Population structure, distribution and harvesting of southern geoduck, Panopea abbreviata, in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina)

Authors

  • Enrique Morsan Instituto de Biología Marina y Pesquera Almirante Storni, Universidad Nacional del Comahue
  • Paula Zaidman Instituto de Biología Marina y Pesquera Almirante Storni, Universidad Nacional del Comahue - CONICET-Chubut
  • Matías Ocampo-Reinaldo Instituto de Biología Marina y Pesquera Almirante Storni, Universidad Nacional del Comahue - CONICET
  • Néstor Ciocco IADIZA, CCT CONICET Mendoza - Instituto de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2010.74n4763

Keywords:

geoduck, clams, fishery, ageing, population structure, growth, natural mortality

Abstract


Southern geoduck is the most long-lived bivalve species exploited in the South Atlantic and is harvested by divers in San Matías Gulf. Except preliminary data on growth and a gametogenic cycle study, there is no basic information that can be used to manage this resource in terms of population structure, harvesting, mortality and inter-population comparisons of growth. Our aim was to analyze the spatial distribution from survey data, population structure, growth and mortality of several beds along a latitudinal gradient based on age determination from thin sections of valves. We also described the spatial allocation of the fleet’s fishing effort, and its sources of variability from data collected on board. Three geoduck beds were located and sampled along the coast: El Sótano, Punta Colorada and Puerto Lobos. Geoduck ages ranged between 2 and 86 years old. Growth patterns showed significant differences in the asymptotic size between El Sótano (109.4 mm) and Puerto Lobos (98.06 mm). The maximum age decreased from north to south. Natural mortality was estimated for each bed according to a catch curve (M = 0.105 – 0.177 yr -1), with a method based on mean age (M = 0.212 – 0.233 yr-1) and a method based on maximum longevity recorded (M = 0.062 – 0.13 yr -1). Population features were integrated into the harvest analysis to generate a preliminary management proposal that includes subdivision of the coastal zone, limited entry, harvest rate and individual vessel quotas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bradbury, A. and J.V. Tagart. – 2000. Modelling geoduck, Panopea abrupta (Conrad, 1849) population dynamics. II. Natural mortality and equilibrium yield. J. Shellfish Res., 19: 63-70.

Bradbury, A., B. Sizemore, D. Rothaus and M. Ulrich. – 2000. Stock Assessment of Subtidal Geoduck Clams (Panapea abrupta) in Washington. Washington State Department of Natural Resources and Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife: 1-61.

Breen, P.A. – 1991. The New Zealand deepwater clams (geoducks) Panopea zelandica and P. smithae. N.Z. Fish. Assess. Res. Doc. 91/5: 1-13.

Bureau, D., W. Hajas, N.W. Surry, C.M. Hand, G. Dovey and A. Campbell. – 2002. Age, size structure and growth parameters of geoducks (Panopea abrupta, Conrad 1849) from 34 locations in British Columbia sampled between 1993 and 2000. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 2413: 1-84.

Caddy, J.F. – 1975. Spatial model for an exploited shellfish population, and its application to the Georges Bank scallop fishery. J. Fish. Res. Board. Can., 32(8): 1305-1328.

Caddy, J.F. – 1979. Some considerations underlying definitions of catchability and fishing effort in shellfish fisheries, and their relevance for stock assessment purposes. Fisheries and Marine Service. MS Report Nº 1489.

Campbell, A., R.M. Harbo and C.M. Hand. – 1998. Harvesting and distribution of Pacific geoduck clams, Panopea abrupta, in British Columbia. In: G.S. Jamieson and A. Campbell (eds.), Proceedings of the North Pacific Symposium on invertebrate stock assessment and management. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 125: 349-358.

Cerrato, R.M. – 1990. Interpretable statistical test for growth comparison using parameters in the von Bertalanffy equation. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 47: 1416-1426. doi:10.1139/f90-160

Chapman, D.G. and D.S. Robson. – 1960. The analysis of a catch-curve. Biometrics, 16: 354-368. doi:10.2307/2527687

Ciocco, N.F. – 2000. Almeja panopea, un nuevo recurso pesquero para el Mar Argentino. Infopesca Inter., 6: 36-39.

