<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SCIENTIA MARINA</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Scientia Marina</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title>Sci Mar</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="epub">0214-8358</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			 <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">sm4744</article-id>
			 <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3989/scimar.04744.31A</article-id>
			 
			
		<title-group>
			  <article-title>The abundance, diversity and distribution of small fishes in mangrove and non-mangrove estuaries in warm temperate South Africa</article-title>
			<trans-title-group xml:lang="es">
				<trans-title>Abundancia, diversidad y distribución de juveniles de peces en estuarios con y sin manglares en áreas templadas de Sudáfrica</trans-title>
			</trans-title-group>
			<alt-title alt-title-type="running-head">Small fishes in mangrove and non-mangrove estuaries</alt-title>
		</title-group>
	
		<contrib-group>
		<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no"> 
			<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1061-567X</contrib-id>
			<name>
				 <surname>McGregor</surname>
				 <given-names>Steven</given-names>
			</name>
			<xref ref-type="aff" rid="U1"/>
			<ext-link ext-link-type="email" xlink:href="mailto:s214045560@mandela.ac.za">s214045560@mandela.ac.za</ext-link>
		</contrib>
		<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"> 
			<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4292-8678</contrib-id>
			<name>
				 <surname>Strydom</surname>
				 <given-names>Nadine A.</given-names>
			</name>
			<xref ref-type="aff" rid="U1"/>
			<ext-link ext-link-type="email" xlink:href="mailto:Nadine.Strydom@mandela.ac.za">Nadine.Strydom@mandela.ac.za</ext-link>
		</contrib>
			  <aff id="U1">Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela University, P.O. Box 77000, Port Elizabeth, 6031 South Africa.</aff>
		 </contrib-group>
		 <contrib-group>
			<contrib contrib-type="editor">
				<name>
					<surname>Macpherson</surname>
					<given-names>E.</given-names>
				</name>
				<role>Editor</role>
			</contrib>
		</contrib-group>	 
		
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
		<day>30</day>
		<month>6</month>
		<year>2018</year>
		</pub-date>
		<pub-date pub-type="collection">
		<year>2018</year>
		</pub-date>
		
		<volume>82</volume>
		<issue>2</issue>
		<fpage>81</fpage>
		<lpage>93</lpage>
		
		<elocation-id content-type="doi">10.3989/scimar.04744.31A</elocation-id>

		 <history>
		  	<date date-type="received">
				<day>11</day>
				<month>12</month>
				<year>2017</year>
			</date>
			<date date-type="accepted">
				<day>31</day>
				<month>5</month>
				<year>2018</year>
			</date>
			<date date-type="published">
				<day>8</day>
				<month>6</month>
				<year>2018</year>
			</date>
		 </history>
		 
		<permissions>
		<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; 2018 CSIC</copyright-statement>
		<copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
		<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.</license-p>
		</license>
		</permissions>
		
		<abstract xml:lang="en">
		<title>SUMMARY</title>
		<p>Mangroves in tropical and subtropical regions have been well documented in terms of the advantages they provide and their role in structuring ichthyofaunal assemblages, but little is known about their warm temperate counterparts. The study aimed to investigate the importance of warm temperate mangroves by comparing the abundance, diversity and distribution of small fishes in mangrove and non-mangrove estuaries in warm temperate South Africa. A 50×2 m (12-mm mesh) seine net was used over three summer seasons to sample small fishes in the Gonubie, Qora, Nahoon and Xhora estuaries (the latter two being mangrove estuaries). Fish abundance and diversity showed little variation among estuaries, despite the presence of mangroves. Estuaries in warm temperate areas are not only at the edge of mangrove distribution, but also offer alternative habitats which lend similar advantages to fish survival. It appears that warm temperate ichthyofauna have not yet evolved a dependence on mangrove systems in terms of the food, refuge and other ecological services they provide. Understanding the function of habitats and their value in enhancing fish survival in estuarine nursery areas is essential for fish conservation.</p>
		</abstract>
		<trans-abstract xml:lang="es">
		<title>RESUMEN</title>
		<p>El papel de los manglares en la estructuración de las comunidades de peces en regiones tropicales y subtropicales está bien documentado, sin embargo, es poco conocido en las zonas templadas. El estudio investiga la importancia de los manglares de zonas templadas comparando la abundancia, diversidad y distribución de juveniles de peces en estuarios con y sin manglares de Sudáfrica. Se utilizó una red de cerco de 50 m (12 mm de malla) durante tres veranos para muestrear juveniles de peces en cuatro estuarios: Gonubie, Qora, Nahoon y Xhora (los dos últimos con manglares). La abundancia y diversidad de peces mostró una escasa variación entre estuarios, a pesar de la presencia o ausencia de manglares. Los estuarios de las zonas templadas están en los límites de distribución de los manglares y pueden, además, favorecer la supervivencia de los peces. Estos resultados implicarían que la ictiofauna no ha evolucionado todavía en sistemas de manglares en función de las ventajas (ej. alimento, refugio) que pueden proporcionar estos ecosistemas. El estudio de estos hábitats y su valor como refugio de los juveniles de peces es esencial para la conservación de estas especies.</p>
			
		</trans-abstract>
		<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
			<title>KEYWORDS</title>
			<kwd>ichthyofauna</kwd>
			<kwd>estuary usage</kwd>
			<kwd>juveniles</kwd>
			<kwd>nursery</kwd>
			<kwd>recruitment</kwd>
			<kwd>refuge</kwd>			
			<kwd>pneumatophores</kwd>
		</kwd-group>
		<kwd-group xml:lang="es">
			<title>PALABRAS CLAVE</title>
			<kwd>ictiofauna</kwd>
			<kwd>uso de los estuarios</kwd>
			<kwd>juveniles</kwd>
			<kwd>guardería</kwd>
			<kwd>reclutamiento</kwd>
			<kwd>refugio</kwd>
			<kwd>pneumatóforos</kwd>
		</kwd-group>
	 </article-meta>
	 </front>
	 <body>

<sec id="S1">
<title>INTRODUCTION</title>
			<p>Mangroves are distributed throughout the tropical regions of the globe, where their distribution is restricted to the 20°C winter seawater isotherm in both the southern and northern hemispheres (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT09">Duke 1993</xref>). In the southern hemisphere, mangroves extend further southward on the eastern sides of continents into warm temperate climatic regions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT14">Hogarth 2015</xref>). These warm, temperate mangrove stands typically contain fewer species (sometimes only a single species) than stands in the tropics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT14">Hogarth 2015</xref>). The complex prop-roots and pneumatophores of mangrove trees form a solid substrate within the intertidal and subtidal zones in estuaries, where they provide suitable habitat for a wide diversity of other floral and faunal life (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT10">Ellison and Farnsworth 1992</xref>). </p>
			<p>Mangrove forests are considered one of the most productive of all marine and coastal ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT08">Duarte and Cebrian 1996</xref>), contributing high levels of nutrients into estuarine ecosystems through detrital food chains starting with the decomposition of leaf litter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT29">Nagelkerken et al. 2008</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT18">Kristensen et al. (2008)</xref> noted that detritus from mangroves and benthic microalgae are typically the greatest contributors to autochthonous carbon sources in tropical estuarine ecosystems. This high nutrient input, coupled with the refuge and habitat which mangrove forests provide, lends an explanation for the high abundance and diversity of fishes associated with mangrove estuaries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT20">Laegdsgaard and Johnson 2001</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT05">Blaber 2007</xref>).</p>
			<p>Mangroves form a vital component in the life history of many fish species in both tropical and subtropical regions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT24">Mahesh and Saravanakumar 2015</xref>). Up to 30% of commercial fishery species globally have been found to be dependent on mangroves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT30">Naylor et al. 2000</xref>), which produced a total annual catch of approximately 30 million t in 2002 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT11">FAO 2004</xref>). In the Gulf of California fishery catches have been positively related to the abundance of nearby mangroves, which are utilized by numerous fishery species as a nursery and feeding area (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT01">Aburto-Oropeza et al. 2008</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT26">Mumby et al. (2004)</xref> also found that the biomass of important commercial fishery species is more than doubled when mangroves are utilized at some point in the fish’s life cycle. Numerous studies show similar findings, asserting that mangroves play a crucial role in sustaining production in fisheries (for example, see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT38">Rönnbäck 1999</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT25">Manson et al. 2005</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT01">Aburto-Oropeza et al. 2008</xref>). This typically forms the foundation for any management decisions with regard to the conservation and reestablishment of mangrove stands, as well as other important coastal wetland habitats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT25">Manson et al. 2005</xref>). Commercially important fish species commonly found utilizing mangroves as a nursery habitat include, among others, snappers (<italic>Lutjanus </italic>spp.),<italic> </italic>barracuda (<italic>Sphyraena barracuda</italic>), mullets (<italic>Chelon </italic>and <italic>Mugil</italic> spp.), groupers (<italic>Epinephelus </italic>spp.) and catfish (<italic>Arius</italic> and <italic>Tachysurus</italic> spp.) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT38">Rönnbäck 1999</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT22">Lugendo et al. 2005</xref>). </p>
			<p>Despite their economic and ecological importance, mangroves are under threat globally. Approximately 90% of mangroves occur in developing countries, where they are critically endangered and on the brink of local extinction in 26 known countries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT17">Kathiresan 2008</xref>). Experts suggest that ecosystem services offered by mangroves may be lost within the next century (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT17">Kathiresan 2008</xref>). Threats to mangroves include habitat clearing for aquaculture and development, harvesting of wood for fuel and timber, hydrological alterations within estuaries, pollution and climate change (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT03">Alongi 2002</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT12">Gilman et al. 2008</xref>). </p>
			<p>In South Africa, mangroves are restricted to the eastern coastline and can be found in 37 estuaries covering almost 1700 ha (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT02">Adams et al. 2004</xref>). Dominant mangrove species in South Africa include the white mangrove (<italic>Avicennia</italic> <italic>marina</italic>), the black mangrove (<italic>Bruguiera</italic> <italic>gymnorrhiza</italic>) and the red mangrove (<italic>Rhizophora</italic> <italic>mucronata</italic>), with the former extending to the southeastern warm temperate coast (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT23">Macnae 1963</xref>). The southeastern coast forms home to the majority of mangrove estuaries in South Africa, and the lack of infrastructure and scientific knowledge in the region makes conservation and management of this habitat type difficult. </p>
			<p>The role of mangroves in warm temperate regions remains relatively unstudied in terms of the advantages they provide (including a refuge/nursery habitat for larval- and juvenile-stage fishes and feeding opportunities). It is therefore important to investigate the role of warm temperate mangroves for fishes utilizing estuaries as nursery areas, especially since these vegetation types are under threat. This knowledge of ecosystem value will help to enable the proper conservation of habitats for fishes. The aim of the study was to investigate catches of juvenile and small adult fishes during the peak summer recruitment period in mangrove and non-mangrove estuaries to determine whether differences in catches exist, and whether mangrove presence lends an advantage to fish survival in warm temperate South Africa. It was hypothesized that mangrove estuaries would have a greater abundance and diversity of young fishes than non-mangrove estuaries.</p>
		</sec>
<sec id="S2">
<title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title>
<sec id="S2.1">
<title>Study site</title>
			<p>Four estuaries (Nahoon, Gonubie, Qora and Xhora), all of which drain into the Indian Ocean, were selected within the warm temperate region of the Eastern Cape, South Africa (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Fig. 1</xref>). Estuarine selection was based on similar geomorphological and biological features: All four estuaries had permanently open mouths and similar drainage basin areas, river and estuary sizes, and available habitats. The Nahoon Estuary (32°59′S; 27°57′E) is situated furthest south of the four estuaries sampled, and falls on the edge of the southern limit of mangrove distribution in Africa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT36">Quisthoudt et al. 2013</xref>). Three mangrove species have been introduced into the Nahoon Estuary from Durban Bay since 1969, including the white, black, and red mangroves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT40">Saintilan et al. 2014</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT15">Hoppe-Speer et al. 2015</xref>). The Gonubie Estuary (32°56′S, 28°02′E) is situated 10 km to the east of Nahoon Estuary and can be found north of the city of East London. The Gonubie Estuary is relatively similar to the Nahoon Estuary in terms of watershed size and available habitat, but there are no mangroves in the Gonubie Estuary. The Nahoon and Gonubie estuaries are situated within urban development areas, and this has led to the anthropogenic alteration of both systems. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT51">Whitfield and Baliwe (2013)</xref> described both the health and condition of the Nahoon Estuary as fair, and the same parameters of the Gonubie Estuary as good. The Qora Estuary (32°27′S, 28°40′E) is situated approximately 80 km northeast of Gonubie Estuary, and the literature shows no historical evidence of mangroves in this estuary (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT46">Ward and Steinke 1982</xref>). The Xhora Estuary (32°10′S, 29°00′E) lies north of the Qora Estuary, roughly 290 km northeast of East London, forming the northern boundary of this study. A number of mangrove stands are present in the lower reaches of the Xhora Estuary (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT46">Ward and Steinke 1982</xref>). The Qora and Xhora estuaries are located along the rural Wild Coast (formerly Transkei), where infrastructure and development are lacking, so humans have little impact on these estuaries. However, due to poverty and lack of management in the region, mangrove and salt marsh habitat are often cut down for wood and grazed by livestock. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT51">Whitfield and Baliwe (2013)</xref> described the Qora and Xhora estuaries as being in excellent and good condition respectively, and the health of both estuaries as good.</p>
						<fig id="F1">
				<label>Fig. 1</label>
				<caption>
				<title>Geographical locations of the four estuaries sampled on the south eastern coast of warm temperate South Africa.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm82n2-4744-web-resources/image/sm4744fig1.jpg"/>
			</fig>

