Reproductive aspects of Acanthurus chirurgus (Perciformes: Acanthuridae) captured by the artisanal fleet operating in Itamaracá Island, Pernambuco, Brazil

Paulo R.  Souza-Almeida; Renata A.  Shinozaki-Mendes; Hilario Murua; María Korta; Paulo G.  Vasconcelos-Oliveira

doi:10.3989/scimar.05588.103

Autores/as

Paulo R. Souza-Almeida Federal Rural University of Pernambuco – Fishing and Aquaculture Departament https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0341-5530
Renata A. Shinozaki-Mendes Federal Rural University of Pernambuco – Fishing and Aquaculture Departament https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1850-4763
Hilario Murua International Seafood Sustainability Foundation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8577-5291
María Korta AZTI-Tecnalia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9180-0107
Paulo G. Vasconcelos-Oliveira Federal Rural University of Pernambuco – Fishing and Aquaculture Departament https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7697-2111

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.05588.103

Palabras clave:

peces arrecifales, frecuencia de desove, fecundidade, conservación

Resumen

Este estudio examinó la biología reproductiva de Acanthurus chirurgus mediante muestreos mensuales desde mayo de 2016 hasta mayo de 2018. Se analizaron un total de 505 ejemplares (317 machos, 188 hembras), con los machos presentando una LT mayor que las hembras (32.0 cm vs. 30.8 cm). La mayor frecuencia de individuos se encontró en el rango de tamaño de 23–25 cm. La reproducción ocurrió de enero a julio, con intensidade reproductiva en febrero, marzo y junio. Las tallas de primera (L50) y máxima maduración (L99) fueron 18.0 cm y 22.1 cm, respectivamente. El desove fue sincrónico, ocurriendo en lotes y siguiendo un patrón de fecundidad indeterminado. La frecuencia de desove se estimó en cada 4.2 días (método HO) y cada 3.5 días (método POFs). La fecundidad por lote varió de 15.403,9 a 48.030,9 ovocitos, y la fecundidad relativa por lote de 2.710.628,5 a 16.842.518,6 ovocitos. Debido al prolongado período reproductivo, se recomiendan cuotas de captura, una veda (febrero, marzo, junio) y un tamaño mínimo de 18 cm.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Bonduriansky R., Maklakov A., Zajitschek F., et al. 2008. Sexual selection, sexual conflict and the evolution of ageing and lifespan. Funct. Ecol. 22: 443-453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01417.x

Brown-Peterson N. J., Wyanski D. M., Saborido- Rey F., et al. 2011. A standardized terminology for describing reproductive development in fishes. Mar. Coast. Fish. 3(1): 52-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2011.555724

Bushell M.E., Claisse J.T., Laidley C.W. 2010. Lunar and seasonal patterns in fecundity of an indeterminate, multiple spawning surgeon fish, the yellow tang Zebrasoma flavescens. J Fish. Biol. 76(6): 1343-1361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02569.x PMid:20537018

Carvalho R.A.A., Cunha F.E.A., Montezuma A.M.N., et al. 2013. Capturas e processamento de peixes recifais no Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, Brasil. Actapesca 1(1); 91-103. https://budioes.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Cartilha-Consumo-online.pdf

Cortés N., Aron A. 2011. Reproductive cycle and batch fecundity of Isacia conceptionis (Perciformes, Haemulidae) at La Herradura, Coquimbo, Chile. Rev Biol Mar Oceanogr 46: 101-104. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-19572011000100016

Feitosa C.V., Pimenta D.A.S., Araújo M.E. 2002. Ictiofauna recifal dos parrachos de Maracajaú (RN) na área dos flutuantes: inventário e estrutura da comunidade. Arquivos de Ciências do Mar 35: 39-50. http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/43499

Ferreri R., Barra M., Gargano A., et al. 2021. New Evaluation of Postovulatory Follicle Degeneration at High-Temperature Regimes Refines Criteria for the Identification of Spawning Cohorts in the European Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus). Animals 11(2): 529. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020529 PMid:33670673 PMCid:PMC7922735

Ferreira C.E.L., Floeter S.R., Gasparini J.L., et al. 2004. Trophic structure patterns of Brazilian reef fishes: a latitudinal comparison. J. Biogeogr. 31: 1093-1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01044.x

Figueiredo J.L., Menezes N.A. 2000. Manual de peixes marinhos do sudeste do Brasil. Vol VI. Teleostei (5). Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo. 116 pp. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284602808

Freitas M.C., Vieira R.H.S., Araújo M.E. 2009. Impact of the construction of the harbor at pecém (Ceará, Brazil) upon reef fish communities in tide pools. Braz. arch. biol. technol. 52(1): 187-195. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132009000100024

Ganias K. 2013. Determining the indeterminate: Evolving concepts and methods on the assessment of the fecundity pattern of fishes. Fish. Res. 138: 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2012.05.006

Ganias K., Kjesbu O. S., Lowerre-Barbieri S., et al. 2025. Reproduction of marine fishes. In: Cabral E. , Lepage M., Lobry J. et al. (eds), Ecology of Marine Fish. Academic Press, 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99036-3.00017-9

Hunter J. R., Macewicz, B. J. 1985. Measurement of spawning frequency in multiple spawning fishes. Fish. Bull. 83(2): 375-392.

