Parámetros de historia de vida y estrategias reproductivas de Pegusa lascaris y Buglossidium luteum en el golfo Ártabro
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.05638.113Palabras clave:
lenguado, relación talla-peso, proporción sexual, tamaño de madurez, temporada de desove, estados de desarrollo gonadal, tamaño de ovocitos, noroeste de la Península IbéricaResumen
La biología reproductiva desempeña un papel clave en la dinámica poblacional de los peces y en la gestión sos-tenible de las pesquerías. Sin embargo, la información reproductiva detallada sigue siendo especialmente escasa en muchas especies de bajo interés comercial. Este estudio analiza la biología y las estrategias reproductivas de dos especies presentes en el golfo Ártabro, al noroeste de la Península Ibérica (Pegusa lascaris y Buglossidium luteum). El muestreo se realizó trimes-tralmente entre 2017 y 2024, con un total de 203 lances de arrastre de fondo en 13 estaciones (entre 10 y 50 m de profundidad). Todos los ejemplares fueron medidos en talla y peso, registrándose el sexo y el estado de madurez en escala macroscópica. Ambas especies mostraron patrones de crecimiento hiper alométrico, con dominancia de hembras en las tallas mayores. El periodo de puesta de P. lascaris se extendió de mayo a septiembre, mientras que B. luteum presenta un periodo comprendido entre marzo y agosto. El análisis del tamaño de madurez (L50) reveló que P. lascaris alcanza la madurez a los 133,6 mm y B. luteum a los 80,7 mm. Las muestras de gónadas fueron procesadas histológicamente para confirmar los estados de madurez y evaluar el desarrollo ovocitario. El análisis histológico confirmó que ambas especies son desovadoras en lotes con desarrollo ovocitario asincrónico. Estos resultados mejoran el conocimiento actual sobre la biología y las estrategias reproductivas de ambas especies y contribuirán significativamente al proceso de evaluación de stocks, especialmente en el caso de P. lascaris.
Descargas
Citas
Adamidou A., Pardalou A., Tsikliras A.C. 2020. Length-Weight Relationships of 31 Fish and Invertebrate Species in the Northern Aegean Sea (Eastern Mediterranean Sea). Thalass. An Int. J. Mar. Sci. 36: 303-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-020-00207-x
Andersen K.H., Farnsworth K.D., Thygesen U.H., et al. 2007. The evolutionary pressure from fishing on size at maturation of Baltic cod. Ecol. Modell. 204: 246-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.01.002
Bode A., Varela M. 1998. Primary production and phytoplankton in three Galician Rias Altas (NW Spain): Seasonal and spatial variability. Sci. Mar. 62: 319-330. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.1998.62n4319
Brown-Peterson N.J., Wyanski D.M., Saborido-Rey F., et al. 2011. A Standardized Terminology for Describing Reproductive Development in Fishes. Mar. Coast. Fish. 3: 52-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2011.555724
Cabral H.N., Lopes M., Loeper R. 2002. Trophic niche overlap between flatfishes in a nursery area on the Portuguese coast. Sci. Mar. 66: 293-300. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2002.66n3293
Cope J.M., Punt A.E. 2009. Length-Based Reference Points for Data-Limited Situations: Applications and Restrictions. Mar. Coast. Fish. 1: 169-186. https://doi.org/10.1577/C08-025.1
Le Cren E.D. 1951. The Length-Weight Relationship and Seasonal Cycle in Gonad Weight and Condition in the Perch (Perca fluviatilis). J. Anim. Ecol. 20: 201. https://doi.org/10.2307/1540 PMCid:PMC9745576
Déniel C. 1981. Les Poissons plats (Téléostéens, Pleuronectiformes) en baie de Douarnenez: reproduction, croissance et migration des Bothidae, Scophthalmidae, Pleuronectidae et Soleidae. Université de Bretagne occidentale-Brest. 490 pp.
Deniel C. 1984. Relations entre l'activite reproductrice et la croissance chez les poissons plats de la baie de Douarnenez. Cybium 8: 83-93.
Deniel C., Le Blanc C., Rodriguez A. 1989. Comparative study of sexual cycles, oogenesis and spawning of two Soleidae, Solea lascaris (Risso, 1810) and Solea impar (Bennet, 1831), on the western coast of Brittany. J. Fish Biol. 35: 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1989.tb03392.x
Deniel C. 1990. Comparative study of growth of flatfishes on the west coast of Brittany. J. Fish Biol. 37: 149-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1990.tb05936.x
Dinis D., Maia C., Figueiredo I., et al. 2020. Information on Soleidae species landings from mainland Portugal. Working Document 18. In: ICES. 2020. Report of the Working Group for the Bay of Biscay and the Iberian waters Ecoregion (WGBIE), 6-13 May 2020. ICES Sci.
