuscus in the western Mediterranean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 132: 43-46. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps132043
Oro D. 1996b. Interspecific kleptoparasitism in Audouin's Gull Larus audouinii at the Ebro Delta, northeast Spain: a behavioural response to low food availability. Ibis 138: 218-221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1996.tb04331.x
Oro D., Bosch M., Ruiz X. 1995. Effects of a trawling moratorium on the breeding success of the Yellow-legged Gull Larus cachinnans. Ibis 137: 547-549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1995.tb03265.x
Oro D., Jover L., Ruiz X. 1996. Influence of trawling activity on the breeding ecology of a threatened seabird, Audouin's gull Larus audouinii. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 139: 19-29. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps139019
Oro D., Pradel R., Lebreton J-D. 1999. Food availability and nest predation influence life history traits in Audouin's gull, Larus audouinii. Oecologia 118: 438-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050746
Oro D., Cam E., Pradel R., et al. 2004. Influence of food availability on demography and local population dynamics in a long-lived seabird. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 271: 387-396. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2609 PMid:15101698 PMCid:PMC1691609
Oro D., Genovart M., Tavecchia G., et al. 2013. Ecological and evolutionary implications of food subsidies from humans. Ecol. Lett. 16: 1501-1514. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12187 PMid:24134225
Pichegru L., Ryan P.G., van der Lingen C.D., et al. 2007. Foraging behaviour and energetics of Cape gannets Morus capensis feeding on live prey and fishery discards in the Benguela upwelling system. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 350: 127-136. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07128
Real E., Oro D., Martínez-Abraín A., et al. 2017. Predictable anthropogenic food subsidies, density-dependence and socio-economic factors influence breeding investment in a generalist seabird. J. Avian Biol. 48: 1462-1470. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.01454
Regehr H.M., Montevecchi W.A. 1997. Interactive effects of food shortage and predation on breeding failure of black-legged kittiwakes: indirect effects of fisheries activities and implications for indicator species. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 155: 249-260. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps155249
Rolland V., Barbraud C., Weimerskirch H. 2008. Combined Effects of Fisheries and Climate on a Migratory Long-Lived Marine Predator. J. Appl. Ecol. 45: 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01360.x
Scheffers B.R., Shoo L., Phillips B., et al. 2017. Vertical (arboreality) and horizontal (dispersal) movement increase the resilience of vertebrates to climatic instability. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26: 787-798. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12585
Soriano-Redondo A., Cortés V., Reyes-González J.M., et al. 2016. Relative abundance and distribution of fisheries influence risk of seabird bycatch. Sci. Rep. 6: 37373. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37373 PMid:27876852 PMCid:PMC5120356
Tasker M.L., Camphuysen C.J., Cooper J., et al. 2000. The impacts of fishing on marine birds. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57: 531-547. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0714
Tuck G.N., Thomson R.B., Barbraud C., et al. 2015. An integrated assessment model of seabird population dynamics: can individual heterogeneity in susceptibility to fishing explain abundance trends in Crozet wandering albatross? J. Appl. Ecol. 52: 950-959. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12462
Vidal E., Médail F., Tatoni T., et al. 2000. Seabirds drive plant species turnover on small Mediterranean islands at the expense of native taxa. Oecologia 122: 427-434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050049 PMid:28308294
Votier S.C., Furness R.W., Bearhop S., et al. 2004. Changes in fisheries discard rates and seabird communities. Nature 427: 727-730. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02315 PMid:14973483
Votier S.C., Fayet A.L., Bearhop S., et al. 2017. Effects of age and reproductive status on individual foraging site fidelity in a long-lived marine predator. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 284: 20171068. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1068 PMid:28747480 PMCid:PMC5543227
Wagner E.L., Boersma P.D. 2011. Effects of Fisheries on Seabird Community Ecology. Rev. Fish. Sci. 19: 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641262.2011.562568
Wakefield E.D., Cleasby I.R., Bearhop S., et al. 2015. Long-term individual foraging site fidelity—why some gannets don't change their spots. Ecology 96: 3058-3074. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1300.1 PMid:27070024
Zeller D., Cashion T., Palomares M., et al. 2017. Global marine fisheries discards: A synthesis of reconstructed data. Fish Fish. 19: 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12233
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
