Scientia Marina, Vol 78, No 2 (2014)

Evolution of geoids in recent years and its impact on oceanography

Marco Talone
Serco SpA - Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES) of the European Commission Joint Research Centre , Italy

Marco Meloni
Serco SpA , Italy

Josep L. Pelegri
Departament d’Oceanografia Física i Tecnològica, Institut de Ciències del Mar, CSIC , Spain

Miquel Rosell-Fieschi
Departament d’Oceanografia Física i Tecnològica, Institut de Ciències del Mar, CSIC , Spain

Rune Flobergaghen
European Space Agency (ESA)-ESRIN , Italy


Mean surface geostrophic ocean currents may be calculated from the Mean Dynamic Topography (MDT), estimated as the difference between a mean sea surface height (MSS) calculated from radar altimeters and a reference geoid height. A review of the most widely used geoids is presented. The difference between the third release of the Gravity field and steady-state Ocean Circulation Explorer (GOCE) geoid and three earlier geoids (the Earth Geopotential Model 1996 [EGM96], one of the geoids obtained by the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment [GRACE05], and the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 [EGM2008]) is computed and interpreted as an ‘artefact’ MDT, i.e. a misfit when non-accurate geoid models are used to calculate the ocean MDT and related geostrophic currents. These results are contrasted with the MDT computed by comparing the GOCE geoid with the MSS distributed by Collecte Localisation Satellites in 2001 (CLS01). The comparison shows that there was a strong influence of altimetry measurements in the construction of the EGM96 geoid, i.e. the artefact MDT calculated using EGM96 shows a high resemblance to the MDT computed using the MSS CLS01 field, both considering GOCE as the reference geoid. The correlation disappears largely, but not completely, for the two most recent geoids; in particular, the MSS has greater global influence on GRACE05 than on EGM2008 although the latter does better at latitudes of less than 60° and is more useful for reproducing the intense western boundary currents. The results show that EGM96 may lead to significant errors in the spatial gradients of MDT (for latitudes of less than 60° the global root mean square is 0.2422 m) and therefore in the geostrophic surface velocities. When the spatially averaged GRACE and EGM2008 geoids are used for latitudes of less than 60°, the global MDT root mean square is substantially reduced.


geoid; mean sea surface; mean dynamic topography; altimetry; surface geostrophic velocity

Full Text:



Andersen O. B., Knudsen P. 2008. The DNSC08 ocean-wide altimetry derived gravity anomaly field. Geophys. Res. Abstracts 10, EGU2008-A-07163, EGU General Assembly 2008.

Andersen O.B., Knudsen P. 2009. DNSC08 mean sea surface and mean dynamic topography models. J. Geophys. Res. 114: C11001.

Andersen O.B., Knudsen P. 2010. The DTU10 mean sea surface and mean dynamic topography – Improvements in the Arctic and coastal zone. Ocean Surface Topography Science Team Meeting, Lisbon, Portugal.

Bingham R.J., Haines K., Hughes C.W. 2008. Calculating the Ocean's Mean Dynamic Topography from a Mean Sea Surface and a Geoid. J. Atmos. Oceanic Tech. 25: 1808-1822.

Bingham R. J., Knudsen P., Andersen O. et al. 2011. An initial estimate of the North Atlantic steady-state geostrophic circulation from GOCE. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38: L01606.

ESA 1999. Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Mission, ESA SP-1233 (1). Reports for mission selection of the four candidate Earth Explorer missions (available at

Foerste C., Flechtner F., Schmidt R. et al. 2008. EIGEN-GL05C - A new global combined high-resolution GRACE-based gravity field model of the GFZ-GRGS cooperation. Geophys. Res. Abstracts 10, EGU2008-A-06944, EGU General Assembly 2008.

Gill A.E. 1982. Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics, International Geophysics Series, Vol. 30, 662 pp, Academic Press, New York.

Hernandez F., Schaeffer P. 2001. The CLS01 mean sea surface: A validation with the GSFC00.1 surface. Tech. Rep., CLS, Ramonville, St Agne, France, 14 pp.

Hughes C.W., Bingham R.J. 2008. An Oceanographer's Guide to GOCE and the Geoid. Ocean Sci. 4: 15-29.

Hwang C., Hsu H.Y., Jang R.J. 2002. Global mean sea surface and marine gravity anomaly from multi-satellite altimetry: applications of deflection-geoid and inverse Vening Meinesz formulae. J. Geodesy 76: 407-418.

Lemoine F.G., Kenyon S.C., Factor J.K. et al. 1998 The Development of the Joint NASA GSFC and NIMA Geopotential Model EGM96, NASA Technical Paper, NASA/TP-1998-206861.

Maximenko N., Niiler P., Centurioni L. et al. 2009. Mean Dynamic Topography of the Ocean Derived from Satellite and Drifting Buoy Data Using Three Different Techniques. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 26: 1910-1919.

Moritz H. 2000. Geodetic Reference System 1980. J. Geodesy 74: 128-162.

Pavlis N.K., Holmes S.A., Kenyon S.C. et al. 2008. EGM 2008: An overview of its Development and Evaluation. IAG Int. Symp. GGEO 2008, 23-27 June, Chania, Crete, Greece.

Rio M.H., Hernandez F. 2004. A mean dynamic topography computed over the world ocean from altimetry, in situ measurements, and a geoid model. J. Geophys. Res. 109: C12032.

Rio M.-H., Mulet S., Bruinsma S. et al. 2012. Accuracy of recent GRACE and GOCE geoid models from an oceanographic perspective. Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly 2012.

Sandwell D.T., Smith W.H.F. 1997. Marine gravity anomaly from Geosat and ERS 1 satellite altimetry. J. Geophys. Res. 102: 10039-10054.

Schaeffer P., Faugere Y., Legeais J.F. et al. 2011. The CNES/CLS 2011 Global Mean Sea Surface. Oral presentation at Ocean Surface Topography Science Team 2011 meeting, available at

Schaeffer P., Faugére Y., Legeais J.F. et al. 2012. The CNES_CLS11 Global Mean Sea Surface Computed from 16 Years of Satellite Altimeter Data. Mar. Geodesy 35-1: 3-19.

Schmitz W.J., McCartney M.S. 1993. On the North Atlantic circulation. Rev. Geophys. 31: 29-49.

Tapley B.D., Bettadpur S., Watkins M. et al. 2004. The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31: L09607.

Copyright (c) 2014 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Contact us

Technical support