Félix P.M., Vinagre C., Cabral H.N. 2011. Life-history traits of flatfish in the Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 27: 100-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2010.01623.x
Fenberg P.B., Roy K. 2008. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of size-selective harvesting: how much do we know? Mol. Ecol. 17: 209-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03522.x PMid:17868288
Froese R. 2006. Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 22: 241-253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00805.x
Froese R., Pauly D. 2024. FishBase. World Wide Web Electron. Publ. URL www.fishbase.org, version (10/2024)
Grimes C.B. 1987. Reproductive biology of the Lutjanidae: A review. In: Plovina J.J., Ralston S. (eds), Tropical Snappers and Groupers: Biology and Fisheries Management. Westview Press, London, pp. 239-294.
Hein M., Díaz Pauli B., Dieckmann U. 2015. Fisheries-Induced Evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 46: 461-480. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054339
Helfman G.S., Collette B.B., Facey D.E. 1997. The diversity of fishes. Blackwell Science, London. 528 pp.
Helfman G.S., Collette B.B., Facey D.E., et al. 2009. The diversity of fishes: biology, evolution, and ecology. John Wiley & Sons.
Hixon M.A., Johnson D.W., Sogard S.M. 2014. BOFFFFs: on the importance of conserving old-growth age structure in fishery populations. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 71: 2171-2185. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fst200
Hunter J.R., Leong R.J. 1981. The spawning energetics of female northern anchovy, Engraulis mordax. Fish. Bull. 79: 215-230.
Hunter J.R., Lo N.C., Leong R.J. 1985. Batch fecundity in multiple spawning fishes. In: Lasker R.M. (ed), An Egg Production Method for Estimating Spawning Biomass of Pelagics Fish: Application to the Northern Anchovy, Engraulis Mordax. NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS, pp. 67-77.
ICES. 2014. Report of the Workshop for maturity staging chairs (WKMATCH), 11-15 June 2012, Split, Croatia. ICES CM 2012/ACOM:58.
ICES. 2024. Working Group for the Bay of Biscay and the Iberian Waters Ecoregion (WGBIE).
İlkyaz A.T., Metin G., Soykan O., et al. 2010. Age, growth and sexual development of solenette, Buglossidium luteum (Risso, 1810), in the central Aegean Sea. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 26: 436-440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2009.01382.x
King J.R., McFarlane G.A. 2003. Marine fish life history strategies: applications to fishery management. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 10: 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2400.2003.00359.x
Lambert T.C., Ware D.M. 1984. Reproductive Strategies of Demersal and Pelagic Spawning Fish. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41: 1565-1569. https://doi.org/10.1139/f84-194
Law R. 2000. Fishing, selection, and phenotypic evolution. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57: 659-668. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0731
Link J.S., Brodziak J.K., Edwards S.F., et al. 2002. Marine ecosystem assessment in a fisheries management context. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59: 1429-1440. https://doi.org/10.1139/f02-115
Lowerre-Barbieri S.K., Barbieri L.R. 1993. A new method of oocyte separation and preservation for fish reproduction studies. Fish. Bull. 91: 165-170.
Mata A.J., Morales J., Márquez L. 2008. Weight-length relationships for 26 demersal fish species of the Spanish South-Atlantic coastal waters. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 24: 330-333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01058.x
McCullagh P., Nelder J.A. 1989. Generalized Linear Models, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6
McEvoy L.A. 1984. Ovulatory rhythms and over-ripening of eggs in cultivated turbot, Scophthalmus maximus L. J. Fish Biol. 24: 437-448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1984.tb04814.x
Mendes B., Fonseca P., Campos A. 2004. Weight-length relationships for 46 fish species of the Portuguese west coast. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 20: 355-361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2004.00559.x
Morgan M.J. 2008. Integrating reproductive biology into scientific advice for fisheries management. J. Northwest Atl. Fish. Sci. 41: 37-51. https://doi.org/10.2960/J.v41.m615
Murua H., Kraus G., Saborido-Rey F., et al. 2003. Procedures to estimate fecundity of marine fish species from field samples in relation to reproductive strategy. J. Northwest Atl. Fish. Sci. 33: 33-54. https://doi.org/10.2960/J.v33.a3
Muus B.J., Nielsen J.G., 1999. Sea fish. Scandinavian Fishing Year Book, Hedehusene, Denmark.
Nagler J.J., Adams B.A., Cyr D.G. 1999. Egg Production, Fertility, and Hatch Success of American Plaice Held in Captivity. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 128: 727-736. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1999)128<0727:EPFAHS>2.0.CO;2
Nottage A.S., Perkins E.J. 1983. The biology of solenette, Buglossidium luteum (Risso), in the Solway Firth. J. Fish Biol. 22: 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1983.tb04722.x
Ozyurt C.E., Mavruk S., Kiyaga V.B., et al. 2018. Spawning ecology of Pegusa lascaris in Iskenderun Bay (northeastern Mediterranean Sea). Fresenius Env. Bullet 27: 6500-6505.