</sec>
<sec id="S2.2">
<title>Data collection</title>
			<p>Field sampling took place over a three-year period from 2015 to 2017, with data collected over the first-quarter moon phase in January of each year. Prior to sampling, five fixed sites were chosen remotely along the length of each estuary and marked using a GPS. Sites were spaced at one-kilometre intervals, with the first site being situated approximately 500 m from each estuary mouth. Physico-chemical measurements including temperature (°C), turbidity (NTU), salinity (PSU), conductivity (S m<sup>–1</sup>), pH, dissolved oxygen (mg L<sup>–1</sup>), and total dissolved solids were measured at each site using a YSI-6600 multimeter. Habitat type was also recorded at each site based on sediment and vegetation type. Six different habitat types were identified, including mud, mud and mangrove, mud and rock, mud and <italic>Nanozostera</italic>, sand, and sand and mangrove. Habitat types in the upper reaches of each estuary were characteristically muddy and rocky, while the lower 2 km were mostly sand. The middle reaches were mostly muddy, with mangroves present in the Nahoon and Xhora estuaries and absent in the Gonubie and Qora estuaries.</p>
  <p>Small fishes were sampled at each site using a 50x2 m seine net with a 12-mm stretched mesh. The seine net was deployed from a boat and pulled ashore, covering an estimated area of 400 m<sup>2</sup>. A consistent deployment of the seine net was maintained at each site, while a heavy sinker line allowed the net to be dragged through eelgrass (<italic>Nanozostera</italic> <italic>capensis</italic>) beds and over the pneumatophores of mangroves in order to obtain quantifiable results among sites and estuaries.</p>
			<p>All fishes were identified in situ to the species level, measured (in millimetres) and quantified prior to being released back into the estuary. Individuals which could not be identified in the field were placed in sample jars containing a 10% formalin solution for further identification in the laboratory. Fishes were identified in the laboratory by doing lateral line scale counts, as well as teeth counts for Mugilidae species following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT45">van der Elst and Wallace (1976)</xref>. Once identified, all fishes were categorized into estuarine usage guilds following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT35">Potter et al. (2015)</xref>, with categorization determined following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT49">Whitfield (1994b)</xref>. </p>
			</sec>
<sec id="S2.3">
<title>Statistical analyses</title>
  <p>Prior to statistical analyses, all factors were tested for normality and homogeneity of variance using the Shapiro-Wilk test and Levene test, respectively. Of the environmental variables, temperature and dissolved oxygen met the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance, and so did turbidity after square-root transformation. Therefore, parametric tests (one-way ANOVA and Tukey test) were used for these variables. The remaining environmental variables did not meet parametric assumptions, even after transformation, so non-parametric tests were used. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare non-parametric environmental variables among years, estuaries, sites and habitats. The Mann-Whitney test was then used to further explore the data if the Kruskal-Wallis test returned a significant <italic>p</italic>-value (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05). The Bonferroni Correction was applied for post hoc use of Mann-Whitney tests at a 0.025 level of significance. </p>
			<p>Catch data were separated into marine and estuarine usage guilds, which were analysed independently to avoid any confounding effects of different estuary use by fishes that are resident versus immigrant. Fish communities were explored using diversity indices (Margalef species richness and Shannon-Wiener diversity) in PRIMER v.6 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT07">Clarke and Gorley 2006</xref>). Catch data did not meet the assumptions of parametric tests, so non-parametric tests were used. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare species richness, abundance and diversity among years, estuaries, sites and habitats. </p>
			<p>Generalized additive models were used to explore trends of species richness, abundance and diversity in relation to physico-chemical variables, as well as the influence that mangrove presence or absence and habitat type had on the same catch parameters. Catch data of fishes from each guild and of dominant species were added to the generalized additive models using a negative binomial distribution with log link. Rare species were removed from the model. The physico-chemical variables for each GAM were determined using forward stepwise variable selection. When habitat type was added to the model, dispersion was tested with ‘dispersiontest’ by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT06">Cameron and Trivedi (1990)</xref>. A Poisson distribution with log link was used when there was under-dispersion and a Quasi-poisson distribution with log link when there was over-dispersion. The Akaike information criterion was used to select the model with the best fit. Statistical analyses were conducted using R and RStudio (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT44">R Core Team 2017</xref>) with the packages <italic>mgcv</italic>, <italic>VEGAN</italic>, and <italic>ggplot2</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT52">Wickham 2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT54">Wood et al. 2016</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT31">Oksanen et al. 2017</xref>).</p>
		</sec>
		</sec>
<sec id="S3">
<title>RESULTS</title>
<sec id="S3.1">
<title>Environmental variability</title>
			<p>Within estuaries, horizontal physico-chemical variables exhibited a relatively uniform gradient (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Fig. 2</xref>). Temperature in the Gonubie Estuary was the only variable with significant variability among sites, with upper sites (Sites 1 and 2) being significantly warmer than lower sites nearest the mouth (Sites 4 and 5) (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05).</p>
						<fig id="F2">
				<label>Fig. 2</label>
				<caption>
				<title>Environmental variables averaged over 2015-2017 per site within each of the four estuaries sampled (bars=range).</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm82n2-4744-web-resources/image/sm4744fig2.jpg"/>
			</fig>

<p>Among the estuaries, the variables temperature, salinity, pH and dissolved oxygen varied significantly, though all four estuaries shared a similar climate regime due to their geographical location. Mean temperatures were significantly warmer in the more northern (Qora and Xhora) estuaries than in the Gonubie Estuary in the south of the study area (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01). Mean salinity varied significantly between the Nahoon and Qora estuaries, as well as between the Gonubie and Qora estuaries (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.025), with the Nahoon and Gonubie estuaries exhibiting a more uniform mean salinity gradient throughout the sites sampled. The Xhora Estuary had a significantly higher mean pH than the remaining three estuaries (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.025). Mean dissolved oxygen (mg L<sup>–1</sup>) was only significantly higher in the Qora Estuary than in the the Nahoon Estuary (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.025). Physico-chemical variations in these parameters were also evident inter-annually among estuaries (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.025). </p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.2">
<title>Species composition and estuary association</title>
			<p>Over the three-year study period, a total of 11625 fishes were caught among all four estuaries sampled, including fishes from both the marine and estuarine guilds. Catches consisted of 52 taxa represented by 26 families, with only 17 taxa making up 97% of the total catch (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). The most speciose families were Gobiidae, Mugilidae and Sparidae, which were comprised of eight, seven and six species respectively. The marine guild made up 67% of the overall catch, representing 7763 individuals from 40 taxa. The estuarine guild had a lower overall abundance and species richness, comprised of 3862 individuals from 12 taxa. <italic>Rhabdosargus holubi</italic> was the most abundant species, with a total of 5136 individuals captured, accounting for 44% of the overall catch. <italic>Gilchristella aestuaria</italic> was the second most abundant species, with 2145 individuals accounting for 18% of the catch. </p>
				<table-wrap id="T1">
			<label>Table 1</label>
		<caption>
			<title>Species composition per estuarine usage guild, catch per unit effort (CPUE), mean length, total number of individuals caught (N) and percent of total catch recorded for each estuary sampled between 2015 and 2017. FEO, freshwater estuarine opportunists; SE, solely estuarine; E&amp;M, estuarine and marine; MEO, marine migrant estuarine opportunists; MED, marine migrant estuarine-dependents; MS, marine stragglers.</title>
		</caption>
		<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
  <thead>
			      <tr>
			        <th colspan="3" />                    
			        <th colspan="4"> Nahoon
			          
