Feeding ecology of demersal elasmobranchs from the shelf and slope off the Balearic Sea (western Mediterranean)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2011.75n4633Keywords:
Elasmobranch, batoid, shark, feeding habits, diet overlap, niche breadth, MediterraneanAbstract
The feeding ecology of eight demersal elasmobranchs, three sharks (Etmopterus spinax, Scyliorhinus canicula and Galeus melastomus) and five batoids (Myliobatis aquila, Leucoraja naevus, Raja polystigma, R. miraletus and R. clavata), from the Balearic Sea (western Mediterranean) was analyzed. For each species, the diet and feeding habits were characterized by depth strata using quantitative indices such as diet overlap, diet breadth and prey diversity. Diet variation with size and depth were also tested for the most abundant species. For shelf-living species, natantian and reptantian crustaceans together with teleosts were the most important preys. On slope bottoms, euphausiids were the preferential prey for S. canicula and G. melastomus, while E. spinax fed mainly on cephalopods. The most specialist and generalist diet corresponded to G. melastomus living on the upper slope and S. canicula from the continental shelf, respectively. High overlap was found between all the skates on the continental shelf and the sympatric sharks S. canicula and G. melastomus on the slope. Significant overlap was also found between S. canicula and R. clavata on the continental shelf. Size was found to significantly affect the diet of S. canicula, G. melastomus and R. clavata, whereas depth affected exclusively S. canicula.
Downloads
References
Angel, M.V. and G.A. Boxshall. – 1990. Life in the Benthic Boundary-Layer - Connections to the Mid-Water and Sea-Floor. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A., 331: 15-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1990.0053
Azouz, J. and C. Capapé. – 1971. Les relations alimentaires entre les Sélaciens et le zoobenthos des côtes nord de la Tunisie. Bull. Inst. Natl. Sci. Tech. Oceanogr. Pêche Salammbo, 2: 121-130.
Bertrand, J.A. – 2002. Mediterranean marine demersal resources: The Medits international trawl survey (1994-1999) - Foreword. Sci. Mar., 66: 5-7.
Bizzarro, J.J., H.J. Robinson, C.S. Rinewalt and D.A. Ebert. – 2007. Comparative feeding ecology of four sympatric skate species off central California, USA. Environ. Biol. Fish., 80: 197-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10641-007-9241-6
Boyle, P.R. and P. Rodhouse. – 2005. Cephalopods: Ecology and fisheries. Oxford, UK.
Capapé, C. – 1976. Etude du régime alimentaire de l’aigle de mer, Myliobatis aquila (L. 1758) des côtes tunisiennes. J. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer., 37: 29-35.
Capapé, C. and J.P. Quignard. – 1974. Dimorphisme sexuel et observations biologiques sur Myliobatis aquila (L. 1758). Contribution à l’étude systématique du genre Myliobatis, Cuvier, 1817. Ann. Mus. Civ. St. Nat. Genova, 80: 1-27.
