Otolith shape analysis as a tool for stock discrimination of the black scabbardfish, Aphanopus carbo Lowe, 1839 (Pisces: Trichiuridae), in Portuguese waters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2009.73s2047Keywords:
black scabbardfish, otolith, contour, shape, Fourier descriptorsAbstract
The variability in otolith contour shape of black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo) from Portuguese waters was analysed for stock discrimination purposes. The contour shape of otoliths from specimens caught off mainland Portugal, Madeira and Azores archipelagos was digitised and extracted according to the closed-form Fourier analysis technique. Mainland and Madeira specimens were compared through the adjustment of a MANOVA model to the normalised elliptic Fourier descriptor (NEFDs) obtained for the otoliths of 200 females and 200 males sampled at each area. Significant differences were found between areas and between sexes; the interaction term was not statistically significant. The effect of the area also proved to be significant when samples from the three regions were considered. These results were further supported by the discriminant analysis of the individual NEFDs for which the correct classifications were 87.5-89% when they were considered by sex and total length for the mainland and Madeira, and 90.9-97.7%, when NEFDs from the three areas were compared by sex and fish length. Otolith contour shape was shown to be a possible tool for differentiating between black scabbardfish stocks in the NE Atlantic.
Downloads
References
Anon. – 1984. INIP – Programa de apoio às pescas na Madeira – III. Cruzeiro de reconhecimento de Pesca e Oceanografia 020330981. Relatórios INIP, 22.
Bird, J.L., D.T. Eppler and D.M. Checkley. – 1986. Comparisons of herring otoliths using Fourier-series shape-analysis. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 43: 1228-1234. doi:10.1139/f86-152
Bolles, K.L. and G.A. Berg. – 2000. Distinction between silver hake (Merluccius bilinearis) stocks in U.S. waters of the northwest Atlantic based on whole otoliths morphometrics. Fish. Bull., 98: 451-462.
Booke, H.E. – 1981. The conundrum of the stock concept – Are nature and nurture definable in fishery science? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 38: 1479-1480. doi:10.1139/f81-200
Cadrin, S.X. and K.D. Friedland. – 1999. The utility of image processing techniques for morphometric analysis and stock identification. Fish. Res., 43: 129-139. doi:10.1016/S0165-7836(99)00070-3
Campana S.E. and J.M. Casselman. – 1993. Stock discrimination using otolith shape analysis. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 50: 1062-1083. doi:10.1139/f93-123
Cardinale, M., P. Doering-Arjes, M. Kastowsky and H. Mosegaard. – 2004. Effects of sex, stock, and environment on the shape of known-age Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) otoliths. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 61(2):158-167. doi:10.1139/f03-151
Castonguay, M., P. Simard and P. Gagnon. – 1991. Usefulness of Fourier analysis of otolith shape for Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) stock discrimination. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 48: 296-302. doi:10.1139/f91-041
Clarke, T.A. and P.J. Wagner. – 1976. Vertical distribution and other aspects of the ecology of certain mesopelagic fishes taken near Hawaii. Fish. Bull., 74: 635-645.
Figueiredo, I., P. Bordalo-Machado, S. Reis, D. Sena-Carvalho, T. Blasdale, A. Newton and L.S. Gordo. – 2003. Observations on the reproductive cycle of the black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo Lowe, 1839) in the NEAtlantic. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 60: 774-779. doi:10.1016/S1054-3139(03)00064-X
Friedland, K.D. and D.G. Reddin. – 1994. Use of otolith morphology in stock discriminations of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 51: 91-98. doi:10.1139/f94-011
Galley, E.A., P.J. Wright and F.M. Gibb. – 2006. Combined methods of otolith shape analysis improve identification of spawning areas in Atlantic cod. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 63: 1710-1717. doi:10.1016/j.icesjms.2006.06.014
Gordon, J.D.M. – 1986. The fish populations of the Rockall Trough. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 88B: 191-204.
Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani and A. Buja. – 1997. Flexible discriminant and mixture models. In: J. Kay and D. Titterington (eds.), Proceedings of “Neural Networks and Statistics” conference, Edinburgh, 1995. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
INE. – 2008. Estatísticas da Pesca 2007. Instituto Nacional de Estatística, I.P., Lisboa, Portugal.