Pajuelo J.G., Lorenzo J.M. 2008. Reproductive characteristics of the sand sole Pegusa lascaris (Soleidae), from the eastern-central Atlantic. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. United Kingdom 88: 629-635. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315408000970
Parker K. 1980. A direct method for estimating northern anchovy, Engraulis mordax, spawning biomass. Fish. Bull. 78: 541-544.
Pauly D. 2021. Why do fish reach first maturity when they do? J. Fish Biol. 101: 333-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14902 https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14902 PMid:34487555
Pereda P., Villamor B. 1991. Relaciones biometricas en peces de la plataforma Cantabrica. Inf. Tec. Inst. Esp. Ocean. 92: 39.
Pianka E. 2000. Evolutionary ecology. Harper and Row, New York.
Prego R., Varela M. 1998. Hydrography of the Artabro Gulf in summer: western coastal limit of Cantabrian seawater and wind-induced upwelling at Prior Cape. Oceanol. Acta 21: 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0399-1784(98)80004-2
Quéro J.C., Desoutter M., Lagardère F. 1986. Soleidae. In: Whitehead P.J.P., Bauchot M.L., Hureau J.C., Nielson J., Tortonese E. (eds), Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. UNESCO, Paris, pp. 1308-1324. https://doi.org/10.2307/1444931
R Core Team. 2024. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rijnsdorp A.D., van Damme C.J., Witthames P.R. 2014. Ecology of reproduction. In: Gibson R.N., Nash R.D.M., Geffen A.J., Veer H.W. (eds), Flatfishes: Biology and Exploitation. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 101-131. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118501153.ch5
Rodríguez-García C., Jiménez-Cobo M., Cabrera-Castro R. 2024. Living between sand and waves: Age and feeding habits of sand sole (Pegusa lascaris, Risso 1810) and brill (Scophthalmus rhombus, Linnaeus, 1758) on the beaches of the Gulf of Cádiz (Southwest Iberian Peninsula). Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 77: 103680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2024.103680
De Roos M., Boukal D.S., Persson L. 2006. Evolutionary regime shifts in age and size at maturation of exploited fish stocks. Proc. Royal Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 273(1596): 1873-1880. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3518 PMid:16822746 PMCid:PMC1634766
Stark J.W. 2004. A comparison of the maturation and growth of female flathead sole in the central Gulf of Alaska and south-eastern Bering Sea. J. Fish Biol. 64: 876-889. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2004.00356.x
Teixeira C.M., Pinheiro A., Cabral H.N. 2009. Feeding ecology, growth and sexual cycle of the sand sole, Solea lascaris, along the Portuguese coast. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 89: 621-627. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315409002562
Thorson J.T., Munch S.B., Cope J.M., et al. 2017. Predicting life history parameters for all fishes worldwide. Ecol. Appl. 27: 2262-2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1606 PMid:28746981
Tyler C.R., Sumpter J.P. 1996. Oocyte growth and development in teleosts. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 6: 287-318. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122584
Wheeler A. 1969. The fishes of the British Isles and North-West Europe. Macmillan, London.
Wilson K.L., De Gisi J., Cahill C.L., et al. 2019. Life-history variation along environmental and harvest clines of a northern freshwater fish: Plasticity and adaptation. J. Anim. Ecol. 88: 717-733. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12965 PMid:30784045
Winton M. V., Wuenschel M.J., McBride R.S. 2014. Investigating spatial variation and temperature effects on maturity of female winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) using generalized additive models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 71: 1279-1290. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2013-0617
Wootton R.J. 1990. Life-history strategies. In: Ecology of Teleost Fishes. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 282-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0829-1_11
Wootton R.J. 1993. The evolution of life histories: Theory and analysis. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 3: 384-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00043394
Yeşilbudak B. 2021. Length-Weight Relationships with Condition Indices of Three Commercial Fish Species Caught by Monofilament Gillnets in the İskenderun Bay, Turkey. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilim. Enstitüsü Derg. 4: 59-64. https://doi.org/10.47495/okufbed.803064
Descargas
Archivos adicionales
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
© CSIC. Los originales publicados en las ediciones impresa y electrónica de esta Revista son propiedad del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, siendo necesario citar la procedencia en cualquier reproducción parcial o total.
Salvo indicación contraria, todos los contenidos de la edición electrónica se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución “Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional ” (CC BY 4.0). Consulte la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia. Esta circunstancia ha de hacerse constar expresamente de esta forma cuando sea necesario.
No se autoriza el depósito en repositorios, páginas web personales o similares de cualquier otra versión distinta a la publicada por el editor.








