Estructura genética poblacional de dos especies piscícolas, una de estuario y una de arrecife, explotados por la pesca artesanal brasilera

Autores/as

  • Regina H.G. Priolli Fisheries and Food Institute, FIFO, PPG Ecomar, UNISANTA - Nepa, Capesca, UNICAMP
  • Miklos M. Bajay Department of Genetics, ESALQ, USP
  • Renato A.M. Silvano Fisheries and Food Institute, FIFO, PPG Ecomar, UNISANTA - Department of Ecology, UFRGS
  • Alpina Begossi Fisheries and Food Institute, FIFO, PPG Ecomar, UNISANTA - Nepa, Capesca, UNICAMP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.04407.17A

Palabras clave:

pesquerías a pequeña escala, microsatélites, diversidad genética, róbalo, mero, cuello de botella

Resumen


En este estudio se han utilizado marcadores microsatélites para examinar la estructura genética de Centropomus undecimalis (Bloch, 1792) y Epinephelus marginatus (Lowe, 1834) en localidades de pesca artesanal localizadas a lo largo de la costa del sudeste de Brasil. Los estadísticos de diferenciación poblacional (F-statisctics) no presentaron diferenciación genética entre las muestras de C. undecimalis (FST=0.012). Sin embargo, los resultados de los análisis basados en clústeres bayesianos, componentes principales (PCA) y análisis discriminante de componentes principales (DAPC) sugieren la posible presencia de dos clústeres diferenciados genéticamente, pero sin ninguna relación con las áreas geográficas. Los resultados del análisis de cuello de botella poblacional no son significativos con valores de tamaño efectivo poblacional (Ne) elevados y similares entre los dos clústeres. Por el contrario, en E. marginatus, los análisis basados en microsatélites no muestran ningún patrón de subdivisión genética. El valor de FST es bajo y no significativo (FST=0.008), el análisis Bayesiano indicia un solo clúster y el PCA determina que todas las muestras de las diferentes localidades geográficas comparten la misma estructura genética. El análisis de cuello de botella muestra diferencias significativas con la observación de una baja Ne. Los resultados de los análisis genéticos en estas dos especies a lo largo de la costa sudeste de Brasil sugieren diferentes estructuras genéticas para cada especie y estos resultados deben tenerse en consideración para la estipulación de las medidas de conservación de la diversidad genética.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Able, K.W. 2005. A re-examination of fish estuarine dependence: Evidence for connectivity between estuarine and ocean habitats. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 64: 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.02.002

Aliaume C., Zerbi A., Joyeux J., et al. 2000. Growth of juvenile Centropomus undecimalis in a tropical island. Environ. Biol. Fishes. 59: 299-308. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007662611839

Almeida F.S., Fungaro M.H.P., Sodré L.M.K. 2001. RAPD and isoenzyme analysis of genetic variability in three allied species of catfishes (Siluriformes Pimelodidae) from the Tibagi river, Brazil. J. Zool. 253: 113-120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952836901000103

Amorim P., Westmeyer M. 2016. Snapper and Grouper: SFP Fisheries Sustainability Overview 2015. Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation. 18 pp. Available from: http://www.fishsource.com

Anderson A.B., Bonaldo R.M., Barneche D.R., et al. 2014. Recovery of grouper assemblages indicates effectiveness of a marine protected area in Southern Brazil. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 514: 207-215. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11032

Andrade A.B., Machado L.F., Hostim-Silva M., et al. 2003. Reproductive biology of the dusky goruper Epinephelus marginatus (Lowe, 1834). Braz. Arch. Biol. Techn. 46: 373-381. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132003000300009

Andrello M., Mouillot D., Beuvier J., et al. 2013. Low connectivity between Mediterranean marine protected areas: a biophysical modeling approach for the dusky grouper Epinephelus marginatus. Plos One 8: e68564. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068564 PMid:23861917 PMCid:PMC3704643

Begossi A., Salivonchyk S.V., Hanazaki N., et al. 2012a. Fishers (Paraty, RJ) and fish manipulation time: a variable associated to the choice for consumption and sale. Braz. J. Biol. 72: 973-975. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842012000500030 PMid:23295533

Begossi A., Salyvonchyk S., Nora V., et al. 2012b. The paraty artisanal fishery (southeastern Brazilian coast): ethnoecology and management of a social-ecological system (SES). J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 8: 22-40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-8-22 PMid:22738073 PMCid:PMC3476967

