Photoinhibition and photosynthetic pigment reorganisation dynamics in light/darkness cycles as photoprotective mechanisms of Porphyra umbilicalis against damaging effects of UV radiation


  • José Aguilera Universidad de Málaga, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Ecología
  • Félix L. Figueroa Universidad de Málaga, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Ecología
  • Donat-P. Häder Institut für Botanik und Pharmazeutische Biologie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität
  • Carlos Jiménez Universidad de Málaga, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Ecología



UV-radiation, chlorophyll fluorescence, thallus absorptance, light/dark cycles, photosynthesis, stress tolerance


Porphyra umbilicalis L. Kutzing collected from the upper intertidal zone at Helgoland, North Sea, was exposed to different spectral ranges of UV radiation under both 12/12 h light/dark cycles and continuous irradiation. In light/dark cycles, oscillations of the optimal quantum yield (Fv /Fm) were observed during the experiments, reaching maximal values at the end of the light phase followed by lower values during the dark phase. Decreased Fv /Fm was observed in thalli illuminated with photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) plus UV-A and PAR+UV-A+UV-B, compared with the PAR control, indicating a certain degree of UV-induced photoinhibition. In addition, a decrease in the percentage of change of the linear initial slope and maximum electron transport rate (ETR) estimated from ETR vs. irradiance curves was induced by UV radiation during the light phase. Recovery during the 12 h dark phase was almost completed in UV-A treated plants. PAR+UV-A seemed not to affect the photosynthesis, measured as O2 production. However, a decrease in O2 production was observed in the PAR+UV-A+UV-B treatment, but it recovered to initial values after 48 h of culture. No changes in total content of photosynthetic pigments were observed. However, thallus absorptance and the in vivo absorption cross-section in the PAR range (400-700 nm) normalised to Chl a (a* parameter) fluctuated during light/dark cycles and were positively correlated with changes in the optimum quantum yield, thus indicating that daily pigment reorganisation in the light-harvesting complex may play a key role in the photosynthetic performance of the algae. Both UV-A and UV-B treatments under continuous irradiation induced a significant reduction in the optimal quantum yield, ETR efficiency and photosynthetic oxygen production during the first 36 h to values around 30% of the initial ones. Thus, different protective mechanisms against UV stress can be observed in P. umbilicalis: dynamic photoinhibition when UVA is combined with PAR, followed by full recovery of photosynthesis during the dark phase, and a more pronounced photoinhibition under UV-B, with only partial recovery after longer time periods, in which photosynthetic pigment reorganisation plays an important role.


Download data is not yet available.


Aguilera, J., F.L. Figueroa and F.X. Niell. – 1997. Photocontrol of short-term growth in Porphyra leucosticta (Rhodophyta). Eur. J. Phycol., 32: 417-424. doi:10.1080/09670269710001737359

Aguilera, J., U. Karsten, H. Lippert, B. Vögele, E. Philipp, D. Hanelt and C. Wiencke. –1999a. Effects of solar radiation on growth, photosynthesis and respiration of marine macroalgae from the Arctic. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 191: 109-119. doi:10.3354/meps191109

Aguilera, J., C. Jiménez, F.L. Figueroa, M. Lebert and D.P. Häder. – 1999b. Effect of ultraviolet radiation on thallus absorption and photosynthetic pigments in the red alga Porphyra umbilicalis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B:Biol., 48: 75-82.

Agustí, S.S. Enríquez, H. Frost-Christensen, K. San-Jensen and C.M. Duarte. – 1994. Light harvesting among photosynthetic organisms. Fuction. Ecol., 8: 1-9.

Anderson, B., A.H. Salter, Y. Virgin, Y. Vass and S. Styring. – 1992. Photodamage to photosystem II-primary and secondary events. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol., 15: 15-21. doi:10.1016/1011-1344(92)87003-R

Aro, E.M., Y. Virgin and B. Anderson. – 1993. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis. II. Inactivation, protein damage and turnover. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1143: 113-134. doi:10.1016/0005-2728(93)90134-2

Berner T., Z. Dubinsky, K. Wyman and P. Falkowski. – 1989. Photoadaptation and the “package” effect in Dunaliella tertiolecta (Chlorophyceae). J. Phycol., 25: 70-78. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3646.1989.00070.x

Caldwell M.M. – 1971. Solar UV irradiation and the growth and development of higher plants. In: A.C. Giese (ed.). Photophysiology, 6: 131-177.

Coutinho, R. and R Zingmark. – 1987. Diurnal photosynthetic responses to light by macroalgae. J. Phycol., 23: 336-343. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.1987.tb04142.x

Cuhel, R.L., B.P. Ortner and D.R.S. Lean. – 1984. Night Synthesis of Protein by Algae. Limnol. Oceanogr., 29: 731-744.

