<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SCIENTIA MARINA</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Scientia Marina</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title>Sci Mar</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="epub">0214-8358</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			 <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">sm4133</article-id>
			 <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3989/scimar.04133.30A</article-id>
			 
			
		<title-group>
			  <article-title>Biodiversity and distribution of macroinfauna assemblages on sandy beaches along the Gulf of Cadiz (SW Spain)</article-title>
		<trans-title-group xml:lang="es">
		<trans-title>Biodiversidad y distribución de las comunidades de macroinfauna en playas arenosas del Golfo de Cádiz (SO España)</trans-title>
		</trans-title-group>
		<alt-title alt-title-type="running-head">Macroinfauna assemblages on sandy beaches</alt-title>
		</title-group>
		
		<contrib-group>
			  <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"> 
				<name>
				 <surname>Reyes-Martínez</surname>
				 <given-names>M. José </given-names>
				</name>
				<xref ref-type="aff" rid="U1"/>
				<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"/>
			  </contrib>
			  <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no"> 
				<name>
				 <surname>Ruiz-Delgado</surname>
				 <given-names>M. Carmen</given-names>
				</name>
				<xref ref-type="aff" rid="U1"/>
			  </contrib>
			  <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no"> 
				<name>
				 <surname>Sánchez-Moyano</surname>
				 <given-names>Juan Emilio</given-names>
				</name>
				<xref ref-type="aff" rid="U2"/>
			  </contrib>
			  <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no"> 
				<name>
				 <surname>García-García</surname>
				 <given-names>Francisco José</given-names>
				</name>
				<xref ref-type="aff" rid="U1"/>
			  </contrib>
			  <aff id="U1">Departamento de Sistemas Físicos, Químicos y Naturales, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Ctra. Utrera km 1, 41013 Sevilla, Spain.</aff>
			  <aff id="U2">Departamento de Zoología, Universidad de Sevilla, Av. Reina Mercedes 6, 41012 Sevilla, Spain.</aff>
			 </contrib-group>
			 
			 <author-notes>
		<corresp id="cor1">e-mail: <email xlink:href="mjreymar@upo.es">mjreymar@upo.es</email>
		</corresp>
		</author-notes>
		
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
		<day>30</day>
		<month>9</month>
		<year>2015</year>
		</pub-date>
		<pub-date pub-type="collection">
		<year>2015</year>
		</pub-date>
		
		<volume>79</volume>
		<issue>3</issue>
		<fpage>367</fpage>
		<lpage>377</lpage>
		
		<elocation-id content-type="doi">10.3989/scimar.04133.30A</elocation-id>

		 <history>
		  	<date date-type="received">
				<day>31</day>
				<month>7</month>
				<year>2014</year>
			</date>
			<date date-type="accepted">
				<day>22</day>
				<month>5</month>
				<year>2015</year>
			</date>
			<date date-type="published">
				<day>3</day>
				<month>7</month>
				<year>2015</year>
			</date>
		 </history>
		 
		<permissions>
		<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; 2015 CSIC</copyright-statement>
		<copyright-year>2015</copyright-year>
		<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/">
		<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial Lisence (by-nc) Spain 3.0.</license-p>
		</license>
		</permissions>
		
		<abstract xml:lang="en">
		<title>SUMMARY</title>
		<p> In the current study, the macroinfauna communities inhabiting 12 sandy beaches along the Spanish coast of the Gulf of Cadiz were describe in order to characterize their unexplored biodiversity, their zonation patterns and their environmental features. A total of 66 macroinfauna taxa were recorded on 12 sandy beaches, ranging from 4 to 33 species. Density reached 848 individual per m<sup>2</sup>. The individual zonation pattern ranged from two to three zones, regardless of the morphodynamic state. A common zonation pattern of the whole set of beaches was established, comprising three across-shore biological zones. Generally, the supralittoral zone was typified by the air-breathing amphipod <italic>Talitrus saltator</italic> and coleopterans; the middle zone was dominated by true intertidal species, such as Haustoriidae amphipods (<italic>Haustorius arenarius</italic>), Cirolanidae isopods (<italic>Eurydice affinis</italic>), Spionidae polychaetes (<italic>Scolelepis</italic> spp.) and nemerteans; and the lower or sublittoral zone was typified by Pontoporeiidae amphipods, mysids and spionid polychaetes. Sediment moisture, average grain size, organic matter content and elevation were the main predictor variables of zonation patterns. We used the conservation and recreation potential indices to show how this information can be useful for coastal management. Most beaches studied show a score above 5 on the conservation index, so the beaches have a reasonable potential for conservation management.</p>
		</abstract>
		<trans-abstract xml:lang="es">
		<title>RESUMEN</title>
		<p>En el presente estudio, se describen las comunidades de macroinfauna de doce playas arenosas de la costa española del Golfo de Cádiz con el objetivo de caracterizar su biodiversidad, sus patrones de zonación, y sus características ambientales. Un total de 66 taxones de macroinfauna fueron registrados en las playas de estudio, oscilando entre 4 y 33 especies, mientras que la densidad total fue de 848 individuos por m<sup>2</sup>. El patrón de zonación individual varió de dos a tres zonas, independientemente del estado morfodinámico de la playa. Se estableció un patrón de zonación común de todo el conjunto de playas, formado por tres zonas biológicas. En general, la zona supralitoral fue tipificada por el anfípodo <italic>Talitrus saltator</italic> y diversas familias de coleópteros. La zona media fue dominada por verdaderas especies intermareales, como anfípodos de la famila Haustoriidae (<italic>Haustorius arenarius</italic>), isópodos cirolánidos (<italic>Eurydice affinis</italic>), poliquetos (<italic>Scolelepis</italic> spp.) y nemertinos. La zona sublitoral se caracterizó por anfípodos de la familia Pontoporeiidae, misidáceos y poliquetos espiónidos. La humedad del sedimento, el tamaño medio de grano, el contenido en materia orgánica y la elevación fueron las principales variables influyentes en los patrones de zonación. Por último, toda esta información fue integrada para la aplicación de los índices de Conservación y Recreación, para mostrar cómo esta información puede ser útil para la gestión costera. La mayoría de las playas mostraron una puntuación superior a 5 en el Índice de Conservación, indicando un razonable potencial para la conservación.</p>
		</trans-abstract>
		<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
			<title>KEYWORDS</title>
			<kwd>sandy beaches</kwd>
			<kwd>benthic macroinfauna</kwd>
			<kwd>zonation pattern</kwd>
			<kwd>environmental variables</kwd>
			<kwd>Gulf of Cadiz</kwd>
			<kwd>coastal management</kwd>			
		</kwd-group>
		<kwd-group xml:lang="es">
			<title>PALABRAS CLAVE</title>
			<kwd>playas arenosas</kwd>
			<kwd>macroinfauna béntica</kwd>
			<kwd>patrones de zonación</kwd>
			<kwd>variables ambientales</kwd>
			<kwd>Golfo de Cádiz</kwd>
			<kwd>gestión costera</kwd>
		</kwd-group>
	 </article-meta>
	</front>
				

	<body>
<sec id="S1">
<title>INTRODUCTION</title>
				
				<p>The Gulf of Cadiz is located in the southwestern Iberian Peninsula, between Cape St Vincent (Portugal) and the Strait of Gibraltar (Spain), which connects the Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea. The Spanish coastal area of this gulf stretches some 300 km, between Ayamonte (Huelva province) and Tarifa (Cadiz province). The area is influenced mainly by the mouths of the rivers Guadiana, Piedras, Tinto, Odiel, Guadalete and Guadalquivir and is dominated by estuarine zones and extensive sandy beaches, many of which are faced by discontinuous rocky-shore platforms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT08">Benavente et al. 2002</xref>), especially on the Cadiz coast. </p>
				<p>The general air circulation in the Gulf of Cadiz is predominantly anticyclonic, with short-term variation influenced by winds. This region is characterized by a mean water-surface temperature ranging from 18°C to 22°C, a salinity range of 36.3‰ to 36.5‰, an average nitrate, phosphate and silicate concentration of about 0.33, 0.08 and 1.37 μM, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT04">Anfuso et al. 2010</xref>), and a chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> concentration of around 10-40 mg m<sup>–2</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT37">Prieto et al. 1999</xref>). These features provide a suitable habitat for the development of several species, which makes this system a very diverse and productive area (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT47">Sobrino et al. 1994</xref>). Many species inhabiting the Gulf of Cadiz have economic value, so it is considered an area with great socio-economic importance for fisheries and shellfish gathering (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT51">Torres et al. 2013</xref>). Frequently, these species use sandy shores as nursery areas for juveniles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT06">Baldó and Drake 2002</xref>), feeding on invertebrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT49">Speybroeck et al. 2007</xref>), and they can use biogenic structures (e.g. tubes, mounds and burrows) constructed by the invertebrates as a refuge from predation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT02">Allen-Brooks et al. 2006</xref>). </p>
				<p>The sandy shores provide a large range of services, such as sediment and water storage, decomposition of organic matter and pollutants, wave dissipation, water filtration and purification, nutrient recycling, maintenance of biodiversity and a functional link between marine and terrestrial environments, where macroinfauna plays a key role (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT15">Defeo et al. 2009</xref>). Furthermore, the favourable climatic conditions in Spain make the coastal environments attractive to tourism for several months a year and beaches are a major economic resource (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT03">Anfuso et al. 2003</xref>).</p>
				<p>Despite the importance of sandy beaches and the scale of the coastline areas occupied in the study, data on biotic and abiotic characteristics are scant. Along the Spanish Gulf of Cadiz, past studies have focused on studying the morphodynamics of sandy beaches in restricted areas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT03">Anfuso et al. 2003</xref>) and the morphological changes associated with meteorological events (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT09">Buitrago and Anfuso 2011</xref>). The few studies that have described the fauna inhabiting the beaches have focused on macroinfauna from estuarine beaches (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT28">Mayoral et al. 1994</xref>) or on the supralittoral arthropods associated with wrack deposits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT43">Ruiz-Delgado et al. 2014</xref>). There is therefore a considerable lack of information on macroinfauna communities in this region. </p>
				<p>Increasing human interest in sandy beaches has exacerbated unsustainable practices that involve destruction of these natural environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT15">Defeo et al. 2009</xref>). Identifying and mapping the macroinfauna inhabiting sandy beaches is an essential step for establishing effective management and conservation tools for a better use of these marine environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT33">McLachlan et al. 2013</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT42">Rolet et al. 2015</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT46">Schlacher et al. 2014</xref>) and for estimating the potential response of biota to future habitat changes.</p>
				<p>The aim of this study is to provide the first description of macroinfauna communities inhabiting sandy beaches and their environmental characteristics. To this end, (1) the physical and morphodynamic characteristics of 12 sandy beaches along the Gulf of Cadiz coastline were defined; (2) the macroinfauna communities inhabiting sandy beaches were characterized; (3) the zonation pattern of macroinfauna was determined; and (4) the influence of environmental factors on the zonation patterns was explored.</p>
				<p>Finally, all this information was employed to calculate two quantitative indicators following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT33">McLachan et al. (2013)</xref>. These indices are used to assess beach condition and suitability for different uses, from which guidelines for planning, management and monitoring can be derived. </p>
				