Ciocco, N.F., N. de Garin, M.A. Diaz, R. Vera, R. Mazzanti, M.A. Monsalve, G. Herrera, S. Sollazo, A. Serda, D. Diaz, C. Signorelli, J. Lopez, J. Ascorti, R. Diaz, M.C.Bazterrica, G. Escati and L. Real. – 2001. Relevamiento de bancos de moluscos bivalvos de interés marisquero en el golfo San José. Resultados de la campaña Sanjo/01. Acta Complementaria Convenio Provincia del Chubut- CENPAT-CONICET Ley 3315. Inf. No 11 del LAPEMAR, Laboratorio de Peces y Mariscos de Interés Comercial (CENPAT): 1-69.

Cranfield, H. J., K.P. Michael and D.R. Stotter. – 1993. Estimates of growth, mortality, and yield per recruit for New Zealand surf clams. N.Z. Fish. Assess. Res. Doc., 93/20: 1-26

Fegley, S. – 2001. Demography and dynamics of hard clam populations. In: J. Kraeuter and M. Castagna (eds.), Biology of the Hard Clam, pp. 383-422. Elsevier, New York.

Gagliardini, D.A. and A.L. Rivas. – 2004. Environmental characteristics of San Matías Gulf obtained from LANDSAT-TM and ETM+ data. Gayana, 68(2) (supl. t.I. Proc.): 186-193.

Goodwin, L. and B.C. Pease. – 1989. Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (Pacific Northwest): Pacific geoduck clam. U.S. Fish. Wildlife Serv. Biol. Rep., 82: 11-120.

Gribben, P.E. and R.G. Creese. – 2005. Age, growth, and mortality of the New Zealand geoduck clam, Panopea zelandica (Bivalvia: Hiatellidae) in two north island populations. Bull. Mar. Sci., 77(1): 119-135.

Hilborn, R. – 2002. The dark side of reference points. In: F. Coleman and J. Travis (eds.), Target, Thresholds and the Burden of Proofs. Bull. Mar. Sci., 70: 403-408.

Hilborn, R. and C.J. Walters. – 1992. Quantitative fisheries stock assessment. Chapman and Hall, New York, N.Y.

Hoffmann, A., A. Bradbury and L. Goodwin. – 2000. Modeling Geoduck, Panopea abrupta (Conrad, 1849) Population Dynamics. I. Growth. J. Shellfish Res., 19(0): 57-62.

Kimura, D.K. – 1980. Likelihood methods for the estimation of the von Bertalanffy growth curve. Fish. Bull., 77: 765-776.

Kleinbaum, D.G. and L.L. Kupper. – 1978. Comparing two straight-line regression models. In: D. Kleinbum, and L. Kupper (eds.), Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods, pp. 95-112. Duxbury Press, North Scituate, Massachusetts.

Leal, G.A., J.B. Dima, F. Dellatorre and P. Barón. – 2008. Schedule of Reproductive Events and Maturity at Size of the Patagonian Stone Crab Platyxanthus patagonicus (Brachyura, Platyxanthidae). J. Crustac. Biol., 28(2): 262-269. doi:10.1651/0278-0372(2008)028[0262:SOREAM]2.0.CO;2

Lanfredi, N.W. and J.L. Pousa. – 1988. Mediciones de corrientes, San Antonio Oeste, Provincia de Río Negro. Instituto de Biología Marina y Pesquera “Alte. Storni”, Río Negro, Argentina, Tech. Rep., 13 pp.

Mazio, C. and C. Vara. – 1983. Las mareas del Golfo San Matías, Argentina., Servicio de Hidrografía Naval. Dpto. Oceanografía, Tech. Rep., 69 pp.

Morsan, E.M. – 2003. Spatial analysis and abundance estimation of the southernmost population of purple clam, Amiantis purpurata in Patagonia (Argentina). J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 83(5): 1115-1128. doi:10.1017/S0025315403008294h

Morsan, E.M. – 2007. Spatial pattern, harvesting and management of the artisanal fishery for purple clam (Amiantis purpurata) in Patagonia (Argentina). Ocean Coast Manage., 50: 481-497. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2006.10.001

Morsan, E.M. – 2008. Impact on biodiversity of scallop dredging in San Matías Gulf, northern Patagonia (Argentina). Hydrobiologia, 609: 167-180.