		            </th>
			        <th colspan="4"> Gonubie
			          
		            </th>
			        <th colspan="4"> Qora
			          
		            </th>
			        <th colspan="4"> Xhora
			          
		            </th>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <th> Guild
			          
		            </th>
			        <th> Family
			          
		            </th>
			        <th> Species
			          
		            </th>
			        <th> Mean CPUE (range)
			          
		            </th>
			        <th> Mean length (mm) (range)
			          
		            </th>
			        <th> N
			          
		            </th>
			        <th> Total catch (%)
			          
		            </th>
			        <th> Mean CPUE (range)
			          
		            </th>
			        <th> Mean length (mm) (range)
			          
		            </th>
			        <th> N
			          
		            </th>
			        <th> Total catch (%)
			          
		            </th>
			        <th> Mean CPUE (range)
			          
		            </th>
			        <th> Mean length (mm) (range)
			          
		            </th>
			        <th> N
			          
		            </th>
			        <th> Total catch (%)
			          
		            </th>
			        <th> Mean CPUE (range)
			          
		            </th>
			        <th> Mean length (mm) (range)
			          
		            </th>
			        <th> N
			          
		            </th>
			        <th> Total catch (%)
			          
		            </th>
		          </tr>
		        </thead>
			    <tbody>
			      <tr>
			        <td rowspan="12"> Estuarine
		            </td>
			        <td rowspan="2"> Ambassidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Ambassis natalensis </italic>(E&amp;M)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 58.9
			          
			          (47-73)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 51.0
			          
			          (51-51)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.3
			          
			          (0-25)
		            </td>
			        <td> 54.3
			          
			          (42-67)
		            </td>
			        <td> 25
		            </td>
			        <td> 5
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Ambassis dussumieri </italic>(E&amp;M)
		            </td>
			        <td> 8.0
			          
			          (0-601)
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 601
		            </td>
			        <td> 56
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td> Atherinidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Atherina breviceps </italic>(E&amp;M)
		            </td>
			        <td> 2.3
			          
			          (0-140)
		            </td>
			        <td> 66.4
			          
			          (26-82)
		            </td>
			        <td> 173
		            </td>
			        <td> 16
		            </td>
			        <td> 1.1
			          
			          (0-43)
		            </td>
			        <td> 70.6
			          
			          (50-85)
		            </td>
			        <td> 82
		            </td>
			        <td> 23
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.4
			          
			          (0-22)
		            </td>
			        <td> 67.5
			          
			          (58-84)
		            </td>
			        <td> 27
		            </td>
			        <td> 5
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td> Clupeidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Gilchristella aestuaria </italic>(SE)
		            </td>
			        <td> 2.9
			          
			          (0-74)
		            </td>
			        <td> 62.0
			          
			          (29-80)
		            </td>
			        <td> 217
		            </td>
			        <td> 20
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.4
			          
			          (0-7)
		            </td>
			        <td> 54.4
			          
			          (20-78)
		            </td>
			        <td> 28
		            </td>
			        <td> 8
		            </td>
			        <td> 21.1
			          
			          (0-943)
		            </td>
			        <td> 60.9
			          
			          (21-90)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1580
		            </td>
			        <td> 83
		            </td>
			        <td> 4.3
			          
			          (0-100)
		            </td>
			        <td> 62.6
			          
			          (50-90)
		            </td>
			        <td> 320
		            </td>
			        <td> 62
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td rowspan="8"> Gobiidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Caffrogobius gilchristi </italic>(E&amp;M)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.5
			          
			          (0-12)
		            </td>
			        <td> 56.1
			          
			          (22-80)
		            </td>
			        <td> 37
		            </td>
			        <td> 3
		            </td>
			        <td> 2.0
			          
			          (0-44)
		            </td>
			        <td> 56.8
			          
			          (27-94)
		            </td>
			        <td> 152
		            </td>
			        <td> 42
		            </td>
			        <td> 2.0
			          
			          (0-96)
		            </td>
			        <td> 59.9
			          
			          (28-98)
		            </td>
			        <td> 152
		            </td>
			        <td> 8
		            </td>
			        <td> 1.4
			          
			          (0-29)
		            </td>
			        <td> 56.3
			          
			          (28-90)
		            </td>
			        <td> 104
		            </td>
			        <td> 20
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Caffrogobius natalensis </italic>(E&amp;M)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-3)
		            </td>
			        <td> 56.3
			          
			          (41-76)
		            </td>
			        <td> 3
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-9)
		            </td>
			        <td> 67.8
			          
			          (49-95)
		            </td>
			        <td> 9
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-3)
		            </td>
			        <td> 78.6
			          
			          (67-94)
		            </td>
			        <td> 5
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Caffrogobius nudiceps </italic>(E&amp;M)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.2
			          
			          (0-7)
		            </td>
			        <td> 56.7
			          
			          (41-77)
		            </td>
			        <td> 14
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-2)
		            </td>
			        <td> 54.5
			          
			          (44-64)
		            </td>
			        <td> 4
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.2
			          
			          (0-15)
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 15
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Glossogobius callidus </italic>(E&amp;M)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-3)
		            </td>
			        <td> 69.6
			          
			          (63-78)
		            </td>
			        <td> 5
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 1.1
			          
			          (0-36)
		            </td>
			        <td> 65.3
			          
			          (28-90)
		            </td>
			        <td> 81
		            </td>
			        <td> 23
		            </td>
			        <td> 1.8
			          
			          (0-54)
		            </td>
			        <td> 71.7
			          
			          (48-95)
		            </td>
			        <td> 136
		            </td>
			        <td> 7
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.3
			          
			          (0-9)
		            </td>
			        <td> 64.8
			          
			          (35-81)
		            </td>
			        <td> 24
		            </td>
			        <td> 5
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Glossogobius giuris</italic> (FEO)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-2)
		            </td>
			        <td> 71.5
			          
			          (65-78)
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Oligolepis acutipennis </italic>(SE)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 76.0
			          
			          (76-76)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-2)
		            </td>
			        <td> 59.0
			          
			          (54-61)
		            </td>
			        <td> 4
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Oxyurichthys keiensis </italic>(SE)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-3)
		            </td>
			        <td> 77.8
			          
			          (60-95)
		            </td>
			        <td> 5
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Psammogobius knysnaensis </italic>(E&amp;M)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.3
			          
			          (0-9)
		            </td>
			        <td> 37.2
			          
			          (20-60)
		            </td>
			        <td> 21
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-7)
		            </td>
			        <td> 36.1
			          
			          (28-49)
		            </td>
			        <td> 11
		            </td>
			        <td> 3
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.3
			          
			          (0-20)
		            </td>
			        <td> 31.7
			          
			          (24-42)
		            </td>
			        <td> 20
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-3)
		            </td>
			        <td> 38.3
			          
			          (37-41)
		            </td>
			        <td> 3
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td rowspan="40"> Marine
		            </td>
			        <td> Ariidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Galeichthys feliceps </italic>(MEO)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.5
			          
			          (0-34)
		            </td>
			        <td> 66.1
			          
			          (54-144)
		            </td>
			        <td> 37
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-6)
		            </td>
			        <td> 64.0
			          
			          (56-74)
		            </td>
			        <td> 6
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td> Bothidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Bothus pantherinus </italic>(MS)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-2)
		            </td>
			        <td> 70.5
			          
			          (70-71)
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 94.0
			          
			          (94-94)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td rowspan="3"> Carangidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Caranx sexfasciatus </italic>(MEO)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-6)
		            </td>
			        <td> 57.6
			          
			          (47-71)
		            </td>
			        <td> 7
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-4)
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 3
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-3)
		            </td>
			        <td> 81.0
			          
			          (53-115)
		            </td>
			        <td> 4
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-4)
		            </td>
			        <td> 70.0
			          
			          (51-102)
		            </td>
			        <td> 10
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Lichia amia </italic>(MED)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 110.0
			          
			          (61-164)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-3)
		            </td>
			        <td> 126.5
			          
			          (90-196)
		            </td>
			        <td> 4
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-4)
		            </td>
			        <td> 171.6
			          
			          (89-447)
		            </td>
			        <td> 5
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Trachurus delagoa </italic>(MS)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 64.5
			          
			          (64-65)
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td> Gerreidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Gerres filamentosus </italic>(MEO)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 85.0
			          
			          (85-85)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-7)
		            </td>
			        <td> 68.6
			          
			          (55-95)
		            </td>
			        <td> 7
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td rowspan="2"> Haemulidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Pomadasys commersonnii </italic>(MED)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.7
			          
			          (0-14)
		            </td>
			        <td> 118.1
			          
			          (34-290)
		            </td>
			        <td> 55
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 1.1
			          
			          (0-51)
		            </td>
			        <td> 88.8
			          
			          (46-430)
		            </td>
			        <td> 80
		            </td>
			        <td> 3
		            </td>
			        <td> 4.2
			          
			          (0-171)
		            </td>
			        <td> 121.9
			          
			          (14-295)
		            </td>
			        <td> 316
		            </td>
			        <td> 15
		            </td>
			        <td> 2.0
			          
			          (0-56)
		            </td>
			        <td> 83.1
			          
			          (34-330)
		            </td>
			        <td> 149
		            </td>
			        <td> 15
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Pomadasys olivaceus </italic>(MEO)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1.0
			          
			          (0-47)
		            </td>
			        <td> 66.1
			          
			          (42-143)
		            </td>
			        <td> 72
		            </td>
			        <td> 3
		            </td>
			        <td> 1.4
			          
			          (0-37)
		            </td>
			        <td> 61.7
			          
			          (38-105)
		            </td>
			        <td> 106
		            </td>
			        <td> 4
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-3)
		            </td>
			        <td> 28.3
			          
			          (22-40)
		            </td>
			        <td> 3
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td> Leiognathidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Leiognathus equula </italic>(MED)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 80.0
			          
			          (80-80)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td> Lutjanidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Lutjanus fulviflamma </italic>(MEO)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 37.8
			          
			          (32-41)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td rowspan="2"> Monodactylidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Monodactylus falciformis </italic>(MED)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.2
			          
			          (0-15)
		            </td>
			        <td> 30.8
			          
			          (21-40)
		            </td>
			        <td> 15
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-2)
		            </td>
			        <td> 23.5
			          
			          (19-28)
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-3)
		            </td>
			        <td> 48.4
			          
			          (25-74)
		            </td>
			        <td> 8
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Monodactylus argenteus </italic>(MED)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-2)
		            </td>
			        <td> 68.0
			          