Benevides E.A., Vallinoto M.N.S., Fetter Filho A.F.H., et al. 2014. When physical oceanography meets population genetics: The case study of the genetic/evolutionary discontinuity in the endangered goliath grouper (Epinephelus itajara; Perciformes: Epinephelidae) with comments on the conservation of the species. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 56: 255-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2014.06.004

Bouchereau J.L., Body P., Chauvet C. 1999. Growth of the dusky grouper Epinephelus marginatus (Linnnaeus, 1758) (Teleostei, Serranidae), in the natural marine reserve of Lavezzi Islands, Corsica, France. Sci. Mar. 63: 71-77. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.1999.63n171

Brookfield J.F.Y. 1996. A simple new method for estimating null allele frequency from heterozygote deficiency. Mol. Ecol. 5: 453-455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.1996.tb00336.x PMid:8688964

Caselle J.E., Hamilton S.L., Schroeder D.M., et al. 2011 Geographic variation in density, demography, and life history traits of a harvested, sex-changing, temperate reef fish. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 68: 288-303. https://doi.org/10.1139/F10-140

Chapman R.W., Sedberry G.R., Koenig C.C., et al. 1999. Stock identification of gag, Mycteroperca microlepis, along the southeast coast of the United States. Mar. Biotechnol. 1: 137-146. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00011761

Chapuis M.P., Estoup A. 2007. Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24: 621-631. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msl191 PMid:17150975

Cornuet J.M., Luikart G. 1996. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144: 2001-2014. PMid:8978083 PMCid:PMC1207747

Damasceno J.S., Siccha-Ramirez R., Morales M.J.A., et al. 2015. Mitochondrial DNA evidences reflect an incipient population structure in Atlantic goliath grouper (Epinephelus itajara, Epinephelidae) in Brazil. Sci. Mar. 79: 419-429. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.04203.20A

De Innocentiis S., Sola L., Cataudella S., et al. 2001. Allozyme and microsatellite loci provide discordant estimates of population differentiation in the endangered dusky grouper (Epinephelus marginatus) within the Mediterranean Sea. Mol. Ecol. 10: 2163-2175. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01371.x PMid:11555259

De Oliveira J.N., Gomes G., do Rego P.S., et al. 2014. Molecular data indicate the presence of a novel species of Centropomus (Centropomidae - Perciformes) in the Western Atlantic. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 77: 275-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.04.019 PMid:24792089

De Souza A.S., Dias E.A. Jr., Galetti P.M. Jr., et al. 2015. Wide-range genetic connectivity of Coney, Cephalopholis fulva (Epinephelidae), through oceanic islands and continental Brazilian coast. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 87: 121-136. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201520130411 PMid:25806980

Dempster A.P., Laird N.M., Rubin D.B. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via em algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. Methodol. 39: 1-38.

DeWoody J.A., Avise J.C. 2000. Microsatellite variation in marine, freshwater and anadromous fishes compared with other animals. J. Fish. Biol. 56: 461-473. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2000.tb00748.x

Earl D.A., VonHoldt B.M. 2012. Structure Harvester: a website and program for visualizing Structure output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 4: 359-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7

Evanno G., Regnaut S., Goudet J. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software Structure: a simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14: 2611-2620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x PMid:15969739

Excoffier L., Laval G., Schneider S. 2005. Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinform. 1: 47-50.

Fitzpatrick B.M. 2009. Power and sample size for nested analysis of molecular variance. Mol. Ecol. 18: 3961-3966. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04314.x PMid:19754511

Frankham R. 2010. Challenges and opportunities of genetic approaches to biological conservation. Biol. Conserv. 143: 1919-1927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.05.011

Ginestet C. 2011. GGPLOT2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A Stat. Soc. 174: 245-246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2010.00676_9.x

Goudet J. 1995. FSTAT (Version 1.2): A computer program to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered. 86: 485-486. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111627

Hereu B., Diaz D., Pasqual J., et al. 2006. Temporal patterns of spawning of the dusky grouper Epinephelus marginatus in relation to environmental factors. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 325: 187-194. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps325187

Hernandez-Vidal U., Lesher-Gordillo J., Contreras-Sanchez W.M., et al. 2014. Genetic variability of the Common Snook Centropomus undecimalis (Perciformes: Centropomidae) in connected marine and riverine environments. Rev. Biol. Trop. 62: 627-636. PMid:25102645

Hubisz M.J., Falush D., Stephens M., et al. 2009. Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 9: 1322-1332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02591.x PMid:21564903 PMCid:PMC3518025