		</sec>
<sec id="S2">
<title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title>
				<sec id="S2.1">
<title>	Study area</title>
				
			  <p>The study area comprised 12 sandy beaches along the Spanish coast of the Gulf of Cadiz, from Hoyo beach (37°11’55”N, 07°17’45”W) near the Portuguese border to Lances beach (36°02’31”N, 05°38’08.031”W) in the area near the Strait of Gibraltar (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Fig. 1</xref>).</p>
			  			<fig id="F1">
				<label>Fig. 1</label>
				<caption>
				<title>Study area showing the 12 sandy beaches sampled.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm79n3-4133-web-images/sm4133fig1_fmt.jpeg"/>
			</fig>

</sec>
<sec id="S2.2">
<title>Sampling procedures</title>
				
		    <p>For all 12 beaches, macroinfauna sampling was carried out in six replicated transects haphazardly separated by a 100-m-long stretch in the central area of each beach during low tide between March and May 2011.</p>
				<p>In each transect, macroinfauna samples were collected at 10 equally spaced shore levels extending from above the drift line (level 10) to the low swash zone (level 1) with a 25-cm-diameter plastic core of a depth of 20 cm. Transect length depended on each beach’s width. A total of 60 samples were collected within a total sampled area of 3.75 m<sup>2</sup> per beach. On temperate beaches this area is considered sufficient to collect 90% of all the macroinfauna (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT25">Jaramillo et al. 1995</xref>). Samples were sieved on site through a 1-mm mesh sieve, collected in labelled plastic bags and preserved in 70% ethanol stained with Rose Bengal. Additionally, one sediment sample was taken at each sampling level with a plastic tube (3.5 cm diameter) buried 15 cm deep to analyse the mean grain size, sorting coefficient (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT52">Trask 1950</xref>), sand moisture and organic matter of the sediment.</p>
				<p>In the laboratory, the macroinfauna was quantified and identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible. The mean grain size was determined following the method proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT21">Guitián and Carballas (1976)</xref>. This method discriminates different granulometric fractions when the sediment composition is mainly sand and the pelitic fraction is low (less than 5%). Sand moisture was determined by measuring the weight loss after drying the samples at 90°C. The organic matter content of the sediment fraction &lt;0.5 mm was estimated as the difference between dry sediment weight and sediment weight after calcination at 500°C. </p>
				<p>To characterize the morphodynamic state, the relative tidal range (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT27">Masselink and Short 1993</xref>), the beach index (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT31">McLachlan and Dorvlo 2005</xref>), the beach state index (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT32">McLachlan et al. 1993</xref>) and the dimensionless fall-velocity parameter (Dean’s parameter; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT13">Dean 1973</xref>) were used. The beach face slope was estimated by the height difference according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT19">Emery (1961)</xref>. The height and wave period, temperature and tidal range were taken from average annual data from the SIMAR oceanographic database of Puertos del Estado (Spanish Ministry of Public Works) (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.puertos.es/es-es/oceanografia/Paginas/portus.aspx">http://www.puertos.es/es-es/oceanografia/Paginas/portus.aspx</ext-link>).</p>
				
			</sec>
<sec id="S2.3">
<title>Conservation and recreation potential indices </title>
				
			  <p>To characterize the main use of beaches, the conservation index (CI) and the recreation potential index (RI) were applied following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT33">McLachlan et al. (2013)</xref>. For each indicator a simple scoring system was developed based on three key drivers in order to evaluate the potential/suitability of a beach for conservation and/or recreation. CI takes into account 1) the extent, nature and condition of the dunes, their well-developed vegetation and their connection with the beach; 2) the presence of iconic and endangered species; and 3) the macrobenthic community abundance and species richness. In contrast, RI is based on 1) available infrastructures to support recreational activities (beach access, toilets, etc.); 2) beach safety and health status; and 3) physical carrying capacity. CI and RI values range from 0 to 10, in increasing order of conservation value or recreation potential. </p>
				
			</sec>
<sec id="S2.4">
<title> Data analysis</title>
				
		    <p>Univariate analyses were used to characterize the fauna communities present on each beach studied, calculating the Margalef richness index (<italic>d</italic>), the Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H’) and the Pielou evenness index (J’), using the PRIMER software package.</p>
				<p>The zonation pattern on each beach studied was identified using cluster analysis, based on the Bray-Curtis similarity matrix, followed by a similarity profile test (SIMPROF) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT10">Clarke and Gorley 2006</xref>), to evaluate the significance of the classification (p&lt;0.05). Previously, abundance data were fourth-root transformed to downweight the contribution of the major abundant species. </p>
				<p>Once the zonation patterns had been defined on individual beaches, a modal pattern of zonation was established for the entire set of beaches. To this end, species from each sampling level were pooled based on zones identified by cluster analysis. Then, a single matrix of “species × zone” for each beach was generated and all of them were combined into a global matrix. This global biological matrix was fourth-root transformed and subjected to non-metric multi-dimensional scaling ordination (n-MDS). Furthermore, the similarity percentages analysis (SIMPER) was performed in order to find the typifying species in each identified zone for the entire set of beaches along the Gulf of Cadiz. Beaches that did not have a clear zonation pattern were excluded from these analyses. All multivariate analyses were performed with PRIMER-E v 6.1 (PRIMER-E Ltd) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT11">Clarke and Warwick 2001</xref>).</p>
				<p>To determine associations of macroinfauna communities with environmental variables, a canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) was applied. First, a global biological matrix was submitted to detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) in order to measure the gradient lengths and to ensure an unimodal species response. Gradient length of the first axis was greater than 3.0 SD, and a CCA ordination method was used. For this analysis, only the most abundant species (&gt;6% of total contribution in each biological zone identified) were taken into account after fourth-root transformation.</p>
				<p>The environmental parameters matrix was transformed (Log(x+1)) and standardized prior to reducing extreme values and providing better canonical coefficient comparisons. Only variables significantly related to the fauna variation were included (p&lt;0.05); to this end, each variable was analysed separately and its significance was tested using a Monte Carlo permutation test (999 permutations) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT50">TerBraak 1995</xref>).</p>
				<p>In CCA analysis, the statistical significance of canonical eigenvalues and the significance of the first two axes were tested by a Monte Carlo test (999 permutations). DCA and CCA were carried out with the statistical software package PC-ORD (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT29">McCune and Medford 1997</xref>).</p>
			</sec>	
		</sec>
<sec id="S3">
<title>RESULTS</title>
				