			          (57-76)
		            </td>
			        <td> 3
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td rowspan="6"> Mugilidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Chelon dumerili </italic>(MED)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1.7
			          
			          (0-43)
		            </td>
			        <td> 136.9
			          
			          (50-256)
		            </td>
			        <td> 129
		            </td>
			        <td> 6
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.9
			          
			          (0-50)
		            </td>
			        <td> 197.0
			          
			          (30-310)
		            </td>
			        <td> 68
		            </td>
			        <td> 3
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.3
			          
			          (0-9)
		            </td>
			        <td> 155.3
			          
			          (78-280)
		            </td>
			        <td> 20
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 92.0
			          
			          (92-92)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Chelon richardsonii </italic>(MEO)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.7
			          
			          (0-25)
		            </td>
			        <td> 98.5
			          
			          (43-175)
		            </td>
			        <td> 55
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 1.1
			          
			          (0-27)
		            </td>
			        <td> 116.7
			          
			          (35-210)
		            </td>
			        <td> 84
		            </td>
			        <td> 3
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.4
			          
			          (0-26)
		            </td>
			        <td> 77.1
			          
			          (60-247)
		            </td>
			        <td> 28
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-4)
		            </td>
			        <td> 95.5
			          
			          (56-180)
		            </td>
			        <td> 5
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Chelon tricuspidens </italic>(MEO)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.3
			          
			          (0-13)
		            </td>
			        <td> 177.6
			          
			          (55-281)
		            </td>
			        <td> 23
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.5
			          
			          (0-14)
		            </td>
			        <td> 146.5
			          
			          (30-390)
		            </td>
			        <td> 40
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-7)
		            </td>
			        <td> 99.3
			          
			          (61-108)
		            </td>
			        <td> 8
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-6)
		            </td>
			        <td> 119.4
			          
			          (47-312)
		            </td>
			        <td> 11
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Mugil cephalus </italic>(MED)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-2)
		            </td>
			        <td> 94.5
			          
			          (64-127)
		            </td>
			        <td> 4
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-4)
		            </td>
			        <td> 75.1
			          
			          (45-176)
		            </td>
			        <td> 7
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-5)
		            </td>
			        <td> 63.6
			          
			          (59-67)
		            </td>
			        <td> 5
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 181.0
			          
			          (181-181)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Planiliza macrolepis </italic>(MED)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-2)
		            </td>
			        <td> 143.0 (128-158)
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 144.5
			          
			          (33-256)
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 126.0 (126-126)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-2)
		            </td>
			        <td> 101.7
			          
			          (50-200)
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Pseudomyxus capensis </italic>(MED)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-4)
		            </td>
			        <td> 98.5
			          
			          (62-175)
		            </td>
			        <td> 7
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.8
			          
			          (0-37)
		            </td>
			        <td> 99.2
			          
			          (28-142)
		            </td>
			        <td> 62
		            </td>
			        <td> 3
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.3
			          
			          (0-9)
		            </td>
			        <td> 149.4
			          
			          (23-286)
		            </td>
			        <td> 24
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 41.0
			          
			          (34-48)
		            </td>
			        <td> 3
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td> Paralichthyidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Pseudorhombus arsius </italic>(MS)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 72.0
			          
			          (72-72)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td> Platycephalidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Platycephalus indicus</italic> (MEO)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-2)
		            </td>
			        <td> 430.0
			          
			          (350-510)
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td> Pomatomidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Pomatomus saltatrix </italic>(MEO)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 1.8
			          
			          (0-135)
		            </td>
			        <td> 74.5
			          
			          (60-84)
		            </td>
			        <td> 138
		            </td>
			        <td> 6
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 67.0
			          
			          (67-67)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-2)
		            </td>
			        <td> 94.7
			          
			          (88-106)
		            </td>
			        <td> 3
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td> Rhinobatidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Acroteriobatus annulatus </italic>(MS)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-2)
		            </td>
			        <td> 720.0 (720-720)
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 760.0
			          
			          (760-760)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td> Sciaenidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Argyrosomus japonicas</italic> (MED)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 263.3 (234-286)
		            </td>
			        <td> 3
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-4)
		            </td>
			        <td> 221.9 (109-405)
		            </td>
			        <td> 8
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1 (0-5)
		            </td>
			        <td> 182.5
			          
			          (64-390)
		            </td>
			        <td> 11
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td> Siganidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Siganus sutor </italic>(MS)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-2)
		            </td>
			        <td> 46.5
			          
			          (46-47)
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td rowspan="2"> Soleidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Heteromycteris capensis </italic>(MEO)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.7
			          
			          (0-23)
		            </td>
			        <td> 47.7
			          
			          (37-60)
		            </td>
			        <td> 50
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.3
			          
			          (0-6)
		            </td>
			        <td> 55.6
			          
			          (23-164)
		            </td>
			        <td> 21
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Solea turbynei </italic>(MED)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1.5
			          
			          (0-47)
		            </td>
			        <td> 55.2
			          
			          (33-80)
		            </td>
			        <td> 109
		            </td>
			        <td> 5
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.6
			          
			          (0-16)
		            </td>
			        <td> 57.0
			          
			          (35-97)
		            </td>
			        <td> 46
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.9
			          
			          (0-24)
		            </td>
			        <td> 57.3
			          
			          (23-95)
		            </td>
			        <td> 71
		            </td>
			        <td> 3
		            </td>
			        <td> 1.0
			          
			          (0-19)
		            </td>
			        <td> 52.6
			          
			          (26-77)
		            </td>
			        <td> 74
		            </td>
			        <td> 7
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td rowspan="7"> Sparidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Diplodus capensis </italic>(MEO)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.8
			          
			          (0-19)
		            </td>
			        <td> 50.1
			          
			          (38-62)
		            </td>
			        <td> 58
		            </td>
			        <td> 3
		            </td>
			        <td> 1.7
			          
			          (0-75)
		            </td>
			        <td> 59.7
			          
			          (21-151)
		            </td>
			        <td> 125
		            </td>
			        <td> 5
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Diplodus cervinus </italic>(MS)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 116.0
			          
			          (54-178)
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-5)
		            </td>
			        <td> 57.6
			          
			          (41-125)
		            </td>
			        <td> 7
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Lithognathus lithognathus </italic>(MED)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-2)
		            </td>
			        <td> 177.5 (165-190)
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 45.0
			          
			          (45-45)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Rhabdosargus globiceps </italic>(MEO)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.2
			          
			          (0-14)
		            </td>
			        <td> 90.8
			          
			          (36-170)
		            </td>
			        <td> 14
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-4)
		            </td>
			        <td> 78.8
			          
			          (50-110)
		            </td>
			        <td> 4
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 80.0
			          
			          (65-95)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Rhabdosargus holubi </italic>(MED)
		            </td>
			        <td> 21.4
			          
			          (0-487)
		            </td>
			        <td> 86.2
			          
			          (23-207)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1607
		            </td>
			        <td> 72
		            </td>
			        <td> 16.1
			          
			          (0-549)
		            </td>
			        <td> 83.3
			          
			          (11-420)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1210
		            </td>
			        <td> 50
		            </td>
			        <td> 21.1
			          
			          (5-406)
		            </td>
			        <td> 74.9
			          
			          (12-184)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1586
		            </td>
			        <td> 75
		            </td>
			        <td> 9.8
			          
			          (0-423)
		            </td>
			        <td> 62.9
			          
			          (28-130)
		            </td>
			        <td> 733
		            </td>
			        <td> 72
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Sarpa salpa </italic>(MEO)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 4.2
			          
			          (0-312)
		            </td>
			        <td> 71.1
			          
			          (58-90)
		            </td>
			        <td> 313
		            </td>
			        <td> 13
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Acanthopagrus vagus </italic>(MED)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 310.0 (310-310)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 287.0
			          
			          (287-287)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td> Sphyraenidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Sphyraena jello </italic>(MEO)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-2)
		            </td>
			        <td> 97.3
			          
			          (90-110)
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td> Terapontidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Terapon jarbua </italic>(MED)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-2)
		            </td>
			        <td> 166.0 (148-184)
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-3)
		            </td>
			        <td> 68.0
			          
			          (25-120)
		            </td>
			        <td> 5
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 75.0
			          
			          (75-75)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td rowspan="3"> Tetraodontidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Arothron immaculatus </italic>(MEO)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-4)
		            </td>
			        <td> 56.0
			          
			          (32-93)
		            </td>
			        <td> 6
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 74.0
			          
			          (74-74)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 55.0
			          
			          (55-55)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Arothron hispidus </italic>(MEO)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 67.0
			          
			          (67-67)
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Geneion honckenii</italic> (MEO)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.5
			          
			          (0-21)
		            </td>
			        <td> 107.4
			          
			          (61-170)
		            </td>
			        <td> 34
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> 45.0
			          
			          (43-47)
		            </td>
			        <td> 2
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td> Torpedinidae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Torpedo sinuspersici </italic>(MEO)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-1)
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 1
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.0
			          
			          (0-2)
		            </td>
			        <td> 301.0
			          
			          (33-440)
		            </td>
			        <td> 3
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 321.0
			          
			          (308-348)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td> Trichiuridae
		            </td>
			        <td><italic>Trichiurus lepturus </italic>(MS)
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> -
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
			        <td> 0.1
			          
