<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpublishing3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SCIENTIA MARINA</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Scientia Marina</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title>Sci Mar</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="epub">0214-8358</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			 <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">sm4060</article-id>
			 <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3989/scimar.04060.29B</article-id>
			 
			
		<title-group>
			  <article-title>Food and habitat choice in the spider crab <italic>Leucippa pentagona</italic> (Majoidea: Epialtidae) in Bahía Bustamante, Patagonia, Argentina</article-title>
		<trans-title-group xml:lang="es">
		<trans-title>Alimentación y selección del hábitat en el cangrejo araña <italic>Leucippa pentagona</italic> (Majoidea: Epialtidae) en Bahía Bustamante, Patagonia, Argentina</trans-title>
		</trans-title-group>
		<alt-title alt-title-type="running-head">Food and habitat choice of <italic>Leucippa pentagona</italic></alt-title>
		</title-group>
		
		<contrib-group>
			  <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"> 
				<name>
				 <surname> Varisco</surname>
				 <given-names>Martin</given-names>
				</name>
				<xref ref-type="aff" rid="U1"/>
				<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"/>
			  </contrib>
			  <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no"> 
				<name>
				 <surname>Martín</surname>
				 <given-names>Lucas</given-names>
				</name>
				<xref ref-type="aff" rid="U2"/>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="U3"/>
		  </contrib>
			  <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no"> 
				<name>
				 <surname>Zaixso</surname>
				 <given-names>Héctor</given-names>
				</name>
				<xref ref-type="aff" rid="U1"/>
			  </contrib>
			  <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no"> 
				<name>
				 <surname>Velasquez</surname>
				 <given-names>Cecilia</given-names>
				</name>
				<xref ref-type="aff" rid="U1"/>
			  </contrib>
			  <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no"> 
				<name>
				 <surname>Vinuesa</surname>
				 <given-names>Julio</given-names>
				</name>
				<xref ref-type="aff" rid="U1"/>
				<xref ref-type="aff" rid="U3"/>
			  </contrib>
			  <aff id="U1">Instituto de Desarrollo Costero, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Ruta Provincial 1 Km 4, Comodoro Rivadavia, Chubut, Argentina. (CP 9005).</aff>
			  <aff id="U2">Laboratorio de Ficología y Micología, Departamento de Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional del Sur, San Juan 670, Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina (CP B8000CTX).</aff>
			  <aff id="U3">Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de la República Argentina.</aff>
			 </contrib-group>
			 
			 <author-notes>
		<corresp id="cor1">e-mail: <email xlink:href="martinvarisco@hotmail.com">martinvarisco@hotmail.com</email>
		</corresp>
		</author-notes>
		
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
		<day>31</day>
		<month>3</month>
		<year>2015</year>
		</pub-date>
		<pub-date pub-type="collection">
		<year>2015</year>
		</pub-date>
		
		<volume>79</volume>
		<issue>1</issue>
		<fpage>107</fpage>
		<lpage>116</lpage>
		
		<elocation-id content-type="doi">10.3989/scimar.04060.29B</elocation-id>

		 <history>
		  	<date date-type="received">
				<day>19</day>
				<month>3</month>
				<year>2014</year>
			</date>
			<date date-type="accepted">
				<day>15</day>
				<month>10</month>
				<year>2014</year>
			</date>
			<date date-type="published">
				<day>8</day>
				<month>1</month>
				<year>2015</year>
			</date>
		 </history>
		 
		<permissions>
		<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; 2015 CSIC</copyright-statement>
		<copyright-year>2015</copyright-year>
		<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/">
		<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial Lisence (by-nc) Spain 3.0.</license-p>
		</license>
		</permissions>
		
		<abstract xml:lang="en">
		<title>SUMMARY</title>
		<p>The aim of the present study was to analyse the feeding strategy and spatial distribution of the spider crab <italic>Leucippa pentagona</italic> in Bahía Bustamante (Patagonia, Argentina). Several microhabitat variables that could influence the spatial distribution of this crab were related to its different life stages by using redundancy analysis. Regarding its feeding preferences, we found that the sphacelariales <italic>Halopteris</italic> spp. and <italic>Sphacelaria fusca</italic>, epiphytes of the alga <italic>Gracilaria gracilis</italic>, represented over 70% of its diet. Conversely, consumption of G. gracilis was low throughout the year. These feeding preferences can be related to the higher proportion of ash-free dry mass of sphacelariales. A close association was observed between <italic>G. gracilis</italic> biomass and recruits and mature crabs; this relationship was stronger at critical periods of the crab’s life cycle such as incubation or moult. Intermolt juveniles were related to <italic>G. gracilis</italic> as well as to other species of macroalgae. Our results suggest that <italic>G. gracilis</italic> plays a key role in the small-scale distribution of <italic>L. pentagona</italic> in Bahía Bustamante, providing food and shelter. The consumption of <italic>G. gracilis</italic> epiphytes allows <italic>L. pentagona</italic> to maintain high foraging rates at safe living sites, minimizing the damage to <italic>G. gracilis</italic>. </p>
		</abstract>
		<trans-abstract xml:lang="es">
		<title>RESUMEN</title>
		<p>En este trabajo se analiza la alimentación y distribución especial del cangrejo araña <italic>Leucippa pentagona</italic> en Bahía Bustamante (Patagonia, Argentina). La distribución espacial de distintos estadios del ciclo de vida de la especie se relacionó con variables ambientales mediante un análisis de redundancias. La especie presenta una dieta especializada, las sphacelariales <italic>Halopteris</italic> spp. y <italic>Sphacelaria fusca</italic>, epifitas de <italic>Gracilaria gracilis</italic>, representan más del 70% de la dieta. Por otra parte, se observó una baja incidencia de <italic>G. gracilis</italic> en la dieta durante todas las estaciones del año. Estos resultados pueden estar relacionados con el alto contenido de materia orgánica que tienen las sphacelariales. Respecto de la distribución espacial, se observó una relación significativa entre la biomasa de <italic>G. gracilis</italic> y reclutas y adultos de <italic>L. pentagona</italic>; esta relación es más significativa en periodos críticos del ciclo de vida del cangrejo como la muda o la incubación de los huevos. Los juveniles de tallas más grandes, en intermuda, están asociados tanto a <italic>G. gracilis</italic> como a otras macroalgas disponibles en el área. Nuestros resultados sugieren que <italic>G. gracilis</italic> tiene un rol importante en la distribución a pequeña escala del cangrejo <italic>L. pentagona</italic> en Bahía Bustamante, proveyéndole alimento y refugio. El alto consumo de epifitas de G. gracilis permite a <italic>L. pentagona</italic> alimentarse en el complejo microhabitat que le provee el alga, minimizando el daño sobre <italic>G. gracilis</italic>.</p>
		</trans-abstract>
		<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
			<title>KEYWORDS</title>
			<kwd><italic>Leucippa pentagona</italic></kwd>
			<kwd><italic>Gracilaria gracilis</italic></kwd>
			<kwd>microhabitat</kwd>
			<kwd>subtidal beds</kwd>
			<kwd>epiphyte consumption</kwd>
			<kwd>Sphacelariales</kwd>			
		</kwd-group>
		<kwd-group xml:lang="es">
			<title>PALABRAS CLAVE</title>
			<kwd><italic>Leucippa pentagona</italic></kwd>
			<kwd><italic>Gracilaria gracilis</italic></kwd>
			<kwd>microhabitat</kwd>
			<kwd>dieta</kwd>
			<kwd>epifitas</kwd>
			<kwd>Sphacelariales</kwd>
		</kwd-group>
	 </article-meta>
	</front>
			<body>
<sec id="S1">
<title>INTRODUCTION</title>
				
			  <p>Seaweed assemblages with a high structural complexity are associated with a wide diversity of benthic invertebrates. Macroalgae play a role in the small-scale distribution and abundance of several decapod species because they provide shelter and food support (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT19">Hines 1982</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT16">García-Raso and Fernández-Muñoz 1987</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT37">Robinson and Tully 2000</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT26">Moksnes 2002</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT22">López De La Rosa et al. 2006</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT11">Cruz-Rivera and Friedlander 2011</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT17">Hammann et al. 2013</xref>). Habitat selection and feeding preferences are closely related, particularly in small herbivores (mesograzers) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT29">Nicotri 1980</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT15">Duffy and Hay 1994</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT23">Mancinelli and Rossi 2001</xref>). In this respect, some studies have suggested that food selection is subordinated to structural complexity of seaweed assemblages, because predation risk is the main selection pressure in coastal areas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT14">Duffy and Hay 1991</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT43">Taylor and Brow 2006</xref>). Habitat requirements of decapod species can change because species are more vulnerable to predation in periods such as settlement, recruitment, incubation and post-moult. However, information about shelter requirements refers mainly to recruitment (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT18">Herrkind and Buttler 1986</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT36">Rodríguez et al. 1993</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT33">Perkins-Visser et al. 1996</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT26">Moksnes 2002</xref>).</p>
				<p>Knowledge on the feeding preferences of mesograzers is crucial to understand their effects on the algal community. Field experiments have shown that mesograzer feeding is insufficient to control algal biomass (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT35">Poore et al. 2009</xref>). However, the use of algae as shelter and food can impose constraints on the amount of food available for consumption in order to maintain the integrity of the shelter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT14">Duffy and Hay 1991</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT41">Stachowicz and Hay 1996</xref>). In particular, beds of <italic>Gracilaria</italic> spp., which are widely distributed around the world, provide refuge and food to a wide variety of mesograzers such as amphipods, isopods, and crabs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT23">Mancinelli and Rossi 2001</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT11">Cruz-Rivera and Friedlander 2011</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT17">Hammann et al. 2013</xref>). Trophic interactions between <italic>Gracilaria</italic> spp. and associated mesograzers are variable. Some mesograzers exploit <italic>Gracilaria</italic> as a food resource, while others prefer feeding on epiphytes or associated macroalgae (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT01">Anderson et al. 1998</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT23">Mancinelli and Rossi 2001</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT39">Smit et al. 2003</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT11">Cruz-Rivera and Friedlander 2011</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT17">Hammann et al. 2013</xref>). Feeding primarily on epiphytes is a feeding behavior that helps to maintain the structural complexity of shelters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT41">Stachowicz and Hay 1996</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT03">Boström and Mattilla 1999</xref>) and can be indirectly beneficial to <italic>Gracilaria</italic> spp. populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT38">Shacklock and Doyle 1983</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT01">Anderson et al. 1998</xref>). In Argentine Patagonia, <italic>G. gracilis</italic> forms large and dense beds at some wave-protected sites of Golfo San Jorge (Bahía Bustamante, Puerto Melo and Bahía Arredondo) and Golfo Nuevo. Beds in Bahía Bustamante are the most important in terms of extension and biomass (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT24">Martin et al. 2011</xref>). However, these beds have significant biomass variation that could be attributed to higher abundance of epiphytes and epiphyte-imposed stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT25">Martin et al. 2013</xref>). No ecological information about these <italic>G. gracilis</italic> beds and associated mesograzers has so far been reported.</p>
				<p>In an earlier study, we reported that the epialtid crab <italic>Leucippa pentagona</italic> is very abundant in Bahía Bustamante (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT48">Varisco and Vinuesa 2011</xref>). Crabs belonging to the family Epialtidae are mainly mesograzers and commonly inhabit subtidal algal assemblages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT50">Vernet-Cornubert 1958</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT19">Hines 1982</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT16">García-Raso and Fernández-Muñoz 1987</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT27">Monteiro-Teixeira et al. 2009</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT20">Hultgren and Stachowicz 2008</xref>). <italic>L. pentagona</italic> has been found in algal and mytilid banks of the Southern Atlantic Ocean (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT02">Boschi et al. 1992</xref>). Although this species is widely distributed from California to southern Chile in the Pacific Ocean, and from Brazil to Argentine Patagonia (~45° LS) in the western Atlantic Ocean, many aspects of its biology and ecology are poorly understood. The ecological information available about <italic>L. pentagona</italic> refers only to larval development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT34">Pohle and Marques 2003</xref>) and reproductive traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT48">Varisco and Vinuesa 2011</xref>). </p>
				<p>This study examines the feeding preferences and habitat choice of <italic>L. pentagona</italic> in Bahía Bustamante. It also analyses the nutritional quality of <italic>G. gracilis</italic>, its epiphytes and other macroalgae abundant in the study area to explain the food choice of these spider crabs. Finally, it analyses the spatial and temporal distribution of different stages of the crab’s life cycle (recruits, juveniles, matures, ovigerous females and post-moult crabs) in relation to biotic and abiotic factors. We hypothesized that: (1) <italic>G. gracilis</italic> plays a key role in the spatial distribution of <italic>L. pentagona</italic>, particularly during critical periods of its life cycle such as recruitment, egg incubation and early post-moult; and (2) <italic>L. pentagona </italic>does not exploit <italic>G. gracilis</italic> because it has lower nutritional value than its epiphytes and other macroalgae of the area. This feeding strategy could be indirectly favorable to <italic>G. gracilis</italic> growth and could help to maintain the complexity of the microhabitat. </p>
				
				</sec>
<sec id="S2">
<title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title>
				<sec id="S2.1">
<title>Study area and sampling</title>
				
			  <p>Bahía Bustamante (45°08'S, 66°32'W) is an enclosed bay located in the north of Golfo San Jorge, in the Argentine Patagonia (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Fig. 1</xref>). The area is influenced by the cold-temperate waters of the Patagonian Current and, occasionally, by the warmer waters of the Brazilian Current during the summer. The bay has a semidiurnal tidal regime, with average amplitude of 4.2 m. There are dense patches of the economically important red alga <italic>Gracilaria gracilis</italic>. In recent years, the alien alga <italic>Undaria pinnatifida</italic> have been found in coastal areas of the bay (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT24">Martin et al. 2011</xref>).</p>
			  			<fig id="F1">
				<label>Fig. 1</label>
				<caption>
				<title>Bahía Bustamante, southwestern Atlantic Ocean.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm79n1-4060-web-images/sm4060fig1_fmt.png"/>
			</fig>

<p>Sampling and field measurements were taken monthly over a two-year period between March 2006 and February 2008 (with exceptions of April 2006, and March, June and December 2007). Sampling was carried out in low tidal conditions (diurnal). Samples (0.25 m<sup>2</sup>) were collected by scuba diving along four transects parallel to the coastline at 2, 4, 6 and 8 m depth below mean low water. In each transect, five sampling units were carried out at 100 m intervals (totaling 20 per month). Sampling units were considered to be independent because they were separated by at least 100 m. All animals and algae were collected using a nylon mesh bag (5 mm aperture), stored in sealed bags and subsequently fixed in 4% formalin.</p>
				<p>Temperature, salinity and pH data were recorded using a YSI multiparameter device. In March 2006, sediment samples were taken next to each sampling unit using plastic corers (500 cm<sup>3</sup>). At rocky sites, no sediment samples were taken and the type of substrate was recorded by direct observation of the diver.</p>
				
			</sec>
<sec id="S2.2">
<title>Laboratory procedures and statistical analysis</title>
				
<sec id="S2.2.1">
<title> Diet analysis</title>
				
			  <p>Samples from January, April, July and October 2007 were selected to perform diet analyses. Crabs were sexed and carapace length (CL) was measured from the tip of the rostrum to the posterior margin of the carapace using a digital calliper (±0.01 mm). Crabs were grouped into three classes according to morphometric criteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT48">Varisco and Vinuesa 2011</xref>): a) recruits (≤10 mm CL); b) late juveniles (&gt;10-18 mm CL for females; &gt;10-28.5 mm CL for males); and c) mature crabs. Crabs were dissected and stomach contents were removed under a stereoscopic microscope (40×). Stomach fullness was estimated by visually assessing the percentage of stomach volume occupied by the contents. Each stomach was categorized as follows: class 0 (empty), class 1 (0-25% fullness), class 2 (25-50%), class 3 (50-75%), and class 4 (75-100%).</p>
				<p>The relative abundance of food items in the natural diet was calculated using an ocular grid marked with 25 intersection points. Stomach contents were examined under a microscope (100×) and relative abundance was calculated as RA(%)=(I<sub>a</sub>/ T)·100, where I<sub>a</sub> is the frequency of intersections for an item and T is the total number of intersections. The frequency of occurrence of each item was FO(%)=(N<sub>i</sub>/N<sub>t</sub>) 100, where N<sub>i</sub> is the number of stomachs with item i and N<sub>t</sub> is the total number of stomachs. Each food item was determined at the lowest possible taxonomic level.</p>
				<p>The independence χ<sup>2</sup> test was used to analyse independence between stomach fullness and factors: season, sex, size class and moult stage. One-way analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) tests were performed to assess changes in RA in relation to season, sex, size and moult stage of crabs. The similarity matrix was calculated using the Bray-Curtis similarity index (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT07">Clarke and Warwick 2001</xref>).</p>
				
				</sec>
<sec id="S2.2.2">
<title>Nutritional quality of algae</title>
				
			  <p>The nutritional quality of algae was assessed using the ash-free dry mass (AFDM) as an approximation for nutritional content of algal species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT09">Cruz-Rivera and Hay 2000</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT11"> Cruz-Rivera and Friedlander 2011</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT12">2013</xref>). This trait was measured in <italic>G. gracilaria, Sphacelaria fusca, Halopteris</italic> sp., <italic>Ceramium virgatum, Undaria pinnatifida</italic> and <italic>Codium fragile</italic>. AFDM is shown as percentage of the wet mass, which is how mesograzers perceive algae, following the criteria proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT11">Cruz-Rivera and Friedlander (2011)</xref>. Thalli of algal species (n=10) were dried on absorbent paper and subsequently weighed (wet mass) (±0.001 g). Dry mass was obtained after drying at 60°C for 48 h. Ash weight was obtained by burning the dried algae in a furnace at 450°C for 24 h.</p>
				<p>Differences in AFDM mean values among algal species were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey post hoc test. Data were previously tested for variance homogeneity (Cochran’s Test). A significance level of 0.05 was used in these tests.</p>
				
				</sec>
<sec id="S2.2.3">
<title>Spatial distribution</title>
				
			  <p>Crabs were sexed, measured and grouped according to the procedures and criteria mentioned. Ovigerous females and post-moult crabs were quantified separately. The distribution pattern of each group of interest was evaluated using the standardized Morisita index. This index is one of the best measures of dispersion because it is independent of sample size and population density (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT40">Smith-Gill 1975</xref>).</p>
				<p>For each sampling unit, thalli of <italic>G. gracilis</italic>, large-sized epiphytes and other macroalgae were separated under a stereoscopic microscope. Algal species were dried on absorbent paper and weighed (±0.001 g). Animal taxa were determined at the lowest taxonomic level possible. All animals in each taxon were counted, except for the solitary ascidian <italic>Paramolgula gregaria</italic>, which was weighed out (±0.001 g). Sediment samples were analysed using the grain-size approach (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT52">Wentworth 1922</xref>) and three fractions were separated (silt/clay, sand, gravel) and weighed in the laboratory.</p>
				<p>A partial redundancy analysis (pRDA) was performed to relate the densities of the different groups of <italic>L. pentagona</italic> to physical and biological variables (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT44">ter Braak 1986</xref>). A previous detrended canonical correspondence analysis (DCCA) was conducted to calculate the gradient length and to verify whether pRDA was the right procedure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT45">ter Braak 1995</xref>). The abiotic factors incorporated in the analysis were a) substrate type, treated as a quantitative variable as recommended by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT46">ter Braak and Looman (1995)</xref>, b) months, treated as circular data, and transformed into two orthogonal quantitative variables: “summerness” and “springness” (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT32">Palmer 2011</xref>), and c) depth, temperature, salinity and pH, as quantitative variables. The biological factors incorporated in pRDA were: a) drained wet biomass of G. gracilis, b) drained wet biomass of large-sized epiphytes on <italic>G. gracilis</italic>, c) drained wet biomass of other macroalgae, d) wet biomass of the ascidian <italic>P. gregaria</italic>, e) density of invertebrate prey of <italic>L. pentagona</italic>, f) density of the crab <italic>Halicarcinus planatus</italic>, g) density of other decapods, and h) density of potential predators. These last variables were selected according to the following criteria: a) macroalgae and ascidians help to create structurally complex habitats which reduce predation risk and dampen current flow, two factors that are particularly important for crab recruitment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT36">Rodríguez et al. 1993</xref>); b) food availability is important for the habitat selection of several decapod species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT36">Rodríguez et al. 1993</xref>) (the preliminary diet analysis of <italic>L. pentagona</italic> supports the inclusion of epiphytic algal species on <italic>G. gracilis </italic>and small invertebrate prey of <italic>L. pentagona</italic>); and c) densities of <italic>H. planatus</italic>, other decapods and predators were considered to include aspects of predation and competition. The effect of predation was probably underestimated due to the sampling method used, which did not enable the sampling of larger fish and highly mobile predators. The density of <italic>H. planatus</italic> was particularly considered because of its great abundance in the study area.</p>
				<p>The sampling year was entered in the model as a covariable. Analysis was made using inter-species correlation scaling, species scores divided by standard deviation, centering by species and square-root transformation of data. No centering/standardization by samples was used. A subsequent manual forward selection of the variables with p&lt;0.01 was done using Monte-Carlo permutation tests (9999 permutations under a full model).</p>
				</sec></sec></sec>
<sec id="S3">
<title>RESULTS</title>
				
<sec id="S3.1">
<title>Diet analysis</title>
				
			  <p>Of the 163 spider crabs analysed, 23.92% exhibited full stomachs, 23.31% exhibited stomachs of class 3, 22.69% exhibited stomachs of class 2 and 15.95% exhibited stomachs of class 1. Empty stomachs were observed in 14.11% of crabs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Fig. 2</xref>). Crabs in post-moult (soft carapace) had empty stomachs throughout the study period. Stomach fullness was independent of the season, sex and size, although it was related to the moult stage (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>). </p>
			  			<fig id="F2">
				<label>Fig. 2</label>
				<caption>
				<title>Proportion (%) of <italic>Leucippa pentagona</italic> in different categories of stomach fullness (SF). MR male recruits, FR female recruits, JM juvenile males, JF juvenile females, MM mature males, MF mature females. Numbers on the top refer to number of specimens in each category.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm79n1-4060-web-images/sm4060fig2_fmt.png"/>
			</fig>

	<table-wrap id="T1">
			<label>Table 1</label>
		<caption>
			<title>Summary of chi-square test of independence between stomach fullness class of spider crabs<italic> Leucippa pentagona</italic> and factors: seasons, sex, size and moult stage. Chi-square statistics (χ<sup>2</sup>), degrees of freedom (df) and p-value (p). Significance p&lt;0.01.</title>
		</caption>
		<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
  <thead>
                    <tr>
                      <th></th>
                      <th> χ<sup>2</sup>
                  
                      </th>
                      <th>df</th>
                      <th>p</th>
                    </tr>
                  </thead>
                  <tbody>
                    <tr>
                      <td>Seasons</td>
                      <td>11.28</td>
                      <td>12</td>
                      <td>0.50</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td>Sex</td>
                      <td>4.41</td>
                      <td>4</td>
                      <td>0.35</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td>Size</td>
                      <td>0.87</td>
                      <td>8</td>
                      <td>0.99</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td>Moult stage</td>
                      <td>121.8</td>
                      <td>4</td>
                      <td>0.001</td>
                    </tr>
                  </tbody>
                </table>
              </table-wrap>
              <p>Forty-five items were identified in the diet of <italic>L. pentagona</italic>, of which 25 were algal species (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>). In most cases, the diet items were highly fragmented as a result of the combined physical action of chelipeds, mouthparts and gastric mill. The diet was characterized by the high FO and RA of <italic>Sphacelaria fusca</italic> and <italic>Halopteris</italic> sp. Other seaweed species that were important components of the diet in terms of FO were <italic>G. gracilis, Ectocarpus</italic> spp., <italic>Lomentaria clavellosa, Calothrix confervicola</italic> and <italic>Ceramium</italic> spp. To differentiate some algal species, it is necessary to look at the ramifications, reproductive structure or apex. This was not always possible in the stomach contents and therefore these species were grouped into a larger category as Sphacelariales, <italic>Ectocarpus</italic> spp. and <italic>Ceramium</italic> spp. Among invertebrates, crustaceans, polychaetes and bryozoans were the most abundant and frequent taxa (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). Five species of Foraminifera were found in the crab’s diet, but their FO and RA were lower. No differences were found in the diet composition between seasons (ANOSIM R=0.008, p=0.33), sex (R=0.009, p=0.13) and size class (R=0.038, p=0.10) of these spider crabs.</p>
			  	<table-wrap id="T2">
			<label>Table 2</label>
		<caption>
			<title>Taxa identified in the stomach content of <italic>Leucippa pentagona</italic> individuals in Bahía Bustamante.</title>
		</caption>
		<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
  <thead>
                  </thead>
                  <tbody>
                    <tr>
                      <td>CYANOPHYTA</td>
                      <td>BRYOZOA</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Chroococcus</italic> sp.
                        </td>
                      <td><italic>Beania inermis</italic>
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Calothrix confervicola</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td><italic>Membranipora isabelleana</italic>
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td>Cyanophyta indet.</td>
                      <td>Bryozoa indet.</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td> </td>
                      <td> </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td>CLOROPHYTA</td>
                      <td>FORAMINIFERA</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Ulva</italic> sp.
                        </td>
                      <td><italic>Elphidium</italic> sp.
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Enteromorpha</italic> sp.
                        </td>
                      <td><italic>Lagena</italic> sp.
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Chaetomorpha</italic> sp.
                        </td>
                      <td><italic>Pyrgo</italic> sp.
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Ulothrix australis</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td><italic>Oolina</italic> sp.
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Codium fragile</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td><italic>Cassidulina</italic> sp.
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td> </td>
                      <td> </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td>RHODOPHYTA</td>
                      <td>BIVALVIA</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Aglaotamnion uruguayense</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td><italic>Mytilus edulis</italic>
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Anotrichium furcellatum</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td><italic>Aulacomya atra</italic>
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Ceramium strictum</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td> </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Ceramium virgatun</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td>ISOPODA</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Polysiphonia abcisa</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td><italic>Serolis</italic> sp.
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Heterosiphonia merenia</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td><italic>Exosphaeroma</italic> sp.
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Aphanocladia robusta</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td><italic>Idotea baltica</italic>
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Lomentaria clavellosa</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td><italic>Neastacilla falklandica</italic>
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Gracilaria gracilis</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td> </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td> </td>
                      <td>AMPHIPODA</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td>PHAEOPHYTA</td>
                      <td><italic>Austroregia huxleyana</italic>
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Sphacelaria fusca</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td><italic>Gondogeneia</italic> sp.
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Halopteris</italic> sp.
                        </td>
                      <td>Amphipoda indet.</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Ectocarpus constanciae</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td> </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Ectocarpus exiguus</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td>COPEPODA</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Ectocarpus siliculosus</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td><italic>Porcellidium</italic> sp.
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Styphocaulon funiculare</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td> </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Dictyota dichotoma</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td>POLYCHAETA</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Undaria pinnatifida</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td><italic>Platynereis</italic> sp.
                        </td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td> </td>
                      <td>Spirorbidae indet.</td>
                    </tr>
                  </tbody>
                </table>
              </table-wrap>
			  	<table-wrap id="T3">
			<label>Table 3</label>
		<caption>
			<title>Frequency of occurrence (FO) and relative abundance (RA) of the main food items of <italic>L. pentagona</italic> in <italic>G. gracilis</italic> beds of Bahía Bustamante.</title>
		</caption>
		<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
  <thead>
                    <tr>
                      <th rowspan="2">Food ítems</th>
                      <th colspan="2">Winter</th>
                      <th colspan="2">Spring</th>
                      <th colspan="2">Summer</th>
                      <th colspan="2">Autumn</th>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <th>FO</th>
                      <th>RA </th>
                      <th>FO</th>
                      <th>RA</th>
                      <th>FO </th>
                      <th>RA </th>
                      <th>FO</th>
                      <th>RA</th>
                    </tr>
                  </thead>
                  <tbody>
                    <tr>
                      <td>Sphacelariales</td>
                      <td>72.7</td>
                      <td>67.5</td>
                      <td>85.7</td>
                      <td>72.3</td>
                      <td>82.5</td>
                      <td>70.1</td>
                      <td>78.3</td>
                      <td>67.3</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Ectocarpus</italic> spp.
                        </td>
                      <td>9.09</td>
                      <td>1.39</td>
                      <td>16.6</td>
                      <td>1.05</td>
                      <td>5.00</td>
                      <td>0.23</td>
                      <td>0</td>
                      <td>0</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Ceramium</italic> spp.
                        </td>
                      <td>6.81</td>
                      <td>0.46</td>
                      <td>11.9</td>
                      <td>3.18</td>
                      <td>10.0</td>
                      <td>0.23</td>
                      <td>0</td>
                      <td>0</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Calothrix confervicola</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td>9.09</td>
                      <td>0.92</td>
                      <td>42.8</td>
                      <td>0.17</td>
                      <td>5.00</td>
                      <td>0.23</td>
                      <td>13.5</td>
                      <td>0.51</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Gracilaria gracilis</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td>13.6</td>
                      <td>4.17</td>
                      <td>11.9</td>
                      <td>1.40</td>
                      <td>10.0</td>
                      <td>0.70</td>
                      <td>24.3</td>
                      <td>0.25</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Lomentaria clavellosa</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td>11.3</td>
                      <td>0.92</td>
                      <td>9.52</td>
                      <td>0.35</td>
                      <td>14.0</td>
                      <td>0.50</td>
                      <td>13.5</td>
                      <td>0.25</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td>Other algae</td>
                      <td>15.9</td>
                      <td>2.30</td>
                      <td>33.3</td>
                      <td>3.18</td>
                      <td>32.5</td>
                      <td>7.0</td>
                      <td>54.0</td>
                      <td>5.41</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Idotea balthica</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td>4.54</td>
                      <td>1.86</td>
                      <td>0</td>
                      <td>0</td>
                      <td>5.00</td>
                      <td>0.51</td>
                      <td>0</td>
                      <td>0</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Austroregia huxleyana</italic>
                        </td>
                      <td>4.54</td>
                      <td>1.30</td>
                      <td>0.42</td>
                      <td>0.17</td>
                      <td>5.00</td>
                      <td>0.23</td>
                      <td>18.9</td>
                      <td>1.02</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td>Copepoda</td>
                      <td>9.09</td>
                      <td>1.27</td>
                      <td>0.84</td>
                      <td>0.29</td>
                      <td>7.50</td>
                      <td>0.51</td>
                      <td>0</td>
                      <td>0</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td>Crustaceans indet.</td>
                      <td>15.9</td>
                      <td>2.09</td>
                      <td>1.26</td>
                      <td>1.83</td>
                      <td>10.0</td>
                      <td>1.82</td>
                      <td>21.6</td>
                      <td>2.72</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td><italic>Platynereis</italic> sp.
                        </td>
                      <td>11.3</td>
                      <td>2.30</td>
                      <td>16.6</td>
                      <td>3.18</td>
                      <td>7.50</td>
                      <td>2.87</td>
                      <td>35.1</td>
                      <td>3.09</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td>Polychaetes indet.</td>
                      <td>9.09</td>
                      <td>0.92</td>
                      <td>7.69</td>
                      <td>1.96</td>
                      <td>2.50</td>
                      <td>0.23</td>
                      <td>13.5</td>
                      <td>2.72</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td>Bryozoans</td>
                      <td>6.81</td>
                      <td>0.23</td>
                      <td>15.4</td>
                      <td>0.35</td>
                      <td>12.5</td>
                      <td>0.23</td>
                      <td>35.1</td>
                      <td>1.02</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td>Unidentified material</td>
                      <td>20.4</td>
                      <td>5.80</td>
                      <td>7.69</td>
                      <td>0.88</td>
                      <td>12.5</td>
                      <td>9.47</td>
                      <td>24.3</td>
                      <td>3.09</td>
                    </tr>
                    <tr>
                      <td>Sediment</td>
                      <td>20.4</td>
                      <td>6.48</td>
                      <td>38.4</td>
                      <td>9.54</td>
                      <td>14.0</td>
                      <td>5.09</td>
                      <td>35.1</td>
                      <td>12.6</td>
                    </tr>
                  </tbody>
                </table>
              </table-wrap>
			  
              </sec>
<sec id="S3.2">
<title>Nutritional quality of algae</title>
				
			  <p>The AFDM showed significant differences between the algal species analysed with respect to wet mass (one-way ANOVA, F<sub>(5,51)</sub>=45.16, p&lt;0.01). The highest AFDM values were recorded for <italic>Sphacelaria fusca</italic> and <italic>Halopteris</italic> sp (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Fig. 3</xref>).</p>
			  			<fig id="F3">
				<label>Fig. 3</label>
				<caption>
				<title>Ash-free dry mass in six macroalgal species of Bahía Bustamante expressed in terms of wet mass percentages. Homogeneous group (Tukey post hoc test) and standard error bars are shown.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm79n1-4060-web-images/sm4060fig3_fmt.png"/>
			</fig>

</sec>
<sec id="S3.3">
<title>Spatial distribution</title>
				
<sec id="S3.3.1">
<title>Environmental and biological variables</title>
				
			  <p>Some physicochemical properties of the sea water in the bay showed seasonal variations. Variations in temperature and pH are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>. Salinity showed no significant variations, ranging between 33.8 and 34.4. Substrates were dominated by fine (4 samples) and medium (11 samples) sand. Only three samples had a preponderance of gravel and two had rock substrate. Soft bottoms were mainly occupied by <italic>G. gracilis</italic>, while the alien alga <italic>U. pinnatifida</italic> was the most abundant alga in hard bottoms. However, the algal assemblage of samples was variable during the study period and some samples without algal coverage were taken (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Fig. 5</xref>). </p>
			  			<fig id="F4">
				<label>Fig. 4</label>
				<caption>
				<title>Monthly variation in sub-superficial temperature and pH of water in Bahía Bustamante (black line) between March 2006 and February 2008. Mean temperature of superficial water is indicated by a grey line (Servicio de Hidrografía Naval 2008).</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm79n1-4060-web-images/sm4060fig4_fmt.png"/>
			</fig>

			<fig id="F5">
				<label>Fig. 5</label>
				<caption>
				<title>Algal assemblage composition of samples: a, samples without algae (dark gray); b, samples with dominance (more than 70% of total algal biomass) of <italic>Gracilaria gracilis</italic> (light grey); c, samples with dominance of other macroalgae (white); and d; samples with mixed composition (black).</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm79n1-4060-web-images/sm4060fig5_fmt.png"/>
				</fig>
              <p><italic>Gracilaria gracilis</italic> was the most abundant macroalga. Mean biomass of <italic>G. gracilis</italic> ranged between 3.98 kg m<sup>−2</sup> in December 2006 and 0.02 kg m<sup>−2</sup> in September 2007. <italic>Undaria pinnatifida</italic> was the most abundant among the other macroalgae of Bahía Bustamante (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">Fig. 6</xref>). Other macroalgae commonly found were <italic>Cladostephus spongiosus, Ceramium virgatum, Neosiphonia harveyi</italic> and <italic>Codium fragile</italic>. The most abundant large-size epiphytes of <italic>G. gracilis</italic> were <italic>Sphacelaria fusca, Halopteris</italic> sp., <italic>Ceramium virgatum, Neosiphonia harveyi, Polysiphonia abscissa, Acrochaetium</italic> spp. and <italic>Calothrix confervicola</italic>.</p>
			  			<fig id="F6">
				<label>Fig. 6</label>
				<caption>
				<title>Monthly variation of the wet biomass of <italic>Gracilaria gracilis </italic>(black), other macroalgae (dark gray) and epiphytes of <italic>G. gracilis</italic> (light grey). Standard error bars are shown.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm79n1-4060-web-images/sm4060fig6_fmt.png"/>
			</fig>

<p>Among invertebrate preys of <italic>L. pentagona</italic>, the isopod <italic>Idotea balthica</italic>, the amphipod <italic>Austroregia huxleyana</italic>, and the polychaete <italic>Platynereis</italic> sp. were highly abundant and frequent. Potential predators included fish (<italic>Patagonotothen sima, P. cornucola, Ribeiroclinus eigenmanni</italic> and <italic>Agonopsis chiloensis</italic>) and large-size crabs (<italic>Carcinus maenas, Ovalipes trimaculatus</italic> and <italic>Peltarion spinosulum</italic>). Thirteen decapod species, mostly represented by juvenile stages, were found (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>).</p>
	<table-wrap id="T4">
			<label>Table 4</label>
		<caption>
			<title>Presence of decapod species in Bahía Bustamante between March 2006 and February 2008.</title>
		</caption>
		<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
  <thead>
      <tr>
        <th> </th>
        <th>Mature</th>
        <th>Juvenile</th>
        <th>N</th>
      </tr>
    </thead>
    <tbody>
      <tr>
        <td>Family Epialtidae</td>
        <td> </td>
        <td> </td>
        <td> </td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><italic>Leucippa pentagona</italic>
          </td>
        <td> x
          </td>
        <td> x
          </td>
        <td> 1218
          </td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><italic>Libidoclaea granaria</italic>
          </td>
        <td> -
          </td>
        <td> x
          </td>
        <td>13</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td> Family Inachidae </td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><italic>Eurypodius latreillei</italic>
          </td>
        <td>-</td>
        <td>x</td>
        <td>13</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td> Family Inachoididae </td>
        <td> </td>
        <td> </td>
        <td> </td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><italic>Leurocyclus tuberculosus</italic>
          </td>
        <td>-</td>
        <td>x</td>
        <td>24</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Family Varunidae</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><italic>Cyrtograpsus angulatus</italic>
          </td>
        <td>x</td>
        <td>x</td>
        <td>48</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><italic>Cyrtograpsus altimanus</italic>
          </td>
        <td>x</td>
        <td>x</td>
        <td>52</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Family Hymenosomatidae</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><italic>Halicarcinus planatus</italic>
          </td>
        <td>x</td>
        <td>x</td>
        <td>172</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Familia Atelecyclidae</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><italic>Peltarion spinosulum</italic>
          </td>
        <td>x</td>
        <td>x</td>
        <td>38</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Familia Portunidae</td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
        <td></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><italic>Carcinus maenas</italic>
          </td>
        <td> -
          </td>
        <td> x
          </td>
        <td> 2
          </td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><italic>Ovalipes trimaculatus</italic>
          </td>
        <td>x</td>
        <td>x</td>
        <td>4</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Familia Paguridae</td>
        <td> </td>
        <td> </td>
        <td> </td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><italic>Pagurus comptus</italic>
          </td>
        <td>x</td>
        <td>-</td>
        <td>13</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Familia Galatheidae</td>
        <td> </td>
        <td> </td>
        <td> </td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><italic>Munida gregaria</italic>
          </td>
        <td>-</td>
        <td>x</td>
        <td>7</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Familia Solenoceridae</td>
        <td> </td>
        <td> </td>
        <td> </td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td><italic>Pleoticus muellieri</italic>
          </td>
        <td>-</td>
        <td>x</td>
        <td>9</td>
      </tr>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.3.2">
<title>Spider crab distribution</title>
				
			  <p><italic>Leucippa pentagona</italic> was the most abundant crab in the area (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref>), with sizes ranging between 2.2 mm and 34.6 mm CL. Abundance of recruits was higher at the end of spring 2006 and lower in the following months. However, recruit abundance can be underestimated because the low crab size was lower than the mesh size used in the sampling. Juvenile abundance was higher in 2007 (with the exception of February) than in 2006. In these size classes, male and female abundance was similar. Conversely, mature females were more abundant than mature males. Ovigerous females were found from June to February in each year. Post-moult crabs were found mainly in late summer and autumn (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Fig. 7</xref>). All the groups of <italic>L. pentagona</italic> analysed showed a clumped distribution pattern (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">Table 5</xref>).</p>
			  			<fig id="F7">
				<label>Fig. 7</label>
				<caption>
				<title>Abundance of <italic>Leucippa pentagona</italic> grouping in recruits, late juveniles and mature crabs. Female (black) and male (grey). Abundance of ovigerous females is indicated by a gray line for mature crabs. Numbers above the bars indicate the number of post-moult crabs.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm79n1-4060-web-images/sm4060fig7_fmt.png"/>
			</fig>

	<table-wrap id="T5">
			<label>Table 5</label>
		<caption>
			<title>Morisita standardized index (MSI) to evaluate aggregation of <italic>Leucippa pentagona</italic>. Aggregated behaviour is suggested if MSI&gt;0.5.</title>
		</caption>
		<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
  <thead>
			        <tr>
			          <th>Interest group</th>
			          <th>MSI</th>
		            </tr>
		          </thead>
			      <tbody>
			        <tr>
			          <td>Recruits</td>
			          <td>0.512</td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td>Juveniles</td>
			          <td>0.506</td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td>Matures</td>
			          <td>0.519</td>
		            </tr>
			        <tr>
			          <td>Ovigerous</td>
			          <td>0.513</td>
		            </tr>
		          </tbody>
		        </table>
		      </table-wrap>
<p>A preliminary DCCA confirmed that pRDA was the right procedure for this analysis (gradient lengths of axes I and II were 1.68 and 0.92, respectively) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT45">ter Braak 1995</xref>). The following explanatory variables were significant and thus included in the statistical model to explain <italic>L. pentagona</italic> distribution: drained wet biomass of <italic>G. gracilis</italic>, drained wet biomass of large epiphytes on <italic>G. gracilis</italic>, drained wet biomass of other macroalgae, density of <italic>H. planatus</italic>, density of other decapods, summerness and depth. Variance inflation factors (VIF) in excess of 10 were deemed to be significant evidence of multicollinearity (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT06">Chatterjee and Price 1977</xref>). All VIF values were less than 1.5, indicating no collinearity. The cumulative variance percentage of the pRDA axes of the general dataset explained 26.2% of the data inertia of the species data and 99.5% of the species-environment relationship (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">Table 6</xref>). In the pRDA biplot of species and environmental factors, the resulting ordination is quite clear (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">Fig. 8</xref>). The small-scale distribution of <italic>L. pentagona</italic> is related to the algal cover provided by <italic>G. gracilis</italic>, their large-sized epiphytes and other macroalgae. No <italic>L. pentagona</italic> individuals were found in samples without macroalgae. Early post-moult crabs, ovigerous females, mature and recruits were closely associated with <italic>G. gracilis</italic>, while juveniles (intermolt) were related in the same way to <italic>G. gracilis</italic> and other macroalgae. Juveniles were also associated with higher depths, while distributions of other groups of interest were not related to depth within the range analysed (0-20 m). Juveniles were negatively related to the occurrence of <italic>H. planatus</italic> and other decapod species. The negative relation of recruits and mature crabs to summerness shows that these size classes were less abundant in summer (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Fig. 7</xref>).</p>
	<table-wrap id="T6">
			<label>Table 6</label>
		<caption>
			<title>Summary of redundancy analysis ordination results for  biological and environmental variables. Cumulative percentage variance of species data (CPVSD). Cumulative percentage variance of species-environment relation (CPVSER).</title>
		</caption>
		<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
  <thead>
      <tr>
        <th></th>
        <th>Axes I</th>
        <th>Axes II</th>
        <th>Axes III</th>
        <th>Axes IV</th>
      </tr>
    </thead>
    <tbody>
      <tr>
        <td>Eigenvalues</td>
        <td>0.226</td>
        <td>0.028</td>
        <td>0.006</td>
        <td>0.002</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>Spp-environment correlation</td>
        <td>0.674</td>
        <td>0.358</td>
        <td>0.247</td>
        <td>0.227</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>CPVSD</td>
        <td>22.6</td>
        <td>25.3</td>
        <td>26.0</td>
        <td>26.2</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td>CPVSER</td>
        <td>85.8</td>
        <td>96.4</td>
        <td>98.7</td>
        <td>99.5</td>
      </tr>
    </tbody>
  </table>
</table-wrap>
			<fig id="F8">
				<label>Fig. 8</label>
				<caption>
				<title>Partial redundancy analysis ordination for biological and environmental variables affecting <italic>Leucippa pentagona</italic> distribution.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="../sm79n1-4060-web-images/sm4060fig8_fmt.png"/>
			</fig>
</sec></sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S4">
<title>DISCUSSION</title>
				
			  <p>Epialtidae crabs are mainly herbivorous, with a wide variety of algae in their diet. However, small gastropods, polychaetes, isopods and amphipods are also found in some Epialtidae species studied (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT53">Woods and McLay 1994</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT42">Stachowicz and Hay 1999</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT311">Paiva Barros et al. 2008</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT49">Vasconcelos et al. 2009</xref>). By contrast, L. pentagona in Bahía Bustamante shows a specialized diet. Over 75% of the diet of this spider crab is composed of epiphytes of <italic>G. gracilis</italic>, in particular Sphacelariales. A high consumption of Sphacelariales determines that the diet composition of <italic>L. pentagona</italic> shows no differences across seasons, sex and size class. It is interesting to note that Sphacelariales are not the most abundant epiphytes of <italic>G. gracilis</italic> in Bahía Bustamante (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT25">Martin et al. 2013</xref>). There is some evidence that temporal predictability, algal morphology and organic content are important factors to explain the preferences of mesograzers. Several marine invertebrates prefer algae with low seasonal variation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT30">Paine and Vadas 1969</xref>). This fact was particularly observed in the spider crab <italic>Mycrophyris bicornutus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT21">Kilar and Lou 1984</xref>) and has been suggested to account for the algal preferences of <italic>Notomithrax ursus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT53">Woods and McLay 1994</xref>) and <italic>Acanthonyx scutiformis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT49">Vasconcelos et al. 2009</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT25">Martin et al. (2013)</xref> reported a low seasonal variation of Sphacelariales biomass in Bahía Bustamante. On the other hand, many spider crab species prefer branched algae as food because they are presumably easier to cut and manipulate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT53">Woods and McLay 1994</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT08">Cruz-Rivera 2001</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT11">Cruz-Rivera and Friedlander 2011</xref>). A recent study has shown that the algal morphology of <italic>Gracilaria cornea</italic> is one of the most important traits in the feeding choice of the spider crab <italic>Acanthonyx lunatus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT12">Cruz-Rivera and Friedlander 2013</xref>). The epiphytes <italic>Sphacelaria fusca</italic> and <italic>Halopteris</italic> sp. are finely branched algae, which can help to explain its high abundance in the diet of <italic>L. pentagona</italic>. Moreover, these species had the highest organic content (AFDM) of all the algae analysed in this study. AFDM is often correlated with more specific nutritional traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT28">Neighbors and Horn 1991</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT42">Stachowicz and Hay 1999</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT08">Cruz-Rivera and Hay 2001</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT11">Cruz-Rivera and Friedlander 2011</xref>). For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT28">Neighbors and Horn (1991)</xref> reported this correlation in 22 algal species of California. Therefore, the high consumption of Sphacelariales could be explained by its higher organic content, its low seasonal variation, and its morphology.</p>
				<p>Feeding on epiphytes may be indirectly beneficial for the algal host because of the removal of epiphytes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT41">Stachowicz and Hay 1996</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT23">Mancinelli and Rossi 2001</xref>), inducing secondary metabolites that might be a deterrent to larger grazers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT47">Toth and Pavia 2007</xref>), providing nutrients in excretory products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT04">Bracken et al. 2007</xref>), or contributing to spore dispersal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT05">Buschmann and Vergara 1993</xref>). Moreover, mesograzers that feed on epiphytes could be economically favourable for commercial algal species such as <italic>Gracilaria</italic> spp. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT38">Shacklock and Doyle 1983</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT01">Anderson et al. 1998</xref>). The feeding preferences of <italic>L. pentagona</italic> may be beneficial for <italic>G. gracilis</italic> and could have important implications for the subtidal community of Bahía Bustamante. The annual production of <italic>G. gracilis</italic> has dropped significantly in the last few years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT24">Martin et al. 2011</xref>). This decrease could be related to the high abundance of epiphytes and their negative effects on the host (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT25">Martin et al. 2013</xref>). Given the high abundance of <italic>L. pentagona </italic>and the high abundance of epiphytes in its diet, we consider that <italic>L. pentagona</italic> can contribute to the control of epiphytes in beds of Bahía Bustamante.</p>
				<p>Habitat selection of mesograzer species can be closely linked to feeding preferences, but algae that provide the best refuge may not be the most palatable (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT29">Nicotri 1980</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT15">Duffy and Hay 1994</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT23">Mancinelli and Rossi 2001</xref>). Experimental evidence has shown that species of the genus <italic>Gracilaria</italic> are potential food resources for isopods and amphipods, but these species prefer to feed on other algae (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT23">Mancinelli and Rossi 2001</xref>). However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT11">Cruz-Rivera and Friedlander (2011)</xref> demonstrated that the spider crab <italic>A. lunulatus</italic> consumes more <italic>G. lemaneiformis</italic> than other macroalgae offered. In this study, consumption of the red algae <italic>G. gracilis</italic> was low throughout the study period (overall RA=2%), with a low winter increase (RA=4.17%). In addition, laboratory observations have confirmed that, if <italic>G. gracilis</italic> is the only food resource offered, it constitutes palatable food for crabs (Varisco, unpublished data). Thalli of <italic>G. gracilis</italic> are tender and lack chemical defenses, which are traits that can favor their palatability. However, AFDM in <italic>G. gracilis</italic> is lower than in Sphacelariales and could account for its low relative abundance and frequency of occurrence. However, this does not preclude the possibility that other nutritional traits not considered in this study could be involved in the negative selection of <italic>G. gracilis</italic>. </p>
				<p>Structurally complex microhabitats such as seagrass beds, kelp forests, algae and mussel beds are favorable for the development of crabs because they help to minimize predation risk and provide food resources. There is extensive information of decapod species associated with complex vegetation assemblages (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT19">Hines 1982</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT18">Herrkind and Buttler 1986</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT16">García-Raso and Fernández-Muñoz 1987</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT33">Perkins-Visser et al. 1996</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT22">López De La Rosa et al. 2006</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT13">Daly and Konar 2010</xref>). Crabs of the family Epialtidae are commonly found in seaweed assemblages of the subtidal zone. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT19">Hines (1982)</xref> studied the distribution pattern of five Epialtidae species in kelp forests of California. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT50">Vernet-Cornubert (1958)</xref> documented the presence of <italic>Pisa tetraodon</italic> in subtidal macroalgal assemblages along the coast of Monaco. This species and juveniles of <italic>P. carinimana</italic> have been reported to be associated with the red alga <italic>Mesophylum lichenoides</italic> in southern Spain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT16">García-Raso and Fernández-Muñoz 1987</xref>). The spider crab <italic>Acanthonyx scutiformis</italic> inhabits subtidal algal beds on Brazilian coasts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT27">Monteiro-Teixeira et al. 2009</xref>). In Argentina, <italic>L. pentagona</italic> has been found in complex habitats such as algal and mytilid banks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT02">Boschi et al. 1992</xref>). Our results show that <italic>L. pentagona</italic> is closely associated with <italic>G. gracilis</italic> patches that provide shelter and food. In the subtidal environment of Bahía Bustamante, <italic>G. gracilis</italic> beds represent the most structurally complex habitat available to spider crabs and other benthic invertebrates.</p>
				<p>The microhabitat selection of crustacean decapods can have seasonal and ontogenetic variations. Ontogenetic shifts in microhabitat preference may be due to different shelter or food requirements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT18">Herrkind and Buttler 1986</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT37">Robinson and Tully 2000</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT51">Vinuesa et al. 2011</xref>). In this study, the analysis of the spatial distribution shows that recruits, mature, ovigerous and post-moult crabs are closely related to <italic>G. gracilis</italic> and its epiphytes, while juveniles occupy a wide habitat, associated with a high biomass of other macroalgae and <italic>G. gracilis</italic>. Diet analysis suggests that the feeding preferences are not the cause of the spatial segregation of juveniles, which could be related to different shelter requirements. Refuge requirements increase in periods or developmental stages in which crabs are more vulnerable to predation, such as recruitment, moult and early post-moult or female incubation. The relevance of <italic>G. gracilis</italic> patches as shelter for <italic>L. pentagona</italic> is suggested by a) the positive relationship between abundance of ovigerous females and biomass of <italic>G. gracilis</italic>, b) the close association between abundance of post-moult individuals (including post-moult juveniles) and <italic>G. gracilis</italic> biomass, and c) larger densities of recruits in algal beds.</p>
				<p>Approximately 50% of crabs in the diet analysis had high-fullness levels (classes 3 and 4), suggesting an extensive foraging effort. Trade-off between foraging effort and predation vulnerability is widely known. In this work, feeding at protected sites provided by <italic>G. gracilis</italic> beds could minimize crab predation. The high structural complexity of <italic>G. gracilis</italic> might be the main determinant of interaction between <italic>L. pentagona</italic> and this alga. High consumption of <italic>G. gracilis</italic> epiphytes allows a high foraging rate in safe living habitats. In addition, this feeding strategy contributes to conserving the microhabitat integrity and could be favorable to <italic>G. gracilis</italic> development.</p>
				
			  </sec>
			  </body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS</title>
				
			  <p>We thank Patricia Leonardi and Alicia Boraso for their collaboration in field sampling. This work was partially done under the Project granted by the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas CONICET PIP Nº 5045 “Evaluación del estado reproductivo y sanitario del alga agarófita <italic>Gracilaria gracilis</italic> (Rhodophyta) en Bahía Bustamante (Chubut)”. We also thank Damian Gil for his constructive comments.</p>
			  </ack>
			  <ref-list>
				<title>REFERENCES</title>
					<ref id="CIT01">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Anderson </surname>
				   <given-names>B.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Smit </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Bolton </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Differential grazing effects by isopods on <italic>Gracilaria gracilaris</italic> and epiphytic <italic>Ceramium diaphanum</italic> in suspended raft culture </article-title>
			  <source> Aquaculture </source>
			  <year>1998</year>
			  <volume>169</volume>
			  <fpage>99</fpage>
			  <lpage>109</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00322-6">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00322-6</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT02">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Boschi </surname>
				   <given-names>E.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Fischbach </surname>
				   <given-names>C.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Iorio </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Catálogo ilustrado de los crustáceos estomatópodos y decápodos marinos de Argentina </article-title>
			  <source> Frente Marítimo </source>
			  <year>1992</year>
			  <volume>10</volume>
			  <fpage>7</fpage>
			  <lpage>94</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT03">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Boström </surname>
				   <given-names>C.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Mattila </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> The relative importance of food and shelter for seagrass associated invertebrates - a latitudinal comparison of habitat choice by isopod grazers </article-title>
			  <source> Oecologia </source>
			  <year>1999</year>
			  <volume>120</volume>
			  <fpage>162</fpage>
			  <lpage>170</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004420050845">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004420050845 </ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT04">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Bracken </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> González-Dorantes </surname>
				   <given-names>C.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Stachowicz </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Whole-community mutualism: associated invertebrates facilitate a dominant habitat-forming seaweed </article-title>
			  <source> Ecology </source>
			  <year>2007</year>
			  <volume>88</volume>
			  <fpage>2211</fpage>
			  <lpage>2219</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/06-0881.1">http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/06-0881.1</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT05">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Buschmann </surname>
				   <given-names>A.H.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Vergara </surname>
				   <given-names>P.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Effect of rocky intertidal amphipods on algal recruitment: a field study </article-title>
			  <source> J Phycol. </source>
			  <year>1993</year>
			  <volume>29</volume>
			  <fpage>154</fpage>
			  <lpage>159</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1993.00154.x">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3646.1993.00154.x</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT06">
	     <element-citation publication-type="book">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
			<name>
			   <surname> Chatterjee </surname>
			   <given-names>S.</given-names>
			</name>	
			<name>
			   <surname> Price </surname>
			   <given-names>B.</given-names>
			</name>
			</person-group>		
			<source> Regression Analysis by examples. </source>
			<year>1977</year>
			<publisher-loc> New York </publisher-loc>
			<publisher-name> John Willey and Sons, </publisher-name>			
		 </element-citation>	  
	 </ref>	
	<ref id="CIT07">
	     <element-citation publication-type="book">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
			<name>
			   <surname> Clarke </surname>
			   <given-names>K.</given-names>
			</name>	
			<name>
			   <surname> Warwick </surname>
			   <given-names>R.</given-names>
			</name>
			</person-group>		
			<source> Changes in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation.</source>
			<year>2001</year>
			<publisher-name> Primer-e Ltd </publisher-name>			
		 </element-citation>	  
	 </ref>	
	<ref id="CIT08">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Cruz-Rivera </surname>
				   <given-names>E.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Generality and specificity in the feeding and decoration preferences of three Mediterranean crabs </article-title>
			  <source> J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. </source>
			  <year>2001 </year>
			  <volume>266</volume>
			  <fpage>17</fpage>
			  <lpage>31</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(01)00334-3">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(01)00334-3</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT09">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Cruz-Rivera </surname>
				   <given-names>E.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Hay </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Can quantity replace quality? Food choice, compensatory feeding, and fitness of marine mesograzers </article-title>
			  <source> Ecology </source>
			  <year>2000</year>
			  <volume>81</volume>
			  <fpage>201</fpage>
			  <lpage>219</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0201:CQRQFC]2.0.CO;2">http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0201:CQRQFC]2.0.CO;2 </ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT10">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Cruz-Rivera </surname>
				   <given-names>E.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Hay </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Macroalgal traits and the feeding and fitness of an herbivorous amphipod: the roles of selectivity, mixing, and compensation </article-title>
			  <source> Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. </source>
			  <year>2001</year>
			  <volume>218</volume>
			  <fpage>249</fpage>
			  <lpage>266</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps218249">http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps218249</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT11">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Cruz-Rivera </surname>
				   <given-names>E.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Friedlander </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Feeding preferences of mesograzers on aquacultured <italic>Gracilaria</italic> and sympatric algae </article-title>
			  <source> J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. </source>
			  <year>2011</year>
			  <volume>322-323</volume>
			  <fpage>218</fpage>
			  <lpage>222</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.09.035">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.09.035</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT12">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Cruz-Rivera </surname>
				   <given-names>E.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Friedlander </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Effects of algal phenotype on mesograzer feeding. </article-title>
			  <source> Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. </source>
			  <year>2013</year>
			  <volume>490</volume>
			  <fpage>69</fpage>
			  <lpage>78</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps10429">http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps10429</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT13">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Daly </surname>
				   <given-names>K.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Konar </surname>
				   <given-names>B.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Temporal trends of two spider crabs (Brachyura, Majoidea) in nearshore kelp habiats in Alaska, U.S.A </article-title>
			  <source> Crustaceana </source>
			  <year>2010</year>
			  <volume>83</volume>
			  <fpage>659</fpage>
			  <lpage>669</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT14">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Duffy </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Hay </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Food and shelter as determinants of food choice by an herbivorous marine amphipod. </article-title>
			  <source> Ecology </source>
			  <year>1991</year>
			  <volume>75</volume>
			  <fpage>1286</fpage>
			  <lpage>1298</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1941102">http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1941102</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT15">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Duffy </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Hay </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Herbivore resistance to seaweed chemical defense: the roles of mobility and predation risk </article-title>
			  <source> Ecology </source>
			  <year>1994</year>
			  <volume>75</volume>
			  <fpage>1304</fpage>
			  <lpage>1319</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1937456">http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1937456</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT16">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> García-Raso </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Fernández-Muñoz </surname>
				   <given-names>R.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Estudio de una comunidad de crustáceos decápodos de fondos coralígenos del alga <italic>Mesophyllum lichenoides</italic> del sur de España. </article-title>
			  <source> Inv. Pesq. </source>
			  <year>1987</year>
			  <volume>51</volume>
			  <fpage>301</fpage>
			  <lpage>322</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT17">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Hammann </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Buchhloz </surname>
				   <given-names>B.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Karez </surname>
				   <given-names>R.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Direct and indirect effects of <italic>Gracilaria vermiculophylla</italic> on native /<italic>Fucus vesiculosus</italic>. </article-title>
			  <source> Aquat. Inv. </source>
			  <year>2013</year>
			  <volume>8</volume>
			  <fpage>121</fpage>
			  <lpage>132</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/ai.2013.8.2.01">http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/ai.2013.8.2.01</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT18">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Herrkind </surname>
				   <given-names>W.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Butler </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Factors regulating postlarval settlement and juvenile microhabitat use by spiny lobsters <italic>Panulirus argus</italic>. </article-title>
			  <source> Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. </source>
			  <year>1986</year>
			  <volume>34</volume>
			  <fpage>23</fpage>
			  <lpage>30</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps034023">http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps034023</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT19">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Hines </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Coexistence in a kelp forest: size, population dynamics, and resource partitioning in a guild of spider crabs (Brachyura, Majidae). </article-title>
			  <source> Ecol. Mon. </source>
			  <year>1982</year>
			  <volume>52</volume>
			  <fpage>179</fpage>
			  <lpage>198</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1942610">http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1942610</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT20">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Hultgren </surname>
				   <given-names>K.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Stachowicz </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Alternative camouflage strategies mediate predation risk among closely related co-occurring kelp crabs. </article-title>
			  <source> Oecologia </source>
			  <year>2008</year>
			  <volume>155</volume>
			  <fpage>519</fpage>
			  <lpage>528</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0926-5">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0926-5</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT21">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Kilar </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Lou </surname>
				   <given-names>R.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Ecological and behavioural studies of the decorator crab, Microphrys bicornutus Latreille (Decapoda: Brachyura): a test of optimum foraging theory </article-title>
			  <source> J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. </source>
			  <year>1984</year>
			  <volume>74</volume>
			  <fpage>157</fpage>
			  <lpage>167</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(84)90083-2">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(84)90083-2</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT22">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> López De La Rosa </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Rodríguez </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> García-Raso </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Seasonal variation and structure of a decapod (Crustacea) assemblage living in a <italic>Caulerpa prolifera</italic> meadow in Cádiz Bay (SW Spain). </article-title>
			  <source> Estuar. Coast Shelf S.</source>
			  <year>2006 </year>
			  <volume>66</volume>
			  <fpage>624</fpage>
			  <lpage>633</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.11.008">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.11.008</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT23">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Mancinelli </surname>
				   <given-names>G.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Rossi </surname>
				   <given-names>L.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Indirect, size-dependent effects of crustacean mesograzers on the rhodophyta <italic>Gracilaria verrucosa</italic> (Hudson) Papenfuss: evidence from a short-term study in the lesina lagoon (Italy). </article-title>
			  <source> Mar. Biol. </source>
			  <year>2001</year>
			  <volume>138</volume>
			  <fpage>1163</fpage>
			  <lpage>1173</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002270100545">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002270100545</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT24">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Martin </surname>
				   <given-names>L.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Boraso </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Leonardi </surname>
				   <given-names>P.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Biomass variation and reproductive phenology of <italic>Gracilaria gracilis</italic> in a Patagonian natural bed (Chubut, Argentina). </article-title>
			  <source> J. Appl. Phycol. </source>
			  <year>2011</year>
			  <volume>23</volume>
			  <fpage>643</fpage>
			  <lpage>654</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-010-9555-1">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-010-9555-1</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT25">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Martin </surname>
				   <given-names>L.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Boraso de Zaixso </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Miravalles </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Epiphytism in a subtidal natural bed of <italic>Gracilaria gracilis</italic> of southwestern Atlantic coast (Chubut, Argentina). </article-title>
			  <source> J. Appl. Phycol.</source>
			  <year>2013</year>
			  <volume>25</volume>
			  <fpage>1319</fpage>
			  <lpage>1329</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-012-9961-7">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10811-012-9961-7</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT26">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Moksnes </surname>
				   <given-names>P.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> The relative importance of habitat-specific settlement, predation and juvenile dispersal for distribution and abundance of young juvenile shore crabs <italic>Carcinus maenas</italic> L. </article-title>
			  <source> J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. </source>
			  <year>2002</year>
			  <volume>271</volume>
			  <fpage>41</fpage>
			  <lpage>73</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(02)00041-2">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(02)00041-2</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT27">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Monteiro-Teixeira </surname>
				   <given-names>G.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Franzoso </surname>
				   <given-names>V.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Cobo </surname>
				   <given-names>V.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Population features of the spider crab <italic>Acanthonyx scutiformis</italic> (Dana 1851) (Crustacea,Majoidea, Epialtidae) associated with rocky-shore algae from southeastern Brazil </article-title>
			  <source> Pan-American J. Aquat. Sci </source>
			  <year>2009</year>
			  <volume>4</volume>
			  <fpage>87</fpage>
			  <lpage>95</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT28">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Neighbors </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Horn </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Nutritional quality of macrophytes eaten and not eaten by two temperate-zone herbivorous fishes: a multivariate comparison. </article-title>
			  <source> Mar. Biol. </source>
			  <year>1991</year>
			  <volume>108</volume>
			  <fpage>471</fpage>
			  <lpage>476</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01313657">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01313657</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT29">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Nicotri </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Factors involved in herbivore food preference </article-title>
			  <source> J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. </source>
			  <year>1980</year>
			  <volume>42</volume>
			  <fpage>13</fpage>
			  <lpage>25</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(80)90163-X">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(80)90163-X</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT30">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Paine </surname>
				   <given-names>R.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Vadas </surname>
				   <given-names>R.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Calorific values of benthic marine algae and their postulated relation to invertebrate food preference </article-title>
			  <source> Mar. Biol. </source>
			  <year>1969</year>
			  <volume>4</volume>
			  <fpage>79</fpage>
			  <lpage>86</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00347036">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00347036</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT31">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Paiva Barros </surname>
				   <given-names>S.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Cobo </surname>
				   <given-names>V.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Fransozo </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Feeding habits of the spider crab<italic> Libinia spinosa</italic> H. Milne Edwards, 1834 (Decapoda, Brachyura) in Ubatuba Bay, Sao Paulo, Brazil </article-title>
			  <source> Braz. Arch. Biol. Tech.</source>
			  <year>2008</year>
			  <volume>51</volume>
			  <fpage>413</fpage>
			  <lpage>417</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132008000200023">http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132008000200023 </ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT32"> 	     
	<element-citation publication-type="webpage"> 
		<person-group person-group-type="author"> 	
			<name>  
				   <surname> Palmer </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
 		</person-group>
		<source> Environmental variables in constrained ordination (e.g. CCA, RDA, DCCA).</source> 
		<year>2011</year>
		<access-date>18 January 2013 </access-date>
 		<comment> 
			<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://ordination.okstate.edu/envva.htm"> http://ordination.okstate.edu/envva.htm </ext-link>
	 	</comment>
 	 </element-citation>
 </ref>	
	<ref id="CIT33">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Perkins-Visser </surname>
				   <given-names>E.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Wolcott </surname>
				   <given-names>T.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Wolcott </surname>
				   <given-names>D.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Nursery role of seagrass beds: enhanced growth of juvenile blue crabs (<italic>Callinectes sapidus</italic>) Rathbun </article-title>
			  <source> J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. </source>
			  <year>1996</year>
			  <volume>198</volume>
			  <fpage>155</fpage>
			  <lpage>173</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(96)00014-7">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(96)00014-7</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT34">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Pohle </surname>
				   <given-names>G.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Marques </surname>
				   <given-names>F.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title>Zoeal stages and megalopa of Leucippa pentagona H. Milne Edwards, 1833 (Decapoda: Brachyura: Majoidea: Epialtidae) obtained from laboratory culture and a comparison with other epialtid and majoid larvae</article-title>
			  <source> Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. </source>
			  <year>2003</year>
			  <volume>43</volume>
			  <fpage>55</fpage>
			  <lpage>70</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07924259.2003.9652522">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07924259.2003.9652522</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT35">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Poore </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Campbell </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Steinberg </surname>
				   <given-names>P.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Natural densities of mesograzers fail to limit growth of macroalgae or their epiphytes in a temperate algal banks </article-title>
			  <source> J. Ecol. </source>
			  <year>2009</year>
			  <volume>97</volume>
			  <fpage>164</fpage>
			  <lpage>175</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01457.x">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01457.x</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT36">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Rodríguez </surname>
				   <given-names>S.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Ojeda </surname>
				   <given-names>F.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Inestrosa </surname>
				   <given-names>C.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Settlement of marine benthic invertebrates </article-title>
			  <source> Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. </source>
			  <year>1993</year>
			  <volume>97</volume>
			  <fpage>193</fpage>
			  <lpage>207</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps097193">http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps097193</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT37">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Robinson </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Tully </surname>
				   <given-names>O.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Spatial variability in decapod community structure and recruitment in sub-tidal habitats. </article-title>
			  <source> Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. </source>
			  <year>2000</year>
			  <volume>194</volume>
			  <fpage>133</fpage>
			  <lpage>141</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps194133">http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps194133</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT38">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Shacklock </surname>
				   <given-names>P.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Doyle </surname>
				   <given-names>R.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Control of epiphytes in seaweed cultures using grazers </article-title>
			  <source> Aquaculture </source>
			  <year>1983</year>
			  <volume>31</volume>
			  <fpage>141</fpage>
			  <lpage>151</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(83)90308-3">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(83)90308-3</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT39">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Smit </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Fourie </surname>
				   <given-names>A.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Robertson </surname>
				   <given-names>B.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Control of the herbivorous isopod <italic>Paridotea reticulata</italic> in <italic>Gracilaria gracilis</italic> tank cultures. </article-title>
			  <source> Aquaculture </source>
			  <year>2003</year>
			  <volume>217</volume>
			  <fpage>385</fpage>
			  <lpage>396</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00412-X">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00412-X</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT40">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Smith-Gill </surname>
				   <given-names>S.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Cytophysiological basis of disruptive pigmentary patterns in the leopard frog <italic>Rana pipiens</italic>. II. Wild type and mutant cell specific patterns. </article-title>
			  <source> J. Morph. </source>
			  <year>1975</year>
			  <volume>146</volume>
			  <fpage>35</fpage>
			  <lpage>54</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051460103">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051460103</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT41">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Stachowicz </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Hay </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Facultative mutualism between an herbivorous crab and a coralline alga: advantages of eating noxious seaweeds </article-title>
			  <source> Oecologia </source>
			  <year>1996</year>
			  <volume>105</volume>
			  <fpage>377</fpage>
			  <lpage>387</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00328741">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00328741</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT42">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Stachowicz </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Hay </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Reduced mobility is associated with compensatory feeding and increased diet breadth of marine crabs </article-title>
			  <source> Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. </source>
			  <year>1999</year>
			  <volume>188</volume>
			  <fpage>169</fpage>
			  <lpage>178</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps188169">http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps188169</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT43">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Taylor </surname>
				   <given-names>R.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Brown </surname>
				   <given-names>P.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Herbivory in the gammarid amphipod <italic>Aora typica</italic>: relationships between consumption rates, performance and abundance across ten seaweed species </article-title>
			  <source> Mar. Biol. </source>
			  <year>2006 </year>
			  <volume>149</volume>
			  <fpage>455</fpage>
			  <lpage>463</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0245-0">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00227-006-0245-0</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT44">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> ter Braak </surname>
				   <given-names>C.J.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis </article-title>
			  <source> Ecology </source>
			  <year>1986</year>
			  <volume>67</volume>
			  <fpage>1167</fpage>
			  <lpage>1179</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1938672">http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1938672</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT45">
		<element-citation publication-type="book">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> ter Braak </surname>
				   <given-names>C.J.</given-names>
				 </name>
			</person-group>
			  <chapter-title> Ordination </chapter-title>
				<person-group person-group-type="editor">
				<name>
				  <surname> Jongman </surname>
				  <given-names>R.</given-names>
				</name>
				<name>
				  <surname> ter Braak </surname>
				  <given-names>C.</given-names>
				</name>
				<name>
				  <surname> van Tongeren </surname>
				  <given-names>O.</given-names>
				</name>
			  </person-group>
		<source> Data in Community and Landscape Ecology </source>
		<year>1995</year>
		<publisher-loc> Cambridge </publisher-loc>
		<publisher-name> Cambridge Univ. Press </publisher-name>
		<fpage>91</fpage>
		<lpage>173</lpage>
	</element-citation>
</ref>
	<ref id="CIT46">
		<element-citation publication-type="book">
			<person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> ter Braak </surname>
				   <given-names>C.J.</given-names>
				 </name>
				<name>
				  <surname> Looman </surname>
				  <given-names>C.</given-names>
				</name>
			</person-group>
			  <chapter-title> Regression </chapter-title>
				<person-group person-group-type="editor">
				<name>
				  <surname> Jongman </surname>
				  <given-names>R.</given-names>
				</name>
				<name>
				  <surname> ter Braak </surname>
				  <given-names>C.</given-names>
				</name>
				<name>
				  <surname> van Tongeren </surname>
				  <given-names>O.</given-names>
				</name>
			  </person-group>
		<source> Data in Community and Landscape Ecology </source>
		<year>1995</year>
		<publisher-loc> Cambridge </publisher-loc>
		<publisher-name> Cambridge Univ. Press </publisher-name>
		<fpage>29</fpage>
		<lpage>77</lpage>
	</element-citation>
</ref>
	<ref id="CIT47">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Toth </surname>
				   <given-names>G.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Pavia </surname>
				   <given-names>H.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Induced herbivore resistance in seaweeds: a metaanalysis </article-title>
			  <source> J. Ecol. </source>
			  <year>2007</year>
			  <volume>95</volume>
			  <fpage>425</fpage>
			  <lpage>434</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01224.x">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01224.x</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT48">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Varisco </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Vinuesa </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Reproductive biology of spider crab <italic>Leucippa pentagona</italic> in (Decapoda: Epialtidae), in its southernmost population of the Argentine Sea </article-title>
			  <source> Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res </source>
			  <year>2011</year>
			  <volume>39</volume>
			  <fpage>471</fpage>
			  <lpage>480</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3856/vol39-issue3-fulltext-8">http://dx.doi.org/10.3856/vol39-issue3-fulltext-8</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT49">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Vasconcelos </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Costa Mendes </surname>
				   <given-names>T.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Soares Fortes </surname>
				   <given-names>W.</given-names>
				 </name>
<etal/>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Feeding and decoration preferences of the Epialtidae crab <italic>Acanthonyx scutiformis</italic></article-title>
			  <source> Braz. J. Oceanogr. </source>
			  <year>2009</year>
			  <volume>57</volume>
			  <fpage>137</fpage>
			  <lpage>143</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-87592009000200006">http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-87592009000200006i</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT50">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Vernet-Cornubert </surname>
				   <given-names>G.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Biologie générale de <italic>Pisa tetraodon</italic> (Pennant)</article-title>
			  <source> Bull. Inst. Océanogr. Monaco </source>
			  <year>1958</year>
			  <volume>1113</volume>
			  <fpage>1</fpage>
			  <lpage>52</lpage>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT51">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Vinuesa </surname>
				   <given-names>J.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Varisco </surname>
				   <given-names>M.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> Escriche </surname>
				   <given-names>F.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Settlement and recruitment of the crab <italic>Halicarcinus planatus</italic> (Crustacea: Decapoda: Hymenosomatidae) in Golfo San Jorge, Argentina. </article-title>
			  <source> J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK </source>
			  <year>2011</year>
			  <volume>91</volume>
			  <fpage>681</fpage>
			  <lpage>695</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025315410001864">http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025315410001864</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT52">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Wentworth </surname>
				   <given-names>C.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. </article-title>
			  <source> J. Geol. </source>
			  <year>1922</year>
			  <volume>30</volume>
			  <fpage>377</fpage>
			  <lpage>392</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/622910">http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/622910</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>
	<ref id="CIT53">
			<element-citation publication-type="journal">
			  <person-group person-group-type="author">
				  <name>
				   <surname> Woods </surname>
				   <given-names>C.</given-names>
				 </name>
				  <name>
				   <surname> McLay </surname>
				   <given-names>C.</given-names>
				 </name>
			  </person-group>
			  <article-title> Masking and ingestion preferences of the spider crab <italic>Notomithrax ursus</italic> (Brachyura: Majidae). </article-title>
			  <source> N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. </source>
			  <year>1994</year>
			  <volume>28</volume>
			  <fpage>105</fpage>
			  <lpage>111</lpage>
	<comment>
		<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00288330.1994.9516599">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00288330.1994.9516599</ext-link>
	</comment>
		</element-citation>
	</ref>

</ref-list>
</back>
</article>