<sec id="S3.1">
<title>Beach characteristics</title>
				
			  <p>The physical and morphodynamic characteristics of the 12 beaches studied are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>. According to the tidal range and relative tidal range, the beaches were categorized as mesotidal, dominated by waves. The beaches showed a wide range of morphodynamic types, classified by Dean’s parameter as intermediate (Terrón, Mazagón, Matalascañas, Barrosa and Zahara), dissipative (Bota, Costa Ballena, Valdelagrana, Levante, Cortadura, and Lances) and reflective (Hoyo). Beach state index values classified most beaches as intermediate to dissipative, with high energy levels, except for Hoyo and Zahara, which were intermediate beaches with low to medium energy levels.</p>
			  	<table-wrap id="T1">
			<label>Table 1</label>
		<caption>
			<title>Physical characterization of sampled beaches. L, beach length (m); Mgs, median grain size (mm); OM, organic matter content (%); RTR, Relative tide range; BI, beach index; BSI, beach state index.</title>
		</caption>
		<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
  <thead>
			        <tr>
			          <th> Beaches </th>
			          <th> L </th>
			          <th> Slope(1/m) </th>
			          <th> Mgs </th>
			          <th> Sand type </th>
			          <th> Sorting </th>
			          <th> Dean </th>
			          <th> RTR </th>
			          <th> BI </th>
			          <th> BSI </th>
			          <th> OM </th>
		            </tr>
		          </thead>
			      <tbody>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Hoyo </td>
			          <td> 2800 </td>
			          <td> 10.99 </td>
			          <td> 0.65 </td>
			          <td> coarse sand </td>
			          <td> 1.54 </td>
			          <td> 1.6 </td>
			          <td> 2.27 </td>
			          <td> 1.36 </td>
			          <td> 0.92 </td>
			          <td> 0.62 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Terrón </td>
			          <td> 3500 </td>
			          <td> 29.52 </td>
			          <td> 0.42 </td>
			          <td> medium sand </td>
			          <td> 1.45 </td>
			          <td> 2.53 </td>
			          <td> 2.27 </td>
			          <td> 2.09 </td>
			          <td> 1.09 </td>
			          <td> 0.48 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Bota </td>
			          <td> 3800 </td>
			          <td> 46.59 </td>
			          <td> 0.22 </td>
			          <td> fine sand </td>
			          <td> 1.33 </td>
			          <td> 5.23 </td>
			          <td> 2.7 </td>
			          <td> 2.51 </td>
			          <td> 1.36 </td>
			          <td> 0.89 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Mazagón </td>
			          <td> 5500 </td>
			          <td> 15.84 </td>
			          <td> 0.49 </td>
			          <td> medium sand </td>
			          <td> 1.57 </td>
			          <td> 2.1 </td>
			          <td> 2.41 </td>
			          <td> 1.75 </td>
			          <td> 1.05 </td>
			          <td> 0.62 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Matalascañas </td>
			          <td> 4200 </td>
			          <td> 13.97 </td>
			          <td> 0.41 </td>
			          <td> medium sand </td>
			          <td> 1.34 </td>
			          <td> 2.59 </td>
			          <td> 2.34 </td>
			          <td> 1.77 </td>
			          <td> 1.1 </td>
			          <td> 0.31 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Costa Ballena </td>
			          <td> 4500 </td>
			          <td> 29.99 </td>
			          <td> 0.23 </td>
			          <td> fine sand </td>
			          <td> 1.35 </td>
			          <td> 5.91 </td>
			          <td> 2.27 </td>
			          <td> 2.31 </td>
			          <td> 1.43 </td>
			          <td> 0.68 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Valdelagrana </td>
			          <td> 1880 </td>
			          <td> 17.69 </td>
			          <td> 0.21 </td>
			          <td> fine sand </td>
			          <td> 1.6 </td>
			          <td> 6.8 </td>
			          <td> 2.28 </td>
			          <td> 2.11 </td>
			          <td> 1.48 </td>
			          <td> 1.19 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Levante </td>
			          <td> 4600 </td>
			          <td> 26.46 </td>
			          <td> 0.22 </td>
			          <td> fine sand </td>
			          <td> 1.43 </td>
			          <td> 6.32 </td>
			          <td> 2.49 </td>
			          <td> 2.25 </td>
			          <td> 1.42 </td>
			          <td> 0.75 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Cortadura </td>
			          <td> 2500 </td>
			          <td> 84.31 </td>
			          <td> 0.20 </td>
			          <td> fine sand </td>
			          <td> 1.25 </td>
			          <td> 7.73 </td>
			          <td> 2.02 </td>
			          <td> 2.81 </td>
			          <td> 1.55 </td>
			          <td> 0.81 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Barrosa </td>
			          <td> 4000 </td>
			          <td> 17.6 </td>
			          <td> 0.47 </td>
			          <td> medium sand </td>
			          <td> 1.55 </td>
			          <td> 2.42 </td>
			          <td> 2.05 </td>
			          <td> 1.76 </td>
			          <td> 1.03 </td>
			          <td> 2.92 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Zahara </td>
			          <td> 2900 </td>
			          <td> 11.5 </td>
			          <td> 0.51 </td>
			          <td> coarse sand </td>
			          <td> 1.75 </td>
			          <td> 2.26 </td>
			          <td> 1.58 </td>
			          <td> 1.43 </td>
			          <td> 0.93 </td>
			          <td> 0.83 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Lances </td>
			          <td> 4300 </td>
			          <td> 24.76 </td>
			          <td> 0.23 </td>
			          <td> fine sand </td>
			          <td> 1.35 </td>
			          <td> 6.41 </td>
			          <td> 1.07 </td>
			          <td> 1.94 </td>
			          <td> 1.19 </td>
			          <td> 0.57 </td>
		            </tr>
		          </tbody>
		        </table>
		    </table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.2">
<title>Macroinfauna</title>
				
			  <p>A total of 63 macroinfauna taxa were recorded from the beaches of the Gulf of Cadiz (<xref ref-type="app" rid="A1">Appendix 1</xref>). Crustaceans were the most diverse taxa, with 23 species, followed by polychaetes (22 species), insects and molluscs (9 and 8 species, respectively). <xref ref-type="app" rid="A1">Appendix 1</xref> shows the total abundance, total species, Margalef species richness, Shannon-Wiener diversity index and Pielou evenness index. Bota and Levante had the highest richness, with 33 and 24 species, respectively, while the lowest value was found at Matalascañas (4 species). Density was also highly variable, ranging from 23 to 249 individuals per m<sup>2</sup>. The lowest diversity value (H’) was observed at Matalascañas beach (0.40), while the highest was found at Levante (2.68). The evenness index ranged from 0.29 at Matalascañas to 0.86 at Lances beach. </p>
				<p><italic>Scolelepis</italic> spp., <italic>Pontocrates arenarius</italic> and <italic>Haustorius arenarius</italic> were the most frequent species. The polychaete was present on 100% of the total beaches sampled, while the amphipods were present on 90%. In terms of abundance, polychaetes of the genus <italic>Scolelepis</italic> were dominant, accounting for 28% of total abundance, followed by the amphipod <italic>Haustorius arenarius</italic>, which accounted for 15% of the total. </p>
			</sec>
<sec id="S3.3">
<title>Zonation</title>
				
			  <p>Across-shore species distribution on each beach studied is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>. Cluster ordination and the SIMPROF test identified two biological zones at Valdelagrana and Cortadura and Lances, and three biological zones at Hoyo, Terrón, Bota, Mazagón, Costa Ballena, Levante, Barrosa and Zahara. Exceptionally, Matalascañas did not show a clear zonation pattern. For this analysis, the sampling levels where no species were present were removed. </p>
			  			<fig id="F2">
				<label>Fig. 2</label>
				<caption>
				<title>Zonation pattern in each studied beach defined by similarity profile (SIMPROF). Grey lines represent significant evidence of community structure (P&lt;0.05). Black lines indicate no significant evidence.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm79n3-4133-web-images/sm4133fig2_fmt.jpeg"/>
			</fig>

<p>A global zonation pattern of the entire set of beaches from the Spanish Gulf of Cadiz coastline was derived from the individual across-shore species distribution; therefore, faunal zones identified at each beach were gathered for a global MDS ordination (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Fig. 3</xref>). SIMPER analysis performed on this ordination showed a degree of similarity of 40% between all lower zones, where <italic>Pontocrates arenarius, Gastrosaccus sanctus</italic> and <italic>Scolelepis</italic> spp. showed the highest percentages of presences (17.8%, 17.2% and 11.0%, respectively). The middle zones showed a similarity of about 30%. Polychaetes of the genus <italic>Scolelepis</italic> (37.70%), the isopod <italic>Eurydice affinis</italic> (26.40%), the amphipod <italic>Haustorius arenarius </italic>(11.56%), and nemerteans (9.95%) highlighted the similarity in faunal composition between all middle zones. Finally, the upper zones showed a 20% similarity and the typifying species were the air-breathing amphipod <italic>Talitrus saltator</italic> (56.7%) and coleopterans (37%). </p>
			<fig id="F3">
				<label>Fig. 3</label>
				<caption>
				<title>n-MDS ordination for the global zonation pattern. Black triangles represent the lower zones, grey inverted triangles the middle zones and black quadrates the upper zones of the studied beaches.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm79n3-4133-web-images/sm4133fig3_fmt.jpeg" alt="sm4133fig3.jpg"/>
			</fig>

<p>Biologically, density values decreased from the lower to the upper zone. In the lower and middle zones the most abundant taxa were crustaceans and polychaetes, while in the upper zones, besides crustaceans, insects were dominant (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Fig. 4</xref>).</p>
			<fig id="F4">
				<label>Fig. 4</label>
				<caption>
				<title>Triplot resulting from CCA analysis. Crosses show the most abundant species in each zone. The lower zones are represented by triangles, the middle zones by inverted triangles and the upper zones by circles. Arrows represents explanatory variables (Moist, sand moisture; Mgs, median grain size; Elev, elevation; OM, organic matter content).</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm79n3-4133-web-images/sm4133fig5_fmt.jpeg" alt="sm4133fig5.jpg"/>
			</fig>

</sec>
<sec id="S3.4">
<title>Relationship between environmental variables and macroinfauna</title>
				
			  <p>Environmental variables significantly related to fauna variations, tested by Monte Carlo permutation test, were elevation (p=0.002), sand moisture (p=0.001), organic matter content (p=0.015) and grain size (p=0.001). However, these predictor variables were not strongly correlated (r<sup>2</sup>&lt;0.5). The Monte Carlo test for the set of environmental variables was significant for both axes (p=0.001) and for eigenvalues (p=0.001) showing a significant relationship between biological data and predictor environmental variables. </p>
			<p>The CCA results show that the total variation of data was 2.49 (inertia), while the total variation explained was 0.802 (the sum of all canonical eigenvalues). Pearson species-environmental correlations were relatively high: 0.93 for Axis 1 and 0.82 for Axis 2. The first axis (accounting for 66% of the total explained variation) correlated positively with elevation (0.745) and negatively with sand moisture (–0.887) and organic matter content (–0.465). The second axis (accounting for 0% of the explained variation) correlated mainly with medium-sized grain (0.806). </p>
				<p>The ordination diagram of CCA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Fig. 5</xref>) showed a gradient of zones (lower, middle, and upper) marked mainly by the first axis and showed that crustaceans (<italic>Bathyporeia pelagica, Eurydice affinis, E. pulchra, Gastrosaccus sanctus, G. spinifer, Haustorius arenarius</italic> and <italic>Pontocrates arenarius</italic>) and Polychaeta (<italic>Scolelepis</italic> spp.) responded positively to sand moisture and organic matter content but negatively to elevation, increasing their density to the left along the first axis. Coleopterans and <italic>Talitrus saltator</italic> exhibited the opposite pattern. Density of nemerteans was the least explained by these environmental variables. </p>
							<fig id="F5">
				<label>Fig. 5</label>
				<caption>
				<title>Mean total density (±SE) of the taxa found in the lower, middle and upper zones.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm79n3-4133-web-images/sm4133fig4_fmt.jpeg" alt="sm4133fig4.jpg"/>
			</fig>

<p>The nemerteans <italic>P. arenarius</italic> and <italic>G. sanctus</italic> also responded positively to medium-coarse grain size, while the density of <italic>Bathyporeia pelagica</italic>, <italic>Donax trunculus </italic>and Coleoptera sp1 was more influenced by fine grain size, due to their distribution along the second axis.</p>
				
		 </sec>
<sec id="S3.5">
<title>Conservation against recreational potential</title>
				