			          (0-4)
		            </td>
			        <td />                    
			        <td> 4
		            </td>
			        <td> 0
		            </td>
		          </tr>
		        </tbody>
		      </table>
	  </table-wrap>
<p>Within the estuarine guild, significant differences in size were recorded among estuaries for <italic>G. aestuaria</italic> and <italic>Glossogobius callidus</italic>. The mean size of <italic>G. aestuaria</italic> caught in the Gonubie Estuary was significantly smaller (54.4 mm mean length) than that of those caught in the Nahoon, Qora and Xhora estuaries (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01), which had mean lengths of 62.0, 60.9 and 62.6 mm, respectively. The mean size of <italic>G. callidus</italic> individuals caught in the Qora Estuary was significantly larger (71.7 mm mean length) than that of individuals caught in both the Gonubie and Xhora estuaries (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01), which had mean lengths of 65.3 and 64.8 mm, respectively.</p>
			<p>In the marine guild, significant differences in length were recorded for <italic>Pomadasys commersonnii</italic>, the mugilids <italic>Chelon dumerili</italic>, <italic>C. richardsonii</italic> and <italic>C. tricuspidens</italic>, and <italic>R. holubi</italic>. The largest mean size of <italic>P. commersonnii</italic> was recorded in the Qora Estuary (121.9 mm) and the smallest in the Xhora Estuary (83.1 mm). Within the Mugilidae, similar size ranges were recorded in all the estuaries sampled. The largest mugilid species was <italic>C. dumerili</italic>, with the greatest mean length being recorded in the Gonubie Estuary (197.0 mm). The smallest mean length of a mugilid species (<italic>C. richardsonii</italic>) was recorded in the Qora Estuary (77.1 mm). The mean size of the dominant sparid <italic>R. holubi</italic> was greatest in the Nahoon Estuary (86.2 mm), followed by the Gonubie Estuary (83.3 mm), with the Xhora Estuary having the smallest mean size (62.9 mm). </p>
  <p class="title3">Fish community composition and habitat use </p>
			<p>Species diversity showed a decreasing trend from the mouth towards the upper reaches within each estuary, but there were no significant differences among estuaries or among habitats (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Fig. 3</xref>). The Gonubie Estuary had the greatest species diversity (H’=1.4) and the Qora Estuary the lowest (H’=1). The Gonubie Estuary also had the highest mean species richness (ten species), closely followed by the Nahoon Estuary (nine species). The Qora and Xhora estuaries both had a mean species richness of seven species. </p>
						<fig id="F3">
				<label>Fig. 3</label>
				<caption>
				<title>Mean species diversity (H’) in each habitat type between 2015 and 2017. Gonubie and Qora estuaries: mangroves absent; Nahoon and Xhora estuaries: mangroves present. M, mud; MM, mud and mangrove; MR, mud and rock; MZ, mud and <italic>Nanozostera</italic>; S, sand; SM, sand and mangrove (bars=range).</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm82n2-4744-web-resources/image/sm4744fig3.jpg"/>
			</fig>

<p>Nahoon Estuary had the greatest habitat complexity at the sites sampled, with a total of five different habitat types. The Qora and Xhora estuaries each had four recorded habitat types, while the Gonubie Estuary showed the lowest habitat complexity with only three habitat types. The sand and mangrove habitat in the Nahoon Estuary had the greatest mean species diversity (H’=1.8), followed by the sand and mud habitats in the Gonubie and Qora estuaries, respectively (H’=1.6). Mud habitat had the most consistently high mean species diversity across all four estuaries sampled. </p>
			<p>There was no significant difference in the catch per unit effort (CPUE) of fishes within both the estuarine and marine guilds among habitat types (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Fig. 4</xref>). Marine species, especially the marine estuarine-dependents, exhibited a high degree of habitat plasticity and dominated the catch throughout all habitat types. Fishes classified within the estuarine and marine category, as well as solely the estuarine category, also displayed habitat plasticity throughout the habitats sampled. Marine stragglers and marine estuarine opportunists were more abundant in the lower reaches of the estuaries sampled, where the sand habitat was predominant, than further upstream, where mud and rocks were predominant. </p>
						<fig id="F4">
				<label>Fig. 4</label>
				<caption>
				<title>Percentage of total catch per unit effort (CPUE) per guild recorded in each habitat type (2015-2017). M, mud; MM, mud and mangrove; MR, mud and rock; MZ, mud and <italic>Nanozostera</italic>; S, sand; SM, sand and mangrove. FEO, freshwater estuarine opportunists; SE, solely estuarine; E&amp;M, estuarine and marine; MEO, marine migrant estuarine opportunists; MED, marine migrant estuarine-dependents; MS, marine stragglers.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm82n2-4744-web-resources/image/sm4744fig4.jpg"/>
			</fig>

<p>The habitats contributing the highest percentage of the total CPUE (combining fishes from all guilds) included mud and <italic>Nanozostera</italic> (26.5%), mud and rock (25%) and mud (21.1%). Mangrove habitats made little contribution to the total CPUE, with the mud and mangrove and sand and mangrove habitats contributing only 7.6% and 4.6%, respectively, to the overall CPUE combining fishes across all guilds. </p>
			<p>When the CPUE of dominant species from the estuarine guild was compared between habitat type, it was found that mud and rock habitat contributed the highest percentage of the overall CPUE of dominant species (13%), followed by mud (8%) and mud and <italic>Nanozostera</italic> (6%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Fig. 5A</xref>). Dominant fishes from the estuarine guild exhibited habitat plasticity, barring <italic>A. dussumieri</italic>, which can be explained by a single, large capture event at one site in the Nahoon Estuary. </p>
						<fig id="F5">
				<label>Fig. 5</label>
				<caption>
				<title>Percentage of total catch per unit effort (CPUE) of dominant species recorded in each habitat type (2015-2017). A, estuarine species; B, marine species. M, mud; MM, mud and mangrove; MR, mud and rock; MZ, mud and <italic>Nanozostera</italic>; S, sand; SM, sand and mangrove.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm82n2-4744-web-resources/image/sm4744fig5.jpg"/>
			</fig>

<p>Within the marine guild, mud and <italic>Nanozostera </italic>habitat contributed the highest CPUE of dominant species (19% overall), followed by the mud and sand habitats, which each contributed 13%, closely followed by the mud and rock habitat, which contributed 12% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Fig. 5B</xref>). Dominant marine species also displayed a high degree of habitat plasticity, although the majority of marine species were recorded at habitats nearest to the mouth of the four estuaries sampled. These habitats included sand, and habitats with mangroves in the two respective mangrove estuaries. Fewer marine species were found further upstream, which was characterized by habitats of mud or the combination of mud and rock. </p>
			<p class="title3">Relationship between fish abundance and environmental variables</p>
  <p>Generalized additive models were used to explore the influence of physico-chemical parameters and habitat type on species distributions. The presence of mangroves was included as a factor in all generalized additive models. The response variables analysed were species richness of all taxa and within guilds, as well as the abundance of dominant species. Species diversity was excluded from the models due to the high similarity among estuaries and habitat types.</p>
			<p>The abundances of fishes within the marine guild were best described by a model using conductivity (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Fig. 6</xref>). Peaks in species abundance were observed at conductivities between 41 and 48 S m<sup>–1</sup> for species in the marine guild. The model that best fitted the abundance of fishes from the estuarine guild included temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen and habitat type. Peaks in abundance for the estuarine guild were observed between temperatures of 22°C and 24°C, with a smaller peak occurring at 26.5°C. Within the same model, there was a peak in abundance between conductivity readings of 29 and 31 S m<sup>–1</sup>, with a smaller peak between 10 and 15 S m<sup>–1</sup>. Although dissolved oxygen was not significant in the model, abundance was shown to increase with increasing dissolved oxygen concentrations. </p>
				<table-wrap id="T2">
			<label>Table 2</label>
		<caption>
			<title>Generalized additive model outputs for abundance data of fishes from all taxa, per guild and for dominant species recorded in all estuaries sampled between 2015 and 2017. Temp, temperature (°C); NTU, turbidity; sal, salinity; DO, dissolved oxygen (mg L<sup>–1</sup>); TDS, total dissolved solids; con, conductivity; hab, habitat type. (Significance codes *** <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001; **&lt;0.01; *&lt;0.05).</title>
		</caption>
		<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
  <thead>
			      <tr>
			        <th> Grouping (no. species) </th>
			        <th> Deviance explained (%) </th>
			        <th> Significant variable(s) </th>
		          </tr>
		        </thead>
			    <tbody>
			      <tr>
			        <td align="left"> Abundance </td>
			        <td />                    
			        <td />                    
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td> All taxa (52) </td>
			        <td> 31.1 </td>
			        <td> con* </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td> Estuarine (12) </td>
			        <td> 65.1 </td>
			        <td> temp* sal** hab*** </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td> Marine (30) </td>
			        <td> 17.5 </td>
			        <td> con** </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td align="left"> Dominant species </td>
			        <td />                    
			        <td />                    
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Atherina breviceps</italic></td>
			        <td> 70.6 </td>
			        <td> temp** DO** hab*** </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Gilchristella aestuaria</italic></td>
			        <td> 79.4 </td>
			        <td> temp*** sal*** DO*** hab*** </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Caffrogobius gilchristi</italic></td>
			        <td> 68.1 </td>
			        <td> NTU** TDS* </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Pomadasys commersonnii</italic></td>
			        <td> 65.9 </td>
			        <td> temp*** sal*** hab* </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Pomadasys olivaceus</italic></td>
			        <td> 44.5 </td>
			        <td> sal* </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Chelon dumerili</italic></td>
			        <td> 63.7 </td>
			        <td> temp** sal*** </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Chelon richardsonii</italic></td>
			        <td> 75.6 </td>
			        <td> con* </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Chelon tricuspidens</italic></td>
			        <td> 13.4 </td>
			        <td> temp* </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Pseudomyxus capensis</italic></td>
			        <td> 81.5 </td>
			        <td> temp*** sal** </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Solea turbynei</italic></td>
			        <td> 74.2 </td>
			        <td> NTU*** DO *** hab** </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Diplodus capensis</italic></td>
			        <td> 23.3 </td>
			        <td> sal** </td>
		          </tr>
			      <tr>
			        <td><italic>Rhabdosargus holubi</italic></td>
			        <td> 14.5 </td>
			        <td> temp** </td>
		          </tr>
		        </tbody>
		      </table>
  </table-wrap>
  			<fig id="F6">
				<label>Fig. 6</label>
				<caption>
				<title>Relationships between fish abundance and environmental variables in all estuaries sampled over the period 2015-2017. GAM output plots include estuarine fish abundance (A) and marine fish abundance (B), and correspond to the results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm82n2-4744-web-resources/image/sm4744fig6.jpg"/>
			</fig>