Jakobsson M., Rosenberg N.A. 2007. Clumpp: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23: 1801-1806. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm233 PMid:17485429

Jombart T. 2008. Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24: 1403-1405. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129 PMid:18397895

Jombart T., Devillard S., Balloux F. 2010. Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet. 2010, 11: 94. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-11-94 PMid:20950446 PMCid:PMC2973851

King J.R., McFarlane G.A. 2003. Marine fish life history strategies: applications to fishery management. Fisheries Manag. Ecol. 10: 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2400.2003.00359.x

Latch E.K, Dharmarajan G., Glaubitz J.C., et al. 2006. Relative performance of Bayesian clustering software for inferring population substructure and individual assignment at low levels of population differentiation. Conserv. Genet. 7: 295-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9098-1

Lopes P.F.M, Rosa E.M., Salyvonchyk S., et al. 2013. Suggestions for fixing top-down coastal fisheries management through participatory approaches. Mar. Policy 40: 100-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.12.033

McClanahan T.R., Marnane M.J., Cinner J.E., et al. 2006. A comparison of marine protected areas and alternative approaches to coral-reef management. Curr. Biol. 16: 1408-1413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.062 PMid:16860739

Mumby P.J., Harborne A.R., Brumbaugh D.R. 2011. Grouper as a Natural Biocontrol of Invasive Lionfish. PLoS One 6: e21510. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021510 PMid:21731769 PMCid:PMC3121772

Paradis E., Claude J., Strimmer K. 2004. APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20: 289-290. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 PMid:14734327

Peery M.Z., Kirby R., Reid B.N., et al. 2012. Reliability of genetic bottleneck tests for detecting recent population declines. Mol. Ecol. 21: 3403-3418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05635.x PMid:22646281

Perera M.A., Mendoza M., Contreras W.M., et al. 2011. Reproductive biology of common snook Centropomus undecimalis (Perciformes: Centropomidae) in two tropical habitats. Rev. Biol. Trop. 59: 669-681.

Perera-Garcia M.A., Mendoza-Carranza M., Contreras-Sanchez W., et al. 2013. Comparative age and growth of common snook Centropomus undecimalis (Pisces: Centropomidae) from coastal and riverine areas in Southern Mexico. Rev. Biol. Trop. 61: 807-819. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v61i2.11224 PMid:23885591

Peters K.M., Matherson R.E., Taylor R.G. 1998. Reproduction and early hsitory of common snook, Centropomus undecimalis (Bloch), in Florida. Bull. Mar. Sci. 62: 509-529.

Peterson M.S., Gilmore R.G. 1991. Eco-physiology of juvenile snook Centropomus undecimalis (Bloch) - Life-history implications . Bull. Mar. Sci. 48: 46-57.

Pinnegar J.K., Engelhard G.H. 2008. The 'shifting baseline' phenomenon: a global perspective. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 18: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-007-9058-6

Piry S., Luikart G., Cornuet J.M. 1999. Bottleneck: A computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. J. Heredity 90: 502-503. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/90.4.502

Priolli R.H.G., Stabelini N.S., Bajay M.M. 2014. Diversidade genética de uma espécie em perigo de extinção: a garoupa Epinephelus marginatus. In Begossi A., Lopes P.F.M. (eds), Comunidades pesqueiras de Paraty sugestões para manejo. RiMa Editora, São Carlos, pp. 27-40.

Pritchard J.K., Stephens M., Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959. PMid:10835412 PMCid:PMC1461096

R Development Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Available online at http://www.R-project.org/

Ramirez M.A., Patricia-Acevedo J., Planas S., et al. 2006. New microsatellite resources for groupers (Serranidae). Mol. Ecol. Notes 6: 813-817. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01354.x

Raymond M., Rousset F. 1995. GENEPOP (version-1.2) - population-genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Heredity 86: 248-249. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111573

Rice W.R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223-225. https://doi.org/10.2307/2409177

Rivera M.A.J., Graham G.C., Roderick G.K. 2003. Isolation and characterization of nine microsatellite loci from the Hawaiian grouper Epinephelus quernus (Serranidae) for population genetic analyses. Mar. Biotechnol. 5: 126-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10126-002-0093-y PMid:12876647

Ryman N., Palm S. 2006. POWSIM: a computer program for assessing statistical power when testing for genetic differentiation. Mol. Ecol Notes 6: 600-602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01378.x