			  <p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref> provides a summary of 12 cases of beach usage by means of CI and RI scores and the ensuing management strategy is illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Figure 6</xref>. Most beaches are in the multiple-use category, indicating that they have high conservation and recreation values. Only Matalascañas and Valdelagrana are in the intensive recreation category, with high RI values (7 and 9, respectively). </p>
			  	<table-wrap id="T2">
			<label>Table 2</label>
		<caption>
			<title>Conservation index (CI) and recreation potential index (RI) scores for beaches.</title>
		</caption>
		<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
  <thead>
			        <tr>
			          <th> Beach name </th>
			          <th> Dune status </th>
			          <th> Iconic species </th>
			          <th> Macro-benthos </th>
			          <th> CI </th>
			          <th> Infrastructure </th>
			          <th> Safety health </th>
			          <th> Carrying capacity </th>
			          <th> RI </th>
		            </tr>
		          </thead>
			      <tbody>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Hoyo </td>
			          <td> 4 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 6 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 3 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 6 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> Well developed, little disturbance </td>
			          <td> Low numbers, not nesting </td>
			          <td> Intermediate </td>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> No infrastructure, limited access </td>
			          <td> Low hazard, clean and pollution free </td>
			          <td> Extensive beach with wide backshore </td>
			          <td></td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Terrón </td>
			          <td> 4 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 7 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 3 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 5 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> Well developed, little disturbance </td>
			          <td> Present in good numbers, may be nesting </td>
			          <td> Intermediate </td>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> No infrastructure, limited access </td>
			          <td> Low hazard, clean and pollution free </td>
			          <td> Intermediate </td>
			          <td></td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Bota </td>
			          <td> 4 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 7 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 3 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 6 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> Well developed, little disturbance </td>
			          <td> Low numbers, not nesting </td>
			          <td> Species rich and abundant </td>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> No infrastructure, limited access </td>
			          <td> Low hazard, clean and pollution free </td>
			          <td> Extensive beach with wide backshore </td>
			          <td></td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Mazagón </td>
			          <td> 4 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 7 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 4 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> Well developed, little disturbance </td>
			          <td> Present in good numbers, may be nesting </td>
			          <td> Intermediate </td>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> No infrastructure, limited access </td>
			          <td> Moderate hazard and clean </td>
			          <td> Intermediate </td>
			          <td></td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Matalascañas </td>
			          <td> 0 </td>
			          <td> 0 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 5 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 0 </td>
			          <td> 7 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> Absent </td>
			          <td> Absent </td>
			          <td> Intermediate </td>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> Excellent access and amenities </td>
			          <td> Moderate hazard and clean </td>
			          <td> Limited, pocket beach, no backshore </td>
			          <td></td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Costa Ballena </td>
			          <td> 3 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 6 </td>
			          <td> 3 </td>
			          <td> 3 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 8 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> Disturbed but largely intact </td>
			          <td> Low numbers, not nesting </td>
			          <td> Species rich and abundant </td>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> Good access, some amenities </td>
			          <td> Low hazard, clean and pollution free </td>
			          <td> Extensive beach with wide backshore </td>
			          <td></td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Valdelagrana </td>
			          <td> 0 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 3 </td>
			          <td> 5 </td>
			          <td> 3 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 9 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> Absent </td>
			          <td> Low numbers, not nesting </td>
			          <td> Species rich and abundant </td>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> Excellent access and amenities </td>
			          <td> Low hazard, clean and pollution free </td>
			          <td> Intermediate </td>
			          <td></td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Levante </td>
			          <td> 4 </td>
			          <td> 3 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 9 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 3 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 5 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> Well developed, little disturbance </td>
			          <td> Significant nesting area for marine birds </td>
			          <td> Species rich and abundant </td>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> No infrastructure and limited access </td>
			          <td> Low hazard, clean and pollution free </td>
			          <td> Intermediate </td>
			          <td></td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Cortadura </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 0 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 3 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 5 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> Severely disturbed </td>
			          <td> Absent </td>
			          <td> Species rich and abundant </td>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> Modest infrastructure, reasonable access </td>
			          <td> Moderate hazard and clean </td>
			          <td> Intermediate </td>
			          <td></td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Barrosa </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 0 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 4 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 3 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 7 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> Extensive disturbance </td>
			          <td> Absent </td>
			          <td> Species rich and abundant </td>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> Modest infrastructure, reasonable access </td>
			          <td> Low hazard, clean and pollution free </td>
			          <td> Extensive beach with wide backshore </td>
			          <td></td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Zahara </td>
			          <td> 4 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 7 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 6 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> Well developed, little disturbance </td>
			          <td> Present in good numbers, may be nesting </td>
			          <td> Intermediate </td>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> Modest infrastructure, reasonable access </td>
			          <td> Moderate hazard and clean </td>
			          <td> Extensive beach with wide backshore </td>
			          <td></td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td> Lances </td>
			          <td> 4 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 1 </td>
			          <td> 7 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 2 </td>
			          <td> 6 </td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> Well developed, little disturbance </td>
			          <td> Present in good numbers, may be nesting </td>
			          <td> Intermediate </td>
			          <td></td>
			          <td> Modest infrastructure, reasonable access </td>
			          <td> Moderate hazard and clean </td>
			          <td> Extensive beach with wide backshore </td>
			          <td></td>
		            </tr>
		          </tbody>
		        </table>
		    </table-wrap>
						<fig id="F6">
				<label>Fig. 6</label>
				<caption>
				<title>Location of each beach listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref> relative to its conservation index and recreation potential index scores. The plot shows the demarcation of beaches for intensive recreation, conservation and multi-purpose use. H, Hoyo; T, Terrón; Bo, Bota; M, Mazagón; Ma, Matalascañas; Cb, Costa Ballena; V, Valdelagrana; Le, Levante; C, Cortadura; Ba, Barrosa; Z, Zahara; La, Lances.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm79n3-4133-web-images/sm4133fig6_fmt.jpeg"/>
			</fig>
</sec>
           </sec>
<sec id="S4">
<title>DISCUSSION</title>
				
<sec id="S4.1">
<title>Macroinfauna</title>
				
			  <p>Sandy beaches are extremely dynamic ecosystems with hostile conditions for life, so the number of taxa adapted to living under these conditions is expected to be low compared with other coastal systems. However, the macroinfauna biodiversity found in sandy beaches of the Spanish coast of the Gulf of Cadiz were relatively high (from 4 to 33 species). This value is similar to those reported in nearby latitudes, such as the 9 to 31 species found in northern Spain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT39">Rodil et al. 2006</xref>), the 27 to 30 species found on the western coast of Portugal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT20">Gonçalves et al. 2009</xref>), and the 4 to 24 species found on Moroccan sandy beaches (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT05">Bayed 2003</xref>). </p>
				<p>The beaches showed a wide range of morphodynamic types and a general increasing trend in species richness from reflective to dissipative beaches was observed, in agreement with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT32">McLachlan et al. (1993)</xref>. Bota beach showed the highest species richness and abundance. This beach, located near the mouth of the Piedras River, where the influence of wave action is lower, is one of the most sheltered of the entire set of beaches studied, as is also reflected in the relative tidal range, which showed high values on this sandy beach. The high richness and abundance values found on Bota beach supports the general trend of biotic variables to increase with exposure, as reported by other authors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT18">Dexter 1983</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT23"> Jaramillo and MacLachlan 1993</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT40">Rodil et al. 2007</xref>). Abundance and richness of macroinfauna are directly related to food supply (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT41">Rodil et al. 2012</xref>), so it is also possible that Piedras river mouth increases food availability, enabling the establishment and development of more species. </p>
				<p>Crustaceans, polychaetes and molluscs were usually dominant among the macroinfauna of sandy beaches (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT30">McLachlan and Brown 2006</xref>). In our study, amphipod and isopod crustaceans and spionid polychaetes were the most abundant and included diverse taxa. In fact, 74% of all individuals collected belong to six species of these groups: <italic>Bathyporeia pelagica, Haustorius arenarius, Pontocrates arenarius, Siphonoecetes sabatieri, Eurydice affinis</italic> and <italic>Scolelepis</italic> spp. The dominant and most frequent species occurring on every beach studied were polychaetes of the genus <italic>Scolelepis</italic>. This genus has a wide geographical distribution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT48">Souza and Borzone 2000</xref>) and is also very abundant on many Atlantic beaches (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT34">Papageorgiou et al. 2006</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT17">Degraer et al. 2003</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT07">Barros et al. 2001</xref>). </p>
				<p>Little importance is given to nemerteans, which are normally not considered typical taxa on sandy beaches, due to residual contributions that they exhibit, although this taxon is considered a useful bio-indicator (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT22">Herrera-Bachiller et al. 2008</xref>). For example, the nemerteans <italic>Lienus acutifrons</italic> and <italic>Psammamphiporus elongatus </italic>were affected by the “Prestige” oil spill on Galician sandy beaches, so they could be a good indicators of beach quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT22">Herrera-Bachiller et al. 2008</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT38">Puerta et al. 2010</xref>). On sandy beaches of southwestern Spain, Nemertean abundance was similar to that of molluscs, showing high occurrences (67% of the sampled beaches), highlighting the importance of nemerteans at these latitudes. Similarly, <italic>Talitrus saltator</italic> was frequently found on the beaches studied. This ‘sand-hopper’ is recognized as a good biomonitor of trace-metal pollution and the effect of human trampling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT53">Ugolini et al. 2008</xref>). </p>
				