  <p>For the dominant species within the estuarine guild, the abundance of <italic>Atherina breviceps</italic> was best explained by models incorporating temperature, dissolved oxygen and habitat. For <italic>G. aestuaria</italic>, a model with temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen and habitat best explained abundance, while a model including turbidity and total dissolved solids best explained <italic>C. gilchristi</italic> abundance. Within the marine guild, temperature and salinity were significant variables influencing the abundances of <italic>P. commersonnii, C. dumerili </italic>and<italic> Pseudomyxus capensis</italic>. Temperature also influenced abundances of <italic>C. tricuspidens</italic> and <italic>R. holubi</italic>, while salinity had an impact on <italic>P. olivaceus</italic> and <italic>D. capensis</italic>. Habitat type also affected the abundances of both <italic>P. commersonnii</italic> and <italic>S. turbynei</italic>, the latter of which was also influenced by turbidity and dissolved oxygen. <italic>C. richardsonii</italic> was the only species for which conductivity had the greatest influence on abundance.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S4">
<title>DISCUSSION</title>
			<p>The study aimed to investigate the importance of mangroves for small fishes in warm temperate South Africa. This was the first study of its kind in the region, and it was unknown whether mangroves play an important role in structuring fish communities as their tropical and subtropical counterparts do. Physico-chemical variables measured showed little variation among the four estuaries sampled, because the estuaries fall within the same climatic region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT51">Whitfield and Baliwe 2013</xref>). There was low variation in species abundance and diversity between mangrove and non-mangrove estuaries for fishes from both the estuarine and marine guilds. Therefore, the hypothesis that mangrove estuaries would have a greater abundance and diversity of young fishes than non-mangrove estuaries is rejected. Generalized additive models indicated that temperature, conductivity and dissolved oxygen were the most important variables structuring the abundance and distribution of fishes from the estuarine guild, while conductivity was the most important for fishes from the marine guild. </p>
			<p>The regulation of freshwater flow into estuaries has been identified as a potential threat to estuarine ecosystem structure and function, and to the productivity of fisheries in particular (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT39">Saintilan and Wen 2012</xref>). Both the Gonubie and Nahoon estuaries had lower freshwater input due to water abstraction and the presence of dams, weirs and causeways along their rivers than the Qora and Xhora estuaries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT53">Wiseman et al. 1993</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT51">Whitfield and Baliwe 2013</xref>). This reduced freshwater input in the Gonubie and Nahoon estuaries could explain the greater intrusion of marine fishes in these two estuaries, which is indicated by the higher species richness and diversity of fishes from the marine guild. These findings differ from those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT48">Whitfield (1994a)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT34">Pattrick and Strydom (2014)</xref>, who recorded greater densities of larvae and juvenile marine fishes in more turbid estuaries with a higher freshwater input and moderate to high axial salinity gradients in studies conducted in warm temperate South African estuaries. </p>
			<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT04">Beck et al. (2001)</xref> assert that environmental processes functioning in nursery habitats need to provide greater contributions to juvenile survival and adult recruitment from a combination of the following four factors: growth, density, juvenile survival and migration to adult habitats. Mangrove stands are associated with high abundance and diversity of fishes and have the well-known function of forming essential fish nurseries in estuaries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT37">Robertson and Duke 1987</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT19">Laegdsgaard and Johnson 1995</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT26">Mumby et al. 2004</xref>), because they contribute to the four factors mentioned above by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT04">Beck et al. (2001)</xref>. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT50">Whitfield (2017)</xref>, different juvenile fish assemblages are supported within different aquatic plant habitats, with some fish species selecting a particular habitat when given a choice of nursery areas within an estuary. However, when a particular preferred nursery area is not present within a system, juveniles will have to use another littoral habitat or move elsewhere. For example, some marine estuarine-dependents such as the flathead mullet (<italic>Mugil</italic> <italic>cephalus</italic>) are able to use nearshore coastal waters as alternative nurseries to estuaries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT21">Lenanton and Potter 1987</xref>). The flathead mullet has a strong propensity to enter estuaries, but can also make use of coastal waters as a nursery habitat in regions where estuaries are absent and still recruit significant numbers of individuals into adulthood (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT21">Lenanton and Potter 1987</xref>).</p>
			<p>Although numerous studies note that the abundance and diversity of fishes is greater in mangrove habitats in tropical areas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT37">Robertson and Duke 1987</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT27">Nagelkerken et al. 2001</xref>), additional literature suggests that other habitats within estuaries also account for high abundance and diversity of fishes, while offering similar nursery functions as mangroves. For example, some studies have shown that seagrass beds, salt marshes and reed beds have an important nursery function for fishes while also providing feeding opportunities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT04">Beck et al. 2001</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT28">Nagelkerken et al. 2002</xref>). The presence of alternative habitat types in the four estuaries sampled may therefore be a possible explanation for the low variation in species abundance and diversity between mangrove and non-mangrove estuaries. All estuaries had eelgrass (<italic>Nanozostera capensis</italic>) beds, which <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT32">Paterson and Whitfield (1997)</xref> identified as an important feeding area for fishes in the Kariega Estuary in South Africa. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT47">Weerts and Cyrus (2002)</xref> also found that eelgrass beds actually support a higher abundance and diversity of fishes than neighbouring mangrove habitats in subtropical South African estuaries. Salt marsh is another important habitat type that is commonly found in warm temperate South African estuaries and often contains <italic>Phragmites</italic> reeds, among other floral species. The stems of <italic>Phragmites</italic> spp. typically house a significant biomass of epiphytic algae (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT16">Karosienė and Kasperovičienė 2012</xref>), which offer an additional food source for fishes, while the reeds themselves offer refuge from predators. </p>
			<p>Additionally, all four estuaries sampled had a number of shallow mud and sand banks, both of which made large contributions to the overall percentage of CPUE of dominant species. It is thought that these shallow habitats could offer a refuge for young fishes that are vulnerable to predation. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT32">Paterson and Whitfield (2000)</xref> provide evidence that shallow portions of estuaries provide a refuge for small fishes, because shallow areas are often more turbid than deeper areas and are also typically inaccessible to larger piscivorous fishes. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT41">Sheaves et al. (2015)</xref> also noted that during an ebb tide submerged macrophytic vegetation can drain and become exposed, thus forcing small fishes into adjacent deeper water where the likelihood of encountering larger piscivorous fishes is greater. </p>
			<p>Ultimately, estuaries with an availability of a variety of nursery habitat types are more beneficial to the survival of young fishes and are able to support a greater abundance and diversity of ichthyofauna than estuaries with low habitat complexity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT13">Gratwicke and Speight 2005</xref>). Estuaries in South Africa offer a range of complex juvenile nursery habitats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT50">Whitfield 2017</xref>). This habitat complexity, coupled with steep gradients of environmental variables (such as turbidity), may improve the recruitment and survival of larvae and juveniles within these systems and thus promote high species richness and diversity in comparison with estuarine systems that are near void of littoral vegetation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT13">Gratwicke and Speight 2005</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT50">Whitfield 2017</xref>). </p>
			<p>Although no significant differences in abundance and diversity were found between mangrove and non-mangrove estuaries in the study, it is important to not write off mangroves as significant refuge and habitat providers in warm temperate regions. The loss of habitat provided by mangroves has been found to significantly reduce the abundance and diversity of ichthyofaunal assemblages, which could potentially have cascading effects at higher trophic levels, leading to severe consequences for fisheries and food production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT25">Manson et al. 2005</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT01">Aburto-Oropeza et al. 2008</xref>). In the present study, fish abundance and diversity was spread across a range of habitats, including mangroves. The loss of mangroves in warm temperate regions would therefore still have significant impacts for fishes utilizing estuaries. Mangroves are at the edge of their distributional range in warm temperate regions, and as a result cover less area than their counterparts in tropical and subtropical areas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT43">Stevens et al. 2006</xref>). Warm temperate ichthyofauna have thus not yet needed to evolve a dependence on mangroves and their services, because other estuarine habitats offer similar refuge and feeding advantages. Furthermore, food is the limiting factor in seasonally mediated ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT42">Short et al. 1990</xref>), making specific niche use a limitation in the broader foraging regimes typical of many marine fishes using estuaries. </p>
			<p>The present study provides preliminary insights into the use of warm temperate mangroves by small fishes. In the event of future studies, it is suggested that a greater number of warm temperate mangrove estuaries be sampled to provide a larger database to assess the importance of mangroves in warm temperate regions in greater depth. Knowledge on the function of habitats and their role in enhancing fish survival in estuarine nursery areas is a crucial asset for fish conservation. </p>
			</sec>
			</body>
			<back>
<ack>
<title>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS</title>
			<p>The authors extend their thanks to Eugin Bornman for imparting his statistical knowledge, and to Cuen Muller, Eugin Bornman, Kyle Hewett and Taryn Smit, who assisted with data collection and fieldwork. Thanks are also given to the Nelson Mandela University for providing infrastructural support and equipment for the duration of this study.</p>
		</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>REFERENCES</title>
	<ref id="CIT01">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Aburto-Oropeza</surname>
				  <given-names>O.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Ezcurra</surname>
				  <given-names>E.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Danemann</surname>
				  <given-names>G.</given-names>
				</name>
<etal/>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Mangroves in the Gulf of California increase fishery yields</article-title>
			 <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source>
			 <year>2008</year>
			 <volume>105</volume>
			 <fpage>10456</fpage>
			 <lpage>10459</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804601105">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804601105</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT02">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Adams</surname>
				  <given-names>J.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Colloty</surname>
				  <given-names>B.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Bate</surname>
				  <given-names>G.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>The distribution and state of mangroves along the coast of Transkei, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa</article-title>
			 <source>Wetlands Ecol. Manage.</source>
			 <year>2004</year>
			 <volume>12</volume>
			 <fpage>531</fpage>
			 <lpage>541</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-005-5165-0">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-005-5165-0</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT03">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Alongi</surname>
				  <given-names>D.M.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Present state and future of the world's mangrove forests</article-title>
			 <source>Environ. Conserv.</source>
			 <year>2002</year>
			 <volume>29</volume>
			 <fpage>331</fpage>
			 <lpage>349</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892902000231">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892902000231</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT04">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Beck</surname>
				  <given-names>M.W.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Heck</surname>
				  <given-names>K.L.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Able</surname>
				  <given-names>K.W.</given-names>
				</name>
<etal/>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates: A better understanding of the habitats that serve as nurseries for marine species and the factors that create site-specific variability in nursery quality will improve conservation and management of these areas</article-title>
			 <source>BioScience</source>
			 <year>2001</year>
			 <volume>51</volume>
			 <fpage>633</fpage>
			 <lpage>641</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0633:TICAMO]2.0.CO;2">https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0633:TICAMO]2.0.CO;2</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT05">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Blaber</surname>
				  <given-names>S.J.M.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Mangroves and fishes: Issues of diversity, dependence, and dogma</article-title>
			 <source>Bull. Mar. Sci.</source>
			 <year>2007</year>
			 <volume>80</volume>
			 <fpage>457</fpage>
			 <lpage>472</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT06">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Cameron</surname>
				  <given-names>A.C.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Trivedi</surname>
				  <given-names>P.K.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson model</article-title>