Carlson, J.K., K.J. Goldman and C.G. Lowe. – 2004. Metabolism, energetic demand, and endothermy. In: J.C. Carrier, J.A. Musick and M.R. Heithaus (eds.), Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives, pp. 203-224. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Carrasson, M., C. Stefanescu and J.E. Cartes. – 1992. Diets and Bathymetric Distributions of 2 Bathyal Sharks of the Catalan Deep-Sea (Western Mediterranean). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 82: 21-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps082021
Cartes, J.E. – 1998. Feeding strategies and partition of food resources in deep-water decapod crustaceans (400-2300 m). J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 78: 509-524. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002531540004159X
Cartes, J.E., M. Hidalgo, V. Papiol, E. Massuti and J. Moranta. – 2009. Changes in the diet and feeding of the hake Merluccius merluccius at the shelf-break of the Balearic Islands: Influence of the mesopelagic-boundary community. Deep-Sea Res Part I., 56: 344-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2008.09.009
Collwell, R.K. and D.J. Futuyma. – 1971. On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology, 52: 567-576. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1934144
Cortes, E. – 1997. A critical review of methods of studying fish feeding based on analysis of stomach contents: Application to elasmobranch fishes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 54: 726-738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-54-3-726
D’Onghia, G., A. Matarrese, A. Tursi and L. Sion. – 1995. Observations on the Depth Distribution Pattern of the Small-Spotted Catshark in the North Aegean Sea. J. Fish Biol., 47: 421-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1995.tb01911.x
Ellis, J.R., M.G. Pawson and S.E. Shackley. – 1996. The comparative feeding ecology of six species of shark and four species of ray (Elasmobranchii) in the north-east Atlantic. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 76: 89-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400029039
Farias, I., I. Figueiredo, T. Moura, L.S. Gordo, A. Neves and B. Serra-Pereira. – 2006. Diet comparison of four ray species (Raja clavata, Raja brachyura, Raja montagui and Leucoraja naevus) caught along the Portuguese continental shelf. Aquat. Living Resour., 19: 105-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/alr:2006010
Gomes, T.M., E. Sola, M.P. Gros, G. Menezes and M.R. Pinho. – 1998. Trophic relationships and feeding habits of demersal fishes from the Azores: importance to multispecies assessment. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 35:7-21.
Heithaus, M.R. – 2004. Predator - Prey interactions. In: Carrier J.C., Musick J.A., Heithaus, M.R. (eds.), Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives, pp. 487-521. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Holden, M.J. and R.N. Tucker. – 1974. Food of Raja clavata Linnaeus 1758, Raja montagui Fowler 1910, Raja naevus Muller and Henle 1841 and Raja brachyura Lafont 1873 in British Waters. J. Cons., 35: 189-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/35.2.189
Hurlbert, S.H. – 1978. Measurement of Niche Overlap and Some Relatives. Ecology, 59: 67-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1936632
Ishihara, H. – 1990. The skates and rays of the western North Pacific: an overview of their fisheries, utilization, and classification. In: Pratt H.L., Gruber S.H., Taniuchi T. (eds.), Elasmobranches as living resources: Advances in the biology, ecology, systematics and the status of the fisheries, pp. 485-497. NOAA Tech. Rep.90.
Jardas, I., M. Santic and A. Pallaoro. – 2004. Diet composition of the eagle ray, Myliobatis aquila (Chondrichthyes : Myliobatidae), in the eastern Adriatic Sea. Cybium, 28: 372-374.
Krebs, C.J. – 1999. Ecological Methodology. 2nd. ed. A. Wesley Longman, New York.
Macpherson, E. – 1977. Estudio sobre las relaciones tróficas en peces bentónicos de la costa catalana. PhD thesis, Univ. Barcelona.
Macpherson, E. – 1980. Régime alimentaire de Galeus melastomus Rafinesque, 1810, Etmopterus spinax (L., 1788) et Scymnorhinus licha (Bonnaterre, 1788) en Mediterranée Occidentale. Vie Milieu, 30: 139-148.
Massutí, E. and J. Moranta. – 2003. Demersal assemblages and depth distribution of elasmobranchs from the continental shelf and slope off the Balearic Islands (western Mediterranean). ICES J. Mar. Sci., 60: 753-766. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1054-3139(03)00089-4
Massutí, E. and O. Reñones. – 2005. Demersal resource assemblages in the trawl fishing grounds off the Balearic Islands (western Mediterranean). Sci. Mar., 69: 167-181.
Morato, T., E. Sola, M.P. Gros and G. Menezes. – 2003. Diets of thornback ray (Raja clavata) and tope shark (Galeorhinus galeus) in the bottom longline fishery of the Azores, northeastern Atlantic. Fish. Bull., 101: 590-602.
