Food manipulation and selection in the omnivorous grapsoid crab Neohelice granulata (Decapoda: Varunidae)

Authors

  • Juan Pablo Lancia Departamento de Biología e Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)
  • Claudia Bas Departamento de Biología e Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)
  • Eduardo Spivak Departamento de Biología e Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.04036.02B

Keywords:

crabs, deposit feeding, Neohelice granulata, feeding appendages, feeding mechanisms, food selection, omnivory

Abstract


Neohelice granulata is an omnivorous, semi-terrestrial burrowing crab endemic to southwestern Atlantic saltmarshes that behaves as a herbivore when it inhabits vegetated saltmarsh areas or a deposit feeder on bare mudflats. In order to gain insights into how non-specialized crabs manage to rely on low quality diets, we studied in laboratory i) how they use feeding appendages to manipulate the food items commonly eaten (halophytic plant leaves and sediment), and ii) their ability to sort particles when they act as deposit feeders by analysing the food particle content of sediment and stomach. According to the source of food consumed, different behaviours and mouthparts involved in food processing were observed. Sex differences were found in handling halophytic plant leaves in the herbivore feeding mode. In deposit feeding, a concentration of potentially N-rich items of animal origin was detected in stomach contents. Indirect evidence of food item concentration from sediment was revealed by analysis of the C and N content of sediment and feces. N. granulata seems to be an effective deposit feeder even though it lacks the characteristic mouthparts commonly associated with this type of food source.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acuña J.L., López-Alvarez M., Nogueira E., et al. 2010. Diatom flotation at the onset of the spring phytoplankton bloom: an in situ experiment. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 400: 115-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps08405

Barbosa P., Castellanos I. 2005. Ecology of predator-prey interactions. Oxford University Press Inc. New York, 413 pp.

Bas C., Lancia J.P., Luppi T., et al. 2013. Influence of tidal regime, diurnal phase, habitat and season on feeding of an intertidal crab. Mar. Ecol. (In press).

Boschi E.E., Fischbach C.E., Iorio M.I. 1992. Catálogo ilustrado de los crustáceos estomatópodos y decápodos marinos de la Argentina. Frente Marino 10(Sec. A): 7-94.

Brousseau D.J., Baglivo J.A. 2005. Laboratory investigations of food selection by the Asian shore crab, Hemigrapsus sanguineus: algal versus animal preference. J. Crustac. Biol. 25(1): 130-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1651/C-2530

Buck T.L., Breed G.A., Pennings S.C., et al. 2003. Diet choice in an omnivorous salt-marsh crab: different food types, body size, and habitat complexity. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 292: 103-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(03)00146-1

Burr A.H.J., Robinson A.F. 2004. Locomotion Behaviour. In: Gaugler R., Bilgrami A.L. (eds), Nematode Behaviour. CABI Publishing, Cambridge, pp. 445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9780851998183.0025

D'Incao F., Silva K.G., Ruffino M.L., et al. 1990. Hábito alimentar do caranguejo Chasmagnathus granulata Dana, 1851 na barra do Rio Grande, RS (Decapoda, Grapsidae). Atlantica 12(2): 85-93.

Eubanks M.D. 2005. Predaceous herbivores and herbivorous predators. In: Barbosa P., Castellanos I. (eds), Ecology of predator-prey interactions. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, pp. 3-16.

Garm A. 2005. Mechanosensory properties of the mouthpart setae of the European shore crab Carcinus maenas. Mar. Biol. 147: 1179-1190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00227-005-0020-7

Garm A., HØeg J.T. 2001. Function and functional groupings of the complex mouth apparatus of the squat lobsters Munida sarsi Huus and M. tenuimana G.O. Sars (Crustacea: Decapoda). Biol. Bull. 200: 281-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1543510 PMid:11441971

Hartnoll R.G. 1974. Variation in growth pattern between some secondary sexual characters in crabs (Decapoda. Brachyura). Crustaceana 27(2): 131-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156854074X00334

Iribarne O., Bortolus A., Botto F. 1997. Between-habitat differences in burrow characteristics and trophic modes in the southwestern Atlantic burrowing crab Chasmagnathus granulata. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 155: 137-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps155137

Isacch J.P., Costa C. S. B., Rodriguez-Gallego L., et al. 2006. Distribution of saltmarsh plant communities associated with environmental factors along a latitudinal gradient on the south-west Atlantic coast. J. Biogeogr. 33: 888-900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01461.x

Lancia J.P. 2013. Ecología y fisiología alimentaria del cangrejo Neohelice granulata. Ph.D. thesis, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Mar del Plata, 136 pp.

Lancia J.P., Fernández Gimenez A., Bas C., et al. 2012. Adaptive differences in digestive enzyme activity in the crab Neohelice granulata in relation to sex and habitat. J. Crustac. Biol. 32(6): 940-948. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1937240X-00002090

Lavalli K.L., Factor R.J. 1995. The feeding appendages. In: Factor R.J. (ed), The Biology of the lobster, Homarus americanus. Academic Press, New York, pp. 349-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-012247570-2/50036-0

Lee S.Y. 1995. Cheliped size and structure: the evolution of a multi-functional decapod organ. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 193: 161-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(95)00116-6

Lee S.Y., Seed R. 1992. Ecological implications of cheliped size in crabs: some data from Carcinus maenas and Liocarcinus holsatus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 84: 151-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps084151

Linton S.M., Greenaway P. 2007. A review of feeding and nutrition of herbivorous land crabs: adaptations to low quality plant diets. J. Comp. Physiol. B. 177: 269-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00360-006-0138-z PMid:17279390

Lopez G.R., Levinton J.S. 1987. Ecology of deposit-feeding animals in marine sediments. Q. Rev. Biol. 62(3): 235-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/415511

Luppi T., Bas C., Méndez Casariego A., et al. 2013. The influence of habitat, season and tidal regime in the activity of the intertidal crab Neohelice (=Chasmagnathus) granulata. Helgoland Mar. Res. 67: 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10152-012-0300-9

Mattson W.J. 1980. Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11: 119-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001003

Mchenga I.S.S., Tsuchiya M. 2010. Feeding choice and the fate of organic materials consumed by Sesarma crabs Perisesarma bidens (De Haan) when offered different diets. J. Mar. Biol. 2010.

Negreiros-Fransozo M.L., Fransozo V. 2003. A morphometric study of the mud crab, Panopeus austrobesus Williams. 1983 (Decapoda. Brachyura) from a subtropical mangrove in South America. Crustaceana 76(3): 281-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156854003765911685

Sayão-Aguiar B., Amaro Pinheiro M.A., et al. 2012. Sediment bioturbation potential of Uca rapax and Uca uruguayensis as a result of their feeding activity. J. Crustac. Biol. 32(2): 223-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/193724011X615451

Schembri P.J. 1982. Feeding behaviour of fifteen species of hermit crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura) from the Otago region, southeastern New Zealand. J. Nat. Hist. 16: 859-878. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222938200770691

Seiple W., Salmon M. 1982. Comparative social behavior of two grapsid crabs, Sesarma reticulatum (Say) and S. cinereum (Bosc). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 62: 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(82)90213-1

Sibly R.M. 1981. Strategies of digestion and defecation. In: Townsend C.R., Calow P. (eds), Physiological Ecology: an evolutionary approach to resource use. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 109-139.

Sokal R., Rohlf J. 1979. Biometría. Principios y métodos estadísticos en la investigación biológica. Blume H., Madrid, 775 pp.

Spivak E.D. 1997. Cangrejos estuariales del Atlántico sudoccidental (25°-41°S) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura). Invest. Mar. Valparaíso 25: 105-120.

Spivak E., Anger K., Luppi T., Bas C., Ismael D. 1994. Distribution and habitat preferences of two grapsid crab species in Mar Chiquita Lagoon (Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina). Helgol. Meeresunters. 48: 59-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02366202

Strauss R.E. 1979. Reliability estimates for Ivlev's electivity index, the forage ratio, and a proposed linear index of food selection. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 108: 344-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1979)108<344:REFIEI>2.0.CO;2

Thacker R.W. 1998. Avoidance of recently eaten foods by land hermit crabs, Coenobita compressus. Anim. Behav. 55: 485-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0621 PMid:9480714

Verardo D.J., Froelich P.N., McIntyre A. 1990. Determination of organic carbon and nitrogen in marine sediments using the Carlo Erba NA-1500 analyzer. Deep-Sea. Res. 37(1): 157-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(90)90034-S

Warner G.F. 1977. The biology of crabs. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York. 202 pp.

Wilde J.E., Linton S.M., Greenaway P. 2004. Dietary assimilation and the digestive strategy of the omnivorous anomuran land crab Birgus latro (Coenobitidae). J. Comp. Physiol. B. 174: 299-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00360-004-0415-7 PMid:14760503

Wolcott D.L., O'Connor N.J. 1992. Herbivory in crabs: Adaptations and ecological considerations. Am. Zool. 32(3): 370-381.

Published

2014-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Lancia JP, Bas C, Spivak E. Food manipulation and selection in the omnivorous grapsoid crab Neohelice granulata (Decapoda: Varunidae). Sci. mar. [Internet]. 2014Dec.30 [cited 2024Mar.29];78(4):529-36. Available from: https://scientiamarina.revistas.csic.es/index.php/scientiamarina/article/view/1550

Issue

Section

Articles