			 <source>J. Econometrics</source>
			 <year>1990</year>
			 <volume>46</volume>
			 <fpage>347</fpage>
			 <lpage>364</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90014-K">https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90014-K</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT07">
	    <element-citation publication-type="book">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
			<name>
			  <surname>Clarke</surname>
			  <given-names>K.R.</given-names>
			</name>	
			<name>
			  <surname>Gorley</surname>
			  <given-names>R.M.</given-names>
			</name>
			</person-group>		
			<source>PRIMER v6</source>
			<year>2006</year>
			<publisher-loc>Plymouth, UK</publisher-loc>
			<publisher-name>PRIMER-E Ltd</publisher-name>		
		</element-citation>	  
	</ref>	
	<ref id="CIT08">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Duarte</surname>
				  <given-names>C.M.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Cebrian</surname>
				  <given-names>J.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>The fate of marine autotrophic production</article-title>
			 <source>Limnol. Oceanogr.</source>
			 <year>1996</year>
			 <volume>41</volume>
			 <fpage>1758</fpage>
			 <lpage>1766</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1996.41.8.1758">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1996.41.8.1758</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT09">
	    <element-citation publication-type="book">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
			<name>
			  <surname>Duke</surname>
			  <given-names>N.C.</given-names>
			</name>	
			</person-group>		
			<source>Mangrove floristics and biogeography</source>
			<year>1993</year>
			<publisher-loc>Washington D.C.</publisher-loc>
			<publisher-name>Am. Geophys. Union</publisher-name>	
		</element-citation>	  
	</ref>	
	<ref id="CIT10">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Ellison</surname>
				  <given-names>A.M.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Farnsworth</surname>
				  <given-names>E.J.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>The ecology of Belizean mangrove-root fouling communities: patterns of epibiont distribution and abundance, and effects on root growth</article-title>
			 <source>Hydrobiologia</source>
			 <year>1992</year>
			 <volume>247</volume>
			 <fpage>87</fpage>
			 <lpage>98</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00008207">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00008207</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT11">
	    <element-citation publication-type="report">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
			<name>
			  <collab>FAO</collab>
			</name>
			</person-group>		
			<source>The state of world fisheries and aquaculture (SOFIA)</source>
			<year>2004</year>
			<publisher-loc>Rome</publisher-loc>
			<publisher-name>FAO</publisher-name>			
		</element-citation>	  
	</ref>	
	<ref id="CIT12">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Gilman</surname>
				  <given-names>E.L.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Ellison</surname>
				  <given-names>J.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Duke</surname>
				  <given-names>N.C.</given-names>
				</name>
<etal/>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Threats to mangroves from climate change and adaptation options: A review</article-title>
			 <source>Aquat. Bot.</source>
			 <year>2008</year>
			 <volume>89</volume>
			 <fpage>237</fpage>
			 <lpage>250</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.009">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.009</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT13">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Gratwicke</surname>
				  <given-names>B.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Speight</surname>
				  <given-names>M.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>The relationship between fish species richness, abundance and habitat complexity in a range of shallow tropical marine habitats</article-title>
			 <source>J. Fish Biol.</source>
			 <year>2005</year>
			 <volume>66</volume>
			 <fpage>650</fpage>
			 <lpage>667</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2005.00629.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-1112.2005.00629.x</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT14">
	    <element-citation publication-type="book">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
			<name>
			  <surname>Hogarth</surname>
			  <given-names>P.J.</given-names>
			</name>	
			</person-group>		
			<source>The biology of mangroves and seagrasses</source>
			<year>2015</year>
			<publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>
			<publisher-name>Oxford Univ. Press</publisher-name>		
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716549.001.0001">https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198716549.001.0001</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>	  
	</ref>	
	<ref id="CIT15">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Hoppe-Speer</surname>
				  <given-names>S.C.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Adams</surname>
				  <given-names>J.B.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Rajkaran</surname>
				  <given-names>A.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Mangrove expansion and population structure at a planted site, East London, South Africa</article-title>
			 <source>South. Forests</source>
			 <year>2015</year>
			 <volume>77</volume>
			 <fpage>131</fpage>
			 <lpage>139</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT16">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Karosienė</surname>
				  <given-names>J.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Kasperovičienė</surname>
				  <given-names>J.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Peculiarities of epiphyton algal communities formation on different macrophyte species</article-title>
			 <source>Bot. Lithuanica</source>
			 <year>2012</year>
			 <volume>18</volume>
			 <fpage>154</fpage>
			 <lpage>163</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2478/v10279-012-0017-3">https://doi.org/10.2478/v10279-012-0017-3</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT17">
	    <element-citation publication-type="book">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
			<name>
			  <surname>Kathiresan</surname>
			  <given-names>K.</given-names>
			</name>	
			</person-group>		
			<source>Threats to mangroves</source>
			<year>2008</year>
			<publisher-loc>India</publisher-loc>
			<publisher-name>Annamalai Univ., Cent. Adv. Study Mar. Biol.</publisher-name>			
			<fpage>476</fpage>
			<lpage>483</lpage>
		</element-citation>	  
	</ref>	
	<ref id="CIT18">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Kristensen</surname>
				  <given-names>E.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Bouillon</surname>
				  <given-names>S.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Dittmar</surname>
				  <given-names>T.</given-names>
				</name>
<etal/>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Organic carbon dynamics in mangrove ecosystems: A review</article-title>
			 <source>Aquat. Bot.</source>
			 <year>2008</year>
			 <volume>89</volume>
			 <fpage>201</fpage>
			 <lpage>219</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.005">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.005</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT19">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Laegdsgaard</surname>
				  <given-names>P.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Johnson</surname>
				  <given-names>C.R.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Mangrove habitats as nurseries: Unique assemblages of juvenile fish in subtropical mangroves in eastern Australia</article-title>
			 <source>Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.</source>
			 <year>1995</year>
			 <volume>126</volume>
			 <fpage>67</fpage>
			 <lpage>81</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps126067">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps126067</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT20">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
					 <name>
				  <surname>Laegdsgaard</surname>
				  <given-names>P.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Johnson</surname>
				  <given-names>C.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Why do juvenile fish utilise mangrove habitats?</article-title>
			 <source>J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.</source>
			 <year>2001</year>
			 <volume>257</volume>
			 <fpage>229</fpage>
			 <lpage>253</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(00)00331-2">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(00)00331-2</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT21">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Lenanton</surname>
				  <given-names>R.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Potter</surname>
				  <given-names>I.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Contribution of estuaries to commercial fisheries in temperate Western Australia and the concept of estuarine dependence</article-title>
			 <source>Estuaries</source>
			 <year>1987</year>
			 <volume>10</volume>
			 <fpage>28</fpage>
			 <lpage>28</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1352022">https://doi.org/10.2307/1352022</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT22">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Lugendo</surname>
				  <given-names>B.R.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Pronker</surname>
				  <given-names>A.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Cornelissen</surname>
				  <given-names>I.</given-names>
				</name>
<etal/>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Habitat utilisation by juveniles of commercially important fish species in a marine embayment in Zanzibar, Tanzania</article-title>
			 <source>Aquat. Living Resour.</source>
			 <year>2005</year>
			 <volume>18</volume>
			 <fpage>149</fpage>
			 <lpage>158</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1051/alr:2005016">https://doi.org/10.1051/alr:2005016</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT23">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Macnae</surname>
				  <given-names>W.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Mangrove swamps in South Africa</article-title>
			 <source>J. Ecol.</source>
			 <year>1963</year>
			 <volume>51</volume>
			 <fpage>1</fpage>
			 <lpage>25</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2257502">https://doi.org/10.2307/2257502</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT24">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Mahesh</surname>
				  <given-names>R.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Saravanakumar</surname>
				  <given-names>A.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Temporal and spatial variability of fin fish assemblage structure in relation to their environmental parameters in Pichavaram mangrove ecosystem, India</article-title>
			 <source>Indian J. Mar. Sci.</source>
			 <year>2015</year>
			 <volume>44</volume>
			 <fpage>910</fpage>
			 <lpage>923</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT25">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Manson</surname>
				  <given-names>F.J.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Loneragan</surname>
				  <given-names>N.R.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Skilleter</surname>
				  <given-names>G.A.</given-names>
				</name>
<etal/>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>An evaluation of the evidence for linkages between mangroves and fisheries: A synthesis of the literature and identification of research directions</article-title>
			 <source>Oceanogr. Mar. Biol.</source>
			 <year>2005</year>
			 <volume>43</volume>
			 <fpage>483</fpage>
			 <lpage>483</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT26">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Mumby</surname>
				  <given-names>P.J.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Edwards</surname>
				  <given-names>A.J.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Arias-González</surname>
				  <given-names>J.E.</given-names>
				</name>
<etal/>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Mangroves enhance the biomass of coral reef fish communities in the Caribbean</article-title>
			 <source>Nature</source>
			 <year>2004</year>
			 <volume>427</volume>
			 <fpage>533</fpage>
			 <lpage>536</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02286">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02286</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT27">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Nagelkerken</surname>
				  <given-names>I.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Kleijnen</surname>
				  <given-names>S.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Klop</surname>
				  <given-names>T.</given-names>
				</name>
<etal/>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Dependence of Caribbean reef fishes on mangroves and seagrass beds as nursery habitats: A comparison of fish faunas between bays with and without mangroves/seagrass beds</article-title>
			 <source>Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.</source>
			 <year>2001</year>
			 <volume>214</volume>
			 <fpage>225</fpage>
			 <lpage>235</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps214225">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps214225</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT28">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Nagelkerken</surname>
				  <given-names>I.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Roberts</surname>
				  <given-names>C.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Van Der Velde</surname>
				  <given-names>G.</given-names>
				</name>
<etal/>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>How important are mangroves and seagrass beds for coral-reef fish? The nursery hypothesis tested on an island scale</article-title>
			 <source>Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.</source>
			 <year>2002</year>
			 <volume>244</volume>
			 <fpage>299</fpage>
			 <lpage>305</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps244299">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps244299</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT29">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Nagelkerken</surname>
				  <given-names>I.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Blaber</surname>
				  <given-names>S.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Bouillon</surname>
				  <given-names>S.</given-names>
				</name>
<etal/>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>The habitat function of mangroves for terrestrial and marine fauna: A review</article-title>
			 <source>Aquat. Bot.</source>
			 <year>2008</year>
			 <volume>89</volume>
			 <fpage>155</fpage>
			 <lpage>185</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.007">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.12.007</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT30">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Naylor</surname>
				  <given-names>R.L.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Goldburg</surname>
				  <given-names>R.J.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Primavera</surname>
				  <given-names>J.H.</given-names>
				</name>
<etal/>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies</article-title>
			 <source>Nature</source>
			 <year>2000</year>
			 <volume>405</volume>
			 <fpage>1017</fpage>
			 <lpage>1024</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/35016500">https://doi.org/10.1038/35016500</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT31">