Morsan, E. M. and N.F. Ciocco.- 2004. Age and growth modelling of the southern geoduck Panopea abbreviata off Puerto Lobos (Argentina). Fish. Res., 49(3): 343-348. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2004.06.012

Narvarte, M.A. – 2005. Biology and fishery of the whelk Buccinanops globulosum (Kiener, 1834) in northern coastal waters of the San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina). Fish. Res., 77: 131-137. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2005.11.006

Orensanz, J.M. and G. Jamieson. – 1998. The assessment and management of spatially structured stocks: an overview of the North Pacific Symposium on invertebrate stock assessment and management. In: G.S. Jamieson and A. Campbell (eds.), Proceedings of the North Pacific Symposium on invertebrate stock assessment and management. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 125: 441-459.

Orensanz, J.M., A.M. Parma and M. Hall. – 1998. The concentration and crowding in shellfish research. In: G.S. Jamieson and A. Campbell (eds.), Proceedings of the North Pacific Symposium on invertebrate stock assessment and management. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 125: 143-157.

Orensanz J.M., R. Hilborn and A.M. Parma. – 2000. Harvesting Methuselah’s clam–Is the geoduck fishery sustainable, or just apparently so? Canadian Stock Assessment Secretariat (CSAS), Res. Doc. 2000/175: 1-68.

Orensanz, J.M., C. Hand, A.M. Parma, J. Valero and R. Hilborn. – 2004. Precaution in the harvest of Methuselah’s clams–the difficulty of getting timely feedback from slow-pace dynamics. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 61: 1355-1372. doi:10.1139/f04-136

Orensanz, J.M., A.M. Parma, G. Jerez, N. Barahona, M. Montecinos and I. Elías. – 2005. What are the key elements for the sustainability of “S-fisheries”? Insights from South America. In: N. Erhardt (ed.), The Scientific Bases for the Sustainability of Fisheries. Bull. Mar. Sci., 76: 527-556.

Piola, A.R. and L.M. Scasso. – 1988. Circuación en el Golfo San Matías. Geoacta, 15: 33-51.

Prince, J. and R. Hilborn. – 1998. Concentration profiles and invertebrate fisheries management. In: G.S. Jamieson and A. Campbell (eds.), Proceedings of the North Pacific Symposium on invertebrate stock assessment and management. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 125: 187-196.

Pritchett, M. – 2003. Geoduck clam stock assessment surveys and fisheries management for the 2002/2003 season. Alaska Department of Fishes and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, Regional Inf. Rep. 1J02-47: 1-78

Rivas, A.L. and E.J. Beier. – 1990. Temperature and salinity fields in the Northpatagonic Gulfs. Oceanol. Acta, 13(1): 15-20.

Scarabino, V. – 1977. Moluscos del Golfo San Matías (Prov. Rio Negro, Argentina). Inventario y claves para su identificación. Com. Soc. Malac. Uruguay, IV(31-32): 177-297

Siddon, C. – 2007. Evaluation of the Southeastern Alaska Geoduck (Panopea abrupta) Stock Assessment Methodologies. Alaska Dep. Fish. Game Spec. Publ., 7-2: 1-14.

Strom, A. – 2003. Climate and fisheries in the Pacific Northwest: historical perspective from geoduck and early explorers. MSc thesis, Univ. Washington.

Van der Molen, S., M. Kroeck and N.F. Ciocco. – 2007. Reproductive cycle of the southern geoduck clam, Panopea abbreviata (Bivalvia: Hiatellidae), in north Patagonia, Argentina. Invert. Reprod. Develop., 50(2): 75-84.

Downloads

Published

2010-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Morsan E, Zaidman P, Ocampo-Reinaldo M, Ciocco N. Population structure, distribution and harvesting of southern geoduck, Panopea abbreviata, in San Matías Gulf (Patagonia, Argentina). Sci. mar. [Internet]. 2010Dec.30 [cited 2024Apr.25];74(4):763-72. Available from: https://scientiamarina.revistas.csic.es/index.php/scientiamarina/article/view/1203

Issue

Section

Articles