Demming-Adams, B. and W. Adams. – 1992. Photoprotection and other responses of plants to high light stress. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 43: 599-626. doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.43.060192.003123

Figueroa, F.L., S. Salles, J. Aguilera, C. Jiménez, J. Mercado, B. Viñegla, A. Flores and M. Altamirano. – 1997. Effects of solar radiation on photoinhibition and pigmentation in the red alga Porphyra leucosticta. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 151: 81-90. doi:10.3354/meps151081

Genty, B., J.-M. Briantais and N.R. Baker. –1989. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochem. Biophys. Acta, 990: 87-92.

Häder, D.P. and F.L. Figueroa. –1997. Photoecophysiology of marine macroalgae. Photochem. Photobiol., 66: 1-14. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.1997.tb03132.x

Häder, D.-P., M. Lebert, J. Mercado, J. Aguilera, S. Salles, A. Flores-Moya, C. Jiménez and F.L. Figueroa. –1996. Photosynthetic oxygen production and PAM fluorescence in the brown alga Padina pavonica (Linnaeus) Lamouroux measured in the field under solar radiation. Mar. Biol., 127: 61-66. doi:10.1007/BF00993644

Häder, D.-P, H.D. Kumar, R.C. Smith and R. C. Worrest. –1998. Effects on aquatic ecosystems. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol., 46: 53-58. doi:10.1016/S1011-1344(98)00185-7

Häder, D.P., M. Lebert, R.P. Sinha, E.S. Barbieri and W.E. Helbling. – 2002. Role of protective and repair mechanisms in the inhibition of photosynthesis in marine macroalgae. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. Biol., 1: 809-814. doi:10.1039/b206152j

Häder, D.P., M. Lebert and W. Helbling. – 2004. Variable fluorescence parameters in the filamentous Patagonian rhodophytes, Callithamnion gaudichaudii and Ceramium sp. under solar radiation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol., 23: 87-99. doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2003.11.001

Hanelt, D. –1998. Capability of dynamic photoinhibition in Arctic macroalgae is related to their depth distribution. Mar. Biol., 131: 361-369. doi:10.1007/s002270050329

Hanelt, D. and W. Nultsch. – 1990. Daily changes of the phaeoplast arrangement in the brown alga Dictyota dichotoma as studied in field experiments. Mar Ecol. Prog. Ser., 61: 273-279. doi:10.3354/meps061273

Hanelt, D. and W. Nultsch. – 1995. Field studies on photoinhibition show non-correlations between oxygen and fluorescence measurements in the Arctic red alga Palmaria palmata. J. Plant Physiol., 145: 31-38.

Hanelt D., B. Melchersmann, C. Wiencke and W. Nultsch. – 1997. Effects of high light stress on photosynthesis of polar macroalgae in relation to depth distribution. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 149: 255-266. doi:10.3354/meps149255

Hanelt, D., I. Hawes and R. Rae. – 2006. Reduction of UV-B radiation causes an enhancement of photoinhibition in high light stressed aquatic plants from New Zealand lakes. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol., 84: 89-102. doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2006.01.013

Herbert, S.K. – 1990. Photoinhibition resistance in the red alga Porphyra perforata. The role of photoinhibition repair. Plant Physiol., 92: 514-519.

Inskeep WP and P.R. Bloom. – 1985. Extinction coefficients of chlorophyll a and b in N,N-dimethylformamide and 80% acetone. Plant Physiol., 77: 483-485.

Jasby, A.D. and T. Platt. –1976. Mathematical formulation of the relationship between photosynthesis and light for phytoplankton. Limnol. Oceanog., 21: 540-545.

Korbee, N., P. Huovinen, F.L. Figueroa, J. Aguilera and U. Karsten. – 2005. Availability of ammonium influences the photosynthesis and the accumulation of MAAs in two Porphyra species (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) from different latitudes. Mar. Biol., 146: 645-654. doi:10.1007/s00227-004-1484-6

Korbee, N., F.L. Figueroa and J. Aguilera. – 2006. Acumulación de aminoácidos tipo micosporina (MAAs): biosíntesis, fotocontrol y funciones ecofisiológicas. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat., 79: 119-132.

Krause, G.H. and E. Weis. – 1991. Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis: the basics. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 42: 313-349. doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.42.060191.001525

Lao K. and A.N. Glazer. – 1996. Ultraviolet-B photodestruction of a light-harvesting complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 93: 5258-5263. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.11.5258

Mata, L., J. Silva, A. Schuenhoff and R. Santos. – 2006. The effects of light and temperature on the photosynthesis of the Asparagopsis armata tetrasporophyte (Falkenbergia rufolanosa), cultivated in tanks. Aquaculture, 252: 12-19. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.11.045

Mercado, J.M., C. Jiménez, F.X. Niell and F.L. Figueroa. – 1996. Comparison of methods for measuring light absorption by algae and their application to the estimation of the package effect. Sci. Mar., 60(Suppl. 1): 39-45.