	    <element-citation publication-type="software">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
			<name>
			  <surname>Oksanen</surname>
			  <given-names>J.</given-names>
			</name>	
			<name>
			  <surname>Blanchet</surname>
			  <given-names>F.G.</given-names>
			</name>
			<name>
			  <surname>Friendly</surname>
			  <given-names>M.</given-names>
			</name>
<etal/>
			</person-group>		
			<source>VEGAN: Community Ecology Package</source>
			<year>2017</year>
			<comment>R package version 2.4-4</comment>
		</element-citation>	  
	</ref>	
	<ref id="CIT32">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Paterson</surname>
				  <given-names>A.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Whitfield</surname>
				  <given-names>A.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>A stable carbon isotope study of the food-web in a freshwater-deprived South African estuary, with particular emphasis on the ichthyofauna</article-title>
			 <source>Est. Coast. Shelf Sci.</source>
			 <year>1997</year>
			 <volume>45</volume>
			 <fpage>705</fpage>
			 <lpage>715</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.1997.0243">https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.1997.0243</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT33">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Paterson</surname>
				  <given-names>A.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Whitfield</surname>
				  <given-names>A.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Do shallow-water habitats function as refugia for juvenile fishes?</article-title>
			 <source>Est. Coast. Shelf Sci.</source>
			 <year>2000</year>
			 <volume>51</volume>
			 <fpage>359</fpage>
			 <lpage>364</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.2000.0640">https://doi.org/10.1006/ecss.2000.0640</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT34">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Pattrick</surname>
				  <given-names>P.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Strydom</surname>
				  <given-names>N.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Recruitment of fish larvae and juveniles into two estuarine nursery areas with evidence of ebb tide use</article-title>
			 <source>Est. Coast. Shelf Sci.</source>
			 <year>2014</year>
			 <volume>149</volume>
			 <fpage>120</fpage>
			 <lpage>132</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2014.08.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2014.08.003</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT35">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Potter</surname>
				  <given-names>I.C.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Tweedley</surname>
				  <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Elliott</surname>
				  <given-names>M.</given-names>
				</name>
<etal/>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>The ways in which fish use estuaries: A refinement and expansion of the guild approach</article-title>
			 <source>Fish Fish.</source>
			 <year>2015</year>
			 <volume>16</volume>
			 <fpage>230</fpage>
			 <lpage>239</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12050">https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12050</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT36">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Quisthoudt</surname>
				  <given-names>K.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Adams</surname>
				  <given-names>J.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Rajkaran</surname>
				  <given-names>A.</given-names>
				</name>
<etal/>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Disentangling the effects of global climate and regional land-use change on the current and future distribution of mangroves in South Africa</article-title>
			 <source>Biodivers. Conserv.</source>
			 <year>2013</year>
			 <volume>22</volume>
			 <fpage>1369</fpage>
			 <lpage>1390</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0478-4">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0478-4</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT37">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Robertson</surname>
				  <given-names>A.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Duke</surname>
				  <given-names>N.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Mangroves as nursery sites: Comparisons of the abundance and species composition of fish and crustaceans in mangroves and other nearshore habitats in tropical Australia</article-title>
			 <source>Mar. Biol.</source>
			 <year>1987</year>
			 <volume>96</volume>
			 <fpage>193</fpage>
			 <lpage>205</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427019">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00427019</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT38">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Rönnbäck</surname>
				  <given-names>P.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>The ecological basis for economic value of seafood production supported by mangrove ecosystems</article-title>
			 <source>Ecol. Econ.</source>
			 <year>1999</year>
			 <volume>29</volume>
			 <fpage>235</fpage>
			 <lpage>252</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00016-6">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00016-6</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT39">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Saintilan</surname>
				  <given-names>N.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Wen</surname>
				  <given-names>L.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Environmental predictors of estuarine fish landings along a temperate coastline</article-title>
			 <source>Est. Coast. Shelf Sci.</source>
			 <year>2012</year>
			 <volume>113</volume>
			 <fpage>221</fpage>
			 <lpage>230</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2012.08.007">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2012.08.007</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT40">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Saintilan</surname>
				  <given-names>N.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Wilson</surname>
				  <given-names>N.C.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Rogers</surname>
				  <given-names>K.</given-names>
				</name>
<etal/>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Mangrove expansion and salt marsh decline at mangrove poleward limits</article-title>
			 <source>Global Change Biol.</source>
			 <year>2014</year>
			 <volume>20</volume>
			 <fpage>147</fpage>
			 <lpage>157</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12341">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12341</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT41">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Sheaves</surname>
				  <given-names>M.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Baker</surname>
				  <given-names>R.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Nagelkerken</surname>
				  <given-names>I.</given-names>
				</name>
<etal/>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>True value of estuarine and coastal nurseries for fish: Incorporating complexity and dynamics</article-title>
			 <source>Estuar. Coasts</source>
			 <year>2015</year>
			 <volume>38</volume>
			 <fpage>401</fpage>
			 <lpage>414</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-014-9846-x">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-014-9846-x</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT42">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Short</surname>
				  <given-names>F.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Dennison</surname>
				  <given-names>W.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Capone</surname>
				  <given-names>D.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Phosphorus-limited growth of the tropical seagrass <italic>Syringodium filiforme</italic> in carbonate sediments</article-title>
			 <source>Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.</source>
			 <year>1990</year>
			 <volume>60</volume>
			 <fpage>169</fpage>
			 <lpage>174</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps062169">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps062169</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT43">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Stevens</surname>
				  <given-names>P.W.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Fox</surname>
				  <given-names>S.L.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Montague</surname>
				  <given-names>C.L.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>The interplay between mangroves and saltmarshes at the transition between temperate and subtropical climate in Florida</article-title>
			 <source>Wetlands Ecol. Manage.</source>
			 <year>2006</year>
			 <volume>14</volume>
			 <fpage>435</fpage>
			 <lpage>444</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-006-0006-3">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-006-0006-3</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT44">
	    <element-citation publication-type="software">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
			<name>
			  <collab>R Core Team</collab>
			</name>
			</person-group>		
			<source>R: A language and environment for statistical computing</source>
			<year>2017</year>
			<publisher-loc>Vienna, Austria</publisher-loc>
			<publisher-name>R Foundation for Statistical Computing</publisher-name>			
		</element-citation>	  
	</ref>	
	<ref id="CIT45">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>van der Elst</surname>
				  <given-names>R.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Wallace</surname>
				  <given-names>J.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Identification of the juvenile mullet of the east coast of South Africa</article-title>
			 <source>J. Fish Biol.</source>
			 <year>1976</year>
			 <volume>9</volume>
			 <fpage>371</fpage>
			 <lpage>374</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1976.tb04685.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1976.tb04685.x</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT46">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Ward</surname>
				  <given-names>C.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Steinke</surname>
				  <given-names>T.D.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>A note on the distribution and approximate areas of mangroves in South Africa</article-title>
			 <source>S. Afr. J. Bot.</source>
			 <year>1982</year>
			 <volume>1</volume>
			 <fpage>51</fpage>
			 <lpage>53</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4618(16)30176-0">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4618(16)30176-0</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT47">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Weerts</surname>
				  <given-names>S.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Cyrus</surname>
				  <given-names>D.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Occurrence of young and small-sized fishes in different habitats within a subtropical South African estuary and adjacent harbour</article-title>
			 <source>Mar. Freshw. Res.</source>
			 <year>2002</year>
			 <volume>53</volume>
			 <fpage>447</fpage>
			 <lpage>456</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/MF01155">https://doi.org/10.1071/MF01155</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT48">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Whitfield</surname>
				  <given-names>A.K.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Abundance of larval and 0+ juvenile marine fishes in the lower reaches of three southern African estuaries with differing freshwater inputs</article-title>
			 <source>Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.</source>
			 <year>1994</year>
			 <volume>105</volume>
			 <fpage>257</fpage>
			 <lpage>267</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3354/meps105257">https://doi.org/10.3354/meps105257</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT49">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Whitfield</surname>
				  <given-names>A.K.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>An estuary-association classification for the fishes of southern Africa</article-title>
			 <source>S. Afr. J. Sci.</source>
			 <year>1994</year>
			 <volume>90</volume>
			 <fpage>411</fpage>
			 <lpage>417</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT50">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Whitfield</surname>
				  <given-names>A.K.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>The role of seagrass meadows, mangrove forests, salt marshes and reed beds as nursery areas and food sources for fishes in estuaries</article-title>
			 <source>Rev. Fish Biol. Fish.</source>
			 <year>2017</year>
			 <volume>27</volume>
			 <fpage>75</fpage>
			 <lpage>110</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-016-9454-x">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-016-9454-x</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT51">
		 <element-citation publication-type="report">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
			<name>
			  <surname>Whitfield</surname>
			  <given-names>A.K.</given-names>
			</name>	
			<name>
			  <surname>Baliwe</surname>
			  <given-names>N.</given-names>
			</name>	
			</person-group>
			<source>A century of science in South African estuaries: Bibliography and review of research trends</source>		
			<series>SANCOR Occasional Report</series>
			<issue>7</issue>
			<year>2013</year>	
			 <fpage>1</fpage>
			 <lpage>289</lpage>
		</element-citation>			  
	</ref>	
	<ref id="CIT52">
	    <element-citation publication-type="book">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
			<name>
			  <surname>Wickham</surname>
			  <given-names>H.</given-names>
			</name>	
			</person-group>		
			<source>ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis</source>
			<year>2009</year>
			<publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>
			<publisher-name>Springer-Verlag</publisher-name>		
		</element-citation>	  
	</ref>	
	<ref id="CIT53">
		<element-citation publication-type="report">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Wiseman</surname>
				  <given-names>K.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Burns</surname>
				  <given-names>M.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Vernon</surname>
				  <given-names>C.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			<series>Estuaries of the Cape. Part II. Synopses of available information on individual systems</series>
				<person-group person-group-type="editor">
				 <name>
					<surname>Morant</surname>
					<given-names>P.D.</given-names>
				 </name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Report No. 42: Nahoon (CSE 44), Qinira (CSE 45) and Gqunube (CSE 46)</article-title>
			 <source>CSIR Res. Rep.</source>
			 <year>1993</year>
			 <volume>441</volume>
			 <fpage>1</fpage>
			 <lpage>136</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT54">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			 <person-group person-group-type="author">
				 <name>
				  <surname>Wood</surname>
				  <given-names>S.N.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Pya</surname>
				  <given-names>N.</given-names>
				</name>
				 <name>
				  <surname>Saefken</surname>
				  <given-names>B.</given-names>
				</name>
			 </person-group>
			 <article-title>Smoothing parameter and model selection for general smooth models (with discussion)</article-title>
			 <source>J. Am. Stat. Assoc.</source>
			 <year>2016</year>
			 <volume>111</volume>
			 <fpage>1548</fpage>
			 <lpage>1575</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1180986">https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2016.1180986</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>