Scientia Marina, Vol 72, No 3 (2008)

Description of the East Brazil Large Marine Ecosystem using a trophic model


https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2008.72n3477

Kátia M.F. Freire
Aquatic Ecosystems Research Laboratory (AERL), Canada

Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Departamento de Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas, Rodovia Ilhéus-
Itabuna, Bahia, Brazil

Villy Christensen
Aquatic Ecosystems Research Laboratory (AERL), Canada

Daniel Pauly
Aquatic Ecosystems Research Laboratory (AERL), Canada

Abstract


The objective of this study was to describe the marine ecosystem off northeastern Brazil. A trophic model was constructed for the 1970s using Ecopath with Ecosim. The impact of most of the forty-one functional groups was modest, probably due to the highly reticulated diet matrix. However, seagrass and macroalgae exerted a strong positive impact on manatee and herbivorous reef fishes, respectively. A high negative impact of omnivorous reef fishes on spiny lobsters and of sharks on swordfish was observed. Spiny lobsters and swordfish had the largest biomass changes for the simulation period (1978-2000); tunas, other large pelagics and sharks showed intermediate rates of biomass decline; and a slight increase in biomass was observed for toothed cetaceans, large carnivorous reef fishes, and dolphinfish. Recycling was an important feature of this ecosystem with low phytoplankton-originated primary production. The mean transfer efficiency between trophic levels was 11.4%. The gross efficiency of the fisheries was very low (0.00002), probably due to the low exploitation rate of most of the resources in the 1970s. Basic local information was missing for many groups. When information gaps are filled, this model may serve more credibly for the exploration of fishing policies for this area within an ecosystem approach.

Keywords


modelling; ecosystem; fishery; South-western Atlantic; Brazil; northeastern Brazil

Full Text:


PDF

References


Allen, K.R. – 1971. Relation between production and biomass. J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 28: 1573-1581.

Araújo, J.N., S. Mackinson, R.R. Ellis and P.J.B. Hart. – 2005. An Ecopath model of the western English Channel ecosystem with an exploration of its dynamic properties. Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft (available online at www.cefas.co.uk/news.as)

Arreguín-Sánchez, F., J.C. Seijo and E. Valero-Pacheco. – 1993. An application of ECOPATH II to the north continental shelf ecosystem of Yucatan, Mexico. In: V. Christensen and D. Pauly (eds.), Trophic models of aquatic ecosystems. ICLARM Conf. Proc., 26: 269-278.

Baird, D., J.M. McGlade and R.E. Ulanowicz. – 1991. The comparative ecology of six marine ecosystems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 333: 15-29. doi:10.1098/rstb.1991.0058

Castro e Silva, S.M.M., A.C.P. Pontes and C.A.S. Rocha. – 2003. Report on the spiny lobster fishery in Brazil. FAO Fish. Rep., 715: 56-67.

Christensen, V. and D. Pauly. – 1993. Trophic models of aquatic ecosystems. ICLARM Conf. Proc., 26: 1-390.

Christensen, V. and C.J. Walters. – 2004. Ecopath with Ecosim: methods, capabilities and limitations. Ecol. Model., 172(2-4): 109-139. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.003

Christensen, V., C. Walters and D. Pauly. – 2005. Ecopath with Ecosim: a user’s guide. Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

Collette, B.B. and C.E. Nauen. – 1983. FAO species catalogue. Vol.2. Scombrids of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of tunas, mackerels, bonitos and related species known to date. FAO Fish. Synop., 2(125): 1-137.

Creed, J.C. – 2003. The seagrasses of South America: Brazil, Argentina and Chile. In: E.P. Green and F.T. Short (eds.), World atlas of seagrasses, pp. 243-250. UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre and Univ. California Press, Berkeley.

Edwards, H. – 2000. Trichechus manatus. Animal Diversity Web. http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Trichechus_manatus.html, accessed in March, 2007.

Ekau, W. and B. Knoppers. – 1999. An introduction to the pelagic system of the North-East and East Brazilian shelf. Arch. Fish. Mar. Res., 47(2/3): 113-132.

Freire, K.M.F. – 2005. Fishing impacts on marine ecosystems off Brazil, with emphasis on the northeastern region. PhD thesis, Univ. British Columbia (available online at www.fisheries.ubc.ca/students/graduated.php).

Freire, K.M.F. and D. Pauly. – 2006. Richness of common names of Brazilian marine fishes and its effect on catch statistics. J. Ethnobiol., 25(2): 279-296.

Froese, R. and D. Pauly. – 2007. FishBase. http://www.fishbase.org, accessed in March, 2007.