			</sec>
<sec id="S4.2">
<title>Macroinfauna zonation</title>
				
			  <p>The zonation of macroinfauna, defined as the distribution of species throughout the intertidal zone on sandy beaches, has been undertaken around the world (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT14">Defeo et al. 1992</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT26">Jaramillo et al. 2000</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT45">Schlacher and Thompson 2013</xref>). Macroinfauna across-shore distribution is highly variable, ranging from one to five biological zones, although three are most common (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT45">Schlacher and Thompson 2013</xref>). In the current study, 67% of total beaches showed three distinct zones and 25% showed two. This pattern was different to that found on beaches in northern Spain, where macroinfauna was divided into two main zones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT39">Rodil et al. 2006</xref>), and on Moroccan sandy beaches, where four zones were identified according to Salvat’s scheme (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT44">Salvat 1964</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT05">Bayed 2003</xref>).</p>
				<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT24">Jaramillo et al. (1993)</xref> determined that intermediate and dissipative beaches include three faunal zones, whereas the reflective beaches had only two. Along the Spanish coast of the Gulf of Cadiz, this pattern was not found. In fact, the more dissipative beaches showed two biological zones, while beaches closest to the reflective state (Hoyo and Mazagón) had three zones. In general, the number of zones alternated, independently of Dean’s parameter. Thus, no clear evidence was found to support the contention that the number of zones is closely related to morphodynamics. These results corroborate the conclusion drawn by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT45">Schlacher and Thompson (2013)</xref>, who detected no significant correlation between habitat metric (habitat dimensions, sediment properties, and morphodynamic state) and the number of fauna zones.</p>
				<p>Although the number of biological zones varied among beaches, a common zonation pattern was established for the entire set of beaches studied. This was done in order to characterize the most typical species inhabiting each zone. The general pattern showed three biological zones according to the zonation scheme of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT12">Dahl (1952)</xref>. In general, the supralittoral zone was typified by air-breathing amphipods (<italic>Talitrus saltator</italic>) and coleopterans. The middle zone was dominated by true intertidal species, such as Haustoriidae amphipods (<italic>Haustorius arenarius</italic>), Cirolanidae isopods (<italic>Eurydice affinis</italic>), Spionidae polychaetes (<italic>Scolelepis</italic> spp.) and nemerteans. The lower or sublittoral zone was typified by amphipods belonging to the Pontoporeiidae family: mysids, and spionid polychaetes. The distribution of the species in each zone is in agreement with findings on other nearby temperate sandy beaches, such as those along the northern coasts of Spain, Tunisia, and Morocco (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT39">Rodil et al. 2006</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT36">Pérez-Domingo et al. 2008</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT05">Bayed 2003</xref>).</p>
				<p>Diversity and densities of individuals increase towards the lower zones. This is a general feature found in numerous studies of sandy beaches worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT24">Jaramillo et al. 1993</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT20">Gonçalves et al. 2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT39">Rodil et al. 2006</xref>). Some authors have determined that this pattern could be due to a reflection of the high sub-tidal diversity and short periods of air exposure, thus allowing more species to inhabit zones closest to the seawater (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT16">Degraer et al. 1999</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT01">Aerts et al. 2004</xref>). The high abundance found in the lower areas of all the beaches studied evidences how important these environments are as potential sources of food for other predatory species (fish and birds).</p>
				
				</sec>
<sec id="S4.3">
<title>Relationship between environmental variables and macroinfauna</title>
				
			  <p>Distribution of macroinfauna is related to the tolerance of these communities to environmental variables (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT30">McLachlan and Brown 2006</xref>). Although the relationship between species and the environment could change with the scale of study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT41">Rodil et al. 2012</xref>), abiotic predictor variables at the local scale were examined. </p>
				<p>Beach slope and grain size have been identified as main factors controlling macroinfauna distribution throughout the intertidal zone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT32">McLachlan et al. 1993</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT23">Jaramillo and MacLachlan 1993</xref>). Results from CCA analysis showed that sand moisture and organic matter content, in addition to elevation and grain size, were the main environmental variables controlling the macroinfauna distribution across the shore on sandy beaches of the Gulf of Cadiz coast. </p>
				<p>Lower and middle zones showed an internal gradient influenced mainly by average grain size. Species inhabiting these zones were <italic>Pontocrates arenarius</italic>, <italic>Siphonoecetes sabatieri</italic> and nemerteans, closely related to coarse grain size, while <italic>Donax trunculus</italic> and <italic>Bathyporeia pelagica</italic> were related to fine grain size. </p>
				<p>The most abundant species in upper zones, the talitrid amphipod <italic>Talitrus saltator</italic> and coleopterans, were correlated positively with elevation but negatively with sand moisture and organic matter content. Grain size was not a good explanatory variable for these species. In fact, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT53">Ugolini et al. (2008)</xref> found no relationship between sand-hopper abundance and sand-grain size. Although these species showed significant relationships with abiotic variables, other factors not taken into account could affect their distribution. For example, it has been reported that stranded material (e.g. macrophytes and macroalgae) provides a physical structure that can be used as a shelter or breeding site and as a food source by supralittoral arthropods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT35">Olabarria et al. 2007</xref>) and the age of these deposits plays a significant role in the structure of upper-shore assemblages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT43">Ruiz-Delgado et al. 2014</xref>). </p>
				
			</sec>
<sec id="S4.4">
<title>Conservation and recreation potential indices</title>
				
			  <p>The conservation and recreation potential indices developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT33">McLachlan et al. (2013)</xref> are useful tools for determining the most suitable beach management approach, providing a set of management principles that can easily be followed, even with limited resources. In these cases, mapping plays a key role for the collection of information and has been identified as a principal step towards management and conservation policies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT42">Rolet et al. 2015</xref>). In addition, the implementation of these indices provides the broadest characterization of sandy beaches, not only based on physical features, since sandy beaches are also social and ecological environments.</p>
				<p>In this work, 12 case studies illustrate the application of the CI and RI indices. Although these indices include five categories, our beaches are grouped mainly into two: intensive recreation and multiple use. Most beaches have shown scores above 5 on the CI, so they have a reasonable potential for conservation. For example, Terrón, Mazagón and Levante beaches, categorized by these indices as of multiple use, have a high conservation potential. Coastal management policies should therefore be designed to promote measures for the conservation of these environments. On the other hand, only Matalascañas and Valdelagrana, have a high recreation potential, which can be exploited with appropriate management strategies or the possible re-evaluation of existing measures that reduce the CI value, for example. </p>
			<p>In conclusion, the beaches on the Spanish coastline along the Gulf of Cadiz are characterized by high biodiversity, including major bio-indicator species, and by a clear zonation of macroinfauna. The overall distribution pattern involves three biological zones: the supralittoral zone, characterized by air-breathing amphipods and coleopterans; the middle zone, characterized by Haustoriidae amphipods, Cirolanidae isopods, Spionidae polychaetes and nemerteans; and the sublittoral zone, characterized by amphipods belonging to the Pontoporeiidae family, mysids and spionid polychaetes. The across-shore distribution of the macroinfauna is influenced primarily by sand moisture, organic matter content, elevation and grain size. Other factors such as wrack deposit and organic inputs from rivers and estuaries could influence the abundance and distribution of macroinfauna inhabiting sandy beaches. Therefore, future studies are needed to elucidate whether the presence of stranded material could affect the global zonation patterns on sandy beaches. The recreation and conservation indices showed that the studied beaches have multiple functionalities, given their social, physical, morphodynamic and biotic features, although many of them have a high potential for conservation that needs to be managed.</p>
			</sec>
			 </sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS</title>
				
			  <p>We would like to thank the “Los Toruños” Natural Park (Cadiz) and its staff for the facilities provided during sampling. This work was supported by the incentive programme for excellent research projects financed by the government of Andalucía (P09- HUM-4717). This project also supported a PhD Grant awarded to the first author. M.C. Ruiz-Delgado was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education via a pre-doctoral grant (FPU) (AP-2009-3906).</p>
			</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>REFERENCES</title>
	<ref id="CIT01">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Aerts </surname>
				   <given-names>K.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Vanagt </surname>
				   <given-names>T.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Degraer </surname>
				   <given-names>S.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Macroinfaunal community structure and zonation of an Ecuadorian sandy beach (bay of Valdivia). </article-title>
			  <source> Belg. Zool. </source>
			  <year>2004</year>
			  <volume>134</volume>
			  <fpage>15</fpage>
			  <lpage>22</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT02">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Allen-Brooks </surname>
				   <given-names>R.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Purdy </surname>
				   <given-names>C.N.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Bell </surname>
				   <given-names>S.S.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> The benthic community of the eastern US continental shelf: A literature synopsis of benthic faunal resources </article-title>
			  <source> Cont. Shelf Res.</source>
			  <year>2006</year>
			  <volume>26</volume>
			  <fpage>804</fpage>
			  <lpage>818</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2006.02.005">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2006.02.005</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT03">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Anfuso </surname>
				   <given-names>G.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Martínez del Pozo </surname>
				   <given-names>J.A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Gracia </surname>
				   <given-names>F.J.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title>.Long-shore distribution of morphodynamic beach states along an apparently homogeneous coast in SW Spain </article-title>
			  <source> J. Coast. Conservat. </source>
			  <year>2003</year>
			  <volume>9</volume>
			  <fpage>49</fpage>
			  <lpage>56</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1652/1400-0350(2003)009[0049:LDOMBS]2.0.CO;2">http://dx.doi.org/10.1652/1400-0350(2003)009[0049:LDOMBS]2.0.CO;2</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT04">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Anfuso </surname>
				   <given-names>E.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Ponce </surname>
				   <given-names>R.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> González-Castro </surname>
				   <given-names>C.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Coupling between the thermohaline, chemical and biological fields during summer 2006 in the northeast continental shelf of the Gulf of Cadiz (SW Iberian Peninsula</article-title>
			  <source> Sci. Mar. </source>
			  <year>2010</year>
			  <volume>74</volume>
<supplement>S1</supplement>
			  <fpage>47</fpage>
			  <lpage>56</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2010.74s1057">http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2010.74s1057</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT05">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Bayed </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Influence of morphodynamic and hydroclimatic factors on the macroinfauna of Moroccan sandy beaches </article-title>
			  <source>Coast.Shelf Sci. </source>
			  <year>2003</year>
			  <volume>58S</volume>
			  <fpage>71</fpage>
			  <lpage>82</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(03)00050-7">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(03)00050-7</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT06">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Baldó </surname>
				   <given-names>F.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Drake </surname>
				   <given-names>P.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> A multivariate approach to the feeding habits of small fishes in the Guadalquivir Estuary </article-title>
			  <source> J. Fish Biol.</source>
			  <year>2002</year>
			  <volume>61</volume>
			  <fpage>21</fpage>
			  <lpage>32</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb01758.x">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb01758.x</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT07">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Barros </surname>
				   <given-names>F.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Borzone </surname>
				   <given-names>C.A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Rosso </surname>
				   <given-names>S.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Macroinfauna of Six Beaches near Guaratuba Bay, Southern Brazil </article-title>
			  <source> Braz. Arch. Biol. Techn.</source>
			  <year>2001</year>
			  <volume>44</volume>
			  <fpage>351</fpage>
			  <lpage>364</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132001000400005">http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132001000400005</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT08">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Benavente </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Del Río </surname>
				   <given-names>L.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Anfuso </surname>
				   <given-names>G.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Utility of morphodynamic characterisation in the prediction of beach damage by storms </article-title>
			  <source> J. Coast. Res. </source>
			  <year>2002</year>
			  <volume>36</volume>
			  <fpage>56</fpage>
			  <lpage>64</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT09">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Buitrago </surname>
				   <given-names>N.R.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Anfuso </surname>
				   <given-names>G.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Morphological changes at Levante Beach (Cadiz, SW Spain) associated with storm events during the 2009-2010 winter seasons</article-title>
			  <source> J. Coast. Res </source>
			  <year>2011</year>
			  <volume>64</volume>
			  <fpage>1886</fpage>
			  <lpage>1890</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT10">
	     <element-citation publication-type="book">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
			<name>
			   <surname> Clarke </surname>
			   <given-names>K.R.</given-names>
			</name>	
			<name>
			   <surname> Gorley </surname>
			   <given-names>R.N.</given-names>
			</name>
			</person-group>		
			<source> PRIMER v6: user manual/tutorial </source>
			<year>2006</year>
			<publisher-loc> Plymouth, UK</publisher-loc>
			<publisher-name> PRIMER-</publisher-name>			
		 </element-citation>	  
	 </ref>	
	<ref id="CIT11">
	     <element-citation publication-type="book">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
			<name>
			   <surname> Clarke </surname>
			   <given-names>K.R.</given-names>
			</name>	
			<name>
			   <surname> Warwick </surname>
			   <given-names>R.M.</given-names>
			</name>
			</person-group>		
			<source> Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation </source>
			<year>2001</year>
			<publisher-loc> Plymouth,UK </publisher-loc>
			<publisher-name>. PRIMER-E </publisher-name>			
		 </element-citation>	  
	 </ref>	
	<ref id="CIT12">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Dahl </surname>
				   <given-names>E.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Some aspects of the ecology and zonation of the fauna on sandy beaches </article-title>
			  <source> Oikos </source>
			  <year>1952</year>
			  <volume>4</volume>
			  <fpage>1</fpage>
			  <lpage>27</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3565072">http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3565072</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
<ref id="CIT13"> 
	<element-citation publication-type="conf-paper"> 
		<person-group person-group-type="author">
			<name>
				   <surname> Dean </surname>
				   <given-names>R.G.</given-names>
			</name>	
		</person-group>
		<article-title> Heuristic models of sand transport in the surf zone </article-title> 
		<conf-name> Proceedings of a Conference on Engineering Dynamics in the Surf Zone (Sydney) </conf-name> 
			<conf-loc> </conf-loc> 
			<year>1973</year>	
			  <fpage>208</fpage>
			  <lpage>214</lpage>
	</element-citation> 
</ref>
	<ref id="CIT14">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Defeo </surname>
				   <given-names>O.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Jaramillo </surname>
				   <given-names>E.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Lyonnet </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Community structure and intertidal zonation of the macroinfauna on the Atlantic coast of Uruguay </article-title>
			  <source> J. Coast. Res. </source>
			  <year>1992</year>
			  <volume>8</volume>
			  <fpage>830</fpage>
			  <lpage>839</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT15">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Defeo </surname>
				   <given-names>O.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> McLachlan </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Schoeman </surname>
				   <given-names>D.S.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: A review. </article-title>
			  <source> Estuar.Coast. Shelf Sci.</source>
			  <year>2009</year>
			  <volume>8</volume>
			  <fpage>1</fpage>
			  <lpage>12</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2008.09.022">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2008.09.022</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT16">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Degraer </surname>
				   <given-names>S.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> De Neve, </surname>
				   <given-names>L.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Mouton </surname>
				   <given-names>L.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Zonation and community structure of the macrobenthos of a macrotidal, ultra- dissipative sandy beach: Summer-Winter comparison
 </article-title>
			  <source> Estuaries </source>
			  <year>1999</year>
			  <volume>22</volume>
			  <fpage>742</fpage>
			  <lpage>752</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1353107">http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1353107</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT17">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Degraer </surname>
				   <given-names>S.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Volckaert </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Vincx </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Macrobenthic zonation patterns along a morphodynamical continuum of macrotidal, low tide bar/rip and ultra-dissipative sandy beaches</article-title>
			  <source> Estuar. Coast. Shelf</source>
			  <year>2003</year>
			  <volume>56</volume>
			  <fpage>459</fpage>
			  <lpage>468</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00195-6">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00195-6</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT18">
		<element-citation publication-type="book">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Dexter </surname>
				   <given-names>D.M.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			<source> Sandy Beaches as Ecosystems </source>
				<person-group person-group-type="editor">
				  <name>
					<surname> McLachlan </surname>
					<given-names>A.</given-names>
				  </name>
				  <name>
					<surname> Erasmus </surname>
					<given-names>T.</given-names>
				  </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Community structure of intertidal sandy beaches in New South Wales, Australia </article-title>
<publisher-name> Springer</publisher-name>
			  <year>1983</year>
			  <fpage>461</fpage>
			  <lpage>472</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2938-3_34">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2938-3_34</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT19">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Emery </surname>
				   <given-names>K.O.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> A simple method of measuring beach profiles. </article-title>
			  <source> Limnol. Oceanogr. </source>
			  <year>1961</year>
			  <volume>6</volume>
			  <fpage>90</fpage>
			  <lpage>93</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.1961.6.1.0090">http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.1961.6.1.0090</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT20">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Gonçalves </surname>
				   <given-names>S.C.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Anastácio </surname>
				   <given-names>P.M.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Pardal </surname>
				   <given-names>A.M.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Sandy beach macroinfaunal communities on the western coast of Portugal –Is there a steady structure under similar exposed conditions?</article-title>
			  <source> Estuar. Coast. Shelf S.</source>
			  <year>2009</year>
			  <volume>81</volume>
			  <fpage>555</fpage>
			  <lpage>568</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2008.12.004">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2008.12.004</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT21">
	     <element-citation publication-type="book">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
			<name>
			   <surname> Guitián </surname>
			   <given-names>F.</given-names>
			</name>	
			<name>
			   <surname> Carballas </surname>
			   <given-names>J.</given-names>
			</name>
			</person-group>		
			<source> Técnicas de análisis de suelos </source>
			<year>1976</year>
			<publisher-loc> Santiago de Compostela </publisher-loc>
			<publisher-name> Pico Sacro</publisher-name>			
		 </element-citation>	  
	 </ref>	
	<ref id="CIT22">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Herrera-Bachiller </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> García-Corrales </surname>
				   <given-names>P.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Roldan </surname>
				   <given-names>C.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> The ignored but common nemertine from the Galician beaches (Spain) <italic>Psammamphiporus elongatus</italic>, affected by the Prestige oil spill</article-title>
			  <source>Mar. Ecol.</source>
			  <year>2008</year>
			  <volume>29</volume>
			  <fpage>43</fpage>
			  <lpage>50</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0485.2007.00199.x">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0485.2007.00199.x</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT23">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Jaramillo </surname>
				   <given-names>E.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> McLachlan </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title>Community and population response of the macroinfauna to physical factors over a range of exposed sandy beaches in south-central Chile</article-title>
			  <source>Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.</source>
			  <year>1993</year>
			  <volume>37</volume>
			  <fpage>615</fpage>
			  <lpage>624</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ecss.1993.1077">http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ecss.1993.1077</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT24">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Jaramillo </surname>
				   <given-names>E.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> McLachlan </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Coetzee </surname>
				   <given-names>P.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Intertidal zonation patterns of macroinfauna over a range of exposed sandy beaches in south-central Chile.</article-title>
			  <source> Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.</source>
			  <year>1993</year>
			  <volume>101</volume>
			  <fpage>105</fpage>
			  <lpage>118</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps101105">http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps101105</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT25">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Jaramillo </surname>
				   <given-names>E.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> McLachlan </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Dugan </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Total sample area and estimates of species richness in exposed sandy beaches </article-title>
			  <source> Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. </source>
			  <year>1995</year>
			  <volume>119</volume>
			  <fpage>311</fpage>
			  <lpage>314</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps119311">http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps119311</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT26">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Jaramillo </surname>
				   <given-names>E.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Duarte </surname>
				   <given-names>C.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Contreras </surname>
				   <given-names>H.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Sandy beaches macroinfauna from the coast of Ancud, Isla Chiloé, southern Chile </article-title>
			  <source> Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat </source>
			  <year>2000</year>
			  <volume>73</volume>
			  <fpage>771</fpage>
			  <lpage>786</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0716-078X2000000400019">http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0716-078X2000000400019</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT27">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Masselink </surname>
				   <given-names>G.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Short </surname>
				   <given-names>A.D.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> The effect of tide range on beach morphodynamics and morphology: a conceptual beach model </article-title>
			  <source> J. Coast. Res.</source>
			  <year>1993</year>
			  <volume>9</volume>
			  <fpage>785</fpage>
			  <lpage>800</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT28">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Mayoral </surname>
				   <given-names>M.A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> López-Serrano </surname>
				   <given-names>L.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Viéitez </surname>
				   <given-names>J.M.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Macroinfauna bentónica intermareal de 3 playas de la desembocadura del río Piedras (Huelva, España)</article-title>
			  <source> Bol. R. Soc. Esp. Hist. Nat.</source>
			  <year>1994</year>
			  <volume>91</volume>
			  <fpage>231</fpage>
			  <lpage>240</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT29">
	     <element-citation publication-type="book">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
			<name>
			   <surname> McCune </surname>
			   <given-names>B.</given-names>
			</name>	
			<name>
			   <surname> Medford </surname>
			   <given-names>M.J.</given-names>
			</name>
			</person-group>		
			<source> PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, Version 3 for Windows.</source>
			<year>1997</year>
			<publisher-loc> Gleneden Beach, Oregon </publisher-loc>
			<publisher-name> MjM Software Design, </publisher-name>			
		 </element-citation>	  
	 </ref>	
	<ref id="CIT30">
	     <element-citation publication-type="book">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
			<name>
			   <surname> McLachlan </surname>
			   <given-names>A.</given-names>
			</name>	
			<name>
			   <surname> Brown </surname>
			   <given-names>A.C.</given-names>
			</name>
			</person-group>		
			<source> The ecology of sandy shores </source>
			<year>2006</year>
			<publisher-loc> Burlington </publisher-loc>
			<publisher-name> Elsevier </publisher-name>			
		 </element-citation>	  
	 </ref>	
	<ref id="CIT31">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> McLachlan </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Dorvlo </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Global patterns in sandy beach macrobenthic communities. </article-title>
			  <source> J. Coast. Res. </source>
			  <year>2005</year>
			  <volume>21</volume>
			  <fpage>674</fpage>
			  <lpage>687</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2112/03-0114.1">http://dx.doi.org/10.2112/03-0114.1</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT32">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> McLachlan </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Jaramillo </surname>
				   <given-names>E.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Donn </surname>
				   <given-names>T.E.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Sandy beach macroinfauna communities and their control by the physical environment: a geographical comparison</article-title>
			  <source> J. Coast. Res. </source>
			  <year>1993</year>
			  <volume>15</volume>
			  <fpage>27</fpage>
			  <lpage>38</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT33">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> McLachlan </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Defeo </surname>
				   <given-names>O.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Jaramillo </surname>
				   <given-names>E.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Sandy beach conservation and recreation: Guidelines for optimising management strategies for multi-purpose use </article-title>
			  <source> Ocean Coast. Manage. </source>
			  <year>2013</year>
			  <volume>71</volume>
			  <fpage>256</fpage>
			  <lpage>268</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.10.005">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.10.005</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT34">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Papageorgiou </surname>
				   <given-names>N.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Arvanitidis </surname>
				   <given-names>C.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Eleftheriou </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Multicausal environmental severity: A flexible framework for microtidal sandy beaches and the role of polychaetes as an indicator taxon </article-title>
			  <source> Estuar. Coast. Shelf</source>
			  <year>2006</year>
			  <volume>70</volume>
			  <fpage>643</fpage>
			  <lpage>653</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.11.033">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.11.033</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT35">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Olabarria </surname>
				   <given-names>C.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Lastra </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Garrido </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Succession of macroinfauna on macroalgal wrack of an exposed sandy beach: Effects of patch size and site</article-title>
			  <source> Mar. Environ. Res. </source>
			  <year>2007</year>
			  <volume>63</volume>
			  <fpage>19</fpage>
			  <lpage>40</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2006.06.001">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2006.06.001</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT36">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Pérez-Domingo </surname>
				   <given-names>S.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Castellanos </surname>
				   <given-names>C.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Junoy </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> The sandy beach macroinfauna of Gulf of Gabés (Tunisia).</article-title>
			  <source>Mar. Ecol.</source>
			  <year>2008</year>
			  <volume>29</volume>
			  <fpage>51</fpage>
			  <lpage>59</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0485.2007.00201.x">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0485.2007.00201.x</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT37">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Prieto </surname>
				   <given-names>L.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> García </surname>
				   <given-names>C.M.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Corzo </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Phytoplankton, bacterioplankton and nitrate reductase activity distribution in relation to physical structure in the northern Alborán Sea and Gulf of Cadiz (southern Iberian Peninsula).</article-title>
			  <source>.Bol. Inst. Esp. Oceanogr. </source>
			  <year>1999</year>
			  <volume>15</volume>
			  <fpage>401</fpage>
			  <lpage>411</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT38">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Puerta </surname>
				   <given-names>P.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Andrade </surname>
				   <given-names>S.C.S.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Junoy </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Redescription of <italic>Lineus acutifrons</italic> Southern, 1913 (Nemertea: Pilidiophora) and comments on its phylogenetic position </article-title>
			  <source> J. Nat. Hist. </source>
			  <year>2010</year>
			  <volume>44</volume>
			  <fpage>2363</fpage>
			  <lpage>2378</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2010.504895">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2010.504895</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT39">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Rodil </surname>
				   <given-names>I.F.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Lastra </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Sánchez-Mata </surname>
				   <given-names>A.G.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Community structure and intertidal zonation of the macroinfauna in intermediate sandy beaches in temperate latitudes: North coast of Spain </article-title>
			  <source> Estuar. Coast. Shelf </source>
			  <year>2006</year>
			  <volume>67</volume>
			  <fpage>267</fpage>
			  <lpage>279</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.11.018">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.11.018 </ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT40">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Rodil </surname>
				   <given-names>I.F.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Lastra </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> López </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Macroinfauna community structure and biochemical composition of sedimentary organic matter along a gradient of wave exposure in sandy beaches (NW Spain).</article-title>
			  <source> Hidrobiología </source>
			  <year>2007</year>
			  <volume>579</volume>
			  <fpage>301</fpage>
			  <lpage>316</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0443-2">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0443-2</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT41">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Rodil </surname>
				   <given-names>I.F.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Compton </surname>
				   <given-names>T.J.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Lastra </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Exploring macroinvertebrate species distributions at regional and local scales across a sandy beach geographic continuum. </article-title>
			  <source> PloSOne </source>
			  <year>2012</year>
			  <volume>7</volume>
			  <fpage> e39609</fpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039609">http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039609</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT42">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Rolet </surname>
				   <given-names>C.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Spilmont </surname>
				   <given-names>N.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Dewarumez </surname>
				   <given-names>J.M.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Linking macrobenthic communities structure and zonation patterns on sandy shores: Mapping tool toward management and conservation perspectives in Northern France.</article-title>
			  <source> Cont. Shelf. Res. </source>
			  <year>2015</year>
			  <volume>99</volume>
			  <fpage>12</fpage>
			  <lpage>25</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2015.03.002">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2015.03.002</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT43">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Ruiz-Delgado </surname>
				   <given-names>M.C.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Vieira </surname>
				   <given-names>J.V.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Veloso </surname>
				   <given-names>V.G.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> The role of wrack deposits for supralittoral arthropods: An example using Atlantic sandy beaches of Brazil and Spain </article-title>
			  <source> Estuar.Coast. Shelf Sci. </source>
			  <year>2014</year>
			  <volume>136</volume>
			  <fpage>61</fpage>
			  <lpage>71</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2013.11.016">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2013.11.016 </ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT44">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Salvat </surname>
				   <given-names>B.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Les conditions hydrodynamiques interstitielles des sediment meubles intertidaux et la répartition verticale de la faune endogée. </article-title>
			  <source> C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris </source>
			  <year>1964</year>
			  <volume>259</volume>
			  <fpage>1567</fpage>
			  <lpage>1579</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT45">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Schlacher </surname>
				   <given-names>T.A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Thompson </surname>
				   <given-names>L.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Spatial structure on ocean-exposed sandy beaches: faunal zonation metrics and their variability. </article-title>
			  <source> Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. </source>
			  <year>2013</year>
			  <volume>478</volume>
			  <fpage>43</fpage>
			  <lpage>55</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps10205">http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps10205 </ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT46">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Schlacher </surname>
				   <given-names>T.A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Schoeman </surname>
				   <given-names>D.S.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Jones </surname>
				   <given-names>A.R.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Metrics to assess ecological condition, change, and impacts in sandy beach ecosystems</article-title>
			  <source> J. Environ. Manage. </source>
			  <year>2014</year>
			  <volume>144</volume>
			  <fpage>322</fpage>
			  <lpage>335</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.036">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.036</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT47">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Sobrino </surname>
				   <given-names>I.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Jiménez </surname>
				   <given-names>M.P.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Ramos </surname>
				   <given-names>F.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Descripción de las pesquerías demersales de la Región Suratlántica Española. </article-title>
			  <source> Bol. Inst. Esp. Oceanogr. </source>
			  <year>1994</year>
			  <volume>151</volume>
			  <fpage>3</fpage>
			  <lpage>79</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT48">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Souza </surname>
				   <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Borzone </surname>
				   <given-names>C.A.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Population dynamics and secondary production of <italic>Scolelepis squamata</italic> (Polychaeta: Spionidae) in an exposed sandy beach of southern Brazil </article-title>
			  <source> Bull. Mar. Sci. </source>
			  <year>2000</year>
			  <volume>67</volume>
			  <fpage>221</fpage>
			  <lpage>233</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT49">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Speybroeck </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Alsteens </surname>
				   <given-names>L.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Vincx </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Understanding the life of a sandy beach polychaete of functional importance – <italic>Scolelepis squamata</italic> (Polychaeta: Spionidae) on Belgian sandy beaches (northeastern Atlantic, North Sea). </article-title>
			  <source> Estuar.Coast. Shelf Sci.</source>
			  <year>2007</year>
			  <volume>74</volume>
			  <fpage>109</fpage>
			  <lpage>118</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2007.04.002">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2007.04.002</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT50">
		<element-citation publication-type="book">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
				<name>
				  <surname> TerBraak </surname>
				  <given-names>C.J.F.</given-names>
				</name>
			</person-group>
			  <chapter-title> Ordination </chapter-title>
				<person-group person-group-type="editor">
				<name>
				  <surname> Jongman </surname>
				  <given-names>R.H.G.</given-names>
				</name>
				<name>
				  <surname>C.J.F.</surname>
				  <given-names></given-names>
				</name>
				<name>
				  <surname> van Tongeren</surname>
				  <given-names>O.F.R.</given-names>
				</name>
			  </person-group>
		<source> Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. </source>
		<year></year>
		<publisher-loc> Cambridge, United Kingdom </publisher-loc>
		<publisher-name> Cambridge University Press </publisher-name>
		<fpage>91</fpage>
		<lpage>173</lpage>
	</element-citation>
</ref>
	<ref id="CIT51">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Torres </surname>
				   <given-names>M.A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Coll </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Heymans </surname>
				   <given-names>J.J.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Food-web structure of and fishing impacts on the Gulf of Cadiz ecosystem (South-western Spain)</article-title>
			  <source> Ecol. Model. </source>
			  <year>2013</year>
			  <volume>265</volume>
			  <fpage>26</fpage>
			  <lpage>44</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.05.019">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.05.019</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT52">
	     <element-citation publication-type="book">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
			<name>
				   <surname> Trask </surname>
				   <given-names>P.D.</given-names>
			</name>	
			</person-group>		
			<source> Applied sedimentation </source>
			<year>1950</year>
			<publisher-loc> New York.</publisher-loc>
			<publisher-name> Jon Wiley and Sons Inc </publisher-name>			
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.16378">http://dx.doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.16378</ext-link>
	</comment>
		 </element-citation>	  
	 </ref>	
	<ref id="CIT53">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Ugolini </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Ungherese </surname>
				   <given-names>G.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Somigli </surname>
				   <given-names>S.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> The amphipod <italic>Talitrus saltator</italic> as a bioindicator of human trampling on sandy beaches.</article-title>
			  <source> Mar. Environ. Res.</source>
			  <year>2008</year>
			  <volume>65</volume>
			  <fpage>349</fpage>
			  <lpage>357</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2007.12.002">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2007.12.002</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
</ref-list>
<app>
	<table-wrap id="A1">
			<label>Appendix 1</label>
		<caption>
			<title>Density (ind. m<sup>–2</sup>); Total species (richness); <italic>d</italic>, Margalef’s species richness; H’, Shannon-Wiener diversity index; J’, Pielou evenness index; T.dens., total density per species (ind. m<sup>–2</sup>); Freq., species frequency; H, Hoyo; T, Terrón; Bo, Bota; Ma, Matalascañas; M, Mazagón; Cb, Costa Ballena; V, Valdelagrana; Le, Levante; C, Cortadura; Ba, Barrosa; Z, Zahara; La, Lances.</title>
		</caption>
		<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
  <thead>

						<tr>
							<th>
								Species composition
							</th>
							<th>
								H
							</th>
							<th>
								T
							</th>
							<th>
								Bo
							</th>
							<th>
								Ma
							</th>
							<th>
								M
							</th>
							<th>
								Cb
							</th>
							<th>
								V
							</th>
							<th>
								Le
							</th>
							<th>
								C
							</th>
							<th>
								Ba
							</th>
							<th>
								Z
							</th>
							<th>
								La
							</th>
							<th>
								T. dens.
							</th>
							<th>
								Freq.
							</th>
						</tr>
 </thead>
					<tbody>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Crustacea
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Ampelisca</italic> sp.
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Apherusa</italic> sp.
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Atylus swammerdami</italic>
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								2.40
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								2.93
							</td>
							<td>
								25%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Bathyporeia pelagica</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								7.47
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								17.60
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								6.13
							</td>
							<td>
								1.07
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								32.27
							</td>
							<td>
								42%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Bodotria pulchella</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Cumella pygmaea</italic>
							</td>
							<td>
								2.67
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								2.67
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Cumopsis fagei</italic>
							</td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								2.13
							</td>
							<td>
								58%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Diogenes pugilator</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								9.33
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								9.60
							</td>
							<td>
								17%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Eocuma dollfusi</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td>
								17%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Eurydice affinis</italic>
							</td>
							<td>
								2.67
							</td>
							<td>
								11.20
							</td>
							<td>
								1.60
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								5.07
							</td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td>
								4.53
							</td>
							<td>
								5.07
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								2.67
							</td>
							<td>
								34.13
							</td>
							<td>
								75%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Eurydice pulchra</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								2.40
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								3.20
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								3.20
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								9.07
							</td>
							<td>
								33%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Gastrosaccus sanctus</italic>
							</td>
							<td>
								2.13
							</td>
							<td>
								2.13
							</td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								1.07
							</td>
							<td>
								4.27
							</td>
							<td>
								1.87
							</td>
							<td>
								13.87
							</td>
							<td>
								83%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Gastrosaccus spinifer</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								4.80
							</td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.07
							</td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td>
								1.60
							</td>
							<td>
								1.87
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								10.67
							</td>
							<td>
								50%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Haustorius arenarius</italic>
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								4.27
							</td>
							<td>
								2.13
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								93.87
							</td>
							<td>
								1.60
							</td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td>
								18.13
							</td>
							<td>
								5.07
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								4.00
							</td>
							<td>
								130.40
							</td>
							<td>
								92%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Lekanesphaera</italic> cf <italic>weilli</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								4.53
							</td>
							<td>
								2.93
							</td>
							<td>
								1.33
							</td>
							<td>
								1.87
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								1.87
							</td>
							<td>
								13.07
							</td>
							<td>
								58%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Processa</italic> sp.
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Liocarcinus depuratus</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Mysidae sp.
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Paguridae
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td>
								17%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Pontocrates arenarius</italic>
							</td>
							<td>
								3.20
							</td>
							<td>
								10.40
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								1.87
							</td>
							<td>
								5.33
							</td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td>
								12.00
							</td>
							<td>
								6.93
							</td>
							<td>
								5.07
							</td>
							<td>
								47.47
							</td>
							<td>
								92%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Portunnus latipes</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.60
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								2.93
							</td>
							<td>
								33%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Siphonoecetes sabatieri</italic>
							</td>
							<td>
								2.13
							</td>
							<td>
								2.93
							</td>
							<td>
								116.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								5.60
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.60
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								128.53
							</td>
							<td>
								42%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Talitrus saltator</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.07
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								4.00
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.07
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								2.67
							</td>
							<td>
								5.07
							</td>
							<td>
								13.87
							</td>
							<td>
								42%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Polychaeta
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Aponuphis bilineata</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Capitella capitata</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Dispio uncinata</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.07
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.07
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								2.93
							</td>
							<td>
								33%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Eteone</italic> sp.
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Flabelligeridae
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								2.13
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								2.67
							</td>
							<td>
								17%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Glycera capitata</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.33
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								2.13
							</td>
							<td>
								17%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Glycera tridactyla</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.07
							</td>
							<td>
								1.33
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								2.40
							</td>
							<td>
								17%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Hesionides arenaria</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Magelona papilliformis</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								2.40
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								2.40
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Nephthys cirrosa</italic>
							</td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								2.93
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								2.40
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								7.20
							</td>
							<td>
								42%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Nephthys hombergii</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Onuphis eremita</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.87
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.87
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Ophelia radiata</italic>
							</td>
							<td>
								3.20
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								3.20
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Paraonis fulgens</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.60
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.87
							</td>
							<td>
								17%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Phyllodocidae sp.
							</td>
							<td>
								5.07
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								5.07
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Saccocirrus</italic> sp.
							</td>
							<td>
								6.93
							</td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								5.33
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.60
							</td>
							<td>
								9.33
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								23.73
							</td>
							<td>
								42%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Scolelepis squamata</italic>
							</td>
							<td>
								6.13
							</td>
							<td>
								3.73
							</td>
							<td>
								59.47
							</td>
							<td>
								69.33
							</td>
							<td>
								2.13
							</td>
							<td>
								4.53
							</td>
							<td>
								79.73
							</td>
							<td>
								7.47
							</td>
							<td>
								1.60
							</td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								1.07
							</td>
							<td>
								236.00
							</td>
							<td>
								100%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Spiophanes</italic> sp.
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Spionidae sp1
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Spionidae sp2
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Sthenelais boa</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Terebellidae sp.
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Insecta
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Carabidae sp
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Coleoptera sp1
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.87
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.87
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Coleoptera sp2
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.33
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.33
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Curculionidae sp.
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								1.60
							</td>
							<td>
								33%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Phaleria bimaculata</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td>
								17%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Pogonus</italic> sp
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Scarabaeidae sp.
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Staphylinidae sp.
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td>
								17%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Tenebrionidae sp.
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Mollusca
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Chamaelea gallina</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Corbula gibba</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Donax trunculus</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								27.47
							</td>
							<td>
								2.93
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.87
							</td>
							<td>
								5.33
							</td>
							<td>
								1.33
							</td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td>
								40.00
							</td>
							<td>
								58%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Mactra stultorum</italic>
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.07
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.33
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Nassarius incrassatus</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Nassarius vaucheri</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.07
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								1.07
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Tapes</italic> sp.
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								<italic>Tellina tenuis</italic>
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td>
								8%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Nemertea
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Nemertea sp.
							</td>
							<td>
								21.87
							</td>
							<td>
								2.40
							</td>
							<td>
								2.40
							</td>
							<td>
								 
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								 
							</td>
							<td>
								 
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								 
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								14.40
							</td>
							<td>
								0.27
							</td>
							<td>
								42.13
							</td>
							<td>
								67%
							</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Density
							</td>
							<td>
								58.9
							</td>
							<td>
								42.4
							</td>
							<td>
								248.5
							</td>
							<td>
								76.3
							</td>
							<td>
								28.8
							</td>
							<td>
								130.9
							</td>
							<td>
								96.8
							</td>
							<td>
								37.3
							</td>
							<td>
								34.7
							</td>
							<td>
								28.5
							</td>
							<td>
								41.6
							</td>
							<td>
								22.7
							</td>
							<td>
								<strong>847.4</strong>
							</td>
							<td></td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								Total species
							</td>
							<td>
								18
							</td>
							<td>
								13
							</td>
							<td>
								33
							</td>
							<td>
								4
							</td>
							<td>
								10
							</td>
							<td>
								15
							</td>
							<td>
								10
							</td>
							<td>
								24
							</td>
							<td>
								19
							</td>
							<td>
								16
							</td>
							<td>
								12
							</td>
							<td>
								10
							</td>
							<td>
								<strong>184</strong>
							</td>
							<td></td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								d
							</td>
							<td>
								3.15
							</td>
							<td>
								2.37
							</td>
							<td>
								4.68
							</td>
							<td>
								0.53
							</td>
							<td>
								1.92
							</td>
							<td>
								2.26
							</td>
							<td>
								1.53
							</td>
							<td>
								4.65
							</td>
							<td>
								3.70
							</td>
							<td>
								3.21
							</td>
							<td>
								2.18
							</td>
							<td>
								2.03
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								H’
							</td>
							<td>
								2.15
							</td>
							<td>
								2.06
							</td>
							<td>
								1.76
							</td>
							<td>
								0.40
							</td>
							<td>
								1.92
							</td>
							<td>
								1.11
							</td>
							<td>
								0.81
							</td>
							<td>
								2.68
							</td>
							<td>
								1.84
							</td>
							<td>
								1.95
							</td>
							<td>
								1.79
							</td>
							<td>
								1.98
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>
								J’ 
							</td>
							<td>
								0.74
							</td>
							<td>
								0.80
							</td>
							<td>
								0.50
							</td>
							<td>
								0.29
							</td>
							<td>
								0.83
							</td>
							<td>
								0.41
							</td>
							<td>
								0.35
							</td>
							<td>
								0.84
							</td>
							<td>
								0.62
							</td>
							<td>
								0.70
							</td>
							<td>
								0.72
							</td>
							<td>
								0.86
							</td>
							<td></td>
							<td></td>
						</tr>
					</tbody>
	</table>
</table-wrap>
</app>
</back>
</article>