Iwata, H. and Y. Ukai. – 2002. SHAPE: Acomputer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. J. Hered., 93: 384-385. doi:10.1093/jhered/93.5.384 PMid:12547931
Kuhl, F.P. and C.R. Giardina. – 1982. Elliptic Fourier features of closed contour. Comp. Graph. Image Process., 18: 236-258. doi:10.1016/0146-664X(82)90034-X
Lestrel, P.E. – 1997. Introduction and overview of Fourier descriptors. In: P.E. Lestrel (ed.), Fourier Descriptors and Their Application in Biology, pp. 22-44. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Lombarte, A. and A. Castellón. – 1991. Interespecific and intraespecific otolith variability in the genus Merluccius as determined by image analysis. Can. J. Zool., 69: 2442-2449. doi:10.1139/z91-343
Maul, G.E. – 1954. Notes and exhibitions. [Asketch of Madeiran Ichthyology with observations on the ecology of the most important fishes]. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 123: 901-903.
Merrett, N.R., J.D.M. Gordon, M. Stehmann and R.L. Haedrich. – 1991. Deep demersal fish assemblage structure in the Porcupine Seabight (eastern North Atlantic): slope sampling by three different trawls compared. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K., 71: 329-358. doi:10.1017/S0025315400051638
Neves, A., A.R. Vieira, I. Farias, I. Figueiredo, V. Sequeira and L.S. Gordo. – 2009. Reproductive strategies in black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo Lowe, 1839) from NEAtlantic. Sci. Mar., 73 S2: 19-31. doi:10.3989/scimar.2009.73s2019
Pajuelo, J.G., J.A. González, J.I Santana, J.M. Lorenzo, A. García-Mederos and V. Tuset. – 2008. Biological parameters of the bathyal fish black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo Lowe, 1839) off the Canary Islands, Central-east Atlantic. Fish. Res., 92(2-3): 140-147. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2007.12.022
Piotrovskii, A.S. – 1979. On the distribution of the black scabbardfish Aphanopus carbo (family Trichiuridae) in the Indian Ocean. J. Ichthyol., 19(5): 145-146.
Ponton, D. – 2006. Is geometric morphometrics efficient for comparing otolith shape of different fish species? J. Morph., 267: 750-757. doi:10.1002/jmor.10439 PMid:16526058
Rencher, A.C. – 2002. Discriminant analysis: Description of group separation. In: A.C. Rencher (ed.). Methods of Multivariate Analysis, pp. 270-298. John Wiley and Sons, New York, U.S.A.
Stefanni, S. and H. Knutsen. – 2007. Phylogeography and demographic history of the deep-sea fish Aphanopus carbo (Lowe, 1839) in the NEAtlantic: vicariance followed by secondary contact or speciation? Mol. Phyl. Evol., 42: 38-46. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2006.05.035 PMid:16876444
Stransky, C. and S. E. MacLellan. – 2005. Species separation and zoogeography of redfish and rockfish (genus Sebastes) by otolith shape analysis. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 62: 2265-2276. doi:10.1139/f05-143
Stransky, C., A.G. Murta, J. Schlickeisen and C. Zimmermann. – 2008. Otolith shape analysis as a tool for stock separation of horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in the Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean. Fish. Res., 89: 159-166. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2007.09.017
Tracey, S.R., J.M. Lyle and G. Duhamel. – 2006. Application of elliptical Fourier analysis of otolith form as a tool for stock identification. Fish. Res., 77: 138-147. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2005.10.013
Torres, G.J., A. Lombarte and B. Morales-Nin. – 2000. Sagittal otolith size and shape variability to identify geographical intraspecific differences in three species of genus Merluccius. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 80: 333-342. doi:10.1017/S0025315499001915
Tuset, V.M., A. Lombarte and C.A. Assis. – 2008. Otolith atlas for the western Mediterranean, north and central eastern Atlantic. Sci. Mar., 72S1: 7-198. doi:10.3989/scimar.2008.72s1199
Younker, J.L. and R. Ehrlich. – 1977. Fourier biometrics: harmonic amplitudes as multivariate shape descriptors. Syst. Zool., 26: 336-342. doi:10.2307/2412679
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2009 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.