Motta, P.J. – 2004. Prey capture behavior and feeding mechanics of elasmobranchs. In: J.C. Carrier, J.A. Musick and M.R. Heithaus (eds.), Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives, pp. 165-202. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Olaso, I., F. Velasco and N. Perez. – 1998. Importance of discarded blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) in the diet of lesser spotted dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula) in the Cantabrian Sea. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 55: 331-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1997.0263
Olaso, I., F. Velasco, F. Sánchez, A. Serrano, C. Rodríguez-Cabello and O. Cendrero. – 2005. Trophic relation of lesser spotted catshark (Scyliorhinus canicula) and blackmouth catshark (Galeus melastomus) in the Cantabrian Sea. J. Northwest Atl. Fish. Soc., 35: 481-494.
Ordines, F. and E. Massutí. – 2009. Relationships between macro-epibenthic communities and fish on the shelf grounds of the western Mediterranean. Aquat. Conserv., 19: 370-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aqc.969
Ordines, F., E. Massutí, J. Moranta, A. Quetglas, B. Guijarro and K. Fliti. – 2011. Balearic Islands vs. Algeria: two nearby western Mediterranean elasmobranchs populations with different oceanographic scenarios and fishing histories. Sci. Mar., 75: 707-717. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2011.75n4707
Preciado, I., J.E. Cartes, A. Serrano, F. Velasco, I. Olaso, F. Sánchez and I. Frutos. – 2009. Resource utilization by deep-sea sharks at the Le Danois Bank, Cantabrian Sea, north-east Atlantic Ocean. J. Fish. Biol., 75: 1331-1355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02367.x PMid:20738618
Rinewalt, C.S., D.A. Ebert and G.M. Cailliet. – 2007. Food habits of the sandpaper skate, Bathyraja kincaidii (Garman, 1908) off central California: seasonal variation in diet linked to oceanographic conditions. Environ. Biol. Fish., 80: 147-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10641-007-9218-5
Romanelli, M., A. Colasante, U. Scacco, I. Consalvo, M.G. Finoia and M. Vacchi. – 2007. Commercial catches, reproduction and feeding habits of Raja asterias (Chondrichthyes: Rajidae) in a coastal area of the Tyrrhenian Sea (Italy, northern Mediterranean). Acta Adriat., 48: 57-71.
Ross, S.T. – 1977. Patterns of resource partitioning in searobins (Pisces: triglidae). Copeia. 561-571. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1443277
Saglam, H. and N.S. Bascinar. – 2008. Feeding ecology of thornback ray (Raja clavata Linnaeus, 1758) on the Turkish coast of the south-eastern Black Sea. Mar. Biol., 4: 451-457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17451000802233393
Saidi, B., M.N. Bradai and A. Bouain. – 2009. Reproductive biology and diet of Mustelus punctulatus (Risso, 1826) (Chondrichthyes: Triakidae) from the Gulf of Gabes, central Mediterranean Sea. Sci Mar., 73(2): 249-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2009.73n2249
Sala, E. and E. Ballesteros. – 1997. Partitioning of space and food resources by three fish of the genus Diplodus (Sparidae) in a Mediterranean rocky infralittoral ecosystem. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 152: 273-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps152273
Serrano, A., F. Velasco and I. Olaso. – 2003. Polychaete annelids in the diet of demersal fish from the southern shelf of the Bay of Biscay. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 83: 619-623. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025315403007550h
Stevens, J.D., R. Bonfil, N.K. Dulvy and P.A. Walker. – 2000. The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 57: 476-494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0724
ter Braak C.J.F. and P. Smilauer. – 1998. CANOCO reference manual and User’s Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York.
Wallace, R.K. – 1981. An assessment of diet-overlap indexes. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 110: 72-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1981)110<72:AAODI>2.0.CO;2
Werner, E.E. and J.F. Gilliam. – 1984. The Ontogenetic Niche and Species Interactions in Size Structured Populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 15: 393-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.15.110184.002141
Wetherbee, B.M. and E. Cortes. – 2004. Food consumption and feeding habits. In: J.C. Carrier, J.A. Musick and M.R. Heithaus (eds.), Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives, pp. 225-246. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.