Misonou, T., J.Saitoh, S. Oshiba, Y. Tokimoto, M. Maegawa, Y. Inoue, H. Hori and T. Sakurai. – 2002. UV-absorbing susbstance in the red alga Porphyra yezoensis (Bangiales, Rhodophyta) block Thymine photodumer production. Mar. Biotechnol., 5: 194-200. doi:10.1007/s10126-002-0065-2

Necci, O. Jr. – 2005. Light-related photosynthetic characteristics of freshwater rhodophytes. Aquat. Bot., 3: 193-209.

Nultsch, W and J. Pfau. – 1979. Occurrence and biological role of light-induced chromatophore displacement in seaweeds. Mar. Biol., 51: 77-82. doi:10.1007/BF00389033

Öquist, G., W.S. Chow and J.M. Anderson. –1992. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis represents a mechanism for the long-term regulation of photosystem II. Planta, 186: 450-468.

Osmond, C.B. – 1994. What is photoinhibition? Some insights from comparisons of shade and sun plants. In: N.R. Baker and N.R. Bowyer (eds.). Photoinhibition of photosynthesis, from the molecular mechanisms to the field, pp. 1-24. BIOS Scientific Publ., Oxford.

Ramus, J. and G. Rosenberg. – 1980. Diurnal photosynthetic performance of seaweeds measured under natural conditions. Mar. Biol., 56: 21-28. doi:10.1007/BF00390590

Rijstenbil J.W., S.M. Coelho and M. Eijsackers. – 2000. A method for the assessment of light-induced oxidative stress in embryos of fucoid algae via confocal laserscan microscopy. Mar. Biol., 137: 763-774 doi:10.1007/s002270000443

Roleda, M.Y., W.H. van de Poll, D. Hanelt and C. Wiencke. – 2004. PAR and UVBR effects on photosynthesis, viability growth and DNA in different life stages of two coexisting Gigartinales: implications for recruitment and zonation pattern. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 281: 37-50. doi:10.3354/meps281037

Roleda, M.Y., W.H. van de Poll, D. Hanelt and C. Wiencke. – 2006. Growth and DNA damage in young Laminaria sporophytes exposed to ultraviolet radiation: implications for depth zonation of kelps of Helgoland (North Sea). Mar. Biol., 148: 1210-1211. doi:10.1007/s00227-005-0169-0

Ruban, A.V., J.Y. Andrew and P. Horton. –1993. Induction of nonphotochemical energy dissipation and absorbance changes in leaves. Plant Physiol., 102: 741-750.

Schreiber, U., W. Bilger and C. Neubauer. – 1994. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a nonintrusive indicator for rapid assessment of in vivo photosynthesis. In: D.E. Schulze and M.M. Caldwell (eds.). Ecophysiology of Photosynthesis. Ecological Study., Vol. 100. pp. 49-70. Springer Verlag, Berlin.

Setlow, R.B. – 1974. The wavelengths of sunlight effective in producing skin cancer: a theoretical analysis. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 71, 3363-3366. doi:10.1073/pnas.71.9.3363

Sokal, P.R. and F.J. Rohlf. – 1995. Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York.

Van de Poll, W.H., A. Eqqert, A.G.J. Buma and A. M. Breeman. – 2001. Effects of UV-B induced DNA damage and photoinhibition on growth of temperate marine red macrophytes: habitatrelated differences in UV-B tolerance. J. Phycol. 37: 30-37. doi:10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.037001030.x

Van de Poll, W.H., D. Hanelt, K. Hoyer, A.G.J. Buma and A.M. Breeman. – 2002. Ultraviolet-B indiced cyclobutane-pyrimidine dimer formation and repair in arctic marine macrophytres. Photochem. Photobiol., 76: 493-500. doi:10.1562/0031-8655(2002)076<0493:UBICPD>2.0.CO;2

Zacher, K., M.Y. Roleda, D. Hanelt and C. Wiencke. – 2007. UV effects on photosynthesis and DNA in propagules of three different Antarctic seaweeds (Adenocystis utricularis, Monostroma hariotii and Porphyra endiviifolium). Planta, 225: 1505-1516. doi:10.1007/s00425-006-0436-4




How to Cite

Aguilera J, Figueroa FL, Häder D-P, Jiménez C. Photoinhibition and photosynthetic pigment reorganisation dynamics in light/darkness cycles as photoprotective mechanisms of Porphyra umbilicalis against damaging effects of UV radiation. Sci. mar. [Internet]. 2008Mar.30 [cited 2024May26];72(1):87-9. Available from: