Mudflat nekton assemblages in the Tagus estuary (Portugal): distribution and feeding patterns


  • Susana França Instituto de Oceanografia, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa
  • Miguel A. Pardal IMAR – Institute of Marine Research, Department of Zoology, University of Coimbra
  • Henrique N. Cabral Departamento de Biologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa



nekton, community structure, daily rations, mudflat, intertidal areas, Tagus estuary


Mudflats are an important component of estuaries, where they may occupy large areas and provide feeding and nursery grounds for many fish and bird species, as in the Tagus estuary. However, knowledge on their role and functioning is still expanding. Spatial and temporal dynamics of nekton assemblages in a mudflat of the Tagus estuary were evaluated to determine their role in the estuarine functioning. Feeding activity and daily rations of the most important nekton species are also analyzed. Two intertidal mudflat areas (upper and lower) were sampled, as well as the adjoining subtidal area. Sampling was conducted every two months, during a yearly cycle. A 24 h sampling cycle was conducted to investigate daily feeding patterns and determine daily rations. Crangon crangon, Carcinus maenas, Palaemon longirostris, Palaemon serratus and Pomatoschistus microps dominated the nekton community. A marked seasonal pattern was noticed with the highest densities recorded in spring and summer, corresponding to recruitment episodes of these species. Highest biomass values were recorded in the subtidal zone, while the highest densities were recorded in the intertidal zone. The mudflats seem to play an important role in the dynamics of the Tagus estuary, acting as a feeding and nursery areas for several nektonic species.


Download data is not yet available.


Amara, R. and C. Paul. – 2003. Seasonal patterns in the fish and epibenthic crustaceans community of an intertidal zone with particular reference to the population dynamics of plaice and brown shrimp. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci., 56: 807-818. doi:10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00315-3

Bettencourt, A. and L. Ramos. – 2003. Estuários Portugueses. Instituto da Água.

Beyst, B., K. Hostens and J. Mees. – 2001. Factors influencing fish and macrocrustacean communities in the surf zone of sandy beaches in Belgium: temporal variation. J. Sea Res., 46: 281-294. doi:10.1016/S1385-1101(01)00087-9

Boer, W.F. and H.H.T. Prins. – 2002. The community structure of a tropical intertidal mudflat under human exploitation. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 59: 1237-1247. doi:10.1006/jmsc.2002.1287

Cabral, H.N. – 1998. Utilização do estuário do Tejo como área de viveiro pelos linguados, Solea solea (L., 1758) e Solea senegalensis Kaup, 1858, e Robalo, Dicentrarchus labrax (L., 1758). Ph. D. thesis, Univ. Lisbon.

Cabral, H.N. – 2000. Comparative feeding ecology of sympatric Solea solea and Solea senegalensis, within the nursery areas of the Tagus estuary, Portugal. J. Fish Biol., 57: 1550-1562. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb02231.x

Cabral, H.N., M.J. Costa and J.P. Salgado. – 2001. Does the Tagus estuary fish community reflect environmental changes? Clim. Res., 18: 119-126. doi:10.3354/cr018119

Cattrijsse, A., H.R. Dankwa and J. Mees. – 1997. Nursery function of an estuarine tidal marsh for the brown shrimp Crangon crangon. J. Sea Res., 38: 109-121. doi:10.1016/S1385-1101(97)00036-1

Costanza, R., R. Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R.V. O’neill, J. Paruelo, R.G. Raskin, P. Sutton and M. van den Belt. – 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387: 253-260. doi:10.1038/387253a0

Dolbeth, M, P.G. Cardoso, S.M. Ferreira, T. Verdelhos, D. Raffaelli and M.A. Pardal. – 2007. Anthropogenic and natural disturbance effects on a macrobenthic estuarine community over a 10-year period. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 54(5): 576-585. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.12.005 PMid:17240405

Eggers, D.M. – 1977. Factors in interpreting data obtained by diel sampling of fish stomachs. J. Fish. Res. Board. Can., 36: 1018-1019.

Elliott, M. and F. Dewailly. – 1995. The structure and components of European estuarine fish assemblages. Neth. J. Aquat. Ecol., 29: 397-417 doi:10.1007/BF02084239

Elliott, M. and K.L. Hemingway. – 2002. Fishes in Estuaries. Blackwell Science. Oxford.

Farinha, J., L. Costa, A. Trindade, P. Araújo and E. Silva. – 2001. Zonas Húmidas Portuguesas de Importância Internacional. Sítios Inscritos na Convenção de Ramsar, 1ª ed. Lisboa. Instituto da Conservação da Natureza.

França, S. – 2006. Utilização das plataformas vasosas intertidais do estuário do Tejo pelas comunidades bentónicas e nectónicas. MsC thesis, Univ. Coimbra.

Gibson, R.N. – 1973. The intertidal movements and distribution of young fish on a sandy beach with special reference to the plaice (Pleuronectes platessa). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 12: 79-102. doi:10.1016/0022-0981(73)90039-7

Goldberg, R., B. Phelan, J. Pereira, S. Hagan, P. Clark, A. Bejda, A. Calabrese, A. Studholme and K.W. Able. – 2002. Variability in habitat use by young-of-the-year Winter Flounder, Pseudopleuronectes americanus, in three northeastern U.S. estuaries. Estuaries, 25(2): 215-226.

Gray, C.A., R.C. Chick and D.J. McElligott. – 1998. Diel changes in assemblages of fishes associated with shallow seagrass and bare sand. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci., 46: 849-859. doi:10.1006/ecss.1997.0321

Halpin, P.M. – 2000. Habitat use by an intertidal salt-marsh fish: trade-offs between predation and growth. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 198: 203-214. doi:10.3354/meps198203

Hampel, H., A. Cattrijsse and M. Vincx. – 2003. Tidal, diel and semi-lunar changes in the faunal assemblage of an intertidal salt marsh creek. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci., 56: 795-805. doi:10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00296-2

Hampel, H. and A. Cattrijsse. – 2004. Temporal variation in feeding rhythms in a tidal marsh population of the common goby Pomatoschistus microps (Kroyer, 1838). Aquat. Sci., 66: 315-326. doi:10.1007/s00027-004-0682-0

Heck, K.L., K.W. Able, M.P. Fahay and C.T. Roman. – 1989. Fishes and decapod crustaceans of Cape Cod eelgrass meadows: species composition, seasonal abundance patterns and comparison with unvegetated substrates. Estuaries, 12: 59-65. doi:10.2307/1351497

Hemingway, K.L. and M. Elliott. – 2002. Field Methods. In: M. Elliott and K.L. Hemingway (eds.). Fishes in Estuarie. Blackwell Science, Oxford.

Héroux, D. and P. Magnan. – 1996. In situ determination of food daily ration in fish: a review and field evaluation. Environ. Biol. Fish., 46: 61-74. doi:10.1007/BF00001699

Hindell, J.S. and G.P. Jenkins. – 2004. Spatial and temporal variability in the assemblage structure of fishes associated with mangroves (Avicennia marina) and intertidal mudflats in temperate Australian embayments. Mar. Biol., 144: 385-395. doi:10.1007/s00227-003-1201-x

Hureau, J.C. – 1969. Biologie comparée de quelques poissons antarctiques (Nototheneidae). Bull. Inst. Oceanogr. Monaco, 68: 1-131.

Kanou, K., M. Sano and H. Kohno. – 2005. Larval and juvenile fishes occurring with flood tides on an intertidal mudflat in the Tama River estuary, central Japan. Ichthyol. Res., 52: 158-164. doi:10.1007/s10228-005-0267-5

Leitão, R., F. Martinho, J.M. Neto, H. Cabral, J.C. Marques and M.A. Pardal. – 2006. Feeding ecology, population structure and distribution of Pomatoschistus microps (Krøyer, 1838) and Pomatoschistus minutus (Pallas, 1770) in a temperate estuary, Portugal. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci., 66: 231-239. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2005.08.012

Maes, J., L. Brabandere, F. Ollevier and J. Mees. – 2003. The diet and consumption of dominant fish species in the upper Scheldt estuary, Belgium. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK, 83: 603-612. doi:10.1017/S0025315403007537h

Melville, A.J. and R.M. Connolly. – 2005. Food webs supporting fish over subtropical mudflats are based on transported organic matter not in situ microalgae. Mar. Biol., 148: 363-371. doi:10.1007/s00227-005-0083-5

Moreira, F. – 1999. On the use by birds on intertidal areas of the Tagus estuary: implications for management. Aquat. Ecol., 33: 301-309. doi:10.1023/A:1009908722680

Morrison, M.A., M.P. Francis, B.W. Hartill and D.M. Parkinson. – 2002. Diurnal and tidal variation in the abundance of the fish fauna of a temperate tidal mudflat. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci., 54: 793-807. doi:10.1006/ecss.2001.0857

del Norte-Campos, A.G.C. and A. Temming. – 1994. Daily activity, feeding and rations in gobies and brown shrimp in the northern Wadden Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 115: 41-53. doi:10.3354/meps115041

Paterson, A.W. and A.K. Whitfield. – 2000. Do shallow-water habitats function as refugia for juvenile fishes? Est. Coast. Shelf Sci., 51: 359-364. doi:10.1006/ecss.2000.0640

Pihl, R. and R. Rosenberg. – 1984. Food selection and consumption of the shrimp Crangon crangon in some shallow marine areas in western Sweden. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 15: 159-168. doi:10.3354/meps015159

Redant, F. – 1980. Population dynamics of brown shrimps (Crangon crangon) in the Belgian coastal waters, 1.Consumption-production model. ICES-CM 1980/K32.

Rodrigues, A.M., S. Meireles, T. Pereira, A. Gama and V. Quintino. – 2006. Spatial patterns of benthic macroinvertebrates in intertidal areas of a Southern European estuary: the Tagus, Portugal. Hydrobiologia, 555: 99-113. doi:10.1007/s10750-005-1109-1

Rountree, R.A. and K.W. Able. – 1997. Nocturnal fish use of New Jersey marsh creek and adjacent bay shoal habitats. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci., 44: 703-711. doi:10.1006/ecss.1996.0134

Rozas, L.P. and D.J. Reed. – 1993. Nekton use of marsh-surface habitats in Louisiana (USA) deltaic salt marshes undergoing submergence. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 96: 147-157. doi:10.3354/meps096147

Salgado, J., M.J. Costa, H. Cabral and L. Deegan. – 2004. Comparison of the fish assemblages in tidal salt marsh creeks and in adjoining mudflat areas in the Tejo estuary (Portugal). Cah. Biol. Mar., 45: 213-224.

Sogard, S.M. and K.W. Able. – 1991. A comparison of eelgrass, sea lettuce macroalgae, and marsh creeks as habitats for epibenthic fishes and decapods. Est. Coast. Shelf. Sci., 33: 501-519. doi:10.1016/0272-7714(91)90087-R

Szedlmayer, S.T. and K.W. Able. – 1996. Patterns of seasonal availability and habitat use by fishes and decapod crustaceans in a southern New Jersey estuary. Estuaries, 19(3): 697-709. doi:10.2307/1352529

Ter Braak, C.J.F. and P. Smilauer. – 2002. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination. Version 4.5. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York, USA.

Van der Veer, H.W., R. Dapper and J. Witte. – 2001. The nursery function of the intertidal areas in the western Wadden Sea for 0-group sole Solea solea (L.). J. Sea Res., 45: 271-279. doi:10.1016/S1385-1101(01)00062-4

Vinagre, C., S. França and H.N. Cabral. – 2006. Diel and semilunar patterns in the use of an intertidal mudflat by juveniles of Senegal sole, Solea senegalensis. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci., 69(1-2): 246-254. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2006.04.017

Vinagre, C., A. Maia and H.N. Cabral. – 2007. Effect of temperature and salinity on the gastric evacuation of juvenile sole Solea solea and Solea senegalensis. J. Appl. Ichthyol., 23: 240-145. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0426.2007.00852.x

Weinstein, M.P. and H.A. Brooks. – 1983. Comparative ecology of nekton residing in a tidal creek and adjacent seagrass meadow: community composition and structure. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.,12: 15-27. doi:10.3354/meps012015




How to Cite

França S, Pardal MA, Cabral HN. Mudflat nekton assemblages in the Tagus estuary (Portugal): distribution and feeding patterns. scimar [Internet]. 2008Sep.30 [cited 2022Sep.28];72(3):591-602. Available from:




Most read articles by the same author(s)