Ryman N, Palm S, André C., et al. 2006. Power for detecting genetic divergence: differences between statistical methods and marker loci. Mol. Ecol. 15: 2031-2045. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02839.x PMid:16780422

Schunter C., Carreras-Carbonell J., Planes S., et al. 2011. Genetic connectivity patterns in an endangered species: The dusky grouper (Epinephelus marginatus). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 401: 126-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.01.021

Seyoum S., Tringali M.D., Sullivan J.G. 2005. Isolation and characterization of 27 polymorphic microsatellite loci for the common snook, Centropomus undecimalis. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5: 924-927. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01118.x

Shiozawa D.K., Kudo J., Evans R.P., et al. 1992. DNA extraction from preserved trout tissues. Gt. Basin Nat. 52: 29-34.

Silva-Oliveira G.C., do Rego P.S., Schneider H., et al. 2008. Genetic characterisation of populations of the critically endangered Goliath grouper (Epinephelus itajara, Serranidae) from the Northern Brazilian coast through analyses of mtDNA. Genet. Mol. Biol. 31: 988-994. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572008005000013

Silvano R.A.M., Begossi A. 2012. Fishermen's local ecological knowledge on Southeastern Brazilian coastal fishes: contributions to research, conservation, and management. Neotrop. Ichthyol. 10: 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252012000100013

Silvano R.A.M., MacCord P.F.L., Lima R.V., et al. 2006. When does this fish spawn? Fishermen's local knowledge of migration and reproduction of Brazilian coastal fishes. Environ. Biol. Fish. 76: 371-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-006-9043-2

Snedecor G.W., Cochran W.G. 1989. Statistical Methods, 8th ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames.

Spedicato M.T., Contegiacomo M., Carbonara P., et al. 1998. Artificial reproduction of Epinephelus marginatus aimed at the development of restocking techniques. Biol. Mar. Mediterr. 5: 1248-1257.

Taylor R.G., Whittington J.A., Grier H.J., et al. 2000. Age, growth, maturation, and protandric sex reversal in common snook, Centropomus undecimalis, from the east and west coasts of South Florida. Fish. Bull. 98: 612-624.

Tringali M.D., Bert T.M. 1996. The genetic stock structure of common snook (Centropomus undecimalis). Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 53: 974-984. https://doi.org/10.1139/f96-027

Tringali M.D., Seyoum S., Wallace E.M., et al. 2008. Limits to the use of contemporary genetic analyses in delineating biological populations for restocking and stock enhancement. Rev. Fish. Sci. 16: 111-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641260701686887

Van Oosterhout C., Hutchinson W.F., Wills D.P.M., et al. 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4: 535-538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x

Vasconcellos A.V., Vianna P., Paiva P.C., et al. 2008. Genetic and morphometric differences between yellowtail snapper (Ocyurus chrysurus, Lutjanidae) populations of the tropical West Atlantic. Genet. Mol. Biol. 31: 308-316. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572008000200026

Waldie P.A., Almany, G.R., Sinclair-Taylor T.H., et al. 2016. Restricted grouper reproductive migrations support community-based management. R. Soc. Open Sci. 3: 150694. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150694 PMid:27069662 PMCid:PMC4821273

Waples R.S., Do C. 2008. LDNE: a program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8: 753-756. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2007.02061.x PMid:21585883

Descargas

Publicado

2016-12-30

Cómo citar

1.
Priolli RH, Bajay MM, Silvano RA, Begossi A. Estructura genética poblacional de dos especies piscícolas, una de estuario y una de arrecife, explotados por la pesca artesanal brasilera. Sci. mar. [Internet]. 30 de diciembre de 2016 [citado 23 de febrero de 2025];80(4):467-7. Disponible en: https://scientiamarina.revistas.csic.es/index.php/scientiamarina/article/view/1676

Número

Vol. 80 Núm. 4 (2016)

Sección

Artículos

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2016 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

© CSIC. Los originales publicados en las ediciones impresa y electrónica de esta Revista son propiedad del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, siendo necesario citar la procedencia en cualquier reproducción parcial o total.

Salvo indicación contraria, todos los contenidos de la edición electrónica se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución “Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional ” (CC BY 4.0). Puede consultar desde aquí la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia. Esta circunstancia ha de hacerse constar expresamente de esta forma cuando sea necesario.

No se autoriza el depósito en repositorios, páginas web personales o similares de cualquier otra versión distinta a la publicada por el editor.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC