Feeding ecology of the deep-sea lanternshark Etmopterus pusillus (Elasmobranchii: Etmopteridae) in the northeast Atlantic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.03540.07BKeywords:
deep-sea fisheries, elasmobranch, Etmopterus pusillus, feeding ecology, lanternsharkAbstract
This study provides the first description of the feeding ecology of the smooth lanternshark Etmopterus pusillus based on stomach contents of specimens caught as bycatch in the Algarve (southern Portugal) with bottom trawling and bottom longline. The diet of E. pusillus consists mainly of fish (dry weight (% W)=87.1%; frequency of occurrence (%FO)=28.6%; number (%N)=30.3%), crustaceans (%W=7.7%; %FO=36.7%; %N=3.4%) and cephalopods (%W=4.7%; %FO=11.3%; %N=11.1%). The diet did not vary between sexes. Ontogenic changes were detected: crustaceans decreased in importance as the sharks increased in size and fish became dominant in the diet of adults. Combining two fishing methods provided broad information on the diet of E. pusillus, as bottom trawling caught smaller specimens and longlines caught larger individuals. E. pusillus feeds mainly on non-commercial species, and therefore does not compete directly with commercial fisheries. Finally, E. pusillus feeds in various parts of the water column and thus it can access a wide range of prey; however, this also means that it can be caught by both gears, making it more vulnerable in terms of conservation.
Downloads
References
Alvarez R.Z. 1968. Crustáceos Decápodos Ibéricos. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Barcelona, 510 pp.
Assis C.A. 2000. Estudo Morfológico dos Otólitos Sagitta, Asteriscus e Lapillus de Teleósteos (Actinopterygii, Teleostei) de Portugal Continental – Sua Aplicação em Estudos de Filogenia, Sistemática e Ecologia. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Lisboa, 991 pp
Blaber S.J.M., Bulman C.M. 1987. Diets of fishes of the upper continental slope of eastern Tasmânia: content, calorific values, dietary overlap and trophic relationships. Mar. Biol. 95: 345-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00409564
Borges T.C., Erzini K., Bentes L., Costa M.E., Gonçalves J.M.S., Lino P.G., Pais C., Ribeiro J. 2001. By-catch and discarding practices in five Algarve (southern Portugal) métiers. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 17: 101-114.
Braccini J.M., Gillanders B.M., Walker T.I. 2005. Sources of variation in the feeding ecology of the piked spurdog (Squalus megalops): implications for inferring predator-prey interactions from overall dietary composition. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 62: 1076-1094.
Cabral H.N., Murta A.G. 2002. The diet of blue whiting, hake, horse mackerel and mackerel off Portugal. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 18: 14-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0426.2002.00297.x
Clarke M.R. 1986. A handbook for the identification of cephalopod beaks. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 273 pp.
Clarke K.R., Warwick R.M. 2001. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd Edition. Natural Environment Research Council, Plymouth, 160 pp.
Coelho R., Erzini K. 2005. Length at first maturity of two species of lantern sharks (Etmopterus spinax and Etmopterus pusillus) of southern Portugal. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 85: 1163-1165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025315405012245
Coelho R., Erzini K. 2007. Population parameters of the smooth lantern shark, Etmopterus pusillus, in Southern Portugal (NE Atlantic). Fish. Res. 86: 42-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2007.04.006
Coelho R., Erzini K. 2008a. Identification of deep water lantern sharks (Chondrichthyes: Etmopteridae) using morphometric data and multivariate analysis. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 88: 199-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025315408000271
Coelho R., Erzini K. 2008b. Effects of fishing methods on deep water shark species caught as by-catch off southern Portugal. Hydrobiologia 606: 187-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9335-y
Coelho R., Bentes L., Gonçalves J.M.S., Lino P.G., Ribeiro J., Erzini K. 2003. Reduction of elasmobranch by-catch in the hake semi-pelagic near bottom longline fishery in the Algarve (Southern Portugal). Fish. Sci. 69: 293-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1444-2906.2003.00620.x
Coelho R., Erzini K., Bentes L., Correia C., Lino P.G., Monteiro P., Ribeiro J., Gonçalves J.M.S. 2005. Semipelagic longline and trammel net elasmobranch catches in southern Portugal: catch composition, catch rates and discards. J. Northwest. Atl. Fish. Sci. 35: 531-537. http://dx.doi.org/10.2960/J.v35.m482
Cortés E., Gruber S.H. 1990. Diet, feeding habits and estimates of daily ration of young lemon sharks (Negaprion brevirostris). Copeia 1990: 204-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1445836
Cortés E. 1997. A critical review of methods of studying fish feeding based on analysis of stomach contents: application to elasmobranch fishes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54: 726-738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-54-3-726
Cortés E. 1999. Standardized diet compositions and trophic levels of sharks. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 56: 707-717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.1999.0489
Cotton C., Dyb D.E., Fossen I. 2005. Bottom-living top predators of the deep Atlantic: the sharks, skates, rays. World Wide Web Electronic publication. www.mar-eco.no.
FAO. 2006. Universal software for fishery statistical time series. Catches and landings 2006. FAO Fisheries Department, Fishery Information, Data and Statistics Unit, Rome.
Gibson C., Valenti S., Fordham S., Fowler S.L. 2008. The Conservation of Northeast Atlantic Chondrichthyans: Report of the IUCN Shark Specialist Group Northeast Atlantic Red List Workshop. IUCN Species Survival Commission, Shark Specialist Group, Newbury, 76 pp.
Hanchet, S. 1991. Diet of spiny dogfish, Squalus acanthias Linnaeus, on the east coast, South Island, New Zealand. J. Fish Biol. 39: 313-323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1991.tb04365.x
Hantz M. 2003. Sharks - Rulers Of The Deep. Science Screen Report, Vol. 33: 1-2.
Hayward R.S., Margraf F.J., Knigth C.T., Glomski D.J. 1989. Gear bias in field estimation of the amount of food consumed by fish. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 46: 874-876. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f89-111
Heithaus M.R., Frid A., Wirsing A.J., Worm B. 2008. Predicting ecological consequences of marine top predator declines. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23: 202-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.01.003
Hureau J.C. 1970. Biologie comparée de quelques poissons antarctiques. Bull. Inst. Oceanogr. Monaco 68: 1-244.
Karpouzi V.S., Stergiou K.I. 2003. The relationships between mouth size and shape and body length for 18 species of marine fishes and their trophic implications. J. Fish. Biol. 62: 1353-1365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8649.2003.00118.x
Lehodey P., Maury O. 2003. Global Ocean Ecosystem Dynamics: a core project of the International Geosphere-biosphere Programme. France.
Mauchline J., Gordon J.D.M. 1991. Oceanic pelagic prey of benthopelagic fish in the benthic boundary layer of a marginal oceanic region. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 74: 109-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps074109
Monteiro P., Araujo A., Erzini K., Castro M. 2001. Discards of the Algarve (southern Portugal) crustacean trawl fishery. Hydrobiologia 449: 267-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1017575429808
Moore J.A., Mace P.M. 1999. Challenges and prospects for deep-sea finfish fisheries. Fisheries 24: 22-23.
Myrberg A.A., Gruber S.H. 1974. The Behavior of the bonnethead shark, Sphyrna tiburo. Copeia 1974: 358-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1442530
Neiva J., Coelho R., Erzini K. 2006. Feeding habits of velvet belly lanternshark Etmopterus spinax (Chondrichthyes: Etmopteridae) off Algarve, southern Portugal. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 86: 835-841. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025315406013762
Pais C. 2002. Diet of a deep-sea fish, Hoplostethus mediterraneus, from the south coast of Portugal. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 82: 351-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002531540200557X
Pauly D., Christensen V., Dalsgaard J., Froese R., Torres Jr. F. 1998. Fishing down marine food webs. Science 279: 860-863. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5352.860 PMid :9452385
Sá R., Bexiga C., Veiga P., Vieira L., Erzini K. 2006. Feeding ecology and trophic relationships of fish species in the lower Guadiana River Estuary and Castro Marim e Vila Real de Santo António Salt Marsh. Est. Coast. Shelf Sci. 70: 19-26.
Saldanha L. 1995. Fauna Submarina Atlântica. Publicações Europa – América, Mem Martins, 364 pp.
Santos J., Borges T.C. 2001. Trophic relationships in deep-water fish communities off Algarve, Portugal. Fish. Res. 51: 337-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00257-0
Shannon C., Weaver W. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, CIDADE, 117 pp.
Simpfendorfer C.A. 1998. Diet of the Australian sharpnose shark, Rhizoprionodon taylori, from northern Queensland. Mar. Freshw. Res. 49: 757-761. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/MF97044
Sims D.W. 2005. Differences in habitat selection and reproductive strategies of male and female sharks. In: Ruckstuhl K.E., Neuhaus P. (eds.), Sexual Segregation in Vertebrates - Ecology of the Two Sexes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 127-147.
Sims D.W., Quayle V.A. 1998. Selective foraging behavior of basking sharks on zooplankton in a small-scale front. Nature 393: 460-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/30959
Sims D.W., Wearmouth V.J., Southall E.J., Hill J., Moore P., Rawlinson K., Hutchinson N., Budd G.C., Righton D., Metcalfe J.D., Nash J.P., Morritt D. 2006. Hunt warm, rest cool: bioenergetic strategy underlying diel vertical migration of a benthic shark. J. Anim. Ecol. 75: 176-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.01033.x PMid :16903055
Springer S. 1967. Social organization of shark population. In: Gilbert P.W., Mathewson R.F., Rall D.P. (eds.), Sharks, Skates, and Rays. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, pp. 149-174.
Stevens J.D., Bonfil R., Dulvy N.K., Walker P.A. 2000. The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57: 476-494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2000.0724
Wetherbee B.M., Cortés E. 2004. Food consumption and feeding habits. In: Carrier J.C., Musick J.A., Heithaus M.R. (eds.), Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives. CRC Press, New York, pp. 225-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780203491317.ch8
Whitehead P.J., Bauchot M.L., Hureau J.C., Nielsen J., Tortonese E. 1986. Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean, Vols. I-III. UNESCO, Paris. 1473 pp.
Xavier J.C., Cherel Y., Assis C.A., Sendão J., Borges T.C. 2010. The feeding ecology of Conger eels (Conger conger) in the North-east Atlantic. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 90: 493-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025315409990555
Xavier J. C., Croxall J. P., Cresswell K. A. 2005. Boluses: a simple, cost-effective diet method to assess the cephalopod prey of albatrosses? Auk 122: 1182-1190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2005)122[1182:BAEMFA]2.0.CO;2
Yamamura O., Inada I. 2001. Importance of micronekton as food of demersal fish assemblages. Bull. Mar. Sci. 68: 13-25.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