Hartup J.A., Marshell A., Stevens G., et al. 2013. Manta alfredi target multispecies surgeonfish spawning aggregations. Coral Reefs 32: 367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-013-1022-4

Marques S., Ferreira B.P. 2010. Composição e características da pesca de armadilha no litoral norte de Pernambuco - Brasil. Boletim Técnico Científico CEPENE, Tamandaré - PE. 18(1): 49-60. www.icmbio.gov.br/cepene/images/stories/publicacoes/btc/vol18/art04-v18.pdf

Mendes P.P. 1999. Estatística aplicada à Aquicultura. Recife-PE: Ed. Bargaço, 265 pp.

Miltra A., Abdel-Gawad A., Bassem S., et al. 2023. Climate change and reproductive biocomplexity in fishes: Innovative Managment Approaches towards sustainability of fisheries and aquaculture. Water 15(4): 725. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15040725

Mozo E.C.; Barandica J.C.N.; Racedo J.B. 2006. Dinámica poblacional del Coroncoro Micropogonias furnieri (Pisces: Sciaenidae) en la ciénaga grande de Santa Marta, Caribe Colombiano. Bol. Invest. Mar. Cost. 35(1): 37-58. http://hdl.handle.net/1834/1980

Murua H., Saborido-Rey F. 2003. Female reproductive strategies of commercially important fish species in the North Atlantic. J. Northw. Atl. Fish. Sci. 33: 23-32. https://doi.org/10.2960/J.v33.a2

Murua, H.; Kraus, G., Saborido-Rey, F., et al. 2003. Procedures to estimate fecundity of marine fish species in relation to their reproductive strategy. J. Northw. Atl. Fish. Sci. 33: 33-54. https://doi.org/10.2960/J.v33.a3

Polunin N.V.C., Roberts C.M. 1993. Greater biomass and value of target coral-reef fishes in two small Caribbean marine reserves. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 100: 167-176. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps100167

Queiroz R.M.V., Rêgo M.G., Hazin, F.H.V., et al. 2018. Reproductive biology of Acanthurus coeruleus (Bloch and Schneider, 1801) (Perciformes: Acanthuridae) in the north coast of the State of Pernambuco, Brazil. Panam. J. Aquat. Sci. 13(1): 25-35. https://panamjas.org/pdf_artigos/PANAMJAS_13(1)_25-35.pdf

Reeson P.H. 1983. The biology, ecology and bionomics of the surgeonfishes. Acanthuridae. In: Munro J.L. (ed), Caribbean coral reef fishery resources. Center for Living Aquatic Resources Managemen, Manila, 178-190.

Ribeiro C.S., Moreira R.G. 2012. Fatores ambientais e reprodução dos peixes. Rev. Biol. 8(1): 58-61. https://doi.org/10.7594/revbio.08.10

Ribeiro, F.P. 2006. A pesca de peixes demersais com armadilhas no Nordeste do Brasil. In B.P. Ferreira and M. Maida (eds), Monitoramento dos recifes de coral do Brasil (p. 72). Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente (MMA).

Robertson D.R., Schober U.M., Brawn J.D. 1993. Comparative variation in spawning output and juvenile recruitment of some Caribbean reef fishes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 94: 105-113. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps094105

Rodrigues E.T., Pardal M.Â. 2015. Primary productivity temporal fluctuations in a nutrient-rich estuary due to climate-driven events. Estuaries Coast. 38: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-014-9813-6

Schaefer K.M. 2001. Reproductive biology of tunas. In: Block B.A., Stevens E.D. (eds), Fish Fhysiol. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 225-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1546-5098(01)19007-2

Shinozaki-Mendes R.A., Santander-Neto J., Silva J.R.F., et al. 2013. Gonad maturation of Haemulon plumieri (Telleostei: Haemulidae) in Ceará state, Northeastern Brazil. Brasilian J. Biol. 73(2): 383-390. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842013000200019 PMid:23917566

Souza U.P., Ferreira F.C., Braga F.M.S., et al. 2014. Feeding, body condition and reproductive investment of Astyanax intermedius (Characiformes, Characidae) in relation to rainfall and temperature in a Brazilian Atlantic Forest stream. Ecol. Freshw. Fish. 24(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/eff.12131

Wallace R.A., Selman K. 1981. Cellular and Dynamic Aspects of Oocyte Growth in Teleosts. Am. Zool. 21: 325-343. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/21.2.325

Yamahira K. 2004. How do multiple environmental cycles in combination determine reproductive timing in marine organisms. A model and test. Funct. Ecol. 18(1): 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-8463.2004.00795.x

Zar J.H. 2010. Biostatistical Analysis. Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 944 pp.

Zudaire I., Murua H., Grande M., et al. 2013. Reproductive potential of Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the western Indian Ocean. Fish. Bull. 111(3): 252-264. https://doi.org/10.7755/FB.111.3.4