Using fisher’s knowledge to estimate catch and effort in the large-scale octopus fishery on the eastern Campeche Bank (Mexico, NW Atlantic)

INTRODUCTION

The international demand for octopus has increased during the last decade. The volumes caught have decreased significantly in traditional fishing areas of the Mediterranean and Sahara Banks off West Africa (DOF 2018DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación). 2018. Acuerdo por el que se da a conocer la actualización de la Carta Nacional Pesquera. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA), México. Retrieved from http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5525712&fecha=11/06/2018&print=true, (accessed 27 September 2021)., Coronado et al. 2020Coronado E., Salas S., Cepeda-González M.F., Chuenpagdee R. 2020. Who’s who in the value chain for the Mexican octopus fishery: Mapping the production chain. Mar. Policy 118: 104013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104013 ), positioning Mexico as one of the principal octopus producer countries (DOF 2018DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación). 2018. Acuerdo por el que se da a conocer la actualización de la Carta Nacional Pesquera. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA), México. Retrieved from http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5525712&fecha=11/06/2018&print=true, (accessed 27 September 2021)., Sauer et al. 2021Sauer W.H., Gleadall I.G., Downey-Breedt N., et al. 2021. World Octopus Fisheries. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 29: 279-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2019.1680603 ).

The Campeche Bank, on the Atlantic coast of Mexico (Fig. 1), is the region that has commonly reported the highest levels of octopus catches, with the Yucatan and Campeche Mexican states as the principal producers (DOF 2018DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación). 2018. Acuerdo por el que se da a conocer la actualización de la Carta Nacional Pesquera. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA), México. Retrieved from http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5525712&fecha=11/06/2018&print=true, (accessed 27 September 2021).). On the Campeche Bank, two species are exploited: the Mayan octopus (Octopus maya, Voss and Solís 1966), an endemic coastal species (DOF 2018DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación). 2018. Acuerdo por el que se da a conocer la actualización de la Carta Nacional Pesquera. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA), México. Retrieved from http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5525712&fecha=11/06/2018&print=true, (accessed 27 September 2021)., Avendaño et al. 2019Avendaño O., Velázquez-Abunader I., Fernández-Jardón C., et al. 2019. Biomass and distribution of the red octopus (Octopus maya) in the north-east of the Campeche Bank. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 99: 1317-1323. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315419000419 , 2020aAvendaño O., Hernández-Flores A., Velázquez-Abunader I., et al. 2020a. Potential biomass and distribution of octopus in the eastern part of the Campeche Bank (Yucatan, Mexico). Sci. Mar. 84: 133-142. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.05007.01A ), and the American octopus (Octopus americanus, Monfort 1802). O. americanus was previously recorded in official landings as Octopus vulgaris (Jereb et al. 2016Jereb P., Roper C.F.E., Norman M.D., Finn J.K. 2016. Cephalopods of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of cephalopod species known to date. Octopods and Vampire squids. FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes, Nº4, Vol. 3. FAO, Roma. 370 pp. ISSN 10120-8682., Amor et al. 2017Amor M.D., Norman M.D., Roura A., et al. 2017. Morphological assessment of the Octopus vulgaris species complex evaluated in light of molecular-based phylogenetic inferences. Zool. Scr. 46: 275-288. https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12207 , DOF 2018DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación). 2018. Acuerdo por el que se da a conocer la actualización de la Carta Nacional Pesquera. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA), México. Retrieved from http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5525712&fecha=11/06/2018&print=true, (accessed 27 September 2021).). Genetic results currently support the identification of O. americanus (formerly known as O. vulgaris type II) along the Campeche Bank, a new octopod extending from the north of Argentina to the northwest coast of the USA (Avendaño et al. 2020bAvendaño O., Roura Á., Cedillo-Robles C.E., et al. 2020b. Octopus americanus: a cryptic species of the O. vulgaris species complex redescribed from the Caribbean. Aquat. Ecol. 54: 909-925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-020-09778-6 ).

Historically, the octopus fishery in the Campeche Bank has mainly been based on a single species, O. maya. With the development of new technological capabilities (e.g. larger capacity outboard motors, storage holds in mother vessels and autonomy >20 days) that occurred around 1995, O. americanus landings came to represent approximately 40% of the total production for Yucatan in the first decade of the 21st century (DOF 2018DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación). 2018. Acuerdo por el que se da a conocer la actualización de la Carta Nacional Pesquera. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA), México. Retrieved from http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5525712&fecha=11/06/2018&print=true, (accessed 27 September 2021).). In the last two decades, both species together have recorded landings of over 20000 t (Fig. 2) (Velázquez-Abunader et al. 2013Velázquez-Abunader I., Salas S., Cabrera M.A. 2013. Differential catchability by zone, fleet, and size: the case of the red octopus (Octopus maya) and common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) fishery in Yucatan, Mexico. J. Shellfish. Res. 32: 845-854. https://doi.org/10.2983/035.032.0328 , DOF 2018DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación). 2018. Acuerdo por el que se da a conocer la actualización de la Carta Nacional Pesquera. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA), México. Retrieved from http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5525712&fecha=11/06/2018&print=true, (accessed 27 September 2021).).

Previously, the two species were considered to occupy different aggregation zones (Fig. 1), with O. maya being more abundant in shallow waters and “O. vulgaris” in deeper waters (>30 m depth) (DOF 2018DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación). 2018. Acuerdo por el que se da a conocer la actualización de la Carta Nacional Pesquera. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA), México. Retrieved from http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5525712&fecha=11/06/2018&print=true, (accessed 27 September 2021)., Sauer et al. 2021Sauer W.H., Gleadall I.G., Downey-Breedt N., et al. 2021. World Octopus Fisheries. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 29: 279-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2019.1680603 ). For this reason, since 1998 small-scale fisheries landings have been recorded as O. maya and large-scale fisheries landings as “O. vulgaris” (DOF 2018DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación). 2018. Acuerdo por el que se da a conocer la actualización de la Carta Nacional Pesquera. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA), México. Retrieved from http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5525712&fecha=11/06/2018&print=true, (accessed 27 September 2021)., Sauer et al. 2021Sauer W.H., Gleadall I.G., Downey-Breedt N., et al. 2021. World Octopus Fisheries. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 29: 279-429. https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2019.1680603 ), which we have assigned to O. americanus (Fig. 2). However, since the two species occupy the eastern area of the Campeche Bank in similar abundances (Avendaño et al. 2020aAvendaño O., Hernández-Flores A., Velázquez-Abunader I., et al. 2020a. Potential biomass and distribution of octopus in the eastern part of the Campeche Bank (Yucatan, Mexico). Sci. Mar. 84: 133-142. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.05007.01A ), the scenario is different, and the large-scale fleet, which was thought to catch O. americanus exclusively, could be catching both species in similar proportions.

The octopus fishing season on the Campeche Bank extends from 1 August to 15 December each year (Salas et al. 2008Salas S., Cabrera M., Palomo L., et al. 2008. Plan de manejo y operación del comité de administración pesquera de escama y pulpo. Informe Final. Cinvestav IPN Unidad. Technical Report. 162 pp. Mérida, México., DOF 2018DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación). 2018. Acuerdo por el que se da a conocer la actualización de la Carta Nacional Pesquera. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA), México. Retrieved from http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5525712&fecha=11/06/2018&print=true, (accessed 27 September 2021).). During this period, the large-scale fleet operates with vessels of 18 to 25 m length that function as mother vessels transporting between 12 and 15 dories (~3 m long, locally called alijos), which fish far from the mother vessel. This fishing technique is called gareteo and consists of letting the alijos drift while fishing with lines tied to bamboo or wooden poles attached to the ends of the alijos (Salas et al. 2008, Sauer et al. 2021). The length of each line depends on the depth. At its lower end, bait is fixed, usually consisting of crab or fish pieces (Callinectes sp., Libinia dubia, Diplectrum spp., or Haemulon plumierii) (Galindo-Cortes et al. 2014Galindo-Cortez G., Hernández-Flores Á., Santos-Valencia J. 2014. Pulpo del Golfo de México Octopus maya y Octopus vulgaris. In: Beléndez-Moreno L.F.J., Espino-Barr E., Galindo-Cortes G., et al. (eds), Sustentabilidad y Pesca Responsable en México, Evaluación y Manejo. INAPESCA. México, pp.177-207. ISBN: 978-607-8274-11-6., López-Rocha et al. 2021López-Rocha J.A., Ramos-Miranda J., Velázquez-Abunader I., et al. 2021. Artes y métodos de pesca de la península de Yucatán. Universidad autónoma de Campeche. Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN, Unidad Mérida. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. México, 70 pp. https://doi.org/10.26359/EPOMEX0121 ).

Owing to the lack of information about the octopus populations in areas far from the coastline, the octopus management plan in Mexico recommends analysing the trends in the catches of the large-scale fleet that operates in areas with depths greater than 30 m (Galindo-Cortes et al. 2014Galindo-Cortez G., Hernández-Flores Á., Santos-Valencia J. 2014. Pulpo del Golfo de México Octopus maya y Octopus vulgaris. In: Beléndez-Moreno L.F.J., Espino-Barr E., Galindo-Cortes G., et al. (eds), Sustentabilidad y Pesca Responsable en México, Evaluación y Manejo. INAPESCA. México, pp.177-207. ISBN: 978-607-8274-11-6., DOF 2018DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación). 2018. Acuerdo por el que se da a conocer la actualización de la Carta Nacional Pesquera. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA), México. Retrieved from http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5525712&fecha=11/06/2018&print=true, (accessed 27 September 2021).). Among the methods used to manage cephalopod fisheries are production models that describe the relationship between surplus production and the stock biomass and an index of the stock biomass, generally expressed as catch per unit effort (CPUE). Applying these models requires time series data on landings and abundance (Pierce and Guerra 1994Pierce G.J., Guerra A. 1994. Stock assessment methods used for cephalopod fisheries. Fish. Res. 21: 255-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(94)90108-2 ). However, these data do not exist or have significant biases for the octopus fishery in the study area.

A quick-fix alternative to the lack of this information in a fishery is to obtain data from interviews with fishers related to the fishery (Rocha et al. 2004Rocha F., Gracia J., González A. F., Jardón C. M., Guerra A. 2004. Reliability of a model based on a short fishery statistics survey: application to the Northeast Atlantic monkfish fishery. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 61: 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2003.10.006 ). One of these models was proposed by Gómez-Muñoz (1990)Gómez-Muñoz V.M. 1990. A model to estimate catches from a short fishery statistics survey. Bull. Mar. Sci. 46: 719-722. and has proven beneficial for estimating the catches and CPUE of a fishing fleet during a fishing season in several cephalopods species, including squids (Loligo vulgaris and L. forbesii), cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) and the common octopus (O. vulgaris) from fisheries located in the NE Atlantic (Galicia and Scotland) (Simón et al. 1996Simón F., Rocha F., Guerra A. 1996. The small-scale squid hand-jig fishery off the northwestern Iberian Peninsula: Application of a model based on short fishery statistics survey. Fish. Res. 25: 253-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(95)00425-4 , Otero et al. 2005Otero J., Rocha F., González A.F., et al. 2005. Modeling artisanal coastal fisheries of Galicia (NW Spain) based on data obtained from fishers: the case of Octopus vulgaris. Sci. Mar. 69: 577-585. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2005.69n4577 , Young et al. 2006Young I.A.G., Pierce G.J., Murphy J., Daly H.I., Bailey N. 2006. Application of the Gómez-Muñoz model to estimate catch and effort in squid fisheries in Scotland. Fish. Res. 78: 26-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2005.12.006 , Rocha et al. 2006Rocha F., Otero J., Outeiral R., et al. 2006. Modelling small-scale coastal fisheries of Galicia (NW Spain) based on data obtained from fisheries: the case of Sepia officinalis. Sci. Mar. 70(4): 593-601. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2006.70n4593 , Comesaña and Guerra 2019Comesaña N., Guerra A. 2019. Application of the Gómez-Muñoz model to estimate catch and effort in the squid Loligo vulgaris fisheries in the Ría de Vigo (NW Spain). Sci. Mar. 83: 305-316. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.04917.10A ). In addition, this methodology was also applied to the monkfish (Lophius spp.) in the Grand Sole fishing ground (NE Atlantic) (Rocha et al. 2004Rocha F., Gracia J., González A. F., Jardón C. M., Guerra A. 2004. Reliability of a model based on a short fishery statistics survey: application to the Northeast Atlantic monkfish fishery. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 61: 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2003.10.006 ), where the reliability of the model was tested by comparing catch estimates with data obtained from the fishers associations and official statistics.

The Gómez-Muñoz model was initially developed to aid the management of small-scale fisheries for which reliable catch and effort data may not be available. The method employs fishers’ knowledge about catching trends obtained through interviews and is based on two simple assumptions. First, the CPUE is assumed to provide an index of the stock size. Second, the trend in the CPUE throughout a fishing season is considered to follow a predictable pattern, in which the CPUE is initially low, then rises to a peak, and later falls off again. The model involves an interview survey of fishing sector personnel (e.g. ship owners, skippers and fishers) to obtain the data for the primary model parameters. The model generates estimates of the CPUE and total catches for a fishery (Rocha et al. 2004Rocha F., Gracia J., González A. F., Jardón C. M., Guerra A. 2004. Reliability of a model based on a short fishery statistics survey: application to the Northeast Atlantic monkfish fishery. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 61: 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2003.10.006 , Young et al. 2006Young I.A.G., Pierce G.J., Murphy J., Daly H.I., Bailey N. 2006. Application of the Gómez-Muñoz model to estimate catch and effort in squid fisheries in Scotland. Fish. Res. 78: 26-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2005.12.006 ).

The present study aimed to estimate CPUE and total catch levels of the two octopus species caught by the large-scale fleet that fishes along the NE coast of the Bank of Campeche. The results obtained will test whether or not there is a discrepancy between the total catch values estimated and the official landing records. They can also be used to advise one of the sectors that make up the fishery on the octopus resource of most significant commercial interest. This sector of private investment is the one that has shown the greatest interest in increasing its fishing effort (Salas et al. 2008Salas S., Cabrera M., Palomo L., et al. 2008. Plan de manejo y operación del comité de administración pesquera de escama y pulpo. Informe Final. Cinvestav IPN Unidad. Technical Report. 162 pp. Mérida, México., DOF, 2018DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación). 2018. Acuerdo por el que se da a conocer la actualización de la Carta Nacional Pesquera. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA), México. Retrieved from http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5525712&fecha=11/06/2018&print=true, (accessed 27 September 2021).).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Gómez-Muñoz model

 ⌅

The data obtained from the interviews (Table 1) were used to estimate the CPUE. As Rocha et al. (2004)Rocha F., Gracia J., González A. F., Jardón C. M., Guerra A. 2004. Reliability of a model based on a short fishery statistics survey: application to the Northeast Atlantic monkfish fishery. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 61: 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2003.10.006 suggested, the Gómez-Muñoz (1990)Gómez-Muñoz V.M. 1990. A model to estimate catches from a short fishery statistics survey. Bull. Mar. Sci. 46: 719-722. model was developed in two phases: in Phase 1, the main parameters for the model were determined through port interviews with skippers; and Phase 2, the values of these main parameters were used to estimate the catches for the main vessels and alijos and for the whole fleet.

Phase 1: variables and parameters

 ⌅

For all the data obtained through interviews, M, I, S and L are defined as the mode and C_max and C_min as the mean catch per haul. Assuming that these parameters are normally distributed, the mean or the mode of the interview data were used for estimation. A set of catch curves based on secondary variables and parameters was estimated from these main parameters. The data set was time-transformed [x(t)] to ensure that the month of the maximum catch coincided with the origin (xM=0). The curve showing the rate of decrease was calculated so that the rate was always between zero and +1. The type of curve was determined from the interview data and defined by their degree of asymmetry (Fig. 3), measured by the parameter TE in the model. TE is the relationship between the minimum and the maximum times to or from C_max. The rate of decrease in catches after the peak (I) can be slow (I=1), intermediate (I=2), or rapid (I=3) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.  Types of rates of catch decrease from the peak during a fishing season. I=1, slow; I=2, intermediate; and I=3, rapid. S is the month when the fishing season starts (Rocha et al. 2004Rocha F., Gracia J., González A. F., Jardón C. M., Guerra A. 2004. Reliability of a model based on a short fishery statistics survey: application to the Northeast Atlantic monkfish fishery. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 61: 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2003.10.006 ).

If the decrease curve is type 1 (slow decrease), then

$TE=\frac{{(M-S)}^I}{S+L-1-M}$  (1)

If the decreaseing curve is type 2 or 3 (intermediate or rapid decrease), then

$TE=\frac{{(S+L-1-M)}^I}{(M-S)}$  (2)

where

$TE=\left(\frac{Elapsed time from the maximum catch}{Elapsed time from the maximum catch}\right)*I$  

and I = type of curve.

The transformation is different for each type of curve. In the case of I=1 (slow), then

$x=x\left(t\right)=\frac{\left(t-S\right)I+TE(t-S-L+1)}{L-1}$  (3)

And in the case of I=2 or 3 (intermediate or rapid decrease),

$x=x\left(t\right)=\frac{I\left(t-S-L+1\right)+TE(t-S)}{L-1}\mathrm{ }$  (4)

This variable has different values for each month within the fishing season. The months were classified according to the number of the month in year (e.g. January = 1, February = 2, March = 3, etc.).

Phase 2: estimation of catch in kg per trip and per vessel (CPUE)

 ⌅

The CPUE (kg trip^-1) for each vessel corresponding to the large-scale fleet in Yucatan was estimated using the equation

$CPUE=\frac{C_{max}\left\{f\left[x\left(t\right)\right]-f\left(I\right)\right\}+C_{min}\left\{1-f\left[x\left(t\right)\right]\right\}}{1-f\left(I\right)}$  (5)

where

$f\left[x\left(t\right)\right]={\mathrm{e}}^{-\left\{\left[\left(x1+x2\right)\right]/{x3}^2/2\right\}}$  (6)

$f\left(I\right)=e^{-{\left(I\right)}^2/2}$  (7)

$x1=\left(month number-S-L+1\right)\times I$  (8)

$x2=\left(month number-S\right)\times TE$  (9)

$x3=L-1$  (10)

and the standard error of the CPUE (s.e. _CPUE ) was calculated by

${s.e.}_{CPUE}=\frac{f\left(x\right)\times f\left(I\right)\times ({CPUE}_{max}-{CPUE}_{min})}{n+1}\times \sqrt{\frac{nf{\left(I\right)}^2-2f\left(I\right)+n}{n+2}}$  (11)

where n is the number of surveys.

Subsequently, the total catch per month (C _t kg) was estimated as follows:

$C_t=CPUE\times n\times v$  (12)

where N is the average of hauls per fishing trip and v is the average number of fishing trips per month.

The standard error of C_t (s.e._Ct) was calculated using the following equation:

${s.e.}_{Ct}=\frac{f\left(x\right)\times f\left(I\right)\times ({Ct}_{max}-{Ct}_{min})}{n+1}\times \sqrt{\frac{nf{\left(I\right)}^2-2f\left(I\right)+n}{n+2}}$  (13)

The total catch (CT) by the large-scale fleet during the fishing season was calculated using the equation

$CT=\left({\sum }_l^L{C}_t\right)\times B$  (14)

The summation includes from January (l=1) until December (L=12), and B is the effective number of vessels of the large-scale fleet whose exploitation is aimed at catching octopus on the eastern part of the Campeche Bank. This information was obtained from the records of CONAPESCA from 2007 to 2020.

Finally, the standard deviation of the total catch was calculated as the square root of the variance obtained from the catches per month.

RESULTS

Table 2 shows the values of the basic parameters of the Gómez-Muñoz model obtained from interviews with skippers in Yucatan. Table 3 shows the catches calculated using the fleet model targeting O. maya and O. americanus from 2014 to 2020 and the official landings of O. americanus in Yucatan (Source: INAPESCA, Yucalpeten). This is the first time that octopus landings from the large-scale fleet have been estimated in Mexico. These data indicate that O. maya was caught in similar proportions to O. americanus.

Correlation analysis was performed between the estimated catches and official landings for O. americanus because official information on the large-scale fleet is attributed to this species. The result showed that the relationship between the official landings records and the catches estimated by the model and for that species was high: r_xy = 0.898. The data shown in Table 3 indicate that the official landings of O. americanus were on average 20% higher than the estimated catches.

The interviews showed that the volume catches per alijo and per total vessel were decreasing (Fig. 4) and were especially low in 2020 (α<0.05 for all the comparisons, except for the minimum catch per vessel by trip).

The surveys allowed us to identify some peculiarities in the organization and conditions of the large-scale fleet targeting the octopus resource. The collected information showed that a) a mother vessel from the large-scale fleet typically travels to the fishing ground five times during the fishing season (once per month) (Fig. 5 A); b) the skippers fish on average 18 days per trip; c) on each fishing trip the mother vessel transports between 10 and 20 alijos, most frequently 15 (Fig. 5 B); d) fishing activity starts at 05:00 h and ends at 18:00 h; e) most skippers make two hauls per day (Fig. 5 C ), each lasting between 6 and 8 hours, and only some (6.5%) make three sets a day of about three hours each; f) the time it takes to release all the alijos carried by a mother vessel is approximately 40 minutes, and the same time is needed to collect them, so fishing time is usually four hours; g) catches per species vary with time, location and depth; h) each alijo can catch between 5 and 100 kg of octopus per day (Fig. 5 E, F ); and i) a vessel from the large-scale fleet catches 50 to 500 kg day^-1, although in periods of maximum abundance and favourable conditions a single vessel can catch a ~1000 kg day^-1, while in periods of low abundance the total catch falls to <40 kg day^-1 vessel^-1 (Fig. 5 H, I ).

According to the information obtained from the skippers, the areas with the highest abundance of both O. maya and O. americanus during the fishing season are zones with depths of less than 45 m. Consequently, fishing operations are carried out in areas between 15 and 35 m depth. As reported by the skippers, they do not have an exclusive fishing area to the northeast of the Campeche Bank but instead carry out their fishing operations across the entire continental shelf of the northern Campeche Bank, at 15 to 45 m depth. The skippers confirmed that they could catch off Celestún (west; Fig. 1) in areas between 25 and 35 m depth when the abundances of O. maya were high in western regions. In the limits of Quintana Roo (east; Fig. 1), the resource could be targeted in shallow areas, in a range between 15 and 40 m.

From the information provided by the interviewees, the following knowledge was obtained: i) at the beginning of the fishing season (August), the species with the highest abundance is regularly O. maya (Fig. 5 D, and 6); ii) as the fishing season progresses and O. maya becomes less abundant, the fishing operations are directed to searching for O. americanus (Fig. 5 G and 6); iii) O. americanus shows a maximum abundance towards the end of the season (November) (Fig. 6); iv) the areas of highest abundance of O. maya are towards the western portion of the Campeche Bank, whereas the areas of highest abundance of O. americanus are in the eastern zone of the Campeche Bank towards the border zone with Yucatan and Quintana Roo off Cabo Catoche; and v) in areas deeper than 45 m, the fishing gear is non-viable, because the current flow prevents the bait from sinking to the sea bottom.

DISCUSSION

Studies using interview data in several species have revealed that a large amount of valuable information for assessment purposes can be collected from fishers and their landing points (Simón et al. 1996Simón F., Rocha F., Guerra A. 1996. The small-scale squid hand-jig fishery off the northwestern Iberian Peninsula: Application of a model based on short fishery statistics survey. Fish. Res. 25: 253-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(95)00425-4 , Rocha et al. 2004Rocha F., Gracia J., González A. F., Jardón C. M., Guerra A. 2004. Reliability of a model based on a short fishery statistics survey: application to the Northeast Atlantic monkfish fishery. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 61: 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2003.10.006 , 2006Rocha F., Otero J., Outeiral R., et al. 2006. Modelling small-scale coastal fisheries of Galicia (NW Spain) based on data obtained from fisheries: the case of Sepia officinalis. Sci. Mar. 70(4): 593-601. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2006.70n4593 , Young et al. 2006Young I.A.G., Pierce G.J., Murphy J., Daly H.I., Bailey N. 2006. Application of the Gómez-Muñoz model to estimate catch and effort in squid fisheries in Scotland. Fish. Res. 78: 26-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2005.12.006 , Comesaña and Guerra 2019Comesaña N., Guerra A. 2019. Application of the Gómez-Muñoz model to estimate catch and effort in the squid Loligo vulgaris fisheries in the Ría de Vigo (NW Spain). Sci. Mar. 83: 305-316. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.04917.10A ). Interviews with the skippers provide detailed information that increases the likelihood of precision and reliability in model estimates. Fishers can differentiate the two octopus species, O. maya and O. americanus on the basis of their morphological characteristics. Avendaño et al. (2020aAvendaño O., Hernández-Flores A., Velázquez-Abunader I., et al. 2020a. Potential biomass and distribution of octopus in the eastern part of the Campeche Bank (Yucatan, Mexico). Sci. Mar. 84: 133-142. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.05007.01A , bAvendaño O., Roura Á., Cedillo-Robles C.E., et al. 2020b. Octopus americanus: a cryptic species of the O. vulgaris species complex redescribed from the Caribbean. Aquat. Ecol. 54: 909-925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-020-09778-6 ) reported that both species were caught in the large-scale octopus fishery in Yucatan. This finding is corroborated by the information provided by the skippers interviewed in this study. However, official landing records do not separate landings by species (Galindo-Cortes et al. 2014Galindo-Cortez G., Hernández-Flores Á., Santos-Valencia J. 2014. Pulpo del Golfo de México Octopus maya y Octopus vulgaris. In: Beléndez-Moreno L.F.J., Espino-Barr E., Galindo-Cortes G., et al. (eds), Sustentabilidad y Pesca Responsable en México, Evaluación y Manejo. INAPESCA. México, pp.177-207. ISBN: 978-607-8274-11-6.). Landings are recorded in a single category corresponding to the American octopus (O. americanus), recorded as O. vulgaris because of the lack of studies (Avendaño et al. 2020bAvendaño O., Roura Á., Cedillo-Robles C.E., et al. 2020b. Octopus americanus: a cryptic species of the O. vulgaris species complex redescribed from the Caribbean. Aquat. Ecol. 54: 909-925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-020-09778-6 ). With the help of the parameters of the Gómez-Muñoz model reported by the interviews (Table 2), we have been able for the first time to reconstruct the catches of both species in the last seven years (Table 3).

A minimum number of interviews by species and fisheries are required because the information is based on the fisher’s appraisals and memory. As fishers have different interpretations of the variables used in the model, the interviewer must be able to interpret the data fairly. However, there should be no prior expectation of the interview result (Simón et al. 1996Simón F., Rocha F., Guerra A. 1996. The small-scale squid hand-jig fishery off the northwestern Iberian Peninsula: Application of a model based on short fishery statistics survey. Fish. Res. 25: 253-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(95)00425-4 , Neis et al. 1999aNeis B., Felt L., Haedrich R.L., Schneider D.C. 1999a. An interdisciplinary methodology for collecting and integrating fishers’ ecological knowledge into resource management. In: Newell D. and Ommer R. (eds), Fishing Places, Fishing People: Issues and Traditions in Canadian Small-Scale Fisheries, University of Toronto Press. 412 pp. pp. 217-238. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442674936-013 , bNeis B., Schneider D.C., Felt L., et al. 1999b. Fisheries assessment: what can be learned from interviewing resource users? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56: 1949-1963. https://doi.org/10.1139/f99-115 , Rocha et al. 2004Rocha F., Gracia J., González A. F., Jardón C. M., Guerra A. 2004. Reliability of a model based on a short fishery statistics survey: application to the Northeast Atlantic monkfish fishery. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 61: 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2003.10.006 ). The results provided in this article give some confidence that the outliers were rejected from the current analysis. Moreover, the number of valid interviews reached the minimum number of interviews necessary to obtain the main requirement for the model to be used optimally (51.1% of the official registered skippers). For the total catches in any port or the total fleet to be accurately estimated, the number of vessels fishing in each area or landing in a specific port must be known precisely. If vessels vary their port of landing, the target species change or the preferred fishing location varies, so the discrepancies between the estimated and actual catches will be considerable. To avoid invoking this bias, we were careful to determine the exact number of landed vessels, using data on the large-scale fleet fishing for octopus supplied by official Mexican fishing agencies (INAPESCA, Yucalpeten, Yucatan).

Although the bias between the landings and the estimated catches was minimized because the total catch was calculated for the whole fleet rather than the fleet representing each port, the discrepancy was low (20%; Table 3). As the results showed, the relationship between official landings and estimated catches was significant. The difference could be due to an imprecise estimate caused by the variability of the CPUEs used in the model as a calculation tool. Also, the catches represent two species, and the abundance of each species must depend on the development and environmental variables (Pierce et al. 2010Pierce G.J., Allock L., Bruno I., et al. 2010. Cephalopod Biology and Fisheries in Europe. Cooperative Research. ICES, Copenhagen. pp. 175. Report No. 303. ISBN 978-87-7482-078-9.). In this case, we were unable to verify the model’s accuracy because of the lack of precise data on landings of each species, and the average of the catches is given with a relatively wide range of variation (Table 3).

However, the method used in this article showed optimal results in calculating the actual catches in this and other octopod fisheries, such as O. vulgaris in northeastern Spain (Rocha et al. 2004Rocha F., Gracia J., González A. F., Jardón C. M., Guerra A. 2004. Reliability of a model based on a short fishery statistics survey: application to the Northeast Atlantic monkfish fishery. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 61: 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2003.10.006 , Otero et al. 2005Otero J., Rocha F., González A.F., et al. 2005. Modeling artisanal coastal fisheries of Galicia (NW Spain) based on data obtained from fishers: the case of Octopus vulgaris. Sci. Mar. 69: 577-585. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2005.69n4577 ). The results obtained in this article allow us to know the potential fishing capacity of the large-scale fleet in Yucatan, an activity with no information available before this study.

The market demand and the pressure from the private sector to increase the fishing effort for this resource will continue (DOF 2018DOF (Diario Oficial de la Federación). 2018. Acuerdo por el que se da a conocer la actualización de la Carta Nacional Pesquera. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA), México. Retrieved from http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5525712&fecha=11/06/2018&print=true, (accessed 27 September 2021).). The information obtained in this analysis of the fishery regarding the relative abundance of each species of octopus within the fishing season and the different abundances per fishing ground will serve to implement appropriate fishing management. However, it is necessary to advise the authorities to record the landings separately for each species. Furthermore, a more precise description of the number of vessels of the whole large-scale fleet targeting octopus resource in the region should be carried out.

The varying availability of the resource in different geographic regions could be related to migratory behaviour that octopods tend to show towards shallower areas for their reproduction, which generates aggregations near to the coast and therefore periods of maximum available abundance (Rosenberg et al. 1990Rosenberg A., Kirkwood G., Crombie J., Beddington J. 1990. The assessment of stocks of annual squid species. Fish. Res. 8: 335-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(90)90003-E , Faraj and Bez 2007Faraj A., Bez N. 2007. Spatial considerations for the Dakhla stock of Octopus vulgaris: indicators, patterns, and fisheries interactions. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 64: 1820-1828. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsm160 , Leite et al. 2009Leite T.S., Haimovici M., Mather J., Lins J.E.O. 2009. Habitat, distribution, and abundance of the commercial octopus (Octopus insularis) in a tropical oceanic island, Brazil: Information for management of an artisanal fishery inside a marine protected area. Fish. Res. 98: 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2009.04.001 , Emery et al. 2016Emery T.J., Hartmann K., Gardner C. 2016. Management issues and options for small scale holobenthic octopus fisheries. Ocean. Coast. Manage. 120: 180-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.12.004 ). This scenario may be present in the octopus resource in the Campeche Bank. The skippers’ knowledge showed that the fishing areas with the highest catches of both species were between 15 and 35 m depth. Regarding octopus fisheries on the Campeche Bank, Avendaño et al. (2020aAvendaño O., Hernández-Flores A., Velázquez-Abunader I., et al. 2020a. Potential biomass and distribution of octopus in the eastern part of the Campeche Bank (Yucatan, Mexico). Sci. Mar. 84: 133-142. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.05007.01A , bAvendaño O., Roura Á., Cedillo-Robles C.E., et al. 2020b. Octopus americanus: a cryptic species of the O. vulgaris species complex redescribed from the Caribbean. Aquat. Ecol. 54: 909-925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-020-09778-6 ) reported that the species that make up the octopus resource show a longitudinal change gradient parallel to the coast, with a greater abundance of O. maya towards the west and of O. americanus towards the East. This finding was also detected in the interviews with the fishing skippers. They also reported that the fishing effort is directed to O. maya at the beginning of the season because it offers better economic returns. However, towards the end of the season, the species representing the highest yields for the large-scale fleet in Yucatan is O. americanus.

CONCLUSION

The model applied in this article can be used as an independent tool for estimating catch and effort in the large-scale fishery of the Campeche Bank targeting O. maya and O. americanus. The model also tests the reliability of the official landing statistics, which is a crucial point when there are no catch and CPUE statistics, as occurs in the large-scale octopus fishery on the Campeche Bank. The interview model provides comprehensive and realistic knowledge of how this fishery works. The increase in abundance of O. americanus throughout the eastern part of the Campeche Bank should not be ignored in the management of this resource. This increase in abundance could indicate that it is an essential region in the development of the species’s life cycle.