Gasalla, M.A. and C.L.D.B. Rossi-Wongtschowski. – 2004. Contribution of ecosystem analysis to investigating the effects of changes in fishing strategies in the South Brazil Bight coastal ecosystem. Ecol. Model., 172(2-4): 283-306. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.012

Haddon, M. – 2001. Modelling and quantitative methods in fisheries. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida.

ICCAT. – 1999. Report of the ICCAT SCRS skipjack stock assessment session. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT: 1-52.

ICCAT. – 2003. Report of the 2002 Atlantic swordfish stock assessment session. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 55(4): 1289-1415.

ICCAT. – 2004. Report of the 2004 meeting of the Standing Committee on Research & Statistics (SCRS), Madrid.

ICCAT. – 2005a. Report of the 2004 ICCAT bigeye tuna stock assessment session. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 57(2): 3-38.

ICCAT. – 2005b. Report of the 2004 inter-sessional meeting of the ICCAT sub-committee on by-catches: shark stock assessment. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 58(3): 799-890.

Ivo, C.T.C. and J.A. Pereira. – 1996. Sinopse das principais observações sobre as lagostas Panulirus argus (Latreille) e Panulirus laevicauda (Latreille) capturadas em águas costeiras do Brasil, entre os estados do Amapá e do Espírito Santo. Bol. Téc. Cient. CEPENE, 4(1): 7-94.

Kaschner, K., R. Watson, V. Christensen, A.W. Trites and D. Pauly. – 2001. Modeling and mapping trophic overlap between marine mammals and commercial fisheries in the North Atlantic. Fish. Cent. Res. Rep., 9(3): 35-45.

Leontief, W.W. – 1951. The structure of American economy, 1919- 1939; an empirical application of equilibrium analysis. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.

Lessa, R.P., M.F. Nóbrega and J.L. Bezerra Júnior. – 2004. Dinâmica de populações e avaliação de estoques dos recursos pesqueiros da região nordeste. Vol. II. DIMAR, Departamento de Pesca, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife-Brazil.

Lindeman, R.L. – 1942. The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology, 23(4): 399-417. doi:10.2307/1930126

Longhurst, A. – 1998. Ecological geography of the sea. Academic Press, San Diego.

Manickchand-Heileman, S.C., L.A. Soto and E. Escobar. – 1998. A preliminary trophic model of the continental shelf, south-western Gulf of Mexico. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci., 46: 885-899. doi:10.1006/ecss.1997.0324

Matsuura, Y. – 1995. Os ecossistemas brasileiros e os principais macrovetores de desenvolvimento. Subsídios ao planejamento da gestão ambiental. Projeto Cenários para o Planejamento da Gestão Ambiental (MMA/PNMA). MMA, Brasília-DF.

Medeiros, C., B. Kjerfve, M. Araújo and S.N. Leitão. – 2000. The Itamaracá estuarine ecosystem, Brazil. In: U. Seeliger and B. Kjerfve (eds.), Coastal marine ecosystems of Latin America. Ecol. Stud., 144: 71-81.

Mendoza, J.J. – 1993. A preliminary biomass budget for the northeastern Venezuela shelf ecosystem. In: V. Christensen and D. Pauly (eds.), Trophic models of aquatic ecosystems. ICLARM Conf. Proc. 26: 285-297.

Mohammed, E. – 2003. A generic marine ecosystem model for the Southeastern Caribbean in the late 1999s: application to Grenada and the Grenadines. Fish. Cent. Res. Rep., 11(6): 191-225.

Odum, E.P. –1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science, 164(3877): 262-270. doi:10.1126/science.164.3877.262 PMid:5776636

Odum, W.E. and E.J. Heald. – 1975. The detritus-based food web of an estuarine mangrove community. In: L.E. Cronin (ed.), Estuarine research. Academic Press, New York.

Okey, T.A. and R. Pugliese. – 2001. A preliminary Ecopath model of the Atlantic continental shelf adjacent to the southeastern United States. Fish. Cent. Res. Rep., 9(4): 167-181.

Opitz, S. – 1996. Trophic interactions in Caribbean coral reefs. ICLARM Tech. Rep., 43: 1-341.

Pace, M.L. J.E. Glasser and L.R. Pomeroy. – 1984. A simulation analysis of continental shelf food webs. Mar. Biol., 82: 47-63. doi:10.1007/BF00392763

Paine, R.T. – 1988. Road maps of interactions or grist for theoretical development? Ecology, 69(6): 1648-1654. doi:10.2307/1941141

Paiva, M.P. – 1997. Recursos pesqueiros estuarinos e marinhos do Brasil. Univ. Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.

Palomares, M.L.D. and D. Pauly. – 1998. Predicting food consumption of fish populations as functions of mortality, food type, morphometrics, temperature and salinity. Mar. Freshw. Res., 49: 447-453. doi:10.1071/MF98015

Pauly, D. and V. Christensen. – 1995. Primary production required to sustain global fisheries. Nature, 374: 255-257. doi:10.1038/374255a0

Pauly, D., V. Christensen and C.J. Walters. – 2000. Ecopath, Ecosim, and Ecospace as tools for evaluating ecosystem impact of fisheries. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 57: 697-706. doi:10.1006/jmsc.2000.0726

Pauly, D., M.L. Soriano-Bartz and M.L.D. Palomares. – 1993. Improved construction, parametrization and interpretation of steady-state ecosystem models. In: V. Christensen and D. Pauly (eds.), Trophic models of aquatic ecosystems. ICLARM Conf. Proc., 26: 1-13.

Polovina, J.J. – 1984. Model of a coral reef ecosystem. I. The ECOPATH Model and its application to French frigate shoals. Coral Reefs, 3: 1-11. doi:10.1007/BF00306135

Rocha, G.R.A., M.A. Gasalla, C.L.D. Rossi-Wongtschowski, L.S.H. Soares, A.M.S. Pires-Vanin, E.Y. Muto, M.C. Cergole, E. Aidar, H.S.L. Mesquita, S.M.F. Gianesella-Galvao, L.A. Vega- Perez and A. Jarre-Teichmann. – 1998. Quantitative model of trophic interactions in the Ubatuba shelf system (Southeastern Brazil). Naga, 21(4): 25-32.

Sherman, K. – 1993. Large marine ecosystems as global units for marine resources management - an ecological perspective. In: K. Sherman, L.M. Alexander and B.D. Gold (eds.), Large marine ecosystems. Stress, mitigation, and sustainability, pp. 3-11. AAAS Press, Washington.

Sherman, K., P. Celone, K. Ohlets, P. August, C. Damon, L. Juda, J. Sutinen and J. Poggie. – 2007. Large Marine Ecosystems of the World. http://www.edc.uri.edu/lme/Text/east-brazil.htm, accessed in March, 2007.

Singarajah, K.V. – 1985. A review of Brazilian whaling: aspects of biology, exploitation and utilization, Cochin, India. In: E.G. Silas (ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium of Endangered Marine Animals and Marine Parks, 12-16 January, 1985: 131-148.

Spalding, M., C. Ravilious and E.P. Green. – 2001. World atlas of coral reefs. Univ. California Press, Berkeley.

Telles, M.D. – 1998. Modelo trofodinâmico dos recifes em franja do Parque Nacional Marinho dos Abrolhos - Bahia. M. Sc. thesis, Fundação Univ. Rio Grande, Brazil.

Trites, A. and D. Pauly. – 1998. Estimating mean body masses of marine mammals from maximum body lengths. Can. J. Zool., 76(5): 886-896. doi:10.1139/cjz-76-5-886

Vasconcellos, M. – 2000. Ecosystem impacts of fishing forage fishes: an analysis of harvest strategies for the Brazilian sardine. PhD thesis, Univ. British Columbia.

Vasconcellos, M. – 2002. Mass-balance models of oceanic ecosystems of the Atlantic. Fisheries Centre, Univ. British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Vasconcellos, M. and M.A. Gasalla. – 2001. Fisheries catches and the carrying capacity of marine ecosystems in southern Brazil. Fish. Res., 50: 279-295. doi:10.1016/S0165-7836(00)00217-4

Vasconcellos, M., S. Mackinson, K. Sloman and D. Pauly. – 1997. The stability of trophic mass-balance models of marine ecosystems: a comparative analysis. Ecol. Model., 100: 125-134. doi:10.1016/S0304-3800(97)00150-6

Velasco, G. and J.P. Castello. – 2005. An ecotrophic model of southern Brazil continental shelf and fisheries scenarios for Engraulis anchoita (Pisces, Engraulididae). Atlântica, 27(1): 59-68.

Walters, C.J. – 2003. Folly and fantasy in the analysis of spatial catch rate data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 60: 1433-1436. doi:10.1139/f03-152

Walters, C.J. and F. Juanes. – 1993. Recruitment limitation as a consequence of natural selection for use of restricted feeding habitats and predation risk taking by juvenile fishes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 50: 2058-2070.

Wiedemeyer, W. – 1997. Analysis of the benthic food web of a mangrove ecosystem at northeastern Brazil. Ph.D. thesis, Kiel Univ.

Wolff, M., V. Koch and V. Isaac. – 2000. A trophic flow model of the Caeté Mangrove Estuary (North Brazil) with considerations for the sustainable use of its resources. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci., 50: 789-803. doi:10.1006/ecss.2000.0611




Copyright (c) 2008 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Contact us scimar@icm.csic.es

Technical support soporte.tecnico